Aspectual transitions and lexical derivations: mapping inchoativity in French and Spanish grammar
-
Filip Verroens
und
María Martínez-Atienza
Abstract
The paper aims to provide a typological analysis of inchoativity in Romance languages, specifically focusing on French and Spanish. The concept of inchoativity, which marks the beginning of an event or change of state, has been ambiguously used and inconsistently defined across linguistic studies. The paper highlights the complexities in terminology, where the same term may represent different concepts or be applied in varied contexts. Two primary approaches are explored: the onomasiological perspective, which examines how inchoativity is expressed through lexical and grammatical elements, and the semasiological perspective, which focuses on the morphological features of verbs denoting state changes. Finally, the paper examines if an integrated approach, attempting to bridge these perspectives, can be defended. In contrast to earlier studies, we conclude that significant challenges remain in reconciling them at the semantic level.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
Anghelescu, Nadia. 2004. La langue arabe dans une perspective typologique. Bucarest: Édition de l’université de Bucarest.Suche in Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 1990. L’opposition longtemps / longuement: Durée objective et durée subjective. Langue Française 88. 90–116. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1990.5755.Suche in Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 2006. Les verbes du deuxième groupe. Des inchoatifs? Cahiers de Lexicologie 89. 5–28.Suche in Google Scholar
Aparicio, Juan, Marta Coll-Florit & Irene Castellon. 2014. Inchoative periphrases: Cognitive approach and study of corpus. Sintagma 26. 73–88.Suche in Google Scholar
Ballabriga, Michel. 2005. Sémantique textuelle 2. Online. http://www.revue-texto.net/1996-2007/Reperes/Cours/Ballabriga2/index.html (Consulted on 19 November 2025).Suche in Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 2016. Vínculos semánticos entre las interpretaciones del adverbio todavía. In A. López Serena. A. Narbona Jiménez & S. Del Rey Quesada (Dirs.), El español a través del tiempo: Estudios ofrecidos a Rafael Cano Aguilar, vol. 1, 203–228. Sevilla: Editorial de la Universidad de Sevilla.Suche in Google Scholar
Brunot, Ferdinand. 1936. La pensée et la langue. Méthodes, principes et plan d’une théorie nouvelle du langage appliquée au français. Paris: Masson et Cie.Suche in Google Scholar
Carrasco Gutiérrez, Ángeles. 2006a. “Comenzar a + infinitivo”. en L. García Fernández dir.: Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, 103–105. Madrid: Gredos.Suche in Google Scholar
Carrasco Gutiérrez, Ángeles. 2006b. “Empezar a + infinitivo”. en L. García Fernández dir.: Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, 130–133. Madrid: Gredos.Suche in Google Scholar
Carrasco Gutiérrez, Ángeles. 2006c. “Ponerse a + infinitivo”. en L. García Fernández dir.: Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, 218–223. Madrid: Gredos.Suche in Google Scholar
Ciszewska, Ewa. 2004. L’inchoatif et les moyens de son expression en français. Neophilologica 16. 7–19. https://doi.org/10.31261/neo.2004.16.01.Suche in Google Scholar
Colmant, Guy. 1971. L’aspect inchoatif en français. Langage et l’Homme: Recherches Pluridisciplinaires sur le Langage 15. 59–62.Suche in Google Scholar
Comer, Marie. 2018. Desplazamiento, incoación y causación: Sobre la cuasi-sinonimia y gramaticalización de poner y meter en español. Ghent: Ghent University Doctoral dissertation.10.1515/9783110662757Suche in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspects and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena. 1999. El aspecto léxico. In I. Bosque y & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2, 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Suche in Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena, and Marina Fernández Lagunilla 2000: “El operador aspectual se”. en Revista Espanola de Linguistica. 30. 13–43.Suche in Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta. 1994. La semántica de los verbos de ‘cambio’. Cuadernos de Lingüística del Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset 2. 55–82.Suche in Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini, Itamar Francez & Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2013. From change to value difference in degree achievements. Proceedings of SALT 23. 97–115. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v23i0.2664.Suche in Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Suche in Google Scholar
Elvira, Javier. 2001. Sobre la distribución columnar de la flexión incoativa medieval. Cahiers de Linguistique et de Civilisation Hispaniques Médiévales. 24. 167–179. https://doi.org/10.3406/cehm.2001.1173.Suche in Google Scholar
Felíu Arquiola, Elena. 2009. Palabras con estructura interna. In E. de Miguel (ed.), Panorama de la lexicología, 51–82. Barcelona: Ariel.Suche in Google Scholar
Fenn, Peter. 1987. A semantic and pragmatic examination of the English perfect. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Fogsgaard, Lene. 2001. Algunas perífrasis incoativas con A + infinitivo. In S. Pastor Cesteros y V. Salazar (eds.), Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante. 247–260.10.14198/ELUA2001.15.10Suche in Google Scholar
Fogsgaard, Lene. 2002. Algunas perífrasis aspectuales del español. Alicante: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante.Suche in Google Scholar
Franckel Jean-Jacques. 1989. Etude de quelques marqueurs aspectuels du français. Genève: Droz.Suche in Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine & Anne-Marie Leonard. 1979. Vers une théorie des aspects. Les systèmes du français et de l’anglais. La Haye: Mouton.10.1515/9783111584560Suche in Google Scholar
García Fernández, Luis. 2000. La gramática de los complementos temporales. Madrid: Visor.Suche in Google Scholar
Garrido Medina, Joaquín. 1991. Gestión semántica de la información pragmática en los adverbios de cambio ‘todavía’ y ‘ya’. Foro Hispánico 2. 11–27.10.1163/9789004485365_003Suche in Google Scholar
Garrido Medina, Joaquín. 1992. Expectations in Spanish and German adverbs of change. Folia Linguistica 26(3–4). 357–402.10.1515/flin.1992.26.3-4.357Suche in Google Scholar
Girón Alconchel, José Luis. 1991a. Tiempo. modalidad y adverbio. Significado y función del adverbio ‘ya’. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Suche in Google Scholar
Girón Alconchel, José Luis. 1991b. Sobre la consideración del adverbio ya como un ‘conmutador’. Revista Espanola de Linguistica 211. 145–153.Suche in Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice & André Goosse. 1993. Le bon usage: Grammaire française. Paris: Louvain-la-Neuve. Duculot. 13e éd. revue.Suche in Google Scholar
Gronemeyer, Claire. 1999. On deriving complex polysemy: The grammaticalization of get. English Language and Linguistics 31. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674399000118.Suche in Google Scholar
Gross, Maurice. 1980. Deux remarques sur l’aspect. In J. David et R. Martin (eds), La notion d’aspect, 69–79. Paris. Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
Gross, Gaston. 1996. Prédicats nominaux et compatibilité aspectuelle. Langages 30. 54–72. https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1996.1740.Suche in Google Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave. 1919 [1975]. Le problème de l’article et sa solution dans la langue française. Paris: Hachette. Réédité par R. Valin. Paris. Nizet et Presses de l’Université Laval. Québec.Suche in Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’. In T. Matthews & D. Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings of SALT9, 127–144. Ithaca. NY: Cornell University CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833Suche in Google Scholar
Hechmati-Ashori, Roksareh. 1984. Étude syntactico-sémantique du verbe commencer et de ses “synonymes”. Thèse de troisième cycle. Paris: Université Paris III.Suche in Google Scholar
Jaberg, Karl. 1925. Die Bezeichnungsgeschichte des Begriffes anfangen. Revue de Linguistique Romane 1. 118–145.Suche in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge-Massachusetts: MIT press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. 2007. Telic senses of deadjectival verbs. Lingua 117. 26–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.09.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Kimball, John. 1973. Get. In J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 2, 205–215. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368804_008Suche in Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(1). 77–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9.Suche in Google Scholar
Kratochvilova, Dana & Jaroslava Jindrova. 2017. Ingressive verbal periphrases in Spanish and Portuguese. Linguistica Pragensia 27(1). 38–56.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter Universitätsverlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda. 2005. Périphrases aspectuelles et temps grammatical dans les langues romanes. In H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot & N. Le Querler (eds.), Les périphrases verbales. Lingvisticae Investigationes. Supplementa 25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lis.25.06lacSuche in Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar & Montserrat Sanz. 1995. “Clíticos y telicidad”. Comunicación en el V Coloquio de Gramática Generativa. La Coruña.Suche in Google Scholar
Lavale Ortiz, Ruth María. 2013. Verbos denominales causativos en español actual. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.Suche in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Suche in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Maria Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity. At the syntax- lexical semantics interface. Massachussets: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2003. Verb augments and meaninglessness in early Romance morphology. Studi di Grammatica Italiana 22. 1–61.Suche in Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2018. The Romance verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199660216.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Maingueneau, Dominique. 1981. Approche de l’énonciation en linguistique française: Embrayeurs, temps, discours rapporté. Paris: Hachette.Suche in Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1941. Atristar — Entristecer: Adjectival verbs in Spanish, Portuguese, and Catalan. Studies in Philology 38. 429–461.Suche in Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael & Louise McNally. 2011. Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(2). 467–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9127-3.Suche in Google Scholar
Marque-Pucheu, Christiane. 1999. L’inchoatif: Marques formelles et lexicales et interprétation logique. In S Vogeleer (ed.), La modalité sous tous ses aspects, 233–257. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004484382_014Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, Robert. 1971. Temps et aspect: Essai sur l’emploi des temps narratifs en moyen français. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
Martínez-Atienza, María. 2012. Temporalidad. aspectualidad y modo de acción. Formas verbales y complementos temporales en español y su contraste con otras lenguas. Muenchen: Lincom.Suche in Google Scholar
Martínez-Atienza, María. 2021. Entre el léxico y la sintaxis: Las fases de los eventos. Bern: Peter Lang AG.10.3726/b17633Suche in Google Scholar
McCoard, Robert W. 1978. The English perfect: Tense-choice and pragmatics inferences. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In I. Bosque y V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2, 1575–1629. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Suche in Google Scholar
Merchán Aravid, Nuria. 2015. Verbos denominales incoativos en español. Universidad de Alicante. Tesis doctoral.Suche in Google Scholar
Merchán Aravid, Nuria. 2017. Verbos denominales incoativos en español. Moenia: Revista Lucense de Linguistica Literatura 23. 29–60.Suche in Google Scholar
Meul, Claire. 2010. The intra-paradigmatic distribution of the infix -I/ESC- from Latin to Modern Romance: Morphomic patterning and beyond. Morphology 20. 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-009-9135-8.Suche in Google Scholar
Nyrop, Kristoffer. 1904. Grammaire historique de la langue française. Copenhague: Gyldendal.Suche in Google Scholar
Paillard, Denis & Francesca Fici Giusti. 1998. Linchoation en russe: Auxiliaires et préverbes. Le langage et l’homme XXXIII. 79–94.Suche in Google Scholar
Pauna, Ramona. 2008. Détermination nominale et aspect. Cahiers de Lexicologie 93. 85–100.Suche in Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert. 1993. Commencer et se mettre à: Une description axiologico – conceptuelle. Langue Française 98. 24–47. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1993.5832.Suche in Google Scholar
Pena, Jesús. 1993. La formación de verbos en español: La sufijación verbal. In en Soledad Varela (ed.), La formación de palabras, 217–281. Madrid: Taurus.Suche in Google Scholar
Pharies, David A. 2002. Diccionario etimológico de los sufijos españoles y de otros elementos finales. Madrid: Gredos.Suche in Google Scholar
Pottier, Bernard. 1985. Linguistique générale. Théorie et description. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
RAE y ASALE. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Suche in Google Scholar
Riegel, Martin, Jean.-Christophe Pellat & René Rioul. 1994. Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.Suche in Google Scholar
Rifón Sánchez, Antonio. 1997. Pautas semánticas para la formación de verbos en español mediante sufijación. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Suche in Google Scholar
Rousseau, André (ed.). 1995. Les préverbes dans les langues d’Europe: Introduction à l’étude de la préverbation. Marcq-en-Baroeul: Septentrion.Suche in Google Scholar
Safa, Parivash. 1995. L’expression de l’inchoativité en français et en persan. Besançon: Université de Franche-Comté, PhD.Suche in Google Scholar
Sanz, Montserrat. 1996. Telicity. Objects and the mapping onto predicate types. A cross-linguistic analysis of the role of syntax in processing. Universidad de Rochester. Tesis doctoral.Suche in Google Scholar
Sanz, Montserrat & Itziar Laka. 2002. Oraciones transitivas con se: El modo de acción en la sintaxis. In C. Sánchez López (ed.), Las construcciones con se, 311–338. Madrid: Visor.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwarze, Christophe. 2009. On the development of Latin -sk- to French and Italian - Lexicalization. Reanalysis and spreading. Rivista di Linguistica 21. 343–382.Suche in Google Scholar
Serrano Dolader, David. 1995. Las formaciones parasintéticas en español. Madrid: Arco Libros.Suche in Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. S. 1997. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer academic.10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6Suche in Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko. 1967. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Nouvelle éd. París: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Hulle, Sven. 2024. The productivity of the inchoative construction in Peninsular Spanish: From ’break to cry’ to ’dive to read’. Ghent: Ghent University Doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610578.001Suche in Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell university press.10.7591/9781501743726Suche in Google Scholar
Verroens, Filip. 2011. La construction inchoative se mettre à: Syntaxe. sémantique et grammaticalisation. Ghent: Ghent University Doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Verroens, Filip. 2018. Sur la notion d’inchoatif en linguistique française. Travaux de Linguistique 76. 91–111.10.3917/tl.076.0091Suche in Google Scholar
Verroens, Filip. 2024. Zooming in on the semantics of French ingressives: A collostructional analysis. Journal of French Language Studies. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959269524000012.Suche in Google Scholar
Verroens, Filip & Ludovic De Cuypere. 2023. French ingressives and (phasal) aspect. A frame-semantic corpus-based analysis. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/ Revue canadienne de Linguistique. 68(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2023.19.Suche in Google Scholar
Von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963. Norm and action: A logical enquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Suche in Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen. 1996. Compositionality of aspect: Evidence from Spanish aspectual se. In Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli y Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Aspects of romance linguistics: Selected papers from the linguistic symposium on romance languages, vol. 24, 475–488. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1987. La réflexivité ergative en français moderne. Français Moderne 55. 23–54.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
