Abstract
In multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, spatial demultiplexing at the receiver has its own significance. Thus, several detection techniques have been investigated. There is a tradeoff between computational complexity and optimal performance in most of the detection techniques. One of the detection techniques which gives improved performance and acceptable level of complexity is ordered successive interference cancellation (OSIC) with minimum mean square error (MMSE). However, optimal performance can be achieved by maximum likelihood (ML) detection but at a higher complexity level. Therefore, MMSE-OSIC with candidates (OSIC2) detection is recommended as a solution. In this paper, spatial multiplexed (SM) MIMO systems are considered to evaluate error performance with different detection techniques such as MMSE-OSIC, ML and MMSE-OSIC2 in a composite fading i. e. Weibull-gamma (WG) fading environment. In WG distribution, Weibull and gamma distribution represent multipath and shadowing effects, respectively. Simulation results illustrate that MMSE-OSIC2 detection technique gives the improved symbol error rate (SER) performance which is similar to ML performance and its complexity level approaches to MMSE-OSIC.
References
[1] G. J. Foschini, “Layered space-time architecture for wireless communication in a fading environment when using multiple antennas,” Bell Lab. Tech. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 41–59, 1996.10.1002/bltj.2015Suche in Google Scholar
[2] S. Sanhdu and A. Paulraj, “Space-time block codes: a capacity perspective,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 384–386, 2000.10.1109/4234.898716Suche in Google Scholar
[3] D. Seethaler, H. Artés, and F. Hlawatsch, “Detection techniques for MIMO spatial multiplexing systems,” e&i Elektrotech. Inf. Tech., vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 91–96, 2005.10.1007/BF03054042Suche in Google Scholar
[4] H. Liu, “Error performance of MIMO systems in frequency selective Rayleigh fading channels,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunication Conference (GLOBECOM), San Francisco, vol. 4, 2005, pp. 2104–2108.Suche in Google Scholar
[5] J. Xu, J. X. Tao, and P. Zhang, “Analytical SER performance bound of M-QAM MIMO System with ZF-SIC receiver,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Beijing, 2008, pp. 5103–5107.10.1109/ICC.2008.958Suche in Google Scholar
[6] M. Vehkapera and M. Juntti, “On the performance of space-time coded and spatially multiplexed MIMO systems with linear receivers,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 642–651, 2010.10.1109/TCOMM.2010.02.080474Suche in Google Scholar
[7] T. H. Liu, “Some results for the fast MMSE-SIC detection in spatially multiplexed MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 5443–5448, 2009.10.1109/TWC.2009.090196Suche in Google Scholar
[8] T. H. Liu, J. Y. Jiang, and Y. S. Chu, “A low-cost MMSE-SIC detector for the MIMO system: algorithm and hardware implementation,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 56–61, 2011.10.1109/TCSII.2010.2092819Suche in Google Scholar
[9] T. H. Liu and Y. L. Liu, “Modified fast recursive algorithm for efficient MMSE-SIC detection of the V-Blast system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 3713–3717, 2008.10.1109/T-WC.2008.070487Suche in Google Scholar
[10] R. P. F. Hoefel, “IEEE 802.11n: On performance with MMSE and OSIC spatial division multiplexing transceivers,” in Proc. 2012 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS), Paris, 2012, pp. 376–380.10.1109/ISWCS.2012.6328393Suche in Google Scholar
[11] Y. Bae and J. Lee,“Low complexity antenna selection for V-Blast systems with OSIC detection,” EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Networking, vol. 6, pp. 1–7, 2011.10.1186/1687-1499-2011-6Suche in Google Scholar
[12] R. Narashimhan, “Error propagation analysis of V-Blast with channel estimation errors,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2005.10.1109/TCOMM.2004.840670Suche in Google Scholar
[13] K. Punia, E. M. George, K. V. Babu, and G. R. Reddy, “Signal detection for Spatially Multiplexed multi input multi output (MIMO) systems,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Communications and Signal Processing (ICCSP), Melmaruvathur, 2014, pp. 612–616.10.1109/ICCSP.2014.6949914Suche in Google Scholar
[14] D. Yongmei, S. Sumei, and L. Zhongding, “A comparative study of QRD-M detection and sphere decoding for MIMO-OFDM systems,” in Proc. IEEE 16th Int. Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Berlin, vol. 1, 2005, pp. 186–190.10.1109/PIMRC.2005.1651424Suche in Google Scholar
[15] W. Shin, H. Kim, M. H. Son, and H. Park, “An improved LLR computation for QRM-MLD in coded MIMO systems,” in Proc. IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) Fall, Baltimore, MD, 2007, pp. 447–451.10.1109/VETECF.2007.105Suche in Google Scholar
[16] H. Kawai, K. Higuchi, N. Maeda, and M. Sawahashi, “Adaptive Control of Surviving Symbol Replica Candidates in QRM-MLD for OFDM MIMO Multiplexing,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1130–1140, 2006.10.1109/JSAC.2005.864027Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Y. A. Eldemerdash, O. A. Dobre, and M. Oner, “Signal identification for multiple-antenna wireless systems: achievements and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–28, 2016.10.1109/COMST.2016.2519148Suche in Google Scholar
[18] A. Balatsoukas-Stimming, M. Bastani Parizi, and A. Burg, “LLR-based successive cancellation list decoding of polar codes,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 19, pp. 5165–5179, 2015.10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6854333Suche in Google Scholar
[19] H. Yuan and P. Kam, “On the LLR metrics for DPSK modulations over two-symbol observation intervals for the flat Rician Fading Channel,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol.63, no.12, pp. 4950–4963, 2015.10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2481888Suche in Google Scholar
[20] T. H. Im, J. Kim, J. H. Yi, S. Yun, and Y. S. Cho, “MMSE-OSIC2 signal detection for spatially multiplexed MIMO systems,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, (VTC) Spring, Singapore, 2008, pp. 1468–1472.Suche in Google Scholar
[21] P. M. Shankar, Fading and Shadowing in Wireless Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2012.10.1007/978-1-4614-0367-8Suche in Google Scholar
[22] A. Abdi and M. Kaveh, “K distribution: An appropriate substitute for Rayleigh-lognormal distribution in fading-shadowing wireless channels,” Electron. Lett., vol. 34, pp. 851–852, 1998.10.1049/el:19980625Suche in Google Scholar
[23] M. Matthaiou, N. D. Chatzidiamantis, G. K. Karagiannidis, and J. A. Nossek, “On the capacity of generalized-K fading MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 5939–5944, 2010.10.1109/TSP.2010.2058108Suche in Google Scholar
[24] P. S. Bithas, “Weibull-Gamma composite distribution: alternative multipath/shadowing fading model,” Electron. Lett., vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 749–751, 2009.10.1049/el.2009.0534Suche in Google Scholar
[25] K. Tiwari and D. S. Saini, “SER improvisation of MIMO-MRC system over Weibull-Gamma fading channel,” in Proc. 2015 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC), Noida, 2015, pp. 70–73.10.1109/ICSPCom.2015.7150622Suche in Google Scholar
[26] I. S. Ansari and M. S. Alouini, “On the performance analysis of digital communications over Weibull-Gamma channels,” in Proc. 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Glasgow, 2015, pp. 1–7.10.1109/VTCSpring.2015.7145973Suche in Google Scholar
[27] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6th ed. New York: Academic Press, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar
[28] G. D. Golden, C. J. Foschini, R. A. Valenzuela, and P. W. Wolniansky, “Detection algorithm and initial laboratory result using V-Blast space-time communication architecture,” Electron. Lett., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 14–15, 1999.10.1049/el:19990058Suche in Google Scholar
[29] Y. S. Cho, J. Kim, W. Y. Yang, and C. G. Kang, MIMO-OFDM Wireless Communications with MATLAB, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pvt. Ltd, 2010.10.1002/9780470825631Suche in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- A Minimized MIMO-UWB Antenna with High Isolation and Triple Band-Notched Functions
- Bird Face Microstrip Printed Monopole Antenna Design for Ultra Wide Band Applications
- CPW-Fed 8-Shaped Monopole Antenna for Ultra Wideband Applications
- Design and Analysis of Miniaturized Microstrip Patch Antenna with Metamaterials Based on Modified Split-Ring Resonator for UWB Applications
- Design of Compact Flower Shape Dual Notched-Band Monopole Antenna for Extended UWB Wireless Applications
- Ultra-Small Dualband Dualmode Microstrip Antenna Based on Novel Hybrid Resonator
- A Compact Parasitic Ring Antenna for ISM Band Applications
- Tri-Band CPW-Fed Stub-Loaded Slot Antenna Design for WLAN/WiMAX Applications
- Experimental and Simulation Investigation of Tri-Sector Cylindrical Dielectric Resonator Antenna in composite forms for Wireless Applications
- Coexistence Analysis of Civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems at Low Altitudes
- Performance Improvement in Spatially Multiplexed MIMO Systems over Weibull-Gamma Fading Channel
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- A Minimized MIMO-UWB Antenna with High Isolation and Triple Band-Notched Functions
- Bird Face Microstrip Printed Monopole Antenna Design for Ultra Wide Band Applications
- CPW-Fed 8-Shaped Monopole Antenna for Ultra Wideband Applications
- Design and Analysis of Miniaturized Microstrip Patch Antenna with Metamaterials Based on Modified Split-Ring Resonator for UWB Applications
- Design of Compact Flower Shape Dual Notched-Band Monopole Antenna for Extended UWB Wireless Applications
- Ultra-Small Dualband Dualmode Microstrip Antenna Based on Novel Hybrid Resonator
- A Compact Parasitic Ring Antenna for ISM Band Applications
- Tri-Band CPW-Fed Stub-Loaded Slot Antenna Design for WLAN/WiMAX Applications
- Experimental and Simulation Investigation of Tri-Sector Cylindrical Dielectric Resonator Antenna in composite forms for Wireless Applications
- Coexistence Analysis of Civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems at Low Altitudes
- Performance Improvement in Spatially Multiplexed MIMO Systems over Weibull-Gamma Fading Channel