Home Top-Four Primaries Help Moderate Candidates via Crossover Voting: The Case of the 2022 Alaska Election Reforms
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Top-Four Primaries Help Moderate Candidates via Crossover Voting: The Case of the 2022 Alaska Election Reforms

  • Sarah E. Anderson EMAIL logo , Daniel M. Butler , Laurel Harbridge-Yong and Renae Marshall
Published/Copyright: April 12, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Concerns about polarization and the difficulty moderate candidates have in winning primary elections have driven several electoral reform efforts in recent decades. In this article, we leverage reforms prior to the 2022 elections in Alaska to assess whether the top-four primary is likely to help moderate candidates succeed. We evaluate three mechanisms by which the top-four might help moderates: by allowing them to advance from the primary and compete for votes from the more moderate general electorate, by changing the composition of the primary electorate and/or by facilitating crossover voting during the primary. Our analysis suggests that the top-four primary creates opportunities for cross-party voting that can enhance the electoral prospects of moderate candidates.


Corresponding author: Sarah E. Anderson, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, E-mail:
The authors are grateful for grant support from Unite America. We also appreciate conversations with Alaska political experts, Tyler Fisher, Richard Barton, and Rachel Leven at Unite America, and the broader group of researchers studying the 2022 election in Alaska. These conversations and careful readings of our paper were instrumental in learning about the dynamics of Alaska politics.

Funding source: Unite America

Award Identifier / Grant number: SB230064

  1. Research funding: This work was funded by Unite America (No: SB230064).

References

Ahler, D. J., C. Jack, and G. S. Lenz. 2016. “Do Open Primaries Improve Representation? an Experimental Test of California’s 2012 Top-Two Primary.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 237–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12113.Search in Google Scholar

Alaska Division of Elections. n.d. Also available at https://www.elections.alaska.gov/RCV.php (accessed December 15, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Banda, K. K., T. M. Carsey, and J. Curiel. 2021. “Incumbency Status and Candidate Responsiveness to Voters in Two-Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 31 (2): 263–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1614007.Search in Google Scholar

Barton, R. 2022. Louisiana’s Long-Term Election Experiment: How Eliminating Partisan Primaries Improved Governance and Reduced Polarization. Also available at https://www.uniteamericainstitute.org/research/louisianas-long-term-election-experiment-how-eliminating-partisan-primaries-improved-governance-and-reduced-polarization (accessed January 12, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Brady, D. W., H. Hahrie, and J. C. Pope. 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(1): 79–105. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007x201994.Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, J. 2021. Republican Alaska Lawmaker Gets Backlash from Party after Breaking Legislative Logjam. Anchorage Daily News. Also available at https://www.adn.com/politics/alaska-legislature/2021/03/03/republican-alaska-lawmaker-gets-backlash-from-party-after-breaking-legislative-logjam/ (accessed January 14, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Burden, B. C. 2004. “Candidate Positioning in US Congressional Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 211–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000712340400002x.Search in Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, B., D. W. B., and J. F. Cogan. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review 96 (01): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402004276.Search in Google Scholar

Crosson, J. 2021. “Extreme Districts, Moderate Winners: Same-Party Challenges, and Deterrence in Top-Two Primaries.” Political Science Research and Methods 9 (3): 532–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.7.Search in Google Scholar

Donovan, T. 2012. “The Top Two Primary: What Can California Learn from Washington?” California Journal of Politics and Policy 4 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5070/p2959z.Search in Google Scholar

Drutman, L. 2021. What We Know about Congressional Primaries and Congressional Primary Reform. New America. Also available at http://newamerica.org/political-reform/reports/what-we-know-about-congressional-primaries-and-congressional-primary-reform/ (accessed January 14, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, J. N., and R. T. Holden. 2009. “The Rising Incumbent Reelection Rate: What’s Gerrymandering Got to Do with it?” The Journal of Politics 71 (2): 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090483.Search in Google Scholar

Grose, C. R. 2020. “Reducing Legislative Polarization: Top-Two and Open Primaries Are Associated with More Moderate Legislators.” Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy 1 (2): 267–87. https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000012.Search in Google Scholar

Herz, N. 2022. “Ranked Choice Voting Isn’t Better or Worse. It’s Different.” Northern Journal. https://northernjournal.substack.com/p/ranked-choice-voting-isnt-better (accessed March 27, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Hill, S. J. 2015. “Institution of Nomination and the Policy Ideology of Primary Electorates.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 461–87. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00015023.Search in Google Scholar

Hirano, S., and J. M. Snyder. 2019. Primary Elections in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139946537Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 2012. “The Electoral Origins of Polarized Politics: Evidence from the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (12): 1612–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463352.Search in Google Scholar

Kamarck, E., and A. R. Podkul. 2018. The 2018 Primaries Project: The Ideology of Primary Voters. Brookings. Also available at https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-2018-primaries-project-the-ideology-of-primary-voters/ (accessed December 15, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J., and J. Lee. 2022. Alaska Primary Voters Had More Choice in 2022. Sightline Institute. Also available at https://www.sightline.org/2022/11/04/alaska-primary-voters-had-more-choice-in-2022/ (accessed January 4, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

McGhee, E., E. McGhee, S. Masket, B. Shor, and S. Rogers. 2014. “A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 337–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12070.Search in Google Scholar

McGhee, E., and B. Shor. 2017. “Has the Top Two Primary Elected More Moderates?” Perspectives on Politics 15 (4): 1053–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592717002158.Search in Google Scholar

Montanaro, D. 2022. Americans Are Sick of Lawmakers Bickering. They Don’t Have Much Hope that Will Change. NPR. Also available at https://www.npr.org/2022/12/15/1142751143/poll-americans-want-compromise-but-have-no-confidence-congress-will-work-togethe (accessed December 15, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Nagler, J. 2015. “Voter Behavior in California’s Top Two Primary.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 7 (1): 1–14, https://doi.org/10.5070/p2cjpp7125524.Search in Google Scholar

Nielson, L., and N. Visalvanich. 2017. “Primaries and Candidates: Examining the Influence of Primary Electorates on Candidate Ideology.” Political Science Research and Methods 5 (2): 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.60.Search in Google Scholar

Pyeatt, N. 2015. “Party Unity, Ideology, and Polarization in Primary Elections for the House of Representatives: 1956–2012.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 651–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12092.Search in Google Scholar

Shapero, J. 2022. Majority of Americans Worried Midterms Will Result in Government Gridlock: Poll. The Hill. Also available at https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3670567-majority-of-americans-worried-midterms-will-result-in-government-gridlock-poll/ (accessed December 15, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Shor, B., and N. McCarty. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 530–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000153.Search in Google Scholar

Woon, J. 2018. “Primaries and Candidate Polarization: Behavioral Theory and Experimental Evidence.” American Political Science Review 112 (4): 826–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000515.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2023-2001).


Published Online: 2023-04-12

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2023-2001/html
Scroll to top button