When are Identities Politically Consequential? Identifying Conditions of Descriptive, Substantive, and Allied Group Identity

References

Barreto, M. A., F. Guerra, M. Marks, S. A. Nuño, and N. D. Woods. 2006. “Controversies in Exit Polling: Implementing a Racially Stratified Homogenous Precinct Approach.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (3): 477–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060689.Search in Google Scholar

Bishin, B. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bishin, B. G., and C. A. Klofstad. 2012. “The Political Incorporation of Cuban Americans: Why Won’t Little Havana Turn Blue?” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 586–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911414589.Search in Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. 1979. “In-Group Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive-Motivational Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (2): 307–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307.Search in Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. 1991. “The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (5): 475–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001.Search in Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. 2001. “Ingroup Identification and Intergroup Conflict: When does Ingroup Love Become Outgroup Hate?” In Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction, edited by R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, and D. Wilder, 17–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195137422.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Brown, A. (2020). The Changing Categories the U.S. Census has Used to Measure Race. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/02/25/the-changing-categories-the-u-s-has-used-to-measure-race/ (accessed August 25, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Bruner, M. W., M. Eys, M. Blair Evans, and K. Wilson. 2015. “Interdependence and Social Identity in Youth Sport Teams.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 27 (3): 351–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2015.1010661.Search in Google Scholar

Brush, Amanda Marie. 2021. Political Siblinghood: Cisgender Identity Politics and Allyship Formation. UC Santa Barbara. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/45z2s19k.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, C. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo3630260.html.Search in Google Scholar

Conover, P. J. 1995. “Citizen Identities and Conceptions of the Self*.” Journal of Political Philosophy 3 (2): 133–65, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1995.tb00032.x.Search in Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K. W. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1: 139–67.Search in Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K. W. 2019. “We Still Have Not Learned from Anita Hill’s Testimony.” UCLA Journal of Gender and Law 26 (1): 17–21, https://doi.org/10.5070/L3261044346.Search in Google Scholar

Dawson, M. C. 1995. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691212982Search in Google Scholar

Dovi, S. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402000412.Search in Google Scholar

Gay, Claudine, and Katherine Tate. 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology 19 (1): 169–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00098.Search in Google Scholar

Hobolt, S. B., T. J. Leeper, and J. Tilley. 2021. “Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 1476–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000125.Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins, D. J., C. R. Kaiser, and E. O. Pérez. 2023. “The Surprising Stability of Asian Americans’ and Latinos’ Partisan Identities in the Early Trump Era.” The Journal of Politics 85: 1321–35, https://doi.org/10.1086/724964.Search in Google Scholar

Huddy, L. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology 22 (1): 127–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00230.Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., Y. Lelkes, M. Levendusky, N. Malhotra, and S. J. Westwood. 2019. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (1): 129–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034.Search in Google Scholar

Jardina, A. 2021. “In-Group Love and Out-Group Hate: White Racial Attitudes in Contemporary U.S. Elections.” Political Behavior 43 (4): 1535–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09600-x.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, H. 2023. “The Politics of Respectability and Black Americans’ Punitive Attitudes.” American Political Science Review 117: 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001289.Search in Google Scholar

Junn, J. 2017. “The Trump Majority: White Womanhood and the Making of Female Voters in the U.S.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (2): 343–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1304224.Search in Google Scholar

Kam, C. D., and D. R. Kinder. 2012. “Ethnocentrism as a Short-Term Force in the 2008 American Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2): 326–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00564.x.Search in Google Scholar

Klar, S. 2013. “The Influence of Competing Identity Primes on Political Preferences.” The Journal of Politics 75 (4): 1108–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000698.Search in Google Scholar

Klar, S. 2018. “When Common Identities Decrease Trust: An Experimental Study of Partisan Women.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 610–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12366.Search in Google Scholar

Kuppens, Toon, and Vincent Y. Yzerbyt. 2012. “Group-Based Emotions: The Impact of Social Identity on Appraisals, Emotions, and Behaviors.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 34 (1): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.637474.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 2008. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane, and Katherine Tate. 1992. “Race Trumps Gender: The Thomas Nomination in the Black Community.” PS: Political Science and Politics 25 (3): 488–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/419439.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, L. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Morris, R. C. 2013. “Identity Salience and Identity Importance in Identity Theory.” Current Research in Social Psychology 21: 23–36.Search in Google Scholar

Oakes, P. 2002. “Psychological Groups and Political Psychology: A Response to Huddy’s “Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory”.” Political Psychology 23 (4): 809–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00308.Search in Google Scholar

Owens, T. J., D. T. Robinson, and L. Smith-Lovin. 2010. “Three Faces of Identity.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 477–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134725.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez, E. O. 2021. Diversity’s Child: People of Color and the Politics of Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226799933.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Petrocik, J. R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797.Search in Google Scholar

Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, E. 2004. “Principles of Categorization.” In Fuzzy Grammar: A Reader, edited by B. Aarts, D. Denison, E. Keizer, and G. Popova, 312–22. Oxford: OUP.10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50028-5Search in Google Scholar

Sanchez, G., N. Masuoka, and B. Abrams. 2019. “Revisiting the Brown-Utility Heuristic: A Comparison of Latino Linked Fate in 2006 and 2016.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (3): 673–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1638803.Search in Google Scholar

Sanchez, G. R., and N. Masuoka. 2010. “Brown-Utility Heuristic? The Presence and Contributing Factors of Latino Linked Fate.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 32 (4): 519–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986310383129.Search in Google Scholar

Spears, R. 2021. “Social Influence and Group Identity.” Annual Review of Psychology 72 (1): 367–90. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-070620-111818.Search in Google Scholar

Stout, C. T., K. Tate, and M. Wilson. 2021. “Does Black Representation Matter? A Review of Descriptive Representation for African Americans in Legislative Offices.” National Review of Black Politics 2 (1): 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1525/nrbp.2021.2.1.2.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., ed. 1978. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, xv, 474. Cambridge: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies In Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33 (1): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by W. G. Austin, and S. Worchel, 33–7. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 2004. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Political Psychology, edited by J. T. Jost, and J. Sidanius, 276–93. London: Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203505984-16Search in Google Scholar

Terry, D. J., M. A. Hogg, and K. M. White. 1999. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Self-Identity, Social Identity and Group Norms.” British Journal of Social Psychology 38 (3): 225–44. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149.Search in Google Scholar

Tesler, M. 2016. Post-Racial or Most-Racial? Race and Politics in the Obama Era. University of Chicago Press. Also available at https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo22961444.html.10.7208/chicago/9780226353159.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Turner, H. T., and C. John. 2004. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Political Psychology. London: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Truman, D. B. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New york: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J. C. 1991. Social Influence, xvi, 206. Pacific Grove: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J. C., R. J. Brown, and H. Tajfel. 1979. “Social Comparison and Group Interest in Ingroup Favouritism.” European Journal of Social Psychology 9 (2): 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090207.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, x, 239. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, Sophia J. 2014. “Representing Latinos: Examining Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (4): 917–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914541795.Search in Google Scholar

Weller, N., and J. Junn. 2018. “Racial Identity and Voting: Conceptualizing White Identity in Spatial Terms.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (2): 436–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717004285.Search in Google Scholar

Wong, C., and G. E. Cho. 2005. “Two-Headed Coins or Kandinskys: White Racial Identification.” Political Psychology 26 (5): 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00440.x.Search in Google Scholar

Yglesias, M. 2015. “All Politics is Identity Politics.” Vox. Also available at https://www.vox.com/2015/1/29/7945119/all-politics-is-identity-politics.Search in Google Scholar