Abstract
This diachronic, corpus-based study examines Spanish constructions formed with the verb tomar ‘take’ and nouns of ‘emotion’, including endogenous nouns with a target participant (e.g. cariño ‘affection’), exogenous nouns with a source or cause participant (e.g. tristeza ‘sadness’), and hybrid nouns allowing both options (e.g. miedo ‘fear’). Such constructions involve three different inchoative (‘begin to feel’) subschemas. The first one, the Prepositional-Stimulus subschema (e.g. tomar tristeza de algo ‘grow sad over something’), included exogenous and hybrid nouns and predominated in the Middle Ages, but disappeared by the 1800s. The other two subschemas, formed with endogenous and hybrid nouns, have survived until today. They include the Prepositional-Goal subschema (e.g. tomar cariño por alguien ‘grow fond of someone’), the most frequent of the two in the Middle Ages, and the Dative-Goal subschema (e.g. tomarle cariño a alguien ‘grow fond of someone’, lit. ‘take fondness to someone’), which presumably arose through analogy in the 1400s and subsequently marginalized its prepositional counterpart, becoming the default realization in present-day Spanish. Using the framework of Diachronic Construction Grammar, these changes are analyzed as involving the reconfiguration of a broader network of inchoative light verb constructions with nouns of emotion in Spanish.
Acknowledgment
I thank two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful feedback. All remaining errors are my own responsibility.
References
Alba-Salas, Josep. 2012a. Colocaciones incoativas con tomar y prender en diacronía. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española 7. 3–38. https://doi.org/10.54166/rhle.2012.07.01.Search in Google Scholar
Alba-Salas, Josep. 2012b. The origins and evolution of inchoative collocations with dar in Spanish. Romance Philology 66. 363–393.10.1484/J.RPH.5.100844Search in Google Scholar
Alba-Salas, Josep. 2013a. Cobrar miedo: Sobre el uso histórico de cobrar con sustantivos que designan cualidades o estados negativos. Scriptum Digital 2. 77–106. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/scriptum.45.Search in Google Scholar
Alba-Salas, Josep. 2013b. De ‘recuperar’ a ‘adquirir’: Sobre la evolución histórica de las colocaciones tipo cobrar afecto y cobrar importancia (1200–2000). Romanische Forschungen 125. 151–193. https://doi.org/10.3196/003581213806915530.Search in Google Scholar
Alba-Salas, Josep. 2016. El triunfo del experimentador dativo: Las colocaciones con ‘entrar + nombre de estado’ en diacronía. Revista de Filología Española 96. 9–38. https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2016.01.Search in Google Scholar
Alba-Salas, Josep. 2017. Venir vergüenza: Cambios históricos en las colocaciones con venir. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 133. 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2017-0005.Search in Google Scholar
Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2004. Las construcciones con verbo de apoyo. Madrid: Visor Libros.Search in Google Scholar
Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2009. Noms d’objet ou cause de sentiment dans le Diccionario de colocaciones del español. In Iva Novakoya & Agnès Tutin (eds.), Le lexique des émotions, 251–274. Grenoble: ELLUG Université Stendhal.10.4000/books.ugaeditions.7131Search in Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 2004. From psych-nouns to psych-adjectives in French: Some semantics insights. Journal of Cognitive Science 5. 51–71.Search in Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions, and historical implications. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1–49. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18.01barSearch in Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia. 2001. Light verbs and polysemy. Language Sciences 23. 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(00)00036-x.Search in Google Scholar
CdE : Davies, Mark. 2002–. Corpus del Español. http://www.corpusdelespanol.org (accessed 9 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Company, Concepción. 2006. El objeto indirecto. In Concepción Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, 479–574. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica and Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Search in Google Scholar
CORDE : Real. 2005. Corpus diacrónico del español. http://www.rae.es (accessed 10 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Corominas, Joan & José Antonio Pascual. 1980–1991. Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico. Madrid: Gredos. CD Rom.Search in Google Scholar
CORPES XXI . 2024. Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI. http://www.rae.es (accessed 6 June 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar
DEA: Seco, Manuel, Olimpia Andrés & Gabino Ramos (eds.). 2012. Diccionario del español actual, 2nd edn. Madrid: Aguilar.Search in Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena. 2015. Los nombres psicológicos: Propuestas de análisis en términos sub-léxicos. In Rafael Marín (ed.), Los predicados psicológicos, 211–248. Madrid: Visor.Search in Google Scholar
DICE: Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2004. Diccionario de colocaciones del español. http://www.dicesp.com/paginas (accessed 12 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2020. Paradigms lost, paradigms regained: Paradigms as hyper-constructions. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 277–315. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.08dieSearch in Google Scholar
DRAE: Real Academia Española. 2015. Diccionario de la lengua española, 23rd edn. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. http://dle.rae.es/ (accessed 2 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Dúbský, Josef. 1962. Formas descompuestas en el español antiguo. Revista de Filología Española 46. 31–48. https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.1963.v46.i1/2.959.Search in Google Scholar
DUE: Moliner, María. 2001. Diccionario de uso español, 2nd edn. CD-Rom, version 2.0 Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar
Elvira, Javier. 2011. Constructions of uncontrolled state or event: The increase in productivity of a new argument structure in Old Spanish. Constructions and Frames 3. 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.3.2.02elv.Search in Google Scholar
Eslava Heredia, Cristina. 2012. La alternancia de las preposiciones en/a en verbos de movimiento que denotan penetración en el español de México. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 60. 425–446. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v60i2.1055.Search in Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Miriam R. L. Petruck, Josef Ruppenhofer & Abby Wright. 2003. FrameNet in action: The case of attaching. International Journal of Lexicography 16. 297–333.10.1093/ijl/16.3.297Search in Google Scholar
Flach, Susanne. 2020. Constructionalization and the Sorites Paradox: The emergence of the into-causative. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 45–67. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.01flaSearch in Google Scholar
Flores, Marcela & Chantal Melis. 2015. El fenómeno del sujeto dativo. In Chantal Melis & Marcela Flores (eds.), El siglo XIX: Inicio de la tercera etapa evolutiva del español, 35–79. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Search in Google Scholar
FrameNet II . 2012–. framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu (accessed 24 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gross, Maurice. 1976. Sur quelques groupes nominaux complexes. In Jean-Claude Chevalier & Maurice Gross (eds.), Méthodes en grammaire française, 97–119. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Gyselinck, Emmeline. 2020. (Re)shaping the constructional network: Modeling shifts and reorganizations in the network hierarchy. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 107–140. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.03gysSearch in Google Scholar
Halder, Guido Frank. 2011. A frame-semantic approach to selectional restrictions in German Support Verb Constructions: The case of [in X geraten]. Austin: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2022. Construction Grammar: The structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lorenz, David. 2020. Converging variations and the emergence of horizontal links: To-contraction in American English. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 243–274. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.07lorSearch in Google Scholar
Melis, Chantal. 1998. Sobre la historia sintáctica de gustar. In Claudio García Turza, Fabián González Bachiller & José Javier Mangado Martínez (eds.), Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, vol. 2, 295–306. La Rioja: Universidad de la Rioja.Search in Google Scholar
Melis, Chantal & Marcela Flores. 2012. Emergence and grammaticalization of constructions within the se me network of Spanish. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections, 249–270. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.130.10melSearch in Google Scholar
Melis, Chantal, Marcela Flores & Sergio Bogard. 2003. La historia del español: Propuesta de un tercer periodo evolutivo. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 51. 1–56. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v51i1.2202.Search in Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yuko. 2001. Los verbos de movimiento. Madrid: Visor.Search in Google Scholar
Ortiz Ciscomani, Rosa María. 2011. Construcciones bitransitivas en la historia del español. Mexico City and Sonora: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Universidad de Sonora.Search in Google Scholar
Perek, Florent. 2020. Productivity and schematicity in constructional change. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 141–166. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.04perSearch in Google Scholar
Perseus Digital Library . Crane Gregory R. (ed.). 1995–. Perseus Digital Library. Tufts University. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu (accessed 16 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar
PhiloBiblon: Faulhaber, Charles B., Arthur L.-F. Askins, Harvey L. Sharrer & John G. May. 1997–. PhiloBiblon. http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/philobiblon/search_en.html (accessed 23 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar
REDES: Bosque, Ignacio (ed.). 2004. REDES: Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: SM.Search in Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa. 2010. Los verbos psicológicos con experimentante dativo en español y el cambio histórico. Cuadernos de la ALFAL, Nueva Serie 1. 167–193.Search in Google Scholar
Rodríguez Molina, Javier & Álvaro Octavio de Toledo y Huerta. 2017. La imprescindible distinción entre texto y testimonio: El CORDE y los criterios de fiabilidad lingüística. Scriptum Digital 6. 5–68. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/scriptum.73.Search in Google Scholar
Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2003. Semántica, sintaxis y combinatoria léxica de los nombres de emoción en español. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2008. El verbo tener como marcador aspectual de los nombres de emoción. Español actual 89. 99–110.Search in Google Scholar
Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2012. Aspecto léxico, sentido y colocaciones: Los nombres de sentimiento. Borealis 1. 63–100. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.1.2295.Search in Google Scholar
Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2017. From the heavy to the light verb: An analysis of tomar ‘to take’. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 40. 228–273. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00005.san.Search in Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer. 2020. Introduction. The nature of the node and the network: Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.intSearch in Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte. 2018. Article emergence in Old English. A constructionalist perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110541052Search in Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte. 2020. Constructionalization, constructional competition and constructional death: Investigating the demise of Old English POSS DEM constructions. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 69–103. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.02somSearch in Google Scholar
Spanish FrameNet: Subirats, Carlos (ed.). 2009. Spanish FrameNet. http://spanishfn.org/ (accessed 23 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Extending the scope of Construction Grammar, 141–180. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110366273.141Search in Google Scholar
Vázquez Rozas, Victoria & Elena Rivas. 2007. Un análisis construccionista de la diacronía de gustar. In Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Carlos Inchaurralde & Jesús Sánchez-García (eds.), Language, mind, and the lexicon, 143–164. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Rising datives: tomar ‘take’ expressions with nouns of ‘emotion’ and constructional network reconfiguration in Spanish
- Variation and change in the Swedish periphrastic passive: a constructional approach
- Permittito aperiat oculum: typological considerations on P-lability and its interaction with morphosyntactic alignment in Latin medical texts
- The Indo-Iranian background of the Ossetic future
- The seamlessness of grammatical innovation: the case of be going to (revisited)
- The ‘Still Not’ Present in Andi: identifying the grammaticalization source
- Beyond dynasties and binary alternations: a diachronic corpus study of four-way variability in Chinese theme-recipient constructions
- The reduction of affixes in morphological reanalysis: Polish neuters in -ich-
- Book Reviews
- Alessandro Del Tomba: The Tocharian gender system. A diachronic study in nominal morphology
- Olga Spevak: Nominalization in Latin
- Patrizia de Bernardo Stempel: The accents of Celtic: New light on the older and oldest stages
- Frederik Hartmann: Germanic phylogeny
- Program Review
- IE9.com. Scrivener
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Rising datives: tomar ‘take’ expressions with nouns of ‘emotion’ and constructional network reconfiguration in Spanish
- Variation and change in the Swedish periphrastic passive: a constructional approach
- Permittito aperiat oculum: typological considerations on P-lability and its interaction with morphosyntactic alignment in Latin medical texts
- The Indo-Iranian background of the Ossetic future
- The seamlessness of grammatical innovation: the case of be going to (revisited)
- The ‘Still Not’ Present in Andi: identifying the grammaticalization source
- Beyond dynasties and binary alternations: a diachronic corpus study of four-way variability in Chinese theme-recipient constructions
- The reduction of affixes in morphological reanalysis: Polish neuters in -ich-
- Book Reviews
- Alessandro Del Tomba: The Tocharian gender system. A diachronic study in nominal morphology
- Olga Spevak: Nominalization in Latin
- Patrizia de Bernardo Stempel: The accents of Celtic: New light on the older and oldest stages
- Frederik Hartmann: Germanic phylogeny
- Program Review
- IE9.com. Scrivener