Abstract
Corporate communication has long been viewed through the lens of narrative and storytelling. Over time, a wide variety of conceptions have been developed in this field with respect to the special circumstances regarding the organisational communicative situation, which differs from other materialisations of narrative. In this article, however, we will explore the value of a more general approach, which pays attention to some of the recurring features of narrative across media and communicative situations. We will approach organisational narrative through common analytical and narratological concepts such as master narrative and counter-narrative, character, identification and actantial roles. Specifically, we investigate the organisational change in the Danish-owned multinational company Danfoss and examine how the materialisation of a founder narrative and a CEO master narrative each evoke different expectations, reactions and counter-narratives among the employees. Our empirical material consists of public communication in, from and around the organisation, and focus group interviews conducted at Danfoss China.
References
Andrews, Molly. 2004. Opening to the original contributions: Counter-narratives and the power to oppose. In Michael G. W. Bamberg & Molly Andrews (eds.), Considering counter narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense, 1–6. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sin.4.02andSearch in Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael G. W. & Molly Andrews (eds.). 2004. Considering counter narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sin.4Search in Google Scholar
Beech, Nic, Stacy A. MacPhail & Christine Coupland. 2009. Anti-dialogic positioning in change stories: Bank robbers, saviours and peons. Organization 16(3). 335–352.10.1177/1350508409102299Search in Google Scholar
Boje, David M. 2001. Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781849209496Search in Google Scholar
Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the fiction film. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 2006. Audience identification with media characters. In Jennings Bryant & Peter Vorderer (eds.), Psychology of entertainment, 183–197. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Cohn, Dorrit. 1999. The distinction of fiction. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cornelissen, Joep. 2011. Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Cornelissen, Joep & Phil Harris. 2001. The corporate identity metaphor: Perspectives, problems and prospects. Journal of Marketing Management 17(1–2). 49–71.10.1362/0267257012571456Search in Google Scholar
Danfoss. Wikipedia.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danfoss (accessed 13 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Danfoss. 2018. The Danfoss story: Fragments of Danfoss’ history. www.danfoss.com (accessed 13 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Danfoss. 2010. Danfoss “Core and Clear”: Aspiration and Perspective (handout version). Global Management Meeting. Unpublished.Search in Google Scholar
Dent, Eric B. & Susan Galloway Goldberg. 1999. Challenging “resistance to change”. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 35(1). 25–41.10.1177/0021886399351003Search in Google Scholar
Fenton, Christopher & Ann Langley. 2011. Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organization Studies 32(9). 1171–1196.10.1177/0170840611410838Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, Walter R. 1989. Clarifying the narrative paradigm. Communication Monographs 56(1). 55–58.10.1080/03637758909390249Search in Google Scholar
Frandsen, Sanne, Timothy Kuhn & Marianne Wolff Lundholt (eds.). 2017. Counter-narratives and organization. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315681214Search in Google Scholar
Gabriel, Yiannis. 2017. Narrative ecologies and the role of counter-narratives: The case of nostalgic stories and conspiracy theories. In Sanne Frandsen, Timothy Kuhn & Marianne Wolff Lundholt (eds.), Counter-narratives and organization, 208–226. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Giangreco, Antonio & Riccardo Peccei. 2005. The nature and antecedents of middle manager resistance to change: Evidence from an Italian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 16(10). 1812–1829.10.1080/09585190500298404Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, Astrid, Cindie Aaen Maagaard & Rasmus Kjærgaard Rasmussen. 2017. “Speaking through the Other”: Countering counter-narratives through stakeholders’ stories. In Sanne Frandsen, Timothy Kuhn & Marianne Wolff Lundholt (eds.), Counter-narratives and organization, 83–102. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
van Krieken, Kobie, Hans Hoeken & José Sanders. 2017. Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters – a linguistic cues framework. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 1190.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01190Search in Google Scholar
Kuhn, Timothy. 2008. A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships. Organization Studies 29(8–9). 1227–1254.10.1177/0170840608094778Search in Google Scholar
Kuhn, Timothy. 2017. Communicatively constituting organizational unfolding through counter-narrative. In Sanne Frandsen, Timothy Kuhn & Marianne Wolff Lundholt (eds.), Counter-narratives and organization, 17–42. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lunde, Niels. 2010. Sådan gør han, Niels Bjørn Christiansen [How he does it, Niels Bjørn Christiansen]. In Politiken (newspaper), 5 September. Copenhagen. Section 1: 15.Search in Google Scholar
Lundholt, Marianne Wolff. 2017. Counter-narratives and organizational crisis: How LEGO bricks became a slippery business. In Sanne Frandsen, Timothy Kuhn & Marianne Wolff Lundholt (eds.), Counter-narratives and organization, 43–64. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Lykke, Pia. 2011. Overvældende medarbejdertilfredshed hos Danfoss [Overwhelming employee-satisfaction at Danfoss]. In Børsen (newspaper). 2 December. Copenhagen. Section 2: 8. Search in Google Scholar
Mar, Raymond A., Keith Oatley, Maja Djikic & Justin Mullin. 2011. Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition and Emotion 25(5). 818–833.10.1080/02699931.2010.515151Search in Google Scholar
Margolin, Uri. 2014. Narrator. In Peter Hühn, Jan Christoph. Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/narrator (accessed 13 July 2018). Search in Google Scholar
Mathews, Brandon & Christopher M. Linski. 2016. Shifting the paradigm: Reevaluating resistance to organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 29(6). 963–972.10.1108/JOCM-03-2016-0058Search in Google Scholar
Norlyk, Birgitte, Per Krogh Hansen & Marianne Wolff Lundholt. 2013. Corporate storytelling. In Peter Hühn, Jan Christoph. Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/corporate-storytelling (accessed 13 July 2018). 10.1515/9783110316469.105Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2014. Narration in various media. In Peter Hühn, Jan Christoph. Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/narration-various-media (accessed 13 July 2018). 10.1515/9783110316469.468Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, Robyn & Cynthia Hardy. 2011. Reframing resistance to organizational change. Scandinavian Journal of Management 27. 322–331.10.1016/j.scaman.2011.05.004Search in Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1969. Grammaire du Décaméron. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Wolf, Werner. 2017. Transmedial narratology: Theoretical foundations and some applications (fiction, single pictures, instrumental music). Narrative 25(3). 256–285.10.1353/nar.2017.0015Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Rhetorical Theory of Narrative and Contemporary Narrative Poetics: A Conversation with James Phelan
- Introduction: Sameness and difference in narratology
- The critique of the common theory of narrative fiction in narratology: Pursuing difference
- The art of narrative – narrative as art: Sameness or difference?
- Sameness, difference, or continuity?
- Beyond sameness and difference: Narrative sense-making in life and literature
- Conflicts between founder and CEO narratives: Counter-narrative, character and identification in organisational changes
- Imaginary scenarios: On the use and misuse of fiction
- Sameness and difference in narrative modes and narrative sense making: The case of Ramsey Campbell’s “The Scar”
- “I’ll teach you differences.” A meta-theoretical approach to narrative theory
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Mapped stories: Cartography, history, and the representation of time in space
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Rhetorical Theory of Narrative and Contemporary Narrative Poetics: A Conversation with James Phelan
- Introduction: Sameness and difference in narratology
- The critique of the common theory of narrative fiction in narratology: Pursuing difference
- The art of narrative – narrative as art: Sameness or difference?
- Sameness, difference, or continuity?
- Beyond sameness and difference: Narrative sense-making in life and literature
- Conflicts between founder and CEO narratives: Counter-narrative, character and identification in organisational changes
- Imaginary scenarios: On the use and misuse of fiction
- Sameness and difference in narrative modes and narrative sense making: The case of Ramsey Campbell’s “The Scar”
- “I’ll teach you differences.” A meta-theoretical approach to narrative theory
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Mapped stories: Cartography, history, and the representation of time in space