References

Banks, Anna & Stephen P. Banks (eds.). 1998. Fiction and social research: By ice or fire. Walnut Creek-London-New Delhi: SAGE/ AltaMira Press. Search in Google Scholar

Barberousse, Anouk & Pascal Ludwig. 2008. Models as Fictions. In Mauricio Suárez (ed.), Fictions in science. Philosophical essays in modeling and idealization, 56–73. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Baroni, Raphaёl & Françoise Revaz (eds.). 2015. Narrative sequence in contemporary narratology. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Barry, David & Michael Elmes. 1997. Strategy retold: Towards a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review 22(2). 429–452. 10.5465/amr.1997.9707154065Search in Google Scholar

Birke, Dorothee, Michael Butter & Tillmann Köppe (eds.). 2011. Counterfactual thinking – Counterfactual writing. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110268669Search in Google Scholar

Brockmeier, Jens. 2016. Beyond the archive: Memory, narrative, and the autobiographical process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199861569.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bryson, Norman. 1983. Vision and painting: The logic of the gaze. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 10.1007/978-1-349-06121-1Search in Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack. 1969. Perceptual Realism. Artscanada 26(136–137). 7–13. 10.1016/0043-1648(69)90527-4Search in Google Scholar

Csikzentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1996 [2007]. Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins e-books.Search in Google Scholar

Dannenberg, Hilary. 2008. Coincidence and counterfactuality: Plotting time and space in narrative fiction. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1dgn486Search in Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur. 1985. Narration and knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Denzin, Norman K. 1996. Interpretative ethnography. Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE.10.4135/9781452243672Search in Google Scholar

Denzin, Norman K. & Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2017 (eds.). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Doležel, Lubomír. 1998. Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801857492Search in Google Scholar

Frigg, Roman. 2010. Fiction and scientific representation. In Roman Frigg & Matthew C. Hunter (eds.), Beyond mimesis and convention: Representation in art and science, 97–138. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_6Search in Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar. 2010. Intuition, imagination, and philosophical methodology: Selected papers. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589760.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. 1993. Fiction and diction. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grishakova, Marina. 2008. Literariness, fictionality, and the theory of possible worlds. In Lars-Åke Skalin (ed.), The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction, 57–76. Örebro: Örebro University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grishakova, Marina. 2019. Interface ontologies. In Alice Bell & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), Possible worlds theory and contemporary narratology, 88–109. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctv8xng0c.8Search in Google Scholar

Hatavara, Mari & Jarmila Mildorf. 2017. Hybrid fictionality and vicarious narrative experience. Narrative 25(1). 65–82. 10.1353/nar.2017.0004Search in Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. 1993. The fictive and the imaginary. Charting literary anthropology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801844980Search in Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. 2000. What is literary anthropology? The difference between explanatory and exploratory fictions. In Michael P. Clark (ed.), Revenge of the aesthetic: The place of literature in theory today, 157–179. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520923508-010Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1981. Selected writings, vol. III. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1987. On realism in art. In Roman Jakobson, Language in literature, 19–27. London & Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard UP. Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Herman 1962. Thinking about the unthinkable. New York: Horizon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel & Amos Tversky (eds.). 2000. Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803475Search in Google Scholar

Klauk, Tobias. 2011. Thought experiments and literature. In Dorothee Birke, Michael Butter & Tillmann Köppe (eds.), Counterfactual thinking – counterfactual writing, 30–61. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110268669.30Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Juri. 1964. Lekcii po strukturalnoi poetike. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Sign systems studies] 1. Tartu: Tartu University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Notten van, Philip. 2005. Writing on the wall. Scenario development in times of discontinuity. Diss. Boca Raton, Florida. Search in Google Scholar

Oatley, Keith. 1999. Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology 3(2). 101–117.10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101Search in Google Scholar

Oatley, Keith. 2016. Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(8). 618–228.10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Pavel, Thomas G. 1986. Fictional worlds. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ralston, Bill, and Ian Wilson. 2006. The scenario planning handbook: Developing strategies in uncertain times. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Ramirez, Rafael. 2008. Scenarios that provide clarity in addressing turbulence. In Rafael Ramirez, et al. (eds.), Business Planning for Turbulent Times. New Methods for Applying Scenarios, 187–206. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Sanford, Anthony J. & Catherine Emmott. 2012. Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge, NY.: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084321Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. 2010 [1999]. Why fiction? [Pourquoi la fiction?]. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Peter. 1991. The art of the long view. New York: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Vaihinger, Hans 1924 [1911]. The philosophy of ‘as if’ [Die Philosophie des Als Ob]. London: Kegan Paul. Search in Google Scholar

Wall, Rajendra Sookdeo. 1983. The theory and use of scenario. University of Massachusetts Amherst: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Weingarten, Gene. 2007. Pearls before breakfast. The Washington Post, April 7. http://www.pulitzer.org/winners/gene-weingarten (accessed 24 Jan., 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Worth, Sarah E. 2008. Storytelling and narrative knowing. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 42(3). 42–55.10.1353/jae.0.0014Search in Google Scholar

Worth, Sarah E. 2015. Narration, representation, truth, and lies. In J. Alexander Bareis & Lene Nordrum (eds.), How to make believe: The fictional truths of the representational Arts, 96–111. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110443875-006Search in Google Scholar

Zunshine, Lisa. 2006. Why we read fiction. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zunshine, Lisa. 2007. Why Jane Austen was different, and why we may need cognitive science to see it. Style 41(3). 275–299.Search in Google Scholar

Zorzi, Ludovico. 1981. Scena. In Enciclopedia Einaudi Vol. XII, Ricerca-Specializzazione, 495–527. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar