Beyond sameness and difference: Narrative sense-making in life and literature
-
Hanna Meretoja
Abstract
This article analyses two major problems in the dichotomous framing of the question of whether narratives in fiction and “real life” are the same or different. The dichotomy prevents us from seeing, first, that there are both crucial similarities and differences between them and, second, that there are important similarities between variants of the “similarity approach” and the “difference approach”, both of which tend to rely on ahistorical, universalizing and empiricist-positivistic assumptions concerning factuality, raw experience and the non-referentiality of narrative fiction. The article presents as an alternative to both approaches narrative hermeneutics, which sees all narratives as culturally mediated and historically changing interpretative practices but approaches literary narratives as specific modes of making sense of the world – as ones that have truth-value on a different level than non-literary narratives. Narrative hermeneutics shares with (at least some forms of) unnatural narratology and the Örebro School a passion for the uniqueness of literary narratives, but it places the emphasis on the ability of literature to disclose the world to us in existentially charged ways that would not be otherwise culturally available – in ways that open up new possibilities of thought, action and affect.
References
Alber, Jan, Stefan Iversen, Henrik Skov Nielsen & Brian Richardson. 2013. Introduction. In Jan Alber, Henrik Skov Nielsen & Brian Richardson (eds.), A poetics of unnatural narrative, 1–15. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Alber, Jan. 2013. Unnatural spaces and narrative worlds. In Jan Alber, Henrik Skov Nielsen & Brian Richardson (eds.), A poetics of unnatural narrative, 45–66. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1982. Structural analysis of narratives (1966). Image/Music/Text (Stephen Heath trans.), 79–124. Glasgow: Fontana.Search in Google Scholar
Bowie, Andrew. 1997. From romanticism to critical theory: The philosophy of German literary theory. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Boyd, Brian. 2009. On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjf9xvkSearch in Google Scholar
Cohn, Dorrit. 1999. The distinction of fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801859427Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 2015. Art as experience (1934). New York: Perigee Books.Search in Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomír. 2010. Possible worlds of fiction and history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.455Search in Google Scholar
Eaglestone, Robert. 2004. One and the same? Ethics, aesthetics, and truth. Poetics today 25(4), 595–608.10.1215/03335372-25-4-595Search in Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. 2008. Uses of literature. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell-Wiley.10.1002/9781444302790Search in Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. London: Routledge.10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97Search in Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2005. Experientiality. In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, 155. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2010. Experience, experientiality and historical narrative: A view from narratology. In Thiemo Breyer & Daniel Creutz (eds.), Erfahrung und Geschichte. Historische Sinnbildung im Pränarrativen, 40–72. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240436.1.40Search in Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 2008. Über Sinn und Bedeutung (1892). In Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien, 23–46. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1997 [1960]. Truth and method (Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall trans.) (2nd edn.). New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Goldie, Peter. 2012. The mess inside: Narrative, emotion, and the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230730.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1966. Sémantique structurale: recherche de méthode. Paris: Larousse.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes (1936). In Martin Heidegger, Gesamtausgabe 5: Holzwege (F.-W. von Herrmann ed.), 1–74. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Search in Google Scholar
Herman, David, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan. 2005. Introduction. In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, ix-xi. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Herman, David. 2009. Basic elements of narrative. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444305920Search in Google Scholar
Herman, David. 2011. Introduction. In David Herman (ed.), The emergence of mind: Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English, 1–40. Lincoln, NE.: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1df4fwq.4Search in Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2006. Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar
Iversen, Stefan. 2013. Broken or unnatural? On the distinction of fiction in non-conventional first person narration. In Matti Hyvärinen, Mari Hatavara & Lars-Christer Hydén (eds.), The Travelling Concepts of Narrative, 141–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sin.18.10iveSearch in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of pure reason (Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1781) (Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Critique of the power of judgment (Kritik der Urteilskraft, 1790) (Paul Guyer & Eric Matthews trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2015. Critique of practical reason (Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, 1788) (Mary Gregor trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Korthals Altes, Liesbeth. 2014. Ethos and narrative interpretation: The negotiation of values in fiction. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1d9nm18Search in Google Scholar
Meretoja, Hanna. 2018. The ethics of storytelling: Narrative hermeneutics, history, and the possible. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190649364.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Meretoja, Hanna. 2016. Fiction, history and the possible: Jonathan Littell's Les Bienveillantes. Orbis Litterarum. 71(5). 371–404.10.1111/oli.12109Search in Google Scholar
Mäkelä, Maria. 2013. Cycles of narrative necessity: Suspect tellers and the textuality of fictional minds. In Lars Bernaerts, Dirk De Geest, Luc Herman & Bart Vervaec (eds.), Stories and minds, 129–153. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ddr7zh.10Search in Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul. 1998. Sideshadowing and tempics. New literary history 29(4). 599–624.10.1353/nlh.1998.0043Search in Google Scholar
Nielsen, Henrik Skov, James Phelan & Richard Walsh. 2015. Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative 23(1). 61–73.10.1353/nar.2015.0005Search in Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1968. The will to power (Walter Kaufmann ed.) (Walter Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale trans.). New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas. 1986. Fictional worlds. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Phelan, James. 2016. Local fictionality within global nonfiction: Roz Chast's Why Can't We Talk about Something More Pleasant? Enthymema 16. 18–31.Search in Google Scholar
Phelan, James & Henrik Skov Nielsen. 2017. Why there are no one-to-one correspondences among fictionality, narrative, and techniques: A response to Mari Hatavara and Jarmila Mildorf. Narrative 25(1). 83–91. 10.1353/nar.2017.0005Search in Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1984. Time and narrative. Vol. 1 (1983) (Kathleen McLaughlin & David Pellauer trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1988. Time and narrative. Vol. 3 (1985) (Kathleen Blamey & David Pellauer trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226713533.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1991. From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II (1986). (Kathleen Blamey & John B. Thompson trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1992 [1990]. Oneself as another (Kathleen Blamey trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 2005. “On denoting.” Special issue: 100 years of “On denoting.” Mind 114, 873–887.10.1093/mind/fzi873Search in Google Scholar
Salmi, Hannu. 2011. Cultural history, the possible, and the principle of plenitude. History and Theory 50. 171–187.10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00575.xSearch in Google Scholar
Sandberg, Tommy. 2017. A “fucked up” novel, narratology, and the Difference approach to literary fiction. Frontiers of Narrative Studies 3(2). 256–272.10.1515/fns-2017-0017Search in Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. 2013. Fictional vs. factual narration. In Peter Hühn, John Pier, Wolf Schmid & Jörg Schönert (eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. URL = http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/fictional-vs-factual-narration (accessed 16 Mar., 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1963. Science, perception and reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Search in Google Scholar
Skalin, Lars-Åke. 2008. “Telling a story”: Reflections on fictional and non-fictional narratives. In Lars-Åke Skalin (ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction, 201–260. Örebro: Örebro universitet.Search in Google Scholar
Skalin, Lars-Åke. 2017. Turning life into stories – turning stories into lives. In Brian Schiff, A. Elizabeth McKim & Sylvie Patron (eds.), Life and narrative: The risks and responsibilities of storying experience, 119–136. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256654.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1969. Grammaire du Décaméron. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Rhetorical Theory of Narrative and Contemporary Narrative Poetics: A Conversation with James Phelan
- Introduction: Sameness and difference in narratology
- The critique of the common theory of narrative fiction in narratology: Pursuing difference
- The art of narrative – narrative as art: Sameness or difference?
- Sameness, difference, or continuity?
- Beyond sameness and difference: Narrative sense-making in life and literature
- Conflicts between founder and CEO narratives: Counter-narrative, character and identification in organisational changes
- Imaginary scenarios: On the use and misuse of fiction
- Sameness and difference in narrative modes and narrative sense making: The case of Ramsey Campbell’s “The Scar”
- “I’ll teach you differences.” A meta-theoretical approach to narrative theory
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Mapped stories: Cartography, history, and the representation of time in space
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Rhetorical Theory of Narrative and Contemporary Narrative Poetics: A Conversation with James Phelan
- Introduction: Sameness and difference in narratology
- The critique of the common theory of narrative fiction in narratology: Pursuing difference
- The art of narrative – narrative as art: Sameness or difference?
- Sameness, difference, or continuity?
- Beyond sameness and difference: Narrative sense-making in life and literature
- Conflicts between founder and CEO narratives: Counter-narrative, character and identification in organisational changes
- Imaginary scenarios: On the use and misuse of fiction
- Sameness and difference in narrative modes and narrative sense making: The case of Ramsey Campbell’s “The Scar”
- “I’ll teach you differences.” A meta-theoretical approach to narrative theory
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Mapped stories: Cartography, history, and the representation of time in space
