Abstract
This article follows the early grammaticalization path of a durative adverb to an aspect marker for a range of aspectual uses including durative, focalized, and habitual. In a usage-based approach, we investigate the behavior of hamē(w) in a Middle Persian database with respect to several grammatical variables, and we check its developmental path against the model proposed for the Romance languages by Bertinetto, Ebert and de Groot, aiming to uncover the amount of similarities/differences between those Romance languages and Persian. The results show that the lexical origin of the structure investigated locates Middle Persian in stage (iii) of the model, and the development documented deviates from the rest of the model in various respects. Furthermore, the usual priority of past tense in progressive developments is not observed: the adverb is originally present-oriented, but past tense usage increases as the grammaticalization proceeds.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and interesting criticism to an earlier version of this paper.
References
Auwera, Johan van der. 1998. Phasal adverbials in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 25–145. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610.25Search in Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2000. The progressive in romance, as compared with English. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 559–604. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197099.4.559Search in Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Karen H. Ebert & Casper de Groot. 2000. The progressive in Europe. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 517–558. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197099.4.517Search in Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Alessandro Lenci. 2012. Habituality, pluractionality, and imperfectivity. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 852–880. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0030Search in Google Scholar
Boyce, Mary. 1977. A word-list of Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian (Acta Iranica 9a). Leiden & Téhéran: Brill & Bibliothéque Pahlavi.10.1163/9789004672031_002Search in Google Scholar
Brunner, Christopher J. 1977. A syntax of Western Middle Iranian. Delmar & New York: Caravan Books.Search in Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit. 1997. Development of Modern Iranian tense-aspect system. In John Hewson & Vit Bubenik (eds.), Tense and aspect in Indo-European languages: Theory, typology, diachrony, 304–313. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.145.23bubSearch in Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit. 2019. Grammaticalization and degrammati(calizati)on in the development of the Iranian verb system. In Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Perspectives on language structure and language change, 193–204. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.345.08bubSearch in Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit & Leila Ziamajidi. 2018. Restructuring of the Iranian tense/aspect/mood system. Lingua Posnaniensis 60(2). 73–98.10.2478/linpo-2018-0013Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cowgill, Warren. 1968. The aorists and perfects of old Persian. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 82(2). 259–268.Search in Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein. 2011a. Tense and aspect in Indo-Iranian, part 1: The present and aorist. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(5). 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2011.00273.x.Search in Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein. 2011b. Tense and aspect in Indo-Iranian, part 2: The perfect, futurate, participial and periphrastic categories. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(5). 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2011.00272.x.Search in Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and the phrasal verb particles out and forth. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 75–104. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.90.06desSearch in Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88(3). 601–633. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056.Search in Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2015. The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of grammaticalization paths: The progressive to imperfective shift. Semantics & Pragmatics 8. 1–52. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.8.14.Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). 2004. Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199270934.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Enke, Dankmar, Roland Mühlenbernd & Igor Yanovich. 2016. The emergence of the progressive to imperfective diachronic cycle in reinforcement-learning agents. In Sean G. Roberts, Christine Cuskley, Luke McCrohon, Lluis Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Feher & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 11th international conference (EVOLANG11). http://evolang.org/neworleans/papers/191.html (accessed 16 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Faravashi, Bahram. 1975. Kārnāme-ye Ardashir-e Bābakān [The book of the deeds of Ardashir, Babak’s son]. Tehran: Tehran University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Geenhoven, Veerle van. 2004. For-adverbials, frequentative aspect, and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12. 135–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:nals.0000031389.36427.af.10.1023/B:NALS.0000031389.36427.afSearch in Google Scholar
Geenhoven, Veerle van. 2005. Atelicity, pluractionality, and adverbial quantification. In Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 107–124. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_6Search in Google Scholar
Gignoux, Philippe. 1969. Notes sur la redaction de l’Ardāy Virāz Nāmag : l’emploi de hamē et de bē. In Wolfgang Voigt (ed.), XVII. Deutscher Orientalistentag. Zeitschrift der deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, Supplement 1, 3. 998–1004.Search in Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost, Javier Martínez & Agnes Korn. 2016. Thesaurus Indogermanischer Text- und Sprachmaterialien (TITUS). http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/indexe.htm (accessed 16 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Groot, Casper de. 2007. The king is on Huntunge: On the relation between progressive and absentive in Old and Early Modern English. In Mike Hannay & Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar: In honour of Lachlan Mackenzie, 175–190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.83.10groSearch in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199227761.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, Eric M. 2005. Resultatives, derived statives, and lexical semantic structure. Los Angeles: University of California PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Josephson, Judith. 2013. The fate of the subjunctive in Late Middle Persian. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on verbs, 57–77. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.134.02josSearch in Google Scholar
Josephson, Judith. 2016. The construction hamē + verb in Middle Persian. In Éva Á. Csató, Lars Johanson, András Róna-Tas & Bo Utas (eds.), Turks and Iranians: Interactions in language and history, 49–64. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.10.2307/j.ctvc5pftm.9Search in Google Scholar
Jügel, Thomas. 2013. The verbal particle BE in Middle Persian. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 67(1). 29–56.Search in Google Scholar
Killie, Kristin. 2008. From locative to durative to focalized? The English progressive and ‘PROG imperfective drift’. In Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Richard Dury (eds.), English historical linguistics 2006: Syntax and morphology, vol. 1, 69–88. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.295.07kilSearch in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1966. Stative adjectives and verbs in English. In Anthony G. Oettinger (ed.), Mathematical linguistics and automatic translation. Report NSF-17, I-1 – I-16. Cambridge, MA: The Computation Laboratory, Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1989. Le Persan. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, 263–293. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization, 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603353Search in Google Scholar
MacKenzie, David Neil. 1971. A concise Pahlavi dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Colin. 1977. The New Persian preverb bi-. Journal of the American Oriental Society 97(1). 8–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/600269.Search in Google Scholar
Maggi, Mauro & Paola Orsatti. 2018. From Old to New Persian. In Anousha Sedighi & Pouneh Shabani-Jadidi (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Persian linguistics, 7–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736745.013.2Search in Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2012. Progressive and continuous aspect. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 803–827. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0028Search in Google Scholar
Mattiola, Simone. 2017. The conceptual space of pluractional constructions. Lingue e Linguaggio 16(1). 119–146.Search in Google Scholar
Mattiola, Simone. 2019. Typology of pluractional constructions in the languages of the world. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.125Search in Google Scholar
Mattiola, Simone. 2020. Pluractionality: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass 14(3). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12366.Search in Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 1991. In defence of Vendler’s achievements. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6. 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.6.05mit.Search in Google Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos. 1998. Adverbial quantification in the languages of Europe: Theory and typology. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 147–185. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610.147Search in Google Scholar
Mühlenbernd, Roland & Dankmar Enke. 2017. The grammaticalization cycle of the progressive: A game-theoretic analysis. Morphology 27. 497–526.10.1007/s11525-017-9310-2Search in Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve. 2007. The grammaticalization of tense markers: A pragmatic reanalysis. In Louis de Saussure, Jacques Moeschler & Genoveva Puskas (eds.), Tense, mood and aspect: Theoretical and descriptive issues, 47–65. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401204446_005Search in Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2012. Pluractional verbs: An overview. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Brenda Laca (eds.), Verbal plurality and distributivity, 185–209. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110293500.185Search in Google Scholar
Nyberg, Henrik S. 1974. A manual of Pahlavi. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar
Petré, Peter. 2016. Grammaticalization by changing co-text frequencies, or why [BE Ving] became the ‘progressive’. English Language and Linguistics 20. 31–54.10.1017/S1360674315000210Search in Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 26 May 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Rashed-Mohassel, Mohammad-Taghi. 2010. Dinkard-e haftom [Dēnkard book 7]. Tehran: Institute for Humanities & Cultural Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1989. Andere Altiranische Dialekte. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, 86–94. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods Oktor. 2009. Middle West Iranian. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 196–278. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Sundermann, Werner. 1989. Mittelpersisch. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, 138–164. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar
Swart, Henriette de. 1993. Adverbs of quantification: A generalised quantifier approach. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar
Tafazzoli, Ahmad. 1997. Tārikh-e adabiyāt-e Irān-e pish az Eslām [The history of Iranian pre-Islamic literature]. Tehran: Sokhan.Search in Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66. 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371.Search in Google Scholar
Windfuhr, Gernot L. 1979. Persian grammar: History and state of its study. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110800425Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Trapped morphology and the rise of the Slavic definite adjective inflection: a reexamination
- Reevaluating the etymology of Latin reflexives
- Verbs of motion and intermediate source domains of modality: the understudied case of Italian occorrere ‘to be necessary, to be needed’
- Aspectual marking from a typologically uncommon origin: a quantitative account of the development of hamē(w) in Middle Persian
- Rethinking the *-s suffix in Old Chinese: with new evidence from Situ Rgyalrong
- The status of /w/ in Old High German
- When internal reconstruction goes further: proposing the vowel system of Pre-Khroskyabs through examining bound state apophony
- A new sound change for Guarani(an): glottal prothesis, internal classification, and the explanation of synchronic irregularities
- Patterns of individual variation and change in Golden Age Spanish. An analysis of three linguistic variables in a corpus of private correspondence
- Book Reviews
- Jorge Vega Vilanova: Past Participle Agreement. A study on the grammaticalization of formal features
- Lilo Moessner: The history of the present English subjunctive: a corpus-based study of mood and modality
- Serenella Baggio and Pietro Taravacci (eds): Lingue naturali, lingue inventate. Atti della Giornata di Studi (Trento, 29 novembre 2019)
- Program Review
- IE7.com. Reconstructing Greek inscriptions with Ithaca
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Trapped morphology and the rise of the Slavic definite adjective inflection: a reexamination
- Reevaluating the etymology of Latin reflexives
- Verbs of motion and intermediate source domains of modality: the understudied case of Italian occorrere ‘to be necessary, to be needed’
- Aspectual marking from a typologically uncommon origin: a quantitative account of the development of hamē(w) in Middle Persian
- Rethinking the *-s suffix in Old Chinese: with new evidence from Situ Rgyalrong
- The status of /w/ in Old High German
- When internal reconstruction goes further: proposing the vowel system of Pre-Khroskyabs through examining bound state apophony
- A new sound change for Guarani(an): glottal prothesis, internal classification, and the explanation of synchronic irregularities
- Patterns of individual variation and change in Golden Age Spanish. An analysis of three linguistic variables in a corpus of private correspondence
- Book Reviews
- Jorge Vega Vilanova: Past Participle Agreement. A study on the grammaticalization of formal features
- Lilo Moessner: The history of the present English subjunctive: a corpus-based study of mood and modality
- Serenella Baggio and Pietro Taravacci (eds): Lingue naturali, lingue inventate. Atti della Giornata di Studi (Trento, 29 novembre 2019)
- Program Review
- IE7.com. Reconstructing Greek inscriptions with Ithaca