‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek

References

Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 15. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v15i0.1753.Search in Google Scholar

Belkadi, Aicha. 2015. Associated motion with deictic directional: A comparative overview. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 16. 49–76.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, David Curtis. 1993. There is more to location than prepositions. Commentary on Landau and Jackendoff. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16. 239. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00029745.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic development study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Bortone, Pietro. 2010. Greek prepositions: From antiquity to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556854.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chantraine, Pierre. 1968. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2014. P-lability and radical P-alignment. Linguistics 52(4). 911–944. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0012.Search in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2008. A constructionist approach to complementation: Evidence from Ancient Greek. Linguistics 46(3). 571–606. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2008.019.Search in Google Scholar

De Pasquale, Noemi. 2017a. Motion-event encoding in Ancient Greek: A typological corpus-based study of Path and Manner expression. Salerno: University of Salerno dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

De Pasquale, Noemi. 2017b. The “classical” way to encode motion. Path and Manner expression in Ancient Greek. In Felicia Logozzo & Paolo Poccetti (eds.), Ancient Greek linguistics: New approaches, insights, perspectives, 679–694. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110551754-691Search in Google Scholar

Filipović, Luna. 2007. Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.91Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64. 501–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531.Search in Google Scholar

Fortis, Jean-Marie & Alice Vittrant. 2011. L’organisation syntaxique de l’expression de la trajectoire: vers une typologie des constructions. Faits de Langues - Les Cahiers 3. 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000006.Search in Google Scholar

Fried, Miriam. 2015. Construction grammar. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – theory and analysis, vol. 2, 974–1003. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0061Search in Google Scholar

Frisk, Hjalmar. 1960. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Georgakopoulos, Thanasis. 2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry: Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames 10(1). 61–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00011.geo.Search in Google Scholar

Georgakopoulos, Thanasis, Eliese-Sophia Lincke, Kiki Nikiforidou & Anna Piata. 2020. On the polysemy of motion verbs in Ancient Greek and Coptic: Why lexical constructions are important. Studies in Language 44(1). 27–69. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18047.geo.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7. 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00080-9.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, William Watson. 2009 [1867]. Syntax of the moods and tenses of the Greek verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511697777Search in Google Scholar

Grinevald, Colette. 2011. On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Faits de Langues - Les Cahiers 3. 3–20.10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000005Search in Google Scholar

Grinevald, Colette & Caroline Imbert. 2008. Twenty years of relational preverbs: A grammaticalization account. In Paper presented at the workshop on New Reflections on Grammaticalization 4 (NRG4). Leuven, 16–19 July 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Guillaume, Antoine. 2016. Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20(1). 81–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0003.Search in Google Scholar

Guillaume, Antoine & Harold Koch. 2021. Introduction: Associated Motion as a grammatical category in linguistic typology. In Antoine Guillaume & Harold Koch (eds.), Associated motion (Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Typology 64), 3–30. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110692099-001Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56(3). 515–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/414448.Search in Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey. 1981. Space and time in Homer: Prepositional and adverbial particles in the Greek epic. New York: Arno Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iacobini, Claudio, Luisa Corona, Noemi De Pasquale & Alfonsina Buoniconto. 2017. How should a “classical” satellite-framed language behave? Path encoding asymmetries in Ancient Greek and Latin. In Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.188.04iacSearch in Google Scholar

Imbert, Caroline. 2010. Multiple preverbation in Homeric Greek: A typological insight. CogniTextes 4. https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.387.Search in Google Scholar

Kay, Paul & Laura Michaelis. 2012. Constructional meaning and compositionality. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 2271–2296. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Koch, Harold. 1984. The category of “associated motion” in Kaytej. Language in Central Australia 1. 23–34.Search in Google Scholar

Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1964. Inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Cognitive grammar. In Flip G. Droste & John E. Joseph (eds.), Linguistic theory and grammatical description, 275–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.75.10lanSearch in Google Scholar

Letuchiy, Alexander. 2009. Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In Alexandre Arkhipov & Patience Epps (eds.), New challenges in typology: Transcending the borders and refining the distinctions, 247–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219067.4.247Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. 2003. On the meaning of prepositions and cases: The expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.67Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia & Chiara Zanchi. 2018. Double accusative constructions and ditransitives in Ancient Greek. In Agnes Korn & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Ditransitive constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective, 25–48. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

McConvell, Patrick & Jane Simpson. 2012. Fictive motion down under: The locative-allative case alternation in some Australian indigenous languages. In Diana Santos, Krister Lindén & Wanjiku Ng’ang’a (eds.), Shall we play the festschrift game? Essays on the occasion of Lauri Carlson’s 60th Birthday, 159–180. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-30773-7_11Search in Google Scholar

Nikitina, Tatiana. 2008. Pragmatic factors and variation in the expression of spatial goals: The case of into vs. in. In Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 175–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.120.09nikSearch in Google Scholar

Nikitina, Tatiana. 2013. Lexical splits in the encoding of motion events from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events, 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.41.08nikSearch in Google Scholar

Nikitina, Tatiana. 2017. Ablative and allative marking of static locations: A historical perspective. In Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 67–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.188.03nikSearch in Google Scholar

Nikitina, Tatiana & Boris Maslov. 2013. Redefining constructio praegnans: On the variation between allative and locative expressions in Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 13(1). 105–142. https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-13130107.Search in Google Scholar

Pompei, Anna. 2014. Verb-particle constructions and preverbs in Homeric Greek between telicization, incorporation and valency change. In The Greek verb. Morphology, syntax, and semantics: Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting on Greek Linguistics In Annamaria Bartolotta (ed.), 253–275. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Rohde, Ada R. 2001. Analyzing path: The interplay of verbs, prepositions, and constructional semantics. Houston: Rice University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner. 1950. Griechische Grammatik, vol. 2: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Sinha, Chris & Tania Kuteva. 1995. Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18(2). 167–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0332586500000159.Search in Google Scholar

Skopeteas, Stavros. 2002. Lokale Konstruktionen im Griechischen: Sprachwandel in funktionaler Sicht. Erfurt: University of Erfurt dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Skopeteas, Stavros. 2008. Encoding spatial relations: Language typology and diachronic change in Greek. STUF - Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(1). 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0006.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.66.05sloSearch in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. & Nini Hoiting. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 20. 487–505. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v20i1.1466.Search in Google Scholar

Smyth, Herbert W. 1920. A Greek grammar for colleges. New York: American Book Company.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Variation and change in English path verbs and constructions: Usage patterns and conceptual structure. In Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events, 223–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.41.10steSearch in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realisation: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 17. 480–520.https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1996. Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), Language and pace, 211–276. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4107.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2017. Neglected aspects of motion representation. In Paper presented at the workshop Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description (NAMED). Paris: École Normale Supérieure, 19–20 May.Search in Google Scholar

Verkerk, Annemarie. 2014. Diachronic change in Indo-European motion event encoding. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4(1). 40–83. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.1.02ver.Search in Google Scholar

Viti, Carlotta. 2008. From space words to transitive markers: The case of ancient Greek en “in”. Transactions of the Philological Society 106(3). 375–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968x.2008.00204.x.Search in Google Scholar

Voirin, Clément. 2016. L’(a)symétrie Source/But : Approche typologique et discursive. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2 MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard. 2001. A typology of displacement (with special reference to Latvian). STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(3). 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2001.54.3.298.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkins, David P. 1989. Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): Studies in the structure and semantics of grammar. Canberra: Australian National University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkins, David P. 1991. The semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of “associated motion” in Mparntwe Arrernte. Buffalo Papers in Linguistics 1. 207–257.Search in Google Scholar

Zaika, Natalia. 2016. The directive/locative alternation in Lithuanian and elsewhere. In Axel Holvoet & Nau Nicole (eds.), Argument realization in Baltic, 333–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/vargreb.3.07zaiSearch in Google Scholar

Zanchi, Chiara. 2017. New evidence for the Source-Goal asymmetry: Ancient-Greek preverbs. In Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 147–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.188.06zanSearch in Google Scholar