Home Linguistics & Semiotics Romanian presumptive in interaction: evidentiality and beyond
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Romanian presumptive in interaction: evidentiality and beyond

  • Cecilia Mihaela Popescu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 7, 2024

Abstract

The paper emphasizes the pragmatic and discursive extensions of a special verbal structure – at its origin, a Future Tense form – known in Romanian linguistics as presumptive mood (hereinafter: PRESUMPT). In terms of evidentiality, the PRESUMPT has two types of meanings: an inferential meaning, expressing an inference-based supposition, and also a reportative meaning, when the utterer does not take responsibility for the truthfulness of information from another source. These significances are very subtle and closely related to their context of use. That is why, sometimes, it is very difficult to distinguish one value from another. Therefore, Romanian PRESUMPT deploys in discourse pragmatic enrichments depending on the syntactic-enunciative structure it is inserted in or on some other parameters, such as: speaker’s epistemic stance, genre of discourse, intersubjectivity, and extends its core meaning of evidentiality through a range of discursive dimensions. Considering this situation, our approach outlines that a complex rhetorical strategy is involved in such contexts, where the PRESUMPT actualizes in fact only its prototypical feature [+placement in a subsequent relation (“ultériorité” – see Bres 2012. Conditionnel et ultériorité dans le passé: De la subjectivité à l’objectivité. In SHS Web of Conferences, Volume 1 (3ème Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française), 1719–1730.)], exclusively marking the relation of subsequence of the hypothesis or of the quoted speech act (in counter-argumentative frames) compared to a previously mentioned state of facts.


Corresponding author: Cecilia Mihaela Popescu, Department of Romance and Classical Languages, University of Craiova, Faculty of Letters, A.I. Cuza Street, no. 13-15, 200585 Craiova, Romania, E-mail:

References

Bermúdez, Fernando W. 2005. Evidencialidad. La codificación lingüística del punto de vista. Stockholm: Stockholm University doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bres, Jacques. 2012. Conditionnel et ultériorité dans le passé: De la subjectivité à l’objectivité. In SHS Web of Conferences, Volume 1 (3ème Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française), 1719–1730. Available at: http://www.linguistiquefrancaise.org/index.php?option=com_article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/shsconf/pdf/2012/01/shsconf_cmlf12_000037.pdf.10.1051/shsconf/20120100037Search in Google Scholar

Călăraşu, Cristina. 1997. Timp, Mod, Aspect în Limba Română în Secolele al XVI-lea – al XVIII-lea. Bucureşti: Tipografia Universităţii din Bucureşti.Search in Google Scholar

Camus, Albert. 1993. Caligula. Le malentendu, collection «Folio». Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Corcheş, Cristina & Diana Roman. 2011. Observations on the regenerative capacity of grammatical structures: The Romanian present presumptive. In Tomiţă Ciulei, Cristian Sandache & Antonio Sandu (eds.), Logos, Universalitate, Mentalitate, Educaţie, Noutate. Secţiunea Filosofie şi Ştiinţe Umaniste/Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty. Section: Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences, vol. 1, 309–324. Iaşi: Lumen.Search in Google Scholar

Figueras, Carolina & Adrián Cabedo (eds.). 2018. Perspectives on evidentiality in Spanish: Explorations across genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.290Search in Google Scholar

Florea, Vladimir. 1980. Existe-t-il un mode présomptif en roumain? In André Joly & W. H. Hirtle (eds.), Langage et Psychomécanique du Langage. Etudes dédiées à Roch Valin, 326–333. Lille – Laval: Presses Universitaires de Lille & Presses de l’Université Laval – Québec.Search in Google Scholar

GALR. 2005. Academia Română and Institutul de Lingvistică “Iorgu Iordan – Al. Rosetti”. Gramatica Limbii Române, vol. I: Cuvântul, vol. II: Enunţul. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române.Search in Google Scholar

Iliescu, Maria. 1999. Pour un statut sémantique et syntaxique du ‘présomptif’ roumain. In Rosanna Brusegan & Michele A. Cortelazzo (eds.), Omaggio a Lorenzo Renzi, 97–112. Roma: Esedra.Search in Google Scholar

