Home Linguistics & Semiotics Rising datives: tomar ‘take’ expressions with nouns of ‘emotion’ and constructional network reconfiguration in Spanish
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Rising datives: tomar ‘take’ expressions with nouns of ‘emotion’ and constructional network reconfiguration in Spanish

  • Josep Alba-Salas EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 28, 2024

Abstract

This diachronic, corpus-based study examines Spanish constructions formed with the verb tomar ‘take’ and nouns of ‘emotion’, including endogenous nouns with a target participant (e.g. cariño ‘affection’), exogenous nouns with a source or cause participant (e.g. tristeza ‘sadness’), and hybrid nouns allowing both options (e.g. miedo ‘fear’). Such constructions involve three different inchoative (‘begin to feel’) subschemas. The first one, the Prepositional-Stimulus subschema (e.g. tomar tristeza de algo ‘grow sad over something’), included exogenous and hybrid nouns and predominated in the Middle Ages, but disappeared by the 1800s. The other two subschemas, formed with endogenous and hybrid nouns, have survived until today. They include the Prepositional-Goal subschema (e.g. tomar cariño por alguien ‘grow fond of someone’), the most frequent of the two in the Middle Ages, and the Dative-Goal subschema (e.g. tomarle cariño a alguien ‘grow fond of someone’, lit. ‘take fondness to someone’), which presumably arose through analogy in the 1400s and subsequently marginalized its prepositional counterpart, becoming the default realization in present-day Spanish. Using the framework of Diachronic Construction Grammar, these changes are analyzed as involving the reconfiguration of a broader network of inchoative light verb constructions with nouns of emotion in Spanish.


Corresponding author: Josep Alba-Salas, Spanish Department, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

I thank two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful feedback. All remaining errors are my own responsibility.

References

Alba-Salas, Josep. 2012a. Colocaciones incoativas con tomar y prender en diacronía. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española 7. 3–38. https://doi.org/10.54166/rhle.2012.07.01.Search in Google Scholar

Alba-Salas, Josep. 2012b. The origins and evolution of inchoative collocations with dar in Spanish. Romance Philology 66. 363–393.10.1484/J.RPH.5.100844Search in Google Scholar

Alba-Salas, Josep. 2013a. Cobrar miedo: Sobre el uso histórico de cobrar con sustantivos que designan cualidades o estados negativos. Scriptum Digital 2. 77–106. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/scriptum.45.Search in Google Scholar

Alba-Salas, Josep. 2013b. De ‘recuperar’ a ‘adquirir’: Sobre la evolución histórica de las colocaciones tipo cobrar afecto y cobrar importancia (1200–2000). Romanische Forschungen 125. 151–193. https://doi.org/10.3196/003581213806915530.Search in Google Scholar

Alba-Salas, Josep. 2016. El triunfo del experimentador dativo: Las colocaciones con ‘entrar + nombre de estado’ en diacronía. Revista de Filología Española 96. 9–38. https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2016.01.Search in Google Scholar

Alba-Salas, Josep. 2017. Venir vergüenza: Cambios históricos en las colocaciones con venir. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 133. 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2017-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2004. Las construcciones con verbo de apoyo. Madrid: Visor Libros.Search in Google Scholar

Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2009. Noms d’objet ou cause de sentiment dans le Diccionario de colocaciones del español. In Iva Novakoya & Agnès Tutin (eds.), Le lexique des émotions, 251–274. Grenoble: ELLUG Université Stendhal.10.4000/books.ugaeditions.7131Search in Google Scholar

Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 2004. From psych-nouns to psych-adjectives in French: Some semantics insights. Journal of Cognitive Science 5. 51–71.Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions, and historical implications. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1–49. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18.01barSearch in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brugman, Claudia. 2001. Light verbs and polysemy. Language Sciences 23. 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(00)00036-x.Search in Google Scholar

CdE : Davies, Mark. 2002–. Corpus del Español. http://www.corpusdelespanol.org (accessed 9 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Company, Concepción. 2006. El objeto indirecto. In Concepción Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, 479–574. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica and Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Search in Google Scholar

CORDE : Real. 2005. Corpus diacrónico del español. http://www.rae.es (accessed 10 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Corominas, Joan & José Antonio Pascual. 1980–1991. Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico. Madrid: Gredos. CD Rom.Search in Google Scholar

CORPES XXI . 2024. Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI. http://www.rae.es (accessed 6 June 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar

DEA: Seco, Manuel, Olimpia Andrés & Gabino Ramos (eds.). 2012. Diccionario del español actual, 2nd edn. Madrid: Aguilar.Search in Google Scholar

De Miguel, Elena. 2015. Los nombres psicológicos: Propuestas de análisis en términos sub-léxicos. In Rafael Marín (ed.), Los predicados psicológicos, 211–248. Madrid: Visor.Search in Google Scholar

DICE: Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2004. Diccionario de colocaciones del español. http://www.dicesp.com/paginas (accessed 12 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2020. Paradigms lost, paradigms regained: Paradigms as hyper-constructions. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 277–315. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.08dieSearch in Google Scholar

DRAE: Real Academia Española. 2015. Diccionario de la lengua española, 23rd edn. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. http://dle.rae.es/ (accessed 2 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Dúbský, Josef. 1962. Formas descompuestas en el español antiguo. Revista de Filología Española 46. 31–48. https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.1963.v46.i1/2.959.Search in Google Scholar

DUE: Moliner, María. 2001. Diccionario de uso español, 2nd edn. CD-Rom, version 2.0 Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar

Elvira, Javier. 2011. Constructions of uncontrolled state or event: The increase in productivity of a new argument structure in Old Spanish. Constructions and Frames 3. 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.3.2.02elv.Search in Google Scholar

Eslava Heredia, Cristina. 2012. La alternancia de las preposiciones en/a en verbos de movimiento que denotan penetración en el español de México. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 60. 425–446. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v60i2.1055.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Miriam R. L. Petruck, Josef Ruppenhofer & Abby Wright. 2003. FrameNet in action: The case of attaching. International Journal of Lexicography 16. 297–333.10.1093/ijl/16.3.297Search in Google Scholar

Flach, Susanne. 2020. Constructionalization and the Sorites Paradox: The emergence of the into-causative. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 45–67. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.01flaSearch in Google Scholar

Flores, Marcela & Chantal Melis. 2015. El fenómeno del sujeto dativo. In Chantal Melis & Marcela Flores (eds.), El siglo XIX: Inicio de la tercera etapa evolutiva del español, 35–79. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Search in Google Scholar

FrameNet II . 2012–. framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu (accessed 24 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gross, Maurice. 1976. Sur quelques groupes nominaux complexes. In Jean-Claude Chevalier & Maurice Gross (eds.), Méthodes en grammaire française, 97–119. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Gyselinck, Emmeline. 2020. (Re)shaping the constructional network: Modeling shifts and reorganizations in the network hierarchy. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 107–140. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.03gysSearch in Google Scholar

Halder, Guido Frank. 2011. A frame-semantic approach to selectional restrictions in German Support Verb Constructions: The case of [in X geraten]. Austin: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2022. Construction Grammar: The structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, David. 2020. Converging variations and the emergence of horizontal links: To-contraction in American English. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 243–274. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.07lorSearch in Google Scholar

Melis, Chantal. 1998. Sobre la historia sintáctica de gustar. In Claudio García Turza, Fabián González Bachiller & José Javier Mangado Martínez (eds.), Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, vol. 2, 295–306. La Rioja: Universidad de la Rioja.Search in Google Scholar

Melis, Chantal & Marcela Flores. 2012. Emergence and grammaticalization of constructions within the se me network of Spanish. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections, 249–270. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.130.10melSearch in Google Scholar

Melis, Chantal, Marcela Flores & Sergio Bogard. 2003. La historia del español: Propuesta de un tercer periodo evolutivo. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 51. 1–56. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v51i1.2202.Search in Google Scholar

Morimoto, Yuko. 2001. Los verbos de movimiento. Madrid: Visor.Search in Google Scholar

Ortiz Ciscomani, Rosa María. 2011. Construcciones bitransitivas en la historia del español. Mexico City and Sonora: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Universidad de Sonora.Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent. 2020. Productivity and schematicity in constructional change. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 141–166. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.04perSearch in Google Scholar

Perseus Digital Library . Crane Gregory R. (ed.). 1995–. Perseus Digital Library. Tufts University. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu (accessed 16 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar

PhiloBiblon: Faulhaber, Charles B., Arthur L.-F. Askins, Harvey L. Sharrer & John G. May. 1997–. PhiloBiblon. http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/philobiblon/search_en.html (accessed 23 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar

REDES: Bosque, Ignacio (ed.). 2004. REDES: Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: SM.Search in Google Scholar

Rivero, María Luisa. 2010. Los verbos psicológicos con experimentante dativo en español y el cambio histórico. Cuadernos de la ALFAL, Nueva Serie 1. 167–193.Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez Molina, Javier & Álvaro Octavio de Toledo y Huerta. 2017. La imprescindible distinción entre texto y testimonio: El CORDE y los criterios de fiabilidad lingüística. Scriptum Digital 6. 5–68. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/scriptum.73.Search in Google Scholar

Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2003. Semántica, sintaxis y combinatoria léxica de los nombres de emoción en español. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2008. El verbo tener como marcador aspectual de los nombres de emoción. Español actual 89. 99–110.Search in Google Scholar

Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2012. Aspecto léxico, sentido y colocaciones: Los nombres de sentimiento. Borealis 1. 63–100. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.1.2295.Search in Google Scholar

Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2017. From the heavy to the light verb: An analysis of tomar ‘to take’. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 40. 228–273. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00005.san.Search in Google Scholar

Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer. 2020. Introduction. The nature of the node and the network: Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.intSearch in Google Scholar

Sommerer, Lotte. 2018. Article emergence in Old English. A constructionalist perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110541052Search in Google Scholar

Sommerer, Lotte. 2020. Constructionalization, constructional competition and constructional death: Investigating the demise of Old English POSS DEM constructions. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 69–103. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.27.02somSearch in Google Scholar

Spanish FrameNet: Subirats, Carlos (ed.). 2009. Spanish FrameNet. http://spanishfn.org/ (accessed 23 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Extending the scope of Construction Grammar, 141–180. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110366273.141Search in Google Scholar

Vázquez Rozas, Victoria & Elena Rivas. 2007. Un análisis construccionista de la diacronía de gustar. In Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Carlos Inchaurralde & Jesús Sánchez-García (eds.), Language, mind, and the lexicon, 143–164. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-02-25
Accepted: 2023-08-21
Published Online: 2024-10-28
Published in Print: 2024-11-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2024-2028/pdf
Scroll to top button