Home Aspectual marking from a typologically uncommon origin: a quantitative account of the development of hamē(w) in Middle Persian
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Aspectual marking from a typologically uncommon origin: a quantitative account of the development of hamē(w) in Middle Persian

  • Roohollah Mofidi ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Peter Petré ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: June 22, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article follows the early grammaticalization path of a durative adverb to an aspect marker for a range of aspectual uses including durative, focalized, and habitual. In a usage-based approach, we investigate the behavior of hamē(w) in a Middle Persian database with respect to several grammatical variables, and we check its developmental path against the model proposed for the Romance languages by Bertinetto, Ebert and de Groot, aiming to uncover the amount of similarities/differences between those Romance languages and Persian. The results show that the lexical origin of the structure investigated locates Middle Persian in stage (iii) of the model, and the development documented deviates from the rest of the model in various respects. Furthermore, the usual priority of past tense in progressive developments is not observed: the adverb is originally present-oriented, but past tense usage increases as the grammaticalization proceeds.


Corresponding author: Roohollah Mofidi, English Department, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and interesting criticism to an earlier version of this paper.

References

Auwera, Johan van der. 1998. Phasal adverbials in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 25–145. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610.25Search in Google Scholar

Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2000. The progressive in romance, as compared with English. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 559–604. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197099.4.559Search in Google Scholar

Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Karen H. Ebert & Casper de Groot. 2000. The progressive in Europe. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 517–558. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197099.4.517Search in Google Scholar

Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Alessandro Lenci. 2012. Habituality, pluractionality, and imperfectivity. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 852–880. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0030Search in Google Scholar

Boyce, Mary. 1977. A word-list of Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian (Acta Iranica 9a). Leiden & Téhéran: Brill & Bibliothéque Pahlavi.10.1163/9789004672031_002Search in Google Scholar

Brunner, Christopher J. 1977. A syntax of Western Middle Iranian. Delmar & New York: Caravan Books.Search in Google Scholar

Bubenik, Vit. 1997. Development of Modern Iranian tense-aspect system. In John Hewson & Vit Bubenik (eds.), Tense and aspect in Indo-European languages: Theory, typology, diachrony, 304–313. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.145.23bubSearch in Google Scholar

Bubenik, Vit. 2019. Grammaticalization and degrammati(calizati)on in the development of the Iranian verb system. In Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Perspectives on language structure and language change, 193–204. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.345.08bubSearch in Google Scholar

Bubenik, Vit & Leila Ziamajidi. 2018. Restructuring of the Iranian tense/aspect/mood system. Lingua Posnaniensis 60(2). 73–98.10.2478/linpo-2018-0013Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cowgill, Warren. 1968. The aorists and perfects of old Persian. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 82(2). 259–268.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Eystein. 2011a. Tense and aspect in Indo-Iranian, part 1: The present and aorist. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(5). 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2011.00273.x.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Eystein. 2011b. Tense and aspect in Indo-Iranian, part 2: The perfect, futurate, participial and periphrastic categories. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(5). 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2011.00272.x.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and the phrasal verb particles out and forth. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 75–104. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.90.06desSearch in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88(3). 601–633. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056.Search in Google Scholar

Deo, Ashwini. 2015. The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of grammaticalization paths: The progressive to imperfective shift. Semantics & Pragmatics 8. 1–52. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.8.14.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). 2004. Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199270934.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Enke, Dankmar, Roland Mühlenbernd & Igor Yanovich. 2016. The emergence of the progressive to imperfective diachronic cycle in reinforcement-learning agents. In Sean G. Roberts, Christine Cuskley, Luke McCrohon, Lluis Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Feher & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 11th international conference (EVOLANG11). http://evolang.org/neworleans/papers/191.html (accessed 16 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Faravashi, Bahram. 1975. Kārnāme-ye Ardashir-e Bābakān [The book of the deeds of Ardashir, Babak’s son]. Tehran: Tehran University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Geenhoven, Veerle van. 2004. For-adverbials, frequentative aspect, and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12. 135–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:nals.0000031389.36427.af.10.1023/B:NALS.0000031389.36427.afSearch in Google Scholar

Geenhoven, Veerle van. 2005. Atelicity, pluractionality, and adverbial quantification. In Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 107–124. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_6Search in Google Scholar

Gignoux, Philippe. 1969. Notes sur la redaction de l’Ardāy Virāz Nāmag : l’emploi de hamē et de bē. In Wolfgang Voigt (ed.), XVII. Deutscher Orientalistentag. Zeitschrift der deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, Supplement 1, 3. 998–1004.Search in Google Scholar

Gippert, Jost, Javier Martínez & Agnes Korn. 2016. Thesaurus Indogermanischer Text- und Sprachmaterialien (TITUS). http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/indexe.htm (accessed 16 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Groot, Casper de. 2007. The king is on Huntunge: On the relation between progressive and absentive in Old and Early Modern English. In Mike Hannay & Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar: In honour of Lachlan Mackenzie, 175–190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.83.10groSearch in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199227761.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Eric M. 2005. Resultatives, derived statives, and lexical semantic structure. Los Angeles: University of California PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Josephson, Judith. 2013. The fate of the subjunctive in Late Middle Persian. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on verbs, 57–77. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.134.02josSearch in Google Scholar

Josephson, Judith. 2016. The construction hamē + verb in Middle Persian. In Éva Á. Csató, Lars Johanson, András Róna-Tas & Bo Utas (eds.), Turks and Iranians: Interactions in language and history, 49–64. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.10.2307/j.ctvc5pftm.9Search in Google Scholar

Jügel, Thomas. 2013. The verbal particle BE in Middle Persian. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 67(1). 29–56.Search in Google Scholar

Killie, Kristin. 2008. From locative to durative to focalized? The English progressive and ‘PROG imperfective drift’. In Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Richard Dury (eds.), English historical linguistics 2006: Syntax and morphology, vol. 1, 69–88. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.295.07kilSearch in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1966. Stative adjectives and verbs in English. In Anthony G. Oettinger (ed.), Mathematical linguistics and automatic translation. Report NSF-17, I-1 – I-16. Cambridge, MA: The Computation Laboratory, Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert. 1989. Le Persan. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, 263–293. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization, 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603353Search in Google Scholar

MacKenzie, David Neil. 1971. A concise Pahlavi dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Colin. 1977. The New Persian preverb bi-. Journal of the American Oriental Society 97(1). 8–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/600269.Search in Google Scholar

Maggi, Mauro & Paola Orsatti. 2018. From Old to New Persian. In Anousha Sedighi & Pouneh Shabani-Jadidi (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Persian linguistics, 7–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736745.013.2Search in Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 2012. Progressive and continuous aspect. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 803–827. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0028Search in Google Scholar

Mattiola, Simone. 2017. The conceptual space of pluractional constructions. Lingue e Linguaggio 16(1). 119–146.Search in Google Scholar

Mattiola, Simone. 2019. Typology of pluractional constructions in the languages of the world. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.125Search in Google Scholar

Mattiola, Simone. 2020. Pluractionality: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass 14(3). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12366.Search in Google Scholar

Mittwoch, Anita. 1991. In defence of Vendler’s achievements. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6. 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.6.05mit.Search in Google Scholar

Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos. 1998. Adverbial quantification in the languages of Europe: Theory and typology. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 147–185. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610.147Search in Google Scholar

Mühlenbernd, Roland & Dankmar Enke. 2017. The grammaticalization cycle of the progressive: A game-theoretic analysis. Morphology 27. 497–526.10.1007/s11525-017-9310-2Search in Google Scholar

Nicolle, Steve. 2007. The grammaticalization of tense markers: A pragmatic reanalysis. In Louis de Saussure, Jacques Moeschler & Genoveva Puskas (eds.), Tense, mood and aspect: Theoretical and descriptive issues, 47–65. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401204446_005Search in Google Scholar

Newman, Paul. 2012. Pluractional verbs: An overview. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Brenda Laca (eds.), Verbal plurality and distributivity, 185–209. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110293500.185Search in Google Scholar

Nyberg, Henrik S. 1974. A manual of Pahlavi. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter. 2016. Grammaticalization by changing co-text frequencies, or why [BE Ving] became the ‘progressive’. English Language and Linguistics 20. 31–54.10.1017/S1360674315000210Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 26 May 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Rashed-Mohassel, Mohammad-Taghi. 2010. Dinkard-e haftom [Dēnkard book 7]. Tehran: Institute for Humanities & Cultural Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1989. Andere Altiranische Dialekte. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, 86–94. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Skjærvø, Prods Oktor. 2009. Middle West Iranian. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 196–278. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sundermann, Werner. 1989. Mittelpersisch. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, 138–164. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Swart, Henriette de. 1993. Adverbs of quantification: A generalised quantifier approach. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Tafazzoli, Ahmad. 1997. Tārikh-e adabiyāt-e Irān-e pish az Eslām [The history of Iranian pre-Islamic literature]. Tehran: Sokhan.Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66. 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371.Search in Google Scholar

Windfuhr, Gernot L. 1979. Persian grammar: History and state of its study. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110800425Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-01-08
Accepted: 2021-05-27
Published Online: 2022-06-22
Published in Print: 2022-11-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2022-2025/html
Scroll to top button