Home Who says? Problematic narration in Paul Auster’s City of glass
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Who says? Problematic narration in Paul Auster’s City of glass

  • Annjeanette Wiese EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 28, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The conventions of narratological categories direct our expectations and interpretation as we read. But when these conventions are problematized, our interpretation becomes more theoretical, forcing us to contemplate why an author would choose to experiment with the category of, for example, narration. In Paul Auster’s City of glass (1985), we have what appears to be a heterodiegetic, omniscient narrator who is mostly, but not fully, unproblematic. By the end, however, we discover that this narrator is (also?) homodiegetic. Auster’s breaking of the rules of traditional narration by having a narrator who is both hetero- and homodiegetic not only leaves readers in a quandary as to how to interpret the text, it also makes us realize how much we rely on the narrator for meaning. I propose to analyze the novel in order to explore the rhetorical strategy of Auster’s refusal to maintain a stable narrator. This analysis will illustrate how the category of narration prompts an unexamined trust in the teller and is therefore essential for our understanding of truth and meaning in narrative. I contend, in other words, that Auster’s experimentation with the category of narration in City of glass is key to the text’s insistence on a revised understanding of truth.

References

Alford, Steven E. 1995. Mirrors of madness: Paul Auster’s The New York trilogy. Critique 37(1). 17–33.10.1080/00111619.1995.9936478Search in Google Scholar

Auster, Paul. 1987 [1985]. City of glass. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Chatman, Seymour. 1978. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.1515/9781501741616Search in Google Scholar

Cohn, Dorrit. 1978. Transparent minds: Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691213125Search in Google Scholar

Coughlan, David. 2006. Paul Auster’s City of glass: The graphic novel. Modern fiction studies 52(4). 832–854.10.1353/mfs.2007.0006Search in Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 2001. Commentary: Narrative voices: Ephemera or bodied beings. New literary history 32(3). 707–710.10.1353/nlh.2001.0034Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. 1972. Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Translated by Jane E. Lewin. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Horstkotte, Silke & Nancy Pedri. 2011. Focalization in graphic narrative. Narrative 19(3). 330–357.10.1353/nar.2011.0021Search in Google Scholar

Jahn, Manfred. 1996. Windows of focalization: Deconstructing and reconstructing a narratological concept. Style 30(2). 241–267.Search in Google Scholar

Karasik, Paul & David Mazzucchelli. 2004. City of glass, the graphic novel. New York: Picador.Search in Google Scholar

Lavender, William. 1993. The novel of critical engagement: Paul Auster’s City of glass. Contemporary literature 34(2). 219–239. 10.2307/1208549Search in Google Scholar

Lehrer, Jonah. 2008. Proust was a neuroscientist. Boston: Mariner.Search in Google Scholar

Margolin, Uri. 2014. Narrator. In Hühn, Peter et al. (eds.): The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. Last modified 26 Jan 2014. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/. (accessed 27 August 2016)10.1515/9783110316469.646Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Brendan. 2008. Paul Auster’s postmodernity. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203937518Search in Google Scholar

McHale, Brian. 2005. Postmodern narrative. In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, 456–460. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Nealon, Jeffrey T. 1996. Work of the detective, work of the writer: Paul Auster’s City of glass. Modern fiction studies 42(1). 91–110.10.1353/mfs.1995.0011Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, James. 2005. Living to tell about it. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pyrhönen, Heta. 2005. Detective fiction. In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, 103–104. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Brian. 2006. Unnatural voices: Extreme narration in modern and contemporary fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. 1983. Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203130650Search in Google Scholar

Rowen, Norma. 1991. The detective in search of the lost tongue of Adam: Paul Auster’s City of glass. Critique 32(4). 224–235.10.1080/00111619.1991.9933811Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2001. The narratorial functions: Breaking down a theoretical primitive. Narrative 9(2). 146–152.Search in Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan. 1977. The poetics of prose. Translated by Richard Howard. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, Richard. 1997. Who is the narrator? Poetics today 18(4). 495–513. 10.2307/1773184Search in Google Scholar

White, Hayden. 1987. The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. In The content of the form. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 10.1086/448086Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-11-28
Published in Print: 2017-11-23

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/fns-2017-0020/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button