Abstract
Concerns about polarization and the difficulty moderate candidates have in winning primary elections have driven several electoral reform efforts in recent decades. In this article, we leverage reforms prior to the 2022 elections in Alaska to assess whether the top-four primary is likely to help moderate candidates succeed. We evaluate three mechanisms by which the top-four might help moderates: by allowing them to advance from the primary and compete for votes from the more moderate general electorate, by changing the composition of the primary electorate and/or by facilitating crossover voting during the primary. Our analysis suggests that the top-four primary creates opportunities for cross-party voting that can enhance the electoral prospects of moderate candidates.
Funding source: Unite America
Award Identifier / Grant number: SB230064
- 
Research funding: This work was funded by Unite America (No: SB230064).
 
References
Ahler, D. J., C. Jack, and G. S. Lenz. 2016. “Do Open Primaries Improve Representation? an Experimental Test of California’s 2012 Top-Two Primary.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 237–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12113.Search in Google Scholar
Alaska Division of Elections. n.d. Also available at https://www.elections.alaska.gov/RCV.php (accessed December 15, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Banda, K. K., T. M. Carsey, and J. Curiel. 2021. “Incumbency Status and Candidate Responsiveness to Voters in Two-Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 31 (2): 263–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1614007.Search in Google Scholar
Barton, R. 2022. Louisiana’s Long-Term Election Experiment: How Eliminating Partisan Primaries Improved Governance and Reduced Polarization. Also available at https://www.uniteamericainstitute.org/research/louisianas-long-term-election-experiment-how-eliminating-partisan-primaries-improved-governance-and-reduced-polarization (accessed January 12, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Brady, D. W., H. Hahrie, and J. C. Pope. 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(1): 79–105. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007x201994.Search in Google Scholar
Brooks, J. 2021. Republican Alaska Lawmaker Gets Backlash from Party after Breaking Legislative Logjam. Anchorage Daily News. Also available at https://www.adn.com/politics/alaska-legislature/2021/03/03/republican-alaska-lawmaker-gets-backlash-from-party-after-breaking-legislative-logjam/ (accessed January 14, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Burden, B. C. 2004. “Candidate Positioning in US Congressional Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 211–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000712340400002x.Search in Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, B., D. W. B., and J. F. Cogan. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review 96 (01): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402004276.Search in Google Scholar
Crosson, J. 2021. “Extreme Districts, Moderate Winners: Same-Party Challenges, and Deterrence in Top-Two Primaries.” Political Science Research and Methods 9 (3): 532–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.7.Search in Google Scholar
Donovan, T. 2012. “The Top Two Primary: What Can California Learn from Washington?” California Journal of Politics and Policy 4 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5070/p2959z.Search in Google Scholar
Drutman, L. 2021. What We Know about Congressional Primaries and Congressional Primary Reform. New America. Also available at http://newamerica.org/political-reform/reports/what-we-know-about-congressional-primaries-and-congressional-primary-reform/ (accessed January 14, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, J. N., and R. T. Holden. 2009. “The Rising Incumbent Reelection Rate: What’s Gerrymandering Got to Do with it?” The Journal of Politics 71 (2): 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090483.Search in Google Scholar
Grose, C. R. 2020. “Reducing Legislative Polarization: Top-Two and Open Primaries Are Associated with More Moderate Legislators.” Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy 1 (2): 267–87. https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000012.Search in Google Scholar
Herz, N. 2022. “Ranked Choice Voting Isn’t Better or Worse. It’s Different.” Northern Journal. https://northernjournal.substack.com/p/ranked-choice-voting-isnt-better (accessed March 27, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Hill, S. J. 2015. “Institution of Nomination and the Policy Ideology of Primary Electorates.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 461–87. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00015023.Search in Google Scholar
Hirano, S., and J. M. Snyder. 2019. Primary Elections in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139946537Search in Google Scholar
Jacobson, G. C. 2012. “The Electoral Origins of Polarized Politics: Evidence from the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (12): 1612–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463352.Search in Google Scholar
Kamarck, E., and A. R. Podkul. 2018. The 2018 Primaries Project: The Ideology of Primary Voters. Brookings. Also available at https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-2018-primaries-project-the-ideology-of-primary-voters/ (accessed December 15, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Lee, J., and J. Lee. 2022. Alaska Primary Voters Had More Choice in 2022. Sightline Institute. Also available at https://www.sightline.org/2022/11/04/alaska-primary-voters-had-more-choice-in-2022/ (accessed January 4, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
McGhee, E., E. McGhee, S. Masket, B. Shor, and S. Rogers. 2014. “A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 337–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12070.Search in Google Scholar
McGhee, E., and B. Shor. 2017. “Has the Top Two Primary Elected More Moderates?” Perspectives on Politics 15 (4): 1053–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592717002158.Search in Google Scholar
Montanaro, D. 2022. Americans Are Sick of Lawmakers Bickering. They Don’t Have Much Hope that Will Change. NPR. Also available at https://www.npr.org/2022/12/15/1142751143/poll-americans-want-compromise-but-have-no-confidence-congress-will-work-togethe (accessed December 15, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Nagler, J. 2015. “Voter Behavior in California’s Top Two Primary.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 7 (1): 1–14, https://doi.org/10.5070/p2cjpp7125524.Search in Google Scholar
Nielson, L., and N. Visalvanich. 2017. “Primaries and Candidates: Examining the Influence of Primary Electorates on Candidate Ideology.” Political Science Research and Methods 5 (2): 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.60.Search in Google Scholar
Pyeatt, N. 2015. “Party Unity, Ideology, and Polarization in Primary Elections for the House of Representatives: 1956–2012.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 651–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12092.Search in Google Scholar
Shapero, J. 2022. Majority of Americans Worried Midterms Will Result in Government Gridlock: Poll. The Hill. Also available at https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3670567-majority-of-americans-worried-midterms-will-result-in-government-gridlock-poll/ (accessed December 15, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Shor, B., and N. McCarty. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 530–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000153.Search in Google Scholar
Woon, J. 2018. “Primaries and Candidate Polarization: Behavioral Theory and Experimental Evidence.” American Political Science Review 112 (4): 826–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000515.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2023-2001).
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
 - Introduction
 - The Forum: Winter 2022 Introduction
 - Articles
 - A Red Wave or a Ripple? Nationalized Politics and the 2022 Midterm Elections
 - Television Advertising in the 2022 Midterms
 - Digital Advertising in the 2022 Midterms
 - Donald Trump and the Democratic Shift among College-Educated Suburban White Voters
 - The Vanishing Incumbency Advantage in State House Elections
 - “Never Trump” Republicans and the 2022 Elections
 - Top-Four Primaries Help Moderate Candidates via Crossover Voting: The Case of the 2022 Alaska Election Reforms
 - Book Review
 - Catherine N. Wineinger: Gendering the GOP: Intraparty Politics and Republican Women’s Representation in Congress
 
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
 - Introduction
 - The Forum: Winter 2022 Introduction
 - Articles
 - A Red Wave or a Ripple? Nationalized Politics and the 2022 Midterm Elections
 - Television Advertising in the 2022 Midterms
 - Digital Advertising in the 2022 Midterms
 - Donald Trump and the Democratic Shift among College-Educated Suburban White Voters
 - The Vanishing Incumbency Advantage in State House Elections
 - “Never Trump” Republicans and the 2022 Elections
 - Top-Four Primaries Help Moderate Candidates via Crossover Voting: The Case of the 2022 Alaska Election Reforms
 - Book Review
 - Catherine N. Wineinger: Gendering the GOP: Intraparty Politics and Republican Women’s Representation in Congress