Home A metalinguistic analysis of the terminology of evidential categories: experiential, conjecture or deduced?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A metalinguistic analysis of the terminology of evidential categories: experiential, conjecture or deduced?

  • Satu Keinänen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 10, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

While evidential categories have similar meanings and uses cross-linguistically, the names given to the categories tend to vary. This article surveys the terms for evidentials used in descriptive grammars of 51 languages that have at least three evidential categories. Comparing terms to find common terminological tendencies can provide useful insights into the descriptions of categories. There is great deal of term synonymy and term polysemy, but each evidential category has its typical terms that are semantically motivated. The term synonymy is the result of emphasizing different semantic aspects of the evidential categories, which leads to variable term choices. There is terminological overlap between categories involving sensory perception (i.e. visual, direct, and nonvisual sensory evidentials), inference, and second-hand information, which suggests that they may not always be considered sufficiently conceptually distinct to merit unique terms, especially when the terms for inferential and assumptive evidentials are frequently created from the same words. The variation of the terminology is also connected to how the understanding of evidentiality and relationship to other adjacent categories has developed.


Corresponding author: Satu Keinänen, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, E-mail:

Appendix: List of languages

Africa: 1

Shilluk (Western Nilotic)

America, North: 14

Apache, Western (Athabaskan)

Greenlandic, Western (= Kalaallisut) (Eskimo-Aleut)

Cora (Southern Uto-Aztecan)

Kashaya (= Southwestern Pomo) (Pomoan)

Kwakiutl (Northern Wakashan)

Makah (Southern Wakashan)

Maricopa (Yuman)

Musqueam (Salishan)

Patwin (Wintuan)

Pomo, Eastern (Pomoan)

Pomo, Southeastern (Pomoan)

Pomo, Southern (Pomoan)[6]

Washo (isolate)

Wintu (Wintuan)

America, South: 16

Aymara (Aymaran)

Bora (Boran)

Desano (Eastern Tucanoan)

Hup (Nadahup)

Jarawara (Arawan)

Quechua, Wanka (Quechuan)

Mamaindê (Northern Nambiquaran)

Matses (Panoan)

Mosetén (isolate)

Mỹky (isolate)

Nambikuara (Nambiquaran)

Shipibo-Konibo (Panoan)

Tariana (Arawakan)

Tsafiki (Barbacoan)

Tuyuca (Eastern Tucanoan)

Wanano (Eastern Tucanoan)

Eurasia: 13

Ainu (Ainu)

Akha (Sino-Tibetan, Burmo-Qiangic)

Dulong (Sino-Tibetan)

Enets, Forest (Uralic, Samoyedic)

Ersu (Sino-Tibetan, Burmo-Qiangic)

Ingush (Nakh-Daghestan)

Kalmyk (Mongolic)

Ladakhi (Sino-Tibetan, Bodish)

Nenets, Tundra (Uralic, Samoyedic)

Qiang (Sino-Tibetan, Burmo-Qiangic)

Tibetan (standard) (Sino-Tibetan, Bodish)

Chechen (Nakh-Daghestan)

Wutun (Sino-Tibetan, Sinitic)

Papua New Guinea: 7

Duna (isolate)

Edolo (Bosavi)

Fasu (isolate)

Foe (East Kutubu)

Huli (Nuclear Trans New Guinea)

Ipili (Nuclear Trans New Guinea)

Oksapmin (Nuclear Trans New Guinea)

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. Evidentiality in Tariana. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 131–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54.09aikSearch in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2018. Evidentiality: The framework. In Alexandra Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 1–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.1Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, Janet. 1984. Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 50(3). 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/465835.Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Franz. 1911. Kwakiutl. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages. Part 1 (Smithsonian Institution. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 40), 423–558. Washington: Government Printing Office.Search in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110219036Search in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper. 2018. Evidentiality: The notion and the term. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 261–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.13Search in Google Scholar

Brugman, Claudia M. & Monica Macaulay. 2015. Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 201–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Casad, Eugene. 1984. Cora. In Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), Studies in Uto-Aztecan grammar, vol. 4, Southern Uto-Aztecan grammatical sketches (Summer Institute of Linguistics: Publications in Linguistics 56, 4), 151–459. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Austin.Search in Google Scholar

Casad, Eugene H. 1992. Cognition, history and Cora yee. Cognitive Linguistics 3(2). 151–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1992.3.2.151.Search in Google Scholar

Cornillie, Bert. 2007. The continuum between lexical and grammatical evidentiality: A functional analysis of Spanish parecer. Rivista di Linguistica 19(1). 109–128.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(01)80001-1.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 529–564. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020.Search in Google Scholar

de Reuse, Willem J. 2003. Evidentiality in Western Apache (Athabaskan). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 79–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54.07reuSearch in Google Scholar

Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2). 379–421. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.2.06dic.Search in Google Scholar

Dickinson, Connie. 2002. Complex predicates in Tsafiki. Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. Evidentiality in Jarawara. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 165–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54.10dixSearch in Google Scholar

Eberhard, David Mark. 2009. Mamaindê grammar: A Northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Epps, Patience. 2005. Areal diffusion and the development of evidentiality: Evidence from Hup. Studies in Language 29(3). 617–650. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.29.3.04epp.Search in Google Scholar

Epps, Patience. 2008. A grammar of Hup (Mouton Grammar Library 43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas, Henrik Bergqvist & Lila San Roque. 2018. The grammar of engagement II: Typology and diachrony. Language and Cognition 10(2). 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2017.22.Search in Google Scholar

Fleck, David William. 2003. A grammar of Matses. Houston, TX: Rice University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Floyd, Rick. 1993. The structure of Wanka Quechua evidential categories. San Diego: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael. 2003. Evidentiality in West Greenlandic. A case of scattered coding. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 291–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54.16forSearch in Google Scholar

Garrett, John. 2001. Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Lynn. 1986. The development of evidentials in Maricopa. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 75–88. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Haarala, Risto. 1981. Sanastotyön opas [Guide to terminological work]. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus.Search in Google Scholar

Hansson, Inga-Lill. 2003. Akha. In Thurgood Graham & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 236–251. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hardman, Martha James. 1986. Data-source marking in the Jaqi languages. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 113–136. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021.Search in Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees & Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher. 2015. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics 53(3). 479–524. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. 2012. “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 389–433. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobsen, William HortonJr. 1964. A grammar of Washo language. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobsen, William H.Jr. 1986. The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 3–28. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Kaye, Jonathan Derek. 1970. The Desano verb: Problems in semantics, syntax and phonology. New York: Columbia University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Barbara & Aimée Lahaussois. 2019. Establishing linguistic schools through reading descriptive grammars: A pilot study using Himalayan grammars. Paper presented at the Colloque de la Société d’histoire et épistémologie des sciences du language, 24–26 January 2019, Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Barbarba & Aimée Lahaussois. 2021. Chains of influence in Himalayan grammars: Models and interrelations shaping descriptions of TB languages of Nepal. Linguistics 59(1). 207–245. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0255.Search in Google Scholar

Kittilä, Seppo. 2019. General knowledge as an evidential category. Linguistics 57(6). 1271–1304. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0027.Search in Google Scholar

Koshal, Sanyukta. 1979. Ladakhi grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Search in Google Scholar

Kroeker, Menno. 2001. A descriptive grammar of Nambikuara. International Journal of American Linguistics 67(1). 1–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/466446.Search in Google Scholar

Künnap, Ago. 2002. On the Enets evidential suffixes. Linguistica Uralica 38(2). 145–153.10.3176/lu.2002.2.07Search in Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy J. 2003a. Dulong. In Thurgood Graham & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 674–684. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy J. 2003b. A grammar of Qiang (Mouton Grammar Library 31). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Loughnane, Robyn. 2009. A grammar of Oksapmin. Melbourne: University of Melbourne dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lowe, Ivan. 1999. Nambiquara. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 269–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McLendon, Sally. 1975. A grammar of Eastern Pomo (University of California Publications in Linguistics 74). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

McLendon, Sally. 1996. Sketch of Eastern Pomo, a Pomoan language. In Ives Goddard (ed.), Handbook of North American indians, vol. 17, 507–550. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Search in Google Scholar

McLendon, Sally. 2003. Evidentials in Eastern Pomo with a comparative survey of the category in other Pomoan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 101–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54.08mclSearch in Google Scholar

Miller, Cynthia L. & Leoma G. Gilley. 2007. Evidentiality and mirativity in Shilluk. In Doris L. Payne & Mechthild Reh (eds.), Advances in Nilo-Saharan linguistics: Proceedings of the 8th International Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium, University of Hamburg, August 22–25, 2001, 191–206. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2020. Context and consciousness: Documenting evidentials. Folia Linguistica 54(2). 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/folia-2020-2045.Search in Google Scholar

Monserrat, Ruth & R. M. W. Dixon. 2003. Evidentiality in Mỹky. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 237–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54.13monSearch in Google Scholar

Moshinsky, Julius. 1974. A grammar of Southeastern Pomo (University of California Publications in Linguistics 72). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 1994. Chechen. In Rieks Smeets (ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus 4, 1–77. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.10.1080/02634939508400926Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 2011. Ingush grammar (University of California Publications in Linguistics 143). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina. 2014. A grammar of Tundra Nenets (Mouton Grammar Library 65). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110320640Search in Google Scholar

Nuopponen, Anita & Nina Pilke. 2010. Ordning och reda: Terminologilära i teori och praktik [Order and clarity: Terminology in theory and practice]. Stockholm: Norstedts.Search in Google Scholar

Oswalt, Robert Lewis. 1961. A Kashaya grammar (Southwestern Pomo). California: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Oswalt, Robert L. 1986. The evidential system of Kashaya. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 29–45. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Pitkin, Harvey. 1984. Wintu grammar (University of California Publications in Linguistics 94). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plungian, Vladimir A. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49), 15–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110223972.15Search in Google Scholar

Rule, William M. 1977. A comparative study of the Foe, Huli and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea (Oceania Linguistic Monographs 20). Sydney: University of Sydney.Search in Google Scholar

Sakel, Jeanette. 2004. A grammar of Mosetén (Mouton Grammar Library 33). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110915280Search in Google Scholar

Sandman, Erika. 2016. A grammar of Wutun. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

San Roque, Lila & Robyn Loughnane. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16(1). 111–167. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0003.Search in Google Scholar

San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd & Elisabeth Norcliffe. 2018. Introduction. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity (Typological Studies in Language 118), 1–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.118.01sanSearch in Google Scholar

Schlichter, Alice. 1986. The origin and deictic nature of Wintu evidentials. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 46–59. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siegl, Florian. 2013. Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia (Suomalais-ugrilaisen seuran toimituksia/Mémoires de la Société finno-ougrienne 267). Helsinki: Société finno-ougrienne.Search in Google Scholar

Skribnik, Elena & Olga Seesing. 2014. Evidentiality in Kalmyk. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, 148–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Stenzel, Kristine. 2008. Evidentials and clause modality in Wanano. Studies in Language 32(2). 405–445. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.2.06ste.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2018. Evidentials and person. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 47–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.2Search in Google Scholar

Suttles, Wayne. 2004. Musqueam reference grammar. Vancouver: UBCPress.Search in Google Scholar

Thiesen, Wesley & David Weber. 2012. A grammar of Bora with special attention to tone (SIL International Publications in Linguistics 148). Dallas, TX: SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham. 1986. The nature and origins of the Akha evidentials system. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology in language, 214–222. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicolas. 1994. Personne et médiatifs en tibétain. Faits de langues 3. 149–158. https://doi.org/10.3406/flang.1994.918.Search in Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicholas & Randy J. LaPolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou.Search in Google Scholar

Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2003. Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo, with a comparative overview of the category in Panoan. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 33–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54.05valSearch in Google Scholar

Visser, Eline. 2015. Tensed evidentials: A typological study. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 279–325. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, Neil Alexander. 2013. A grammar of Southern Pomo: An indigenous language of California. Santa Barbara: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Whistler, Kenneth W. 1986. Evidentials in Patwin. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 60–74. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Widmer, Manuel. 2020. Same same but different: On the relationship between egophoricity and evidentiality. In Seppo Kittilä & Henrik Bergqvist (eds.), Evidentiality, egophoricity and engagement (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 30), 263–287. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1). 51–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil.Search in Google Scholar

Zeisler, Bettina. 2017. The emergence of the Ladakhi inferential and experiential markers from a marker for admirativity (non-commitment): The case of ḥdug and snaŋ. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4(2). 259–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2017-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Zeisler, Bettina. 2018. Don’t believe in a paradigm that you haven’t manipulated yourself! – Evidentiality, speaker attitude, and admirativity in Ladakhi (extended version). Himalayan Linguistics 17(1). 67–130. https://doi.org/10.5070/h917136797.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Sihong. 2014. The expression of knowledge in Ersu. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, 132–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-08-05
Accepted: 2021-07-28
Published Online: 2021-09-10
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2021-2030/html
Scroll to top button