Pop, Liana. 1984. Prezumptiv şi Presupoziţie. Limba Româna 33(2). 142–148.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Cecilia Mihaela. 2009. La grammaticalisation du présomptif en roumain. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 54(1-2). 151–160.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Cecilia Mihaela. 2012. Le futur, le présomptif et le conditionnel dans le système verbal du roumain. Hypothèses et hypostases. In Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu & Alexandru Nicolae (eds.), Limba Română: Direcţii Actuale în Cercetarea Lingvistică (I): Gramatică. Fonetică și Fonologie. Istoria Limbii Române, Filologie. Actele celui de al 11-lea Colocviu Internaţional al Departamentului de Lingvistică. (Bucureşti, 9−10 decembrie 2011), 199–208. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Cecilia Mihaela. 2013. Viitorul şi condiţionalul în limbile romanice. Abordare morfosintactică şi categorizare semantică din perspectivă diacronică [Future and Conditional Mood in Romance languages. Morpho-syntactic approach and semantic categorization from a diachronic perspective]. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Cecilia Mihaela. 2015. Le ‘futur épistémique inférentiel’ dans les langues romanes. Une approche contrastive (domaine: Français – espagnol – italien – roumain). Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique (RSP) 38. 59–76. https://doi.org/10.4000/rsp.853.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Cecilia Mihaela. 2018. Il futuro concessivo romanzo, un marcatore polifonico, evidenziale e/o inferenziale. In Elena Pîrvu (ed.), Il tempo e lo spazio nella lingua e nella letteratura italiana. Atti del VIII Convegno internazionale di italianistica dell’Università di Craiova, 16–17 settembre 2016, 197–208. Firenze: Franco Cesati Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Cecilia Mihaela & Oana Duță. 2017. Romanian presumptive in Romanian language, an evidential and/or epistemic marker. In Juana I. Marin-Arrese, Julia Lavid López, Marta Carretero, Elena Dominguez Romero, Victoria Martín de la Rosa & María Pérez Blanco (eds.), Evidentiality and modality in European languages. Discourse-pragmatic perspectives, 33–56. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Reinheimer-Rîpeanu, Sanda. 1994a. Om trăi şi om vedea. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 29(2). 179–197.Search in Google Scholar

Reinheimer-Rîpeanu, Sanda. 1994b. Ce-o fi o fi. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 29(5-6). 511–527.Search in Google Scholar

Reinheimer-Rîpeanu, Sanda. 2000. Le présomptif roumain: Marqueur évidentiel et épistémique. In Martine Coene, Walter De Mulder, Patrick Dendale & Yves D’Hulst (eds.), Traiani Augusti vestigia pressa sequamur: Studia linguistica in honorem Lilianae Tasmowski, 481–491. Padova: Unipress.Search in Google Scholar

Rocci, Andrea. 2000. L’interprétation épistémique du futur en italien et en français: Une analyse procédurale. Cahiers de Linguistique Française: Inférences directionnelles, Représentations mentales et Subjectivité 22. 241–274.Search in Google Scholar

Rossari, Corine, Corina Cojocariu, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon. 2007. Devoir et l’évidentialité en français et en roumain’, Discours. Revue de Linguistique, Psycholinguistique et Informatique, vol. 1. http://discours.revues.org/116 (accessed 30 July 2014).10.4000/discours.116Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, Mario. 2004. Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in romance. Lingua 114. 873–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(03)00064-0.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, Mario. 2005. L’evidenzialità in rumeno e nelle altre lingue romanze. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 121(2). 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.2005.246.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, Mario. 2012. Evidentiality in interaction: The concessive use of the Italian Future between grammar and discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 2116–2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.008.Search in Google Scholar

Ţenchea, Maria. 1999. Équivalences françaises du mode présomptif du roumain. In Maria Ţenchea (ed.), Études contrastives (français-roumain), 62–78. Timişoara: Hestia.Search in Google Scholar

Tuţescu, Mariana. 2007. Le ‘probable’ et le ‘possible’, valeurs modales prototypiques dans les langues romanes? In Alexandra Cuniţă, Coman Lupu & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Studii de Lingvistică şi Filologie Romanică. Hommages offerts à Sanda Reinheimer Rîpeanu, 559–563. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Search in Google Scholar

Vet, Co & Brigitte Kampers-Manhe. 2001. Futur simple et futur du passé: leurs emplois temporels et modaux. In Patrick Dendale & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Le conditionnel en français, 89–105. Paris: Librairie Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Vlad, Daciana. 2004. Equivalents roumains du conditionnel français. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Studia Philologia 3. 79–86.Search in Google Scholar

Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12. 51–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil.Search in Google Scholar

Zafiu, Rodica. 2002. Evidenţialitatea în limba românä actuală. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), Aspecte ale dinamicii limbii române actuale, 127–144. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Search in Google Scholar

Zafiu, Rodica. 2009. Interpretări gramaticale ale prezumptivului. In Rodica. Zafiu, Blanca Croitor & Ana-Maria Mihail (eds.), Studii de gramatică. Omagiu Doamnei Profesoare Valeria Guţu Romalo, 289–305. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-31
Accepted: 2023-07-31
Published Online: 2024-02-07
Published in Print: 2025-04-28

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2023-2049/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button