Reconstruction and idiomaticity: The origin of Russian verbless clauses reconsidered

References

Adamou, Evangelia & Denis Costaouec. 2010. Connective constructions in the world’s languages: A functionalist approach. La Linguistique 46(1). 43–80.10.3917/ling.461.0043Search in Google Scholar

Apresjan, Jury D. 1995. Leksikografičeskie portrety (na primere glagola byt’) [Lexicographic portraits: the case of byt’ ‘to be’]. In Ju. D. Apresjan (ed.), Izbrannye trudy. Moskva: Škola Jazyki Russkoj Kulʹtury.Search in Google Scholar

Arutjunova, Nina D. & E. N. Shirjaev. 1983. Russkoe predloženie. Bytijnyj tip [Russian clause. The existential type]. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Search in Google Scholar

Babby, Leonard. 1980. Existential sentences and negation in Russian. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Balanovskaya, Elena. V., D. V. Pezhemsky, A. G. Romanov, E. E. Baranova, M. V. Romashkina, A. T. Agzhdonyan, A. G. Balaganskii, E. E. Yevseyev, R. Willems & O. P. Balanovsky. 2011. Genofond Russkogo Severa: Slaviane? Finny? Paleoevropeytsy? [Genepool of the Russian North: Slavs? Finns? Paleo-European?]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta: Antropologija. XXIII(3). 7–58.Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Johana. 2013. Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. In Graeme Trousdale & Th. Hoffmann. (eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0024Search in Google Scholar

Bender, Emily M. 2000. Syntactic variation and linguistic competence: The case of AAVE copula absence. Stanford University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1950. La phrase nominale. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 46. 19–36.Search in Google Scholar

Bezdenežnyx, E. L. 1972. Dvusostavnye bezglagolnye predlozheniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [The two-part verbless clauses in modern Russian]. Moscow: Prosveshchenije.Search in Google Scholar

Birnbaum, Henrik. 1984. Notes on syntactic change: Cooccurrence vs. substitution stability vs. permeability. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical syntax, 25–46. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110824032.25Search in Google Scholar

Borkovskij, V. I., (ed.). 1968. Sravnitelno-istoričeskij sintaksis vostočnoslavjanskich jazykov [Historical-comparative syntax of the East-Slavic languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Borkovsky, Viktor. V. (ed.). 1983. Struktura predloženija v istorii vostočnoslavjanskih jazykov [Clause structure in the history of the East-Slavic languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lily. 1990. Syntactic reconstruction and Finno-Ugric. In Henning Andersen & E. F. Konrad Koerner (eds.), Historical linguistics 1987: Papers from the 8th International Conference on historical linguistics (8. ICHL), 51–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.66.05camSearch in Google Scholar

Chvany, Kathrine. 1975. On the syntax of BE-clauses in Russian. Cambridge, MA: Slavica.Search in Google Scholar

Collinder, Björn. 1960. Comparative grammar of the Uralic languages. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Search in Google Scholar

Décsy, Gyula. 1967. Is there a Finnic substratum in Russian? Orbis 16. 150–160.Search in Google Scholar

Décsy, Gyula. 1988. Slawischer Einfluss auf die uralischen Sprachen. In Denis Sinor (ed.), The Uralic languages. Description, history, and foreign, 618–637. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1971. Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk, and pidgins. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 141–150. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gauthiot, Robert. 1908–1909. La phrase nominale en finno-ougrien. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 15. 201–227.Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, Péter. 1970. Korreferat A. In Wolfgang Schlachter (ed.), Symposion über Syntax der uralischen Sprachen. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 61–62. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Hakulinen, Lauri. 1946. Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. Part 2: Sanasto- ja lauseoppia. [The Structure and Development of the Finnish Language]. Helsinki: Otava.Search in Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110883282Search in Google Scholar

Hetzron, Robert. 1970, Nonverbal sentences and degrees of definiteness in Hungarian. Language 46(4). 899–927.10.2307/412261Search in Google Scholar

Honti, László. 1992. Morphologische Merkmale des nominalen Prädikats in einigen uralischen Sprachen. Linguistica Uralica 28. 262–271.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Isačenko, Alexander V. 1976. Poterja glagol’noj formy v russkom jazyke [Verb form omission in Russian]. In Alexander V. Isačenko (eds.), Opera selecta, 12–20. Munich: Fink Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Kay, Paul & Charles J. Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the ‘What’s X doing Y?’ construction. Language 75. 1–33.10.2307/417472Search in Google Scholar

Kemmer, Susane & Barlow, Michael. 2000. A usage–based conception of language. LAUD, Series B, No. 295.Search in Google Scholar

Kettunen, Lauri. 1943. Vepsän murteiden lauseopillinen tutkimus [Syntactic investigation of the Veps dialects]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Valentin. 1969. Gibt es ein finnougrisches Substrat im Slavischen? Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Series B, Tom. 153(4). 1–29.Search in Google Scholar

Klemm, Antal. 1928. Magyar történeti mondattan [Historical syntax of Hungarian]. Vol. 1. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia.Search in Google Scholar

Kopotev, Mikhail. 1999. Bezglagolnye predlozhenija v istorii russkogo jazyka [Verbless clauses in the Russian language history]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kopotev, Mikhail. 2006. What a difference a verb makes! Russian and Finnish verbless sentences. In Marja Nenonen & Sinikka Niemi (eds.), Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on syntactic freezes, 177–192. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernard Wälchli. 2001 The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages: Typology and contact. Vol. 2, 615–750. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.55.15kopSearch in Google Scholar

Korhonen, Mikko. 1981. Johdatus lapin kielen historiaan [Introduction to the history of the Lapp language]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Search in Google Scholar

Künnap, Arne. 1997. Potential Finno-Ugric substratum in Slavic. Linguistica Uralica 33.4. 253–257.Search in Google Scholar

L’Hermitte, Rene. 1978. La phrase nominale en russe. Paris: Institut d’études Slaves.Search in Google Scholar

Laakso, Johanna (ed.). Typologie der Negation in den obugrischen und samojedischen Sprachen. http://www.univie.ac.at/negation (accessed7 August 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Letuchiy, Alexander. 2014. Copulas in comparison to lexical verbs: some syntactic tests. 1st Workshop on Copulas Università di Bologna, 2014. 1–13. www.academia.edu/6423473/Copulas_in_comparison_to_lexical_ verbs_some_syntactic_tests (accessed7 August 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Letuchiy, Alexander. forthc. 2015. Russian copulas and lexical verbs: Why so different? Lingue e Linguaggio 2015(2).Search in Google Scholar

Lyashevskaya, Olga N. & Sergey A. Sharoff. 2009. Chastotnyi slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Modern Russian frequency dictionary]. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Search in Google Scholar

Maisak, Timur A. 2005. Tipologija grammatikalizacii konstrukcij s glagolami dviženija i glagolami pozicii [Typology of grammaticalization of constructions with verbs of motion and verbs of location]. Moscow: SCL.Search in Google Scholar

McShane, Marjorie. J. 2000. Verbal ellipsis in Russian, Polish and Czech. Slavic and East European Journal 44(2). 195–233.10.2307/309950Search in Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1906–1908. La phrase nominale en indo-européen. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris XIV. 1–26.Search in Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor. A. 1995. Phrasemes in Language and Phraseology in Linguistics. In Martin Everaert, Erik-Jan van der Linden, André Schenk & Rob Schreuder (eds.), Idioms. structural and psychological perspectives, 167–232. Hillsdale, New Jersey & Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Mrazek, Roman. 1990. Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis slavjanskih literaturnyh jazykov [Comparative syntax of Slavic standard languages]. Brno: Univ. Purkyne.Search in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David M. & Paul M. Postal. 1983. Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In David M. Perlmutter (ed.), Studies in relational grammar 1, 81–128. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Petruxin, Pavel. V. 2007. Žili-byli: vopros zakryt? [Zhili-byli: Is the question closed?] Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 2(14). 268–282.Search in Google Scholar

Ravila, Paavo. 1943. Uralilaisen lauseen alkuperäisestä rakenteesta [About original structure of the Uralic clause]. Virittäjä 47. 247–263.Search in Google Scholar

Rédei, Károly. 1970. Nord-ostjakische Texte (Kazym-Dialekt) mit Skizze der Grammatik. In Wolfgang Schlachter (ed.), Symposion über Syntax der uralischen Sprachen. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 62–64. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Savelyeva, Lidia V. 1989. Razvitie sintaksicheskix form otricanija v russkom yazyke donatcionalnogo perioda [Development of the syntactic forms of negation in the Russian language during the Kievan period]. Leningrad: Leningrad University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Serebrennikov, Boris A. 1987. Sintaksis ural’skogo prayazyka – sintaksis tyurkskogo tipa [Syntax of the Uralic protolanguage is a syntax of Turkic type]. Sovetskoe finno-ugrovedenie 2. 81–87.Search in Google Scholar

Stassen, Leo. 1994. Typology versus mythology: The case of the Zero-Copula. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17(2). 105–126.10.1017/S0332586500002961Search in Google Scholar

Stassen Leo. 2001. Nonverbal predication in the Circum-Baltic languages. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), Circum-Baltic languages: Vol. 2, 569–590. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.55.12staSearch in Google Scholar

Tereschenko, Nikolay M. 1973. Sintaksis samodiiskih yazykov [Syntax of Samoyedic languages]. Leningrad: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Testelec, J. G. 2008. Struktura predloženij s nevyražennoj svjazkoj v russkom jazyke [Structure of zero-copula clauses in Russian]. In R. Rozina & G. Kustova (eds.), Dinamičeskie modeli. A Festschrift for Elