Abstract
The relation evidentiality bears on the coding of some information as presupposition or as implicature is still an underexplored research field. In this paper, such an interplay is addressed by looking into how presupposed and implied contents (differently) respond to contexts of challenge and deniability. As taken for granted information (Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4). 447–457), presupposition is more resistant to both challenging and retracting conversational moves, since it conveys content the speaker does not commit to. By contrast, implicature – characterized as intentional meaning (Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press) – allows both challenging and retracting conversational moves, because it is information the speaker commits to the most, similarly to what happens with plain declarative sentences. Building on this account, it is suggested that the higher challenging and deniability status cued by implicature is related to its function of encoding a direct type of evidentiality (Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press), namely a condition in which the speaker presents herself as the first-hand source of some information. Conversely, the weaker challengeability and deniability associated to presupposition hinges on its property of encoding a mutual type of evidentiality (Hintz, Daniel J. & Hintz Diane M. 2017. The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua. Lingua 186. 88–109), that is, a state in which information is construed and conveyed as already shared by all participants at the moment of utterance.
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Amaral, Patricia & Chris Cummins. 2015. A cross-linguistic study on information backgrounding and presupposition projection. In Florian Schwarz (ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, 157–172. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-07980-6_7Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace Chafe & Joanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality. The linguistic coding of epistemology, 273–312. Norwood (NJ): Ablex.Search in Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire & Jean-Marie Marandin. 2009. Commitment: une attitude dialogique. Langue Française 162. 89–107. https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.162.0089.Search in Google Scholar
Brocca, Nicola, Ewa A. Borowiec & Viviana Masia. 2020. Didactics of pragmatics as a way to improve social media literacy. An experiment proposal with Polish and Italian students in L1. heiEDUCATION Journal 5. 81–107. https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.heied.2020.5.24158.Search in Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Joanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood (NJ): Ablex.Search in Google Scholar
Daneš, František. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In František Daneš (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective, 106–128. Prague: Academia & The Hague.10.1515/9783111676524.106Search in Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford: University of Stanford dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine. 2008. A question of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22. 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22.06gun.Search in Google Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J. & Hintz Diane M. 2017. The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua. Lingua 186. 88–109.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.014Search in Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of information. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.48Search in Google Scholar
Katriel, Tamar & Marcelo Dascal. 1989. Speaker’s commitment and involvement in discourse. In Tobin Yishai (ed.), From sign to text: A semiotic view of communication, 275–297. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/fos.20.21katSearch in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Carol & Paul Kiparsky. 1971. Fact. In Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovitz (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader, 345–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philological Logic 8(1). 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00258436.Search in Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2009. La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana. 2017. Sociobiological bases of information structure. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ais.9Search in Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana. 2020. Presupposition, assertion and the encoding of evidentiality in political discourse. Linguistik Online 102(2). 129–153. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.102.6828.Search in Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana. 2021. The manipulative disguise of truth. Tricks and threats of implicit communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.322Search in Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana, Davide Garassino, Nicola Brocca & Louis de Saussure. 2023. Recalling presupposed information: Evidence from the online processing of presuppositions in political tweets. Pragmatics & Cognition 30(1). 92–119. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22011.mas.Search in Google Scholar
Mazzarella, Diana, Robert Reinecke, Ira Noveck & Hugo Mercier. 2018. Saying, presupposing and implicating: How pragmatics modulates commitment. Journal of Pragmatics 133. 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.009.Search in Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah E. 2017. The semantics of evidentials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199681570.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2005. Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In William Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality (The Expression of Cognitive Categories 1), 1–26. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197570.1Search in Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2012. Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 5. 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.04nuy.Search in Google Scholar
Pagin, Peter. 2004. Is assertion social? Journal of Pragmatics 36(5). 833–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.004.Search in Google Scholar
Récanati, François. 1987. Meaning and force: The pragmatics of performative utterances. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14(56). 479–493.10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479Search in Google Scholar
Saussure, Louis de & Steve Oswald. 2009. Argumentation et engagement du locuteur: pour un point de vue subjectiviste. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 29. 215–243.Search in Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2007. Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4). 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00262951.Search in Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. 1959. Individuals: An essay on descriptive metaphysics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1–2). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2002. Relevance theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 249–290.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The pragmatics of evidentiality: markers, strategies and implications for linguistic theory
- Articles
- Conjectural questions in Sm’algyax
- The epistemic conditional in polar questions as an argumentative strategy
- Evidentials and dubitatives in Finnish: perspective shift in questions and embedded contexts
- Evidential strategies in English: not just lexical
- Romanian presumptive in interaction: evidentiality and beyond
- Some notes on the role of modal particles in weil+V2-clauses in German
- The evidential meaning of presupposition and implicature between retractability and deniability of information
- The interrogative flip with illocutionary evidentials
- Once known, always known. Turn-final sai in North-East regional Italian
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The pragmatics of evidentiality: markers, strategies and implications for linguistic theory
- Articles
- Conjectural questions in Sm’algyax
- The epistemic conditional in polar questions as an argumentative strategy
- Evidentials and dubitatives in Finnish: perspective shift in questions and embedded contexts
- Evidential strategies in English: not just lexical
- Romanian presumptive in interaction: evidentiality and beyond
- Some notes on the role of modal particles in weil+V2-clauses in German
- The evidential meaning of presupposition and implicature between retractability and deniability of information
- The interrogative flip with illocutionary evidentials
- Once known, always known. Turn-final sai in North-East regional Italian