References

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11. 1–34.10.1080/01638538809544689Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2011. Affectivity in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective. In Thomas Stehl (ed.), Sprachen in mobilisierten Kulturen: Aspekte der Migrationslinguistik, 231–257. Potsdam: Potsdam University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. On assessing situations and events in conversation: “Extraposition” and its relatives. Discourse Studies 10. 443–467.10.1177/1461445608091882Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond referentiality: The trace of identity in discourse. In Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stance-taking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. & Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk 32. 433–451.10.1515/text-2012-0021Search in Google Scholar

Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stance-taking in discourse: An introduction. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stance-taking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164Search in Google Scholar

Etelämäki, Marja. 2009. The Finnish demonstrative pronouns in light of interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 25–46.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Finegan, Edward. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: An introduction. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554469.001Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A. 1993. Discourse structure and anaphora: Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Charles Goodwin & Alessandro Duranti (eds.), Rethinking context, 147–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hakulinen, Auli & Fred Karlsson. 1979. Nykysuomen lauseoppia [Syntax of Modern Finnish]. Helsinki: SKS.Search in Google Scholar

Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja-Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [The large grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Search in Google Scholar

Halonen, Mia. 2005. Mä en sit siihe sanony mitää – Raportit sanomatta jättämisestä ja evidentiaalinen partikkeli sit(te(n)) keskustelun kertomuksissa. Virittäjä 109. 271–298.Search in Google Scholar

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 1996. A discourse perspective on the grammaticization of the partitive case in Finnish. In Timo Haukioja, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Elise Kärkkäinen (eds.), SKY 1996 yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, 7–34. Helsinki: SKY.Search in Google Scholar

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 1997. Functions of case marking vs. non-marking in Finnish discourse. In Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Kristin Davidse & Dirk Noël (eds.), Reconnecting language: Morphology and syntax in functional perspectives, 213–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.154.13helSearch in Google Scholar

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001. Syntax in the making: The emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.9Search in Google Scholar

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2014. Agreement or crystallization: Patterns of 1st and 2nd person subjects and verbs of cognition in Finnish conversational interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 63. 63–78.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.011Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45. 1–29.10.1080/08351813.2012.646684Search in Google Scholar

Huumo, Tuomas. 2007. Kvantiteetti ja aika II: Nominaalinen aspekti ja suomen predikatiivin sijanvaihtelu. Virittäjä 111. 3–23.Search in Google Scholar

Huumo, Tuomas. 2009. Fictive dynamicity, nominal aspect, and the Finnish copulative construction. Cognitive Linguistics 20. 43–70.10.1515/COGL.2009.003Search in Google Scholar

Huumo, Tuomas. 2010. Nominal aspect, quantity, and time: The case of the Finnish object. Journal of Linguistics 46. 83–125.10.1017/S0022226709990223Search in Google Scholar

Itkonen, Terho. 1976. Erään sijamuodon ongelmia. Opuscula Instituti Linguae Fennicae, Universitas Helsingiensis, vol. 53, 173–217. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.Search in Google Scholar

Kangasharju, Helena. 1998. Alignment in disagreement: Building alliances in multiperson interaction. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on ‘I think’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.115Search in Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2006. Stance-taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk 26. 699–731.10.1515/TEXT.2006.029Search in Google Scholar

Keisanen, Tiina. 2007. Stance-taking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stance-taking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 253–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.10keiSearch in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), Projecting from the lexicon, 1–38. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 5–38.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Larjavaara, Matti. 1990. Suomen deiksis [Deixis in Finnish]. Helsinki: SKS.Search in Google Scholar

Laury, Ritva. 1996. Conversational use and basic meaning of demonstratives in Finnish. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 303–319. Stanford: CSLI.10.1075/sidag.7Search in Google Scholar

Laury, Ritva. 1997. Demonstratives in interaction: The emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.7Search in Google Scholar

Laury, Ritva. 2012. Taking stance and getting on with it: The form and function of the Finnish finite clausal extraposition construction. Text & Talk 32. 503–524.10.1515/text-2012-0024Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1994. Subjecthood and subjectivity. In Marina Yaguello (ed.), Subjecthood and subjectivity: The status of the subject in linguistic theory, 9–17. Paris: Ophrys.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Maisa. 1987. Adjektiivipredikatiivin sijasta. Virittäjä 91. 274–278.10.23982/vir.37557Search in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2014. Partitives and negation: A cross-linguistic survey. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 63–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110346060.63Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1987. The grammatical nature and the discourse power of demonstratives. Berkeley Linguistic Society (BLS), 184–194.Search in Google Scholar

Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.87Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schiffelin. 1989. Language has a heart. Text 9. 7–25.10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7Search in Google Scholar

Rauniomaa, Mirka. 2007. Stance markers in spoken Finnish: Mun mielestä and minusta in assessments. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stance-taking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 221–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.09rauSearch in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50. 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar

Sadeniemi, Matti. 1950. Totaalisesta ja partiaalisesta predikatiivista. Virittäjä 54. 46–53.Search in Google Scholar

Sands, Kristina & Lyle Campbell. 2001. Non-canonical marking of subject and object in Finnish. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, 251–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.46.10sanSearch in Google Scholar

Scheibman, Joanne. 2002. Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.11Search in Google Scholar

Seppänen, Eeva-Leena. 1997. Vuorovaikutus paperilla. In Liisa Tainio (ed.), Keskustelunanalyysin perusteet [Foundations of Conversation Analysis], 18–31. Tampere: Vastapaino.Search in Google Scholar

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.70Search in Google Scholar

Wetzer, Harrie. 1996. The typology of adjectival predication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110813586Search in Google Scholar

Yli-Vakkuri, Valma. 1969. Miksi pojat ovat joskus iloiset? Adjektiivisen nominatiivipredikatiivin esiintymisedellytyksiä. In Juhlakirja Paavo Siron täyttäessä 60 vuotta 2.8.1969 [Festschrift in honour of Paavo Siro on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 2 August 1969]. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 26, 257–268. Tampere: University of Tampere.Search in Google Scholar

Yli-Vakkuri, Valma. 1986. Kieliopillisten muotojen toissijainen käyttö [The secondary usage of grammatical forms]. Turku: University of Turku.Search in Google Scholar