Home A Red Wave or a Ripple? Nationalized Politics and the 2022 Midterm Elections
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A Red Wave or a Ripple? Nationalized Politics and the 2022 Midterm Elections

  • Jamie L. Carson EMAIL logo and Aaron A. Hitefield
Published/Copyright: February 10, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Republicans were initially optimistic that the 2022 midterms would result in a sizeable red wave that would lead them to win back control of the House and Senate in light of President Biden’s low levels of approval and high rates of inflation. Although they did win enough seats to narrowly control the House, they failed to pick up a sufficient number of seats in the Senate to control that chamber during the next 2 years. This article examines the candidates, outcomes, and implications of the 2022 midterm elections. In doing so, we analyze the effect that former President Donald Trump had on the election while also considering the impact of factors such as inflation and abortion on congressional election outcomes. The article closes with a discussion of the effects of the 2022 midterms on both the incoming 118th Congress as well as the upcoming 2024 Presidential election.


Corresponding author: Jamie L. Carson, UGA Athletic Association Professor of Public and International Affairs II University of Georgia, Athens, USA, E-mail:

We thank Stewart Ulrich for assistance with data collection on the 2022 congressional primaries and the general election.


References

Abramowitz, A. I. 1985. “Economic Conditions, Presidential Popularity, and Voting Behavior in Midterm Congressional Elections.” The Journal of Politics 47 (1): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131064.Search in Google Scholar

Aldrich, J., J. Carson, B. Gomez, and J. Merolla. 2024. Change and Continuity in the 2020 and 2022 Elections. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Forthcoming.10.4135/9781544356730Search in Google Scholar

Brown, N. E., and E. C. Cassese. 2020. “Introduction to the Symposium on “The Role of Gender in the 2018 Midterm Elections”.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (4): 923–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920948638.Search in Google Scholar

Carson, J., H. Spencer, and A. Hitefield. 2021. “You’re Fired! Donald Trump and the 2020 Congressional Elections.” The Forum 18 (4): 627–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2020-2103.Search in Google Scholar

Carson, J., and A. Hitefield. 2018. “Donald Trump, Nationalization, and the 2018 Midterm Elections.” The Forum 16 (4): 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-0035.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, S. J., R. L. Fox, and D. Kelly. 2021. Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009052818Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. E. 2019. “Polls and Elections: Presidential Referendum Effects in the 2018 Midterm Election: An Initial Analysis.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 49 (3): 669–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12579.Search in Google Scholar

Dolan, J., M. M. Deckman, and M. L. Swers. 2021. Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Political Influence. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Geras, M. J.. 2021. “Women Running the Party and Women Running for Congress: An Examination of State Party Diversity and Candidate Emergence in the 2018 Midterm Elections.” Party Politics 27 (5): 942–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820921491.Search in Google Scholar

Hassell, H. J. G. 2018. The Party’s Primary: Control of Congressional Nominations. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108355803Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins, D. J. 2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226530406.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83 (3): 773–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962060.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 2015. “It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections.” The Journal of Politics 3 (3): 861–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/681670.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 2019. “Extreme Referendum: Donald Trump and the 2018 Midterm Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 134 (1): 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12866.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 2021. “Donald Trump’s Big Lie and the Future of the Republican Party.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 51 (2): 273–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12716.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 2023. “The 2022 Elections: A Test of Democracy’s Resilience and the Referendum Theory of Midterms.” Political Science Quarterly. Forthcoming.10.1093/psquar/qqad002Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C., and J. L. Carson. 2020. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 10th ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C., and S. Kernel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lawless, J. L., and R. L. Fox. 2018. “A Trump Effect? Women and the 2018 Midterm Elections.” The Forum 16 (4): 665–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-0038.Search in Google Scholar

Sides, J., M. Tesler, and V. Lynn. 2020. “Gender Attitudes and American Public Opinion in the Trump Era.” In Dynamics of American Democracy: Partisan Polarization, Political Competition, and Government Performance, edited by E. Patashnik, and W. Schiller. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.10.2307/j.ctv1m0kjj1.11Search in Google Scholar

Simien, E. M. 2022. Historic Firsts in US Elections: Trailblazing Candidates in Gubernatorial, Congressional, and Mayoral Campaigns. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003213925Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-02-10

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2023-2002/html
Scroll to top button