Startseite The House Freedom Caucus, Kevin McCarthy’s Race for Speaker, and the Fate of Rules Reform in the 118th Congress
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The House Freedom Caucus, Kevin McCarthy’s Race for Speaker, and the Fate of Rules Reform in the 118th Congress

  • Emily Baer EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Juni 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
The Forum
Aus der Zeitschrift The Forum Band 21 Heft 2

Abstract

For the first time in one hundred years, the 118th Congress began with a prolonged Speaker’s race that required fifteen ballots to elect a Speaker. The contentious Republican debate displayed a level of personal animosity between a faction – the House Freedom Caucus (HFC) – and the majority party’s chosen leader – Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) – but it also revealed a series of significant divisions within the majority party over policy, and legislative norms and practices. How do different strategies shape the capacity of factions to spur formal changes to legislative institutions? How do party leaders respond to the demands of factions that raise issues threatening to party unity and their own leadership position? In this article, I analyze the composition of defectors in the Speaker’s race, the status of their rule and procedural reform agenda, and the response by McCarthy, including to committee assignments and early use of restrictive rules in the 118th Congress. I conclude with a discussion of the consequences of the HFC strategy for the contemporary U.S. House, and an emerging need to expand theories of institutional change to better integrate the behavior of both party leaders and factions.


Corresponding author: Emily Baer, Assistant professor of political science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA, E-mail:

References

Aabram, V. 2022. “House Republicans Consider First Set of Conference Rules Changes.” Washington Examiner. November 16: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/republicans-begin-votes-rule-changes.Suche in Google Scholar

Aldrich, J. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Alexander, B. 2021. A Social Theory of Congress: Legislative Norms in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham: Lexington Books.10.5771/9781793601285Suche in Google Scholar

Baer, E. 2022. “Who Sets the Agenda? Participation Asymmetries in the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress in the 116th Congress.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (4): 668–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096522000610.Suche in Google Scholar

Beavers, O., and S. Ferris. 2023. “McCarthy Builds a Kitchen Cabinet Ahead of Debt Showdown – without His No. 2, Scalise.” Politico. April 21: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/21/mccarthy-kitchen-cabinet-debt-showdown-without-scalise-00093073.Suche in Google Scholar

Blake, A. 2023. “McCarthy’s Speaker Deal Takes a Bizarre Turn.” The Washington Post. May 30: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/30/mccarthy-chip-roy-speaker-deal/.Suche in Google Scholar

Blum, R. M. 2020. How the Tea Party Captured the GOP: Insurgent Factions in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226687667.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Brooks, E. 2022. “House GOP Hashes Out Internal Rules with McCarthy Speakership on the Line.” The Hill. November 16: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3739010-house-gop-hashes-out-internal-rules-with-mccarthy-speakership-on-the-line/.Suche in Google Scholar

Brufke, J., and V. Aabram. 2022. “House Republicans Vote to Keep Earmarks in Second Round of Rule Changes.” Washington Examiner. November 30: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/republicans-approve-second-round-rule-changes.Suche in Google Scholar

Caygle, H., R. Bade, and J. Bresnahan. 2019. “Pelosi Gets Revenge against One of the Dem Rebels.” Politico. January 15: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/15/pelosi-rice-judiciary-committee-1102772.Suche in Google Scholar

Chaturvedi, N. S. 2018. “Filling the Amendment Tree: Majority Party Control, Procedures, and Polarization in the U.S. Senate.” American Politics Research 46 (4): 724–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x17744173.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, M., D. Karol, H. Noel, and J. Zaller. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226112381.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Cox, G. W., and M. D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

DeSilver, D. 2015. “Freedom Caucus Districts Look Much Like Other GOP-Held Districts.” Pew Research Center. October 22: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2015/10/22/freedom-caucus-districts-look-much-like-other-gop-held-districts/.Suche in Google Scholar

DiSalvo, D. 2012. Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics 1869–2010. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199891702.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Edmondson, C. 2023. “McCarthy Brought His Detractors in from the Cold. Will They Stay?” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/28/us/politics/mccarthy-republicans-right-wing-debt-ceiling.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferris, S., O. Beavers, and J. Carney. 2023. “Here’s Who McCarthy Needs to Convince for His Debt Bill.” Politico. April 23: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/26/republicans-mccarthy-debt-ceiling-bill-00093932.Suche in Google Scholar

Foran, C., M. Raju, M. Zanona, A. Grayer, and K. Wilson. 2023. “House Adjourns for Third Day without Picking a Speaker in Longest Contest in 164 Years.” CNN. January 6: https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/05/politics/kevin-mccarthy-speaker-bid/index.html.Suche in Google Scholar

French, L., and J. Sherman. 2015. “Ryan Offers Concession to House Freedom Caucus.” Politico. October 22 https://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/ryan-concessions-freedom-caucus-215075.Suche in Google Scholar

Garrison, J., and E. Lee. 2023. “McCarthy, GOP Debt Limit Plan Proposes $4.5 Trillion in Cuts, Eliminates Student Loan Forgiveness.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2023/04/19/mccarthy-debt-limit-plan-default/11695574002/.Suche in Google Scholar

Green, M. 2019. Legislative Hardball: The House Freedom Caucus and the Power of Threat-Making in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108677011Suche in Google Scholar

Green, M., and D. B. Harris. 2019. Choosing the Leader: Leadership Elections in the U.S. House of Representatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300222579.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Greene, M. 2021. Rules Governing House Committee and Subcommittee Assignment Procedures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Suche in Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., and E. Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174466Suche in Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. A., and C. StewartIII. 2013. Fighting for the Speakership: The House and the Rise of Party Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691118123.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Krouse, S. 2023. “The House Speaker Drama Has One Winner: C-SPAN.” The Wall Street Journal. January 6: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-house-speaker-drama-has-one-winner-c-span-11673017215.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, F. 2009. Beyond Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, F. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226409184.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

McCarthy, N., K. Poole, and H. Rosenthal. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, 2nd ed. Boston: MIT Press Books.Suche in Google Scholar

McCubbins, M. D., and G. W. Cox. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McPherson, L. 2022. “Anti-McCarthy Group Vows Not to Be Picked off One-By-One.” Roll Call. December 14: https://rollcall.com/2022/12/14/anti-mccarthy-group-vows-not-to-be-picked-off-one-by-one/.Suche in Google Scholar

McPherson, L. 2023. “House Adopts Rules Package for the 118th Congress.” Roll Call. January 9: https://rollcall.com/2023/01/09/house-adopts-rules-package-for-the-118th-congress/.Suche in Google Scholar

Milkis, S. M., and D. J. Tichenor. 2017. Rivalry and Reform: Presidents, Social Movements, and the Transformation of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226569420.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Nam, R. 2023. “U.S. Hits its Debt Limit and Now Risks Defaulting on its Bills.” NPR. January 19: https://www.npr.org/2023/01/19/1150006177/debt-limit-ceiling-political-fight-janet-yellen.Suche in Google Scholar

Pearson, K. 2015. Party Discipline in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.4402299Suche in Google Scholar

Picket, K. 2022. “House GOP Votes on Rules Package for New Congress.” Washington Times. November 16: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/nov/16/house-gop-votes-rules-package-new-congress/.Suche in Google Scholar

Rohde, D. W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Post-Reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226724058.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Rubin, R. B. 2017. Building the Bloc. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schickler, E. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schickler, E., E. McGhee, and J. Sides. 2003. “Remaking the House and Senate: Personal Power, Ideology, and the 1970s Reforms.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (3): 297–331. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298003x200908.Suche in Google Scholar

Scholtes, J., and C. Emma. 2023. “House GOP Budget Chief Moves Forward after McCarthy Beef.” Politico. April 24: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/24/jodey-arrington-house-budget-00093278.Suche in Google Scholar

Schuman, D. 2020. Who Steers the Ship? An Examination of House Steering and Policy Committee Membership. First Branch Forecast. July 20: https://firstbranchforecast.com/2020/07/20/who-steers-the-ship-an-examination-of-house-steering-and-policy-committee-membership-in-the-116th-congress/.Suche in Google Scholar

Sherman, J., and J. Bresnahan. 2015. “Boehner Takes Revenge.” Politico. January 16: https://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/boehner-allies-out-for-revenge-114007.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, B. 2007. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 3rd ed. Washington: CQ Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sotomayor, M., P. Kane, and J. Mark. 2023. “McCarthy, White House Race to Woo Lawmakers to Pass Debt Ceiling Package.” New York Times. May 29: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/05/29/raising-debt-ceiling-budget-memorial-day/.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, C. 2023. U.S. Rep. Scott Perry touts House Freedom Caucus agenda on federal debt ceiling and House rules. PennLive. April 6: https://www.pennlive.com/news/2023/04/us-rep-scott-perry-touts-house-freedom-caucus-agenda-on-federal-debt-ceiling-and-house-rules.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Warren, M., and Z. Melanie. 2022. “Kevin McCarthy’s Path to Speakership Enters Final but Treacherous Leg.” CNN. January 21: https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/21/politics/kevin-mccarthy-speaker-gop-conference/index.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, J. 2000. “Interest Groups, Congressional Reform, and Party Government in the United States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (2): 217–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/440369.Suche in Google Scholar

Zelizer, J. 2004. On Capitol Hill: The Struggle to Reform Congress and its Consequences, 1948–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-06-14

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2023-2013/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen