Startseite A comparative typological analysis of passivisation and functional alternatives: Keenan’s passive universals in Eshkevari Gilaki (EG), Hungarian, and lingua franca languages
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A comparative typological analysis of passivisation and functional alternatives: Keenan’s passive universals in Eshkevari Gilaki (EG), Hungarian, and lingua franca languages

  • Yasin Khoshhaldelijani ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. September 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Folia Linguistica
Aus der Zeitschrift Folia Linguistica

Abstract

Passives in some languages are less frequent than in English, and this infrequency is compensated for by alternatives. This typological analysis focuses on passivisation and semi-passive constructions in two lesser-studied languages: Eshkevari Gilaki (EG) and Hungarian. For comparative context, three widely-studied lingua franca languages, English, Mandarin Chinese and Arabic, are also referenced. It evaluates these languages’ conformity to Edward L. Keenan’s universals of passive productivity. The synthesised data are derived from native speakers and existing literature. Hungarian and EG, being topic-prominent, adopt passive-like functional alternatives such as agentless clauses, impersonals and middles. Moreover, the observations challenge the assumed direct correlation between syntactic flexibility and passive productivity. Despite its less-configurational nature, Hungarian prioritises pragmatic role assignment over syntactic promotion. This analysis proposes an extension of Keenan’s framework, arguing that typological restrictions on passivisation emanate not from structural incapacity but from morphosyntactic conditions and discourse-pragmatic priorities. It is also suggested that, given the unique features observed in EG (inchoatives and middles) and Hungarian (telicity), functional alternatives and semi-passives should be integrated into cross-linguistic typology, particularly for languages with low EGIDS rankings.


Corresponding author: Yasin Khoshhaldelijani, Doctoral School of Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

I thank Allah and Ahlulbayt for helping me complete this project, my colleagues, native speakers of Arabic, Chinese, and Hungarian, for providing samples and valuable comments, my family, native speakers of Eshkevari Gilaki, for providing samples and their support, especially my wife, without whom this research could not have been completed, and my teacher, Dr. Nikolett F. Gulyás, who ignited my interest in conducting a typological linguistic analysis.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: The author used GPT 3.5 and GPT 4 for proofreading the content of the manuscript.

  5. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

Aarts, Bas. 2024. English syntax and argumentation. London: Palgrave Publishers Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar

Abu-Chacra, Faruk. 2017. Arabic: An essential grammar. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315620091Suche in Google Scholar

Al-Raba’a, Basem. 2013. The grammatical influence of English on Arabic in the passive voice in translation. International Journal of Linguistics 5(1). 204–218.10.5296/ijl.v5i1.3306Suche in Google Scholar

Alberti, Gábor. 1996. Passivization types in Hungarian. In Proceedings of the third international conference on the structure of Hungarian. Amsterdam.Suche in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2017. Passives and syntax. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.194Suche in Google Scholar

Birhan, Yelay. 2017. Assessment of the qualities of academic writing in senior essays of English graduates: The case of Dire Dawa University. International Journal of English and Literature 8(8). 102–114. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEL2015.0777.Suche in Google Scholar

Borjian, Habib. 2004. Māzandarān: Language and people (the state of research). In Iran & the Caucasus, 289–328. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4030997.10.1163/1573384043076045Suche in Google Scholar

Borjian, Maryam & Habib Borjian. 2023. At the crossroads: Caspian languages through a sociolinguistic lens. In Anousha Sedighi (ed.), Iranian and minority languages at home and in diaspora, 9–36. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110694277-002Suche in Google Scholar

Bubenik, Vit. 1979. Thematization and passivization in Arabic. Lingua 49(4). 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(79)90045-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Markedness: Iconicity, economy, and frequency. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 131–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Charles, N. Li & Sandra A. Thompson. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar, vol. 3. California: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chu, Chauncey C. 1973. The passive construction: Chinese and English. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1(3). 437–470.Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2). 81–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Darzi, Ali & Maryam Danaye Tousi. 2005. Sākht-e ghayr-shakhsi dar guyesh-e Gilaki-ye shahrestān-e Lāhijān [Impersonal construction in the Gilaki dialect of Lahijan city]. The Academy of Persian Language and Literature (Dialectology) 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Darzi, Ali & Maryam Danaye Tousi. 2016. Sākht-e ghayr-shakhsi dar Gilaki-ye Langarud [Impersonal construction in Gilaki of Langroud]. Language Related Research 7(5). 119–142.Suche in Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin & Liesbet Heyvaert. 2007. On the middle voice: An interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics 45(1). 37–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Depraetere, Ilse & Raphael Salkie. 2015. Tense. In Nick Riemer (ed.), The Routledge handbook of semantics, 354–369. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Deyhim, Giti. 2010. Dialectological Atlas of Qasran-e Dakhel. Tehran: Soroush.Suche in Google Scholar

Dezső, László. 1988. Passiveness in Hungarian: With reference to Russian passive. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 291–328. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.16.10dezSuche in Google Scholar

El-Yasin, Mohammad K. 1996. The passive voice: A problem for the English-Arabic translator. Babel 42(1). 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.42.1.03ely.Suche in Google Scholar

Estival, Dominique. 1985. Syntactic priming of the passive in English. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 5(1–2). 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1985.5.1-2.7.Suche in Google Scholar

Fennig, Charles D., David M. Eberhard & Gary F. Simons (eds.). 2022. Ethnologue: Languages of Asia. Dallas: SIL International Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Fenyvesi, Anna. 2005. Az USA nyelvpolitikájának hatása az amerikai magyarok anyanyelvi oktatására. In Attila Benő & N. Sándor Szilágyi (eds.), Nyelvi közösségek – nyelvi jogok, 105–115. Kolozsvár: Anyanyelvápolók Erdélyi Szövetsége.Suche in Google Scholar

Gordon, Raymond G. (ed.). 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 15th edn. Dallas: SIL International Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Grady, Michael. 1969. Varieties of the English middle voice and medio-passive. Linguistics 7(54). 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1969.7.54.5.Suche in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2025. Glottolog 5.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for evolutionary anthropology.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese, 10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Inglese, Giovanni. 2022. Cross-linguistic sources of anticausative markers. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads 2(2). 127–186. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-0943/14224.Suche in Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj & Cecil Nelson. 2001. World englishes. In Anne Burns & Caroline Coffin (eds.), Analysing English in a global context, 123–135. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward. 1985. Passive in the world’s languages. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1: Clause structure, 243–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward. 1987. Universal grammar (RLE Linguistics A: General Linguistics). London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kenesei, István, Robert M. Vago & Ágnes Fenyvesi. 1998. Hungarian. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Khalil, Aziz. 1988. The passive voice in English and classical Arabic: Formation, type and function. Bethlehem University Journal 7/8. 7–38.Suche in Google Scholar

Khoshsirat, Zia. 2026. The unexpected passive suffix in Gilaki Foomanati. In Reza Falahati & Zahra Ghane (eds.), Handbook of phonetics and phonology of modern Iranian languages. Berlin: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mallette, Karla. 2014. Lingua franca. In Peregrine Horden & Sharon Kinoshita (eds.), A companion to Mediterranean history, 330–344. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118519356.ch21Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, Jim. 2008. An introduction to English syntax. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Minahan, James B. 2016. Encyclopaedia of stateless nations: Ethnic and national groups around the world. Santa Barbara, California: Greenwood.10.5040/9798216018605Suche in Google Scholar

Nasidze, I., D. Quinque, M. Rahmani, S. A. Alemohamad & M. Stoneking. 2006. Concomitant replacement of language and mtDNA in South Caspian populations of Iran. Current Biology: CB 16(7). 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.021.Suche in Google Scholar

Nelson, Gerald & Sidney Greenbaum. 2018. An introduction to English grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315720319Suche in Google Scholar

Nordquist, Richard. 2020. Definitions and examples of passivization in English. https://www.thoughtco.com/passivization-1691489 (accessed 25 September 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Pakpour, Padideh. 2015. Identity construction. The case of young women in Rasht. Uppsala University PhD Dissertation. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:845051/FULLTEXT01.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Rastorgueva, Vera Sergeevna, Aida A. Kerimova, A. K. Mamedzade, Ludmila A. Pireiko, Džoj Iosifovna Edel’man & R. M. Lockwood. 2012. The Gilaki language. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Available at: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-182789.Suche in Google Scholar

Rostami Sammak, Mohaddese, Ali Darzi & Maryam Danaye Tousi. 2015. Sākht-e ghayr-shakhsi dar Gilaki-ye shahrestān-e Langarud [Impersonal construction in Gilaki, Langrud County]. Language Searches (Comparative Language and Literature Research) 6(34). 119–142.Suche in Google Scholar

Rounds, Carol. 2009. Hungarian: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203886199Suche in Google Scholar

Saad, George N. 1974. Causatives and passives in Arabic. an-Nashra 7(1). 22–31.Suche in Google Scholar

Shabani, Mansour. 2020. Tamayoz-e miān-e zabān o guyesh: Barresi-ye vaz’iyat-e guneh-ye Gilaki [The distinction between language and dialect: Exploring the state of Gilaki variety]. University of Alzahra Quarterly Journal of Linguistic Studies 12(37). 122–145. https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2020.28358.1787.Suche in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 2013. Passive constructions. In Matthew Stuart Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world Atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/107 (accessed 3 December 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Stilo, Donald. 2001. Gilan, X. Languages. In Ehsan Yarshater (ed.), Encyclopædia Iranica, vol. X (Fisheries-Gindaros), 660–668. Bibliotheca Persica Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stilo, Donald L. 2015. An introduction to the Atlas of the Araxes-Iran linguistic area. In Bernard Comrie & Lucía Golluscio (eds.), Language contact and documentation/Contacto lingüístico y documentación, 343–356. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Stilo, Donald. 2018. The Caspian region and south Azerbaijan: Caspian and tatic. In Geoffrey Haig & Geoffrey Khan (eds.), The Languages and Linguistics of western Asia: An areal perspective, vol. 6. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.10.1515/9783110421682-019Suche in Google Scholar

Suárez-Palma, Ignacio & Antonio Santamaría-Gallego. 2024. Noncore datives in Basque and Spanish impersonal, passive, and anticausative sentences. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 13(1). 29–55. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.13.1.7468.Suche in Google Scholar

Tankó, Enikő. 2016. On the Hungarian equivalents of the English passive in literary translations. A case study on the translations of two novels. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 8(2). 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2016-0020.Suche in Google Scholar

Tompa, József (ed.). 1961. A mai magyar nyelv rendszere [The System of Present-day Hungarian]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Suche in Google Scholar

Vahedi Langroudi, Mohammad Mahdi. 2007. Barresi-ye sākht-hā-ye ghayr-shakhsi (qālebi) dar chahār guneh-ye zabāni [A study of impersonal (template) constructions in four language varieties]. The Academy of Persian Language and Literature (Syntax) 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Li. 2004. Hanyu shi gao 汉语史稿 [History of Mandarin]. Beijing: Zhonghua Chubanshe.Suche in Google Scholar

Weiner, E. Judith & William Labov. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007441.Suche in Google Scholar

Xiao, Robert, Tony McEnery & Yufang Qian. 2006. Passive constructions in English and Chinese: A corpus-based contrastive study. Languages in Contrast 6(1). 109–149. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.6.1.05xia.Suche in Google Scholar

Yip, Po-ching & Danny Rimmington. 2006. Chinese: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203969793Suche in Google Scholar

Zamani Roodsari, Sedighe. 2023. Gilaki: From language regimes into minoritizing. Studies in Linguistics and Literature 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v7n1p41.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Liulin. 2018. The Chinese notional passive construction under the view of cognitive construction grammar. Acta Linguistica Asiatica 8(2). 83–110. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.8.2.83-110.Suche in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. 1982. Stranded to and phonological phrasing in English. Linguistics 20(1–2). 3–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1982.20.1-2.33-58 Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-08-09
Accepted: 2025-08-17
Published Online: 2025-09-15

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 18.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2024-0007/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen