Startseite Cherchez la femme: Two Germanic suffixes, one etymology
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Cherchez la femme: Two Germanic suffixes, one etymology

  • Piotr Gąsiorowski EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. November 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The origin of the Germanic suffixes forming occupational titles and agent nouns – masculine *-ārijaz (the ancestor of Modern English -er) and its feminine counterpart reflected in Old English as -estre and in Modern as -ster – is an old problem in Germanic historical morphology. The masculine “agentive” suffix, which occurs in all the subgroups of Germanic, is generally presumed to be of Latin origin, though it occurs mostly with native derivational bases even in the earliest attested Germanic languages; the latter is believed to be native, but has no accepted etymology, and its limited range of occurrence in Germanic remains unexplained. It will be argued that the two suffixes are etymologically connected in a hitherto unsuspected way, that the traditional opinion about the origin of *-ārijaz should be revised, and that both suffixes have interesting Indo-European cognates outside Germanic.

Acknowledgements

I wish to express my gratitude to the editors and four anonymous reviewers. I have done my best to improve the argument by implementing their suggestions and responding to their criticism. I am especially indebted to Muriel Norde for her helpful comments on the final draft of the article. All remaining flaws, errors and infelicities are entirely my own.

References

Booij, Geert. 1999. The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Casaretto, Antje. 2004. Nominale Wortbildung der gotischen Sprache: Die Derivation der Substantive. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, Garry. 1992. Old English -estre and PGmc. *-ārjaz: The origin and development of two agentive suffixes in Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 4. 103–116.10.1017/S1040820700000901Suche in Google Scholar

DOE=Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus (2009 release). Compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey, John Price Wilkin & Xin Xiang. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. http://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/ (accessed 20 October 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Gary, Miller, D. 2006. Latin suffixal derivatives in English and their Indo-European Ancestry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285051.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gąsiorowski, Piotr. 2012. The Germanic reflexes of PIE *-sr- in the context of Verner’s Law. In Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead et al. (eds.), The sound of Indo-European: Phonetics, phonemics, and morphophonemics, 117–128. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen Jay & Elisabeth S. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1). 4–15.10.1017/S0094837300004310Suche in Google Scholar

Grönberg, Anna Gunnarsdotter. 2002. Masculine generics in current Icelandic. In Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. II. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.10.13groSuche in Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey & Öpengin. Ergin. 2015. Gender in Kurdish: Structural and socio-cultural dimensions. In Marlis Hellinger & Heiko Motschenbacher (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. IV. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.36.10haiSuche in Google Scholar

Harðarson, Jón Axel. 2004. Nordische Personennamen vom Typ Einarr, Hróarr und Steinarr. In Astrid Van Nahl, Lennart Elmevik & Stefan Brink (eds.), Namenwelten. Orts- und Personennamen in historischer Sicht, 545–564. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter,.10.1515/9783110911473.545Suche in Google Scholar

Harðarson, Jón Axel. 2014. Das andere Wort für ‘Frau’ im Urindogermanischen. In Sergio Neri & Roland Schuhmann (eds.), Studies on the collective and feminine in Indo-European from a diachronic and typological perspective, 23–54. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004264953_004Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffner, Harry A. & H. Craig Melchert. 2008. A grammar of the Hittite language. Part 1: Reference grammar. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.10.5325/j.ctv240djsfSuche in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1962 [1927]. A supposed feminine ending. In Selected writings of Otto Jespersen, 371–380. Tokyo: Senyo Publishing. [Originally published as: The ending ‘-ster’. Modern Language Review 22/2: 129–136.].10.2307/3714485Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Ronald. 2005. Ossetic silæ/syl and the Indo-Iranian word for ‘female’. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 2(1). 123–168.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Ronald. 2009. Another look at Tocharian B ṣarya. Historische Sprachforschung 122. 111–117.10.13109/hisp.2009.122.1.111Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Ronald. 2014. A tale of two suffixes: *-h₂-, *-ih₂-, and the evolution of feminine gender in Indo-European”. In Sergio Neri & Roland Schuhmann (eds.), Studies on the collective and feminine in Indo-European from a diachronic and typological perspective, 115–136. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004264953_006Suche in Google Scholar

Kluge, Friedrich. 1886. Nominale Stammbildungslehre der altgermanischen Dialecte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar

Kozianka, Maria. 2010. Loanwords in the Etymological Dictionary of Old High German. Unpublished paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Historical Lexicography and Lexicology, St Anne’s College, Oxford, 16–18 June 2010. Oxford University Research Archive. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:35ad4916-bb11-4351-9818-ff5857b84463 (accessed 20 October 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Krahe, Hans. 1969. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. III, Wortbildungslehre, 7th edn. revised by Wolfgang Meid. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26(1). 79–102.10.1017/S0022226700014432Suche in Google Scholar

Lowe, Pardee, Jr. 1972. Germanic word formation. In Frans Van Coetsem & Herbert L. Kufner (eds), Toward a grammar of Proto-Germanic, 211–238. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar

Meyer-Brügger, Michael. 2002. Indogermanische Sprachwissenchaft (8th edition, revised and expanded in cooperation with Matthias Fritz & Manfred Mayrhofer). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Norde, Muriel & Freek Van De Velde (eds). 2016. Exaptation and language change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.336Suche in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Alan J. 1986. Head and horn in Indo-European. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110850130Suche in Google Scholar

OED=Oxford English Dictionary Online. (3rd edition, updated in September 2015). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/ (accessed 20 October 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Peterson, Paul. 2013. An old problem in etymology revisited. The origin of Germanic nouns with the suffix -ster. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 70. 1–20.10.1163/9789401209205_002Suche in Google Scholar

Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2013. The lady (almost) vanishes. In Adam I. Cooper, Jeremy Rau & Michael Weiss (eds), Multi Nominis Grammaticus. Studies in classical and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, 240–254. Ann Arbor & New York: Beech Stave Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård. 1999 [1986]. A new rule of Indo-European accent: Greek τόρμος/κορμός; Germanic *waiþō/*skandō. In Selected papers on Indo-European linguistic: With a section on comparative Eskimo linguistics. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. [Originally published in APILKU (Arbejdspapirer udsendt af Institut for Lingvistik, Københavns Universitet) 5. 161–177].Suche in Google Scholar

Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (=A linguistic history of English, Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Ringe, Don & Ann Taylor. 2014. The development of Old English (=A linguistic history of English, Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207848.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Schaffner, Stefan. 2001. Das Vernersche Gesetz und der innerparadigmatische grammatische Wechsel des Urgermanischen im Nominalbereich. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Suche in Google Scholar

Sihler, Andrew. 1977. The PIE origins of the Germanic feminine nomina agentis in *-stri(ō)n. Die Sprache 23. 36–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Stifter, David. 2010. The Proto-Germanic shift *ā>*ō and early Germanic linguistic contacts. Historische Sprachforschung 122. 268–283.10.13109/hisp.2009.122.1.268Suche in Google Scholar

Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1986. Urgermanische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Wilhelm.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Thomas. 1884. Anglo-Saxon and Old English vocabularies, 2nd edn. revised by Richard Paul Wülcker. London: Trübner.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-11-10
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 10.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flih-2017-0005/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen