Permittito aperiat oculum: typological considerations on P-lability and its interaction with morphosyntactic alignment in Latin medical texts

References

Adams, James N. 1995. Pelagonius and Latin veterinary terminology in the Roman Empire. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004377363Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511843433Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 2016. An anthology of informal Latin, 200 BC–AD 900: Fifty texts with translations and linguistic commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139626446Search in Google Scholar

Audollent, Auguste. 1904. Defixionum tabellae quotquot innotuerunt tam in Graecis orientis quam in totius occidentis partibus praeteratticas in Corpore inscriptionum atticarum editas. Paris: Albert Fontemoing.Search in Google Scholar

Bahrt, Nicklas N. 2021. Voice syncretism. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Brigitte. 2009. Word order. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on Latin syntax, vol. 1: Syntax of the sentence, 241–316. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110205626.241Search in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia. 2006. Split intransitivity in Italian. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110896053Search in Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia. 2016. Split intransitivity. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 821–832. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0050Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2009. Case marking and alignment. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 304–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0021Search in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 1998. The loss of voice dimension between Late Latin and Early Romance. In Monika Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds.), Historical linguistics 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 77–100. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.164.06cenSearch in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2001. L’extended accusative e le nozioni di voce e relazione grammaticale nel latino tardo e medievale. In Valeria Viparelli (ed.), Ricerche linguistiche tra antico e moderno, 3–27. Napoli: Liguori.Search in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2006. The rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive auxiliaries. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology, 311–336. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.68.18cenSearch in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2009. Argument structure and alignment variations and changes in Late Latin. In Jóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case, 307–346. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.108.17cenSearch in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2021. Anticausatives and lability in Italian and French: A diachronic-synchronic comparative study. In Silvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (eds.), Valency over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency orientation, 265–304. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110755657-009Search in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2022. Anticausativization in Latin and Early Italo-Romance: The semantics of predicates and the syntax of voice. In Domenica Romagno, Francesco Rovai, Michele Bianconi & Marta Capano (eds.), Variation, contact, and reconstruction in the Ancient Indo-European languages, 243–273. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004508873_011Search in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2015. Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53(4). 677–729. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0015.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2014. P-lability and radical P-alignment. Linguistics 52(4). 911–944. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0012.Search in Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin. 1992. Transitivity/ergativity: The Janus-headed grammar of actions and events. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 105–135. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark. 2008. Semantic alignment systems: What’s what, and what’s not. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 24–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Fedriani, Chiara. 2014. Experiential constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004257832Search in Google Scholar

Feltenius, Leif. 1977. Intransitivizations in Latin. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Search in Google Scholar

Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Fögen, Thorsten. 2011. Latin as a technical and scientific language. In James Clackson (ed.), A companion to the Latin language, 445–463. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343397.ch25Search in Google Scholar

Galdi, Giovanbattista. 2015. Some remarks on the language of the Itinerarium Antonini Placentini. Listy filologické 138(1–2). 41–63.Search in Google Scholar

Gianollo, Chiara. 2014. Labile verbs in Late Latin. Linguistics 52(4). 945–1002. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0013.Search in Google Scholar

Green, John N. 1991. The collapse and replacement of verbal inflection in Late Latin/Early Romance: How would one know? In Roger Wright (ed.), Latin and the Romance languages in the Early Middle Ages, 83–99. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Arbeitspapiere 5. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Cologne.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSearch in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Tania Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IX, 127–144. Ithaca, New York: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833Search in Google Scholar

Heidinger, Steffen. 2010. French anticausatives: A diachronic perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110251357Search in Google Scholar

Heidinger, Steffen. 2014. The persistence of labile verbs in the French causative-anticausative alternation. Linguistics 52(4). 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0014.Search in Google Scholar

Herman, József. 1997. Vulgar Latin, translated by Roger Wright. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Herman, Jószef. 2002. La disparition du passif synthétique latin : Nouvel essai sur l’ècrit et le parlé en latin mérovingien. Estudis Romanics 24. 31–46.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Roland. 2016. On causativity in Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 15(1). 33–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2016-0002.Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Inglese, Guglielmo. 2021. Anticausativization and basic valency orientation in Latin. In Silvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (eds.), Valency over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency orientation, 133–168. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110755657-005Search in Google Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. Middle voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.23Search in Google Scholar

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(1). 77–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9.Search in Google Scholar

Korkiakangas, Timo. 2016. Morphosyntactic realignment and markedness change in Late Latin: Evidence from charter texts. Pallas 102. 287–296. https://doi.org/10.4000/pallas.3763.Search in Google Scholar

Kühner, Raphael & Carl Stegmann. 1976. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, part 2: Satzlehre, vol. 1. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 1998. Passive, anticausative and classification of verbs: The case of Vedic. In Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds.), Typology of verbal categories, 139–153. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110913750.139Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2011. Voice typology. In Jae J. Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0019Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid & Nikolaos Lavidas. 2014. Introduction. In Leonid Kulikov & Nikolaos Lavidas (eds.), Typology of labile verbs: Focus on diachrony [Special issue]. Linguistics 53(4). 871–877.10.1515/ling-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar

La Fauci, Nunzio. 1988. Oggetti e soggetti nella formazione della morfosintassi romanza. Pisa: Giardini.Search in Google Scholar

La Fauci, Nunzio. 1997. Per una teoria grammaticale del mutamento morfosintattico: Dal latino verso il romanzo. Pisa: ETS.Search in Google Scholar

Langslow, David. 2000. Medical Latin in the Roman empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198152798.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2010. Transitivity alternations in diachrony: Changes in argument structure and voice morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publisher.Search in Google Scholar

Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2016. Latin causativization in typological perspective. In Paolo Poccetti (ed.), Latinitatis rationes. Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Rome, 2013, 917–941. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110431896-057Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

McMillion, Alan. 2006. Labile verbs in English: Their meaning, behavior and structure. Stockholm: Stockholm University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, D. Garry. 1993. Complex verb formation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.95Search in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua 45. 233–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(78)90026-8.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62(1). 56–119. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1986.0014.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2). 149–211. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.005.Search in Google Scholar

Önnerfors, Alf. 1963. In medicinam Plinii studia philologica: De memoria et uerborum contextu opusculi, de elocutione et aetate deque iis operibus, quibus medio aeuo conceptum est. Lund: Gleerup.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 1991. Evidence for SVO in Latin? In Roger Wright (ed.), Latin and the Romance languages in the Early Middle Ages, 69–82. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin syntax, vol. I: The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2021. The Oxford Latin syntax, vol. II: The complex sentence and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199230563.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. 1985. The extended accusative/restricted nominative in perspective. In Frans Plank (ed.), Relational typology, 269–310. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110848731.269Search in Google Scholar

Rovai, Francesco. 2005. L’estensione dell’accusativo in latino tardo e medievale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 90. 54–89.Search in Google Scholar

Rovai, Francesco. 2012. Sistemi di codifica argomentale: Tipologia ed evoluzione. Pisa: Pacini.Search in Google Scholar

Rovai, Francesco. 2014. Case marking in absolute constructions: Further evidence for a semantically based alignment in Late Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 13(1). 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2014-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.126Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Florian. 2009. The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2). 641–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00127.x.Search in Google Scholar

Siller-Runggaldier, Heidi. 2011. Changes of valence and their effect on objects. In Giuliana Fiorentino (ed.), Romance objects: Transitivity in Romance languages, 187–216. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota. 1997 [1991]. The parameter of aspect, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2010. Constituent order in classical Latin prose. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.117Search in Google Scholar

TLL = Thesaurus Linguae Latinae. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. & David P. Wilkins. 1996. The case for “effector”: Case roles, agents and agency revisited. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 289–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198235392.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371.Search in Google Scholar

Zamboni, Alberto. 1998. Dal latino tardo al romanzo arcaico: Aspetti diacronico-tipologici della flessione nominale. In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Sintassi storica. Atti del XXX congresso internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana, Pavia, 26–28 settembre 1996, 127–146. Roma: Bulzoni.Search in Google Scholar

Zuñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä. 2019. Grammatical voice (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar