On the construal of MUSIC IS MOTION metaphor
-
Jingfang Wu
und
Yuhong Liu
Abstract
TIME IS MOTION can be construed in two models. One is the Ego-based, the other is Time-based so as to form three time metaphors, MOVING TIME, TIME’S LANDSCAPE, and TEMPORAL SEQUENCE. When construing musical motion, people tend to borrow this conceptual framework and get three musical metaphors, i.e. MOVING MUSIC, MUSICAL LANDSCAPE, and MUSICAL SEQUENCE. The MUSICAL SEQUENCE metaphor falls into three categories, i.e. SEQUENCE IS THE RELATIVE POSITION ON THE TIME PATH, ON THE PITCH PATH, and ON THE KEY PATH. Time Metaphor and the Event Structure Metaphor jointly construct the two construal models for the metaphor MUSIC IS MOTION. This study tries to validate the previous research on conceptual construals in such a new field as music so as to enlarge the research range of the conceptual metaphor theory and provide reference for the subsequent research on music.
References
Adlington, Robert. 2003. Moving beyond motion: Metaphors for changing sound. Journal of the Royal Musical Association 128(2). 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrma/128.2.297.Suche in Google Scholar
Aksnes, Hallgjerd. 2002. Music and its resonating body. Danish Yearbook for Music Research (29). 81–101.Suche in Google Scholar
Antović, Mihailo. 2014. Metafora o muzici ili metafora u muzici: jedan prilog za saradnju kognitivne lingvistike iognitivne muzikologije [Metaphor about music or metaphor in music: A contribution to the cooperation of cognitive linguistics and cognitive musicology]. In Mateusz-Milan Stanojevic (ed.), Metafore koje istražujemo: suvremeni uvidi ukonceptualnu metaforu [Metaphors we study: Contemporary insights into conceptual metaphor], 233–254. Zagreb, Croatia: Srednja Europa. (English translation retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2566258).Suche in Google Scholar
Bonds, Mark Evan. 2010. The spatial representation of musical form. Journal of Musicology 27(3). 265–303. https://doi.org/10.1525/jm.2010.27.3.265.Suche in Google Scholar
Brower, Candace. 2000. A cognitive theory of musical meaning. Journal of Music Theory 44(2). 323–379.10.2307/3090681Suche in Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm. 2003. Musical movement and aesthetic metaphors. The British Journal of Aesthetics 43(3). 20–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.3.209.Suche in Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. 1998. STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics (9). 107–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.2.107.Suche in Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Timothy E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Suche in Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The structure of time: Language, meaning, and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.12Suche in Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph E. 1997. Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.Suche in Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate. 2005. When down is not bad, and up not good enough: A usage-based assessment of the plus-minus parameter in image-schema theory. Cognitive Linguistics 16(1). 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.81.Suche in Google Scholar
Hanslick, Eduard. 1982. On the beauty of music. Yang, Yezhi., translated. Beijing: People’s Music Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark & Steve Larson. 2003. “Something in the way she moves” – Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol 18(2). 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1802_1.Suche in Google Scholar
Julich, Nina. 2018. Metaphors for musical motion – Beyond TIME IS MOTION. In Annalisa Baicchi, Rémi Digonnet & Jodi L. Sandford (eds.), Sensory perceptions in language, embodiment and epistemology. Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-91277-6_8Suche in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor. A practical introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Essentials of cognitive grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0005Suche in Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2004. Ego-based and field-based frames of reference in space to time metaphors. In Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2006. Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics (17). 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog.2006.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2011. Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics (43). 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.003.Suche in Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2014. The spatial language of time. Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.42Suche in Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert. 1980. Musical time/musical space. Critical Inquiry (6). 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/448063.Suche in Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E. & Eve Sweetser. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science (30). 401–450. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62.Suche in Google Scholar
Rinaldi, Luca, Francesca, Locati, Laura, Parolin, Nicolò F. Bernardi & Luisa, Girelli. 2016. Walking on a mental time line: Temporal processing affects step movements along the sagittal space. Cortex (78). 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.02.013.Suche in Google Scholar
Spitzer, Michael. 2004. Metaphor and musical thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226279435.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Sullivan, R. Karen & Linh Thuy Bui. 2016. With the future coming up behind them: Evidence that time approaches from behind in Vietnamese. Cognitive Linguistics (27). 205–233. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0066.Suche in Google Scholar
Wen, Xu. 2007. Meaning, cognition and constral. Foreign Language Research (06). 35–39.Suche in Google Scholar
Zbikowski, Lawrence. 2002. Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195140231.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
