Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

How Impressionable Were the Younger Reagan Cohorts?

  • Zachary F. Cook received his Ph.D. in Political Science from Northwestern University. He is currently an instructor in Political Science at DePaul University. His current research focuses on age, ideology, political parties, and elections. The author received no funding in connection with this paper.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Younger voters today, defined as under the age of 30 and often labeled the Millennial Generation, have shown high support for Barack Obama and for certain statements about activist government. Are we witnessing some generational effect for a significant percentage of the Millennials, stemming from their growing up during impressionable years under first George W. Bush and then Obama? To study this question with a historical analogy, I use the ANES to compare under-30 cohorts under Jimmy Carter as a benchmark and then Ronald Reagan much more extensively. I find evidence consistent with categories advanced by Sears (1983). The Reagan years disproportionately shifted this age group’s symbolic attitudes, including partisanship, self-reported ideology, and approval of Reagan himself, but not most specific policy opinions. If this finding generalizes, recent events may leave a Democratic imprint on the Millennials, but their current measures of policy liberalism should not be attributed overmuch to Obama’s influence.


Corresponding author: Zachary F. Cook, Department of Political Science, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA, e-mail:

About the author

Zachary F. Cook

Zachary F. Cook received his Ph.D. in Political Science from Northwestern University. He is currently an instructor in Political Science at DePaul University. His current research focuses on age, ideology, political parties, and elections. The author received no funding in connection with this paper.

References

Alwin, Duane F., and Jon A. Krosnick. 1991. “Aging, Cohorts, and the Stability of Sociopolitical Orientations Over the Life Span.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (1): 169–195.10.1086/229744Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M., and Simon Jackman. 2014. “A Generational Model of Political Learning.” Electoral Studies 33: 7–18.10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.004Search in Google Scholar

Becker, Jo. 2014. “How the President Got to ‘I Do’ on Same Sex Marriage.” New York Times Magazine, April 16, 2014. Accessed July 24, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/20/magazine/how-the-president-got-to-i-do-on-same-sex-marriage.html.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, David E. 2002. “The Young and the Realigning: A Test of the Socialization Theory of Realignment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66: 209–234.10.1086/339849Search in Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E. 1969. “Of Time and Partisan Stability.” Comparative Political Studies 2(2): 139–171.10.1177/001041406900200201Search in Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, Michael X. 1989. “Age and History: Generations and Sociopolitical Change.” In Political Learning in Adulthood, edited by Roberta S. Sigel, 11–56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dionne Jr., E. J. 1988. “G.O.P. Makes Reagan Lure Of Young a Long-Term Asset.” New York Times, October 31, 1988. Accessed April 10, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/31/us/political-memo-gop-makes-reagan-lure-of-young-a-long-term-asset.html.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards III, George C. 2006. On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gallup. 2009. “Democrats Do Best Among Generation Y and Baby Boomers.” http://www.gallup.com/poll/118285/Democrats-Best-Among-Generation-Baby-Boomers.aspx?CSTS=alert.Search in Google Scholar

Ghitza, Yair, and Andrew Gelman. 2014. “The Great Society, Reagan’s Revolution, and Generations of Presidential Voting.” Working Paper, July 7, 2014. Accessed July 24, 2014. http://graphics8.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/07/06/generations2/assets/cohort_voting_20140707.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Donald, Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identity of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc. 2012. “Partisanship and Polarization.” In New Directions in Public Opinion, edited by Adam Berinsky, 101–118. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Layman, Geoffrey, and Thomas Carsey. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 786–802.10.2307/3088434Search in Google Scholar

Leonhardt, David. 2014. “Why Teenagers Today May Grow Up Conservative.” The New York Times, July 8, 2014. Accessed July 16, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/08/upshot/why-teenagers-may-be-getting-more-conservative.html.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Helmut Norpoth, William G. Jacoby, and Herbert F. Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.92266Search in Google Scholar

Mannheim, Karl. 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by Paul Kecskemeti, 276–320. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut. 1987. “Under Way and Here to Stay: Party Realignment in the 1980s?” Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (3): 376–391.10.1086/269042Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Danny, David O. Sears, and Nicholas A. Valentino. 2011. “The End of the Solidly Democratic South: The Impressionable-Years Hypothesis.” Political Psychology 32 (1): 81–107.10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00796.xSearch in Google Scholar

Parker, Ashley. 2014. “Democrats Aim for a 2014 More Like 2012 and 2008.” New York Times, February 6, 2014. Accessed April 10, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/07/us/politics/democrats-aim-to-make-2014-more-like-2012-and-2008.html?_r=0.Search in Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2011. “The Generation Gap and the 2012 Election.” http://www.people-press.org/2011/11/03/the-generation-gap-and-the-2012-election-3/.Search in Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2012. “Younger Voters Supported Obama Less, But May Have Mattered More.” http://www.people-press.org/2012/11/26/young-voters-supported-obama-less-but-may-have-mattered-more/.Search in Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2014. “Millennials in Adulthood.” http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/03/07/millennials-in-adulthood/.Search in Google Scholar

Sears, David O. 1981. “Life-stage Effects on Attitude Change, Especially Among the Elderly.” In Aging: Social Change, edited by Sara B. Kiesler, James N. Morgan, and Valerie K. Oppenheimer, 183–204. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sears, David O. 1983. “The Persistence of Early Political Predispositions: The Role of Attitude Objects and Life Stage.” Review of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 79–116.Search in Google Scholar

Sears, David O. 1990. “Whither Political Socialization Research? The Question of Persistence.” In Political Socialization, Citizenship, Education and Democracy, edited by Orit Ichilov, 69–97. New York: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sears, David O., and Nicholas A. Valentino. 1997. “Politics Matters: Political Events as Catalysts for Preadult Socialization.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 45–65.10.2307/2952258Search in Google Scholar

Skowronek, Stephen. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton, Revised Edition. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sides, John. 2014. “Democrats Have a Young People Problem, Too.” Online post. March 10, 2014. Available online at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/03/10/democrats-have-a-young-people-problem-too/, last accessed July 16, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Sides, John, and Lynn Vavreck. 2013. The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctt7ztpn1Search in Google Scholar

Stoker, Laura, and M. Kent Jennings. 2008. “Of Time and the Development of Partisan Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 619–635.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00333.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ullmann, Owen. “Reagan Wooing Youth Vote for GOP.” The Inquirer, May 25, 1986. Accessed April 10, 2014. http://articles.philly.com/1986-05-25/news/26050928_1_young-voters-reagan-presidency-youth-vote.Search in Google Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 981–1000.10.2307/2111666Search in Google Scholar

Zukin, Cliff, Scott Keeter, Molly Andolina, Krista Jenkins, and Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2006. A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183177.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-10-31
Published in Print: 2014-10-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 1.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2014-5017/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button