Corporeal narrative of insatiable desire in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest
-
Xiaomeng Wan
Abstract
Considering addiction to be the central concern of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest (1996), this article sees the human body as both a storytelling agent and a described object. It explores insatiable desire as essence of addiction, focusing on the interaction between characters’ bodies and their desires. This article seeks to further examine corporeal narrative techniques in the novel with a particular focus on the relationship between narrative bodies and time or space, the differential embodiments of bodies, and the text’s manipulation of the reader’s body. Adopting varied corporeal narrative techniques, Wallace warns readers against indulging one’s desire for addictive satisfaction – especially with regard to passive entertainment – and indicates the vulnerability of the human mind and body to desire. In this way, the reader not only observes the characters’ external actions and internal feelings under insatiable desire from a third-person perspective, but they also have the chance to feel similar desires within themselves.
References
Bartlett, Christopher. 2016. “An exercise in telemachry”: David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest and intergenerational conversation. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 57(4). 374–389.10.1080/00111619.2015.1113921Suche in Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. 1992. Reading for the plot: Design and intention in narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. 1993. Body work: Objects of desire in modern narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674028869Suche in Google Scholar
Caro, Mark. 2012. The next big thing: Can a downstate author withstand the sensation over his 1,079-page novel?. In Stephen J. Burn (ed.), Conversations with David Foster Wallace, 53–57. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.10.2307/j.ctt24hzc6.9Suche in Google Scholar
Curtis, Paul M. 2016. “Yo man so what's your story”: The double bind and addiction in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest. Mosaic: An interdisciplinary critical journal 49(4). 37–52.10.1353/mos.2016.a640850Suche in Google Scholar
Den Dulk, Allard. 2014. Good faith and sincerity: Sartrean virtues of self-becoming in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest. In Robert K. Bolger & Scott Korb (eds.), Gesturing toward reality: David Foster Wallace and philosophy, 199–220. New York: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar
Den Dulk, Allard & Preben Jordal. 2018. Subjectivity and faith in Updike and Wallace: A comparison of the interpretation of Kierkegaard in Rabbit, Run and Infinite Jest. The Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies 1(1). 17–54.Suche in Google Scholar
Englade, Emilio. 2019. The birth of the reader: Inside the final edits to Infinite Jest. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 60(5). 613–626.10.1080/00111619.2019.1638749Suche in Google Scholar
Gimlin, Debra. 2002. Body work: Beauty and self-image in American culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520926868Suche in Google Scholar
Holland, Mary K. 2018. Infinite Jest. In Ralph Clare (ed.), The Cambridge companion to David Foster Wallace, 127–141. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108553902.010Suche in Google Scholar
Jahn, Manfred. 2017. Narratology: A guide to the theory of narrative. Cologne: University of Cologne.Suche in Google Scholar
Kelly, Adam. 2010. David Foster Wallace: The death of the author and the birth of a discipline. IJAS Online 2. 47–59.Suche in Google Scholar
Lambert, Stephanie. 2020. “The real dark side, baby”: New sincerity and neoliberal aesthetics in David Foster Wallace and Jennifer Egan. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 61(4). 394–411.10.1080/00111619.2020.1727831Suche in Google Scholar
McCaffery, Larry. 2012. An expanded interview with David Foster Wallace. In Stephen J. Burn (ed.), Conversations with David Foster Wallace, 21–52. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.10.2307/j.ctt24hzc6.8Suche in Google Scholar
Punday, Daniel. 2003. Narrative bodies: Toward a corporeal narratology. New York: Oalgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403981653Suche in Google Scholar
Russell, Emily. 2011. Reading embodied citizenship: Disability, narrative, and the body politic. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.10.36019/9780813549903Suche in Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. 2008. Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802829Suche in Google Scholar
Sloane, Peter. 2019. David Foster Wallace and the body. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429286483Suche in Google Scholar
Wallace, David Foster. 1996. Infinite jest. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Suche in Google Scholar
Wallace, David Foster. 2012. Both flesh and not: Essays. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Suche in Google Scholar
Woodend, Kyle. 2019. Irony, narcissism, and affect in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 60(4). 1–13.10.1080/00111619.2019.1596876Suche in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Storyworld, transmedia storytelling, and contemporary narrative theory: An interview with Marie-Laure Ryan
- Being for every other: Levinas in the anthropocene
- Edmund Wilson, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and the rhetoric of protection
- Corporeal narrative of insatiable desire in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest
- “The old boys’ network”: Medical space, gendered memory, and prejudices in Sidney Sheldon’s Nothing Last Forever
- I, theorist: Accrediting the “wild imagination” of Northanger Abbey
- Review
- Bob Fischer, ed. The routledge handbook of animal ethics. New York: Routledge, 2020. xviii+584 pp. ISBN: 9781138095069.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Storyworld, transmedia storytelling, and contemporary narrative theory: An interview with Marie-Laure Ryan
- Being for every other: Levinas in the anthropocene
- Edmund Wilson, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and the rhetoric of protection
- Corporeal narrative of insatiable desire in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest
- “The old boys’ network”: Medical space, gendered memory, and prejudices in Sidney Sheldon’s Nothing Last Forever
- I, theorist: Accrediting the “wild imagination” of Northanger Abbey
- Review
- Bob Fischer, ed. The routledge handbook of animal ethics. New York: Routledge, 2020. xviii+584 pp. ISBN: 9781138095069.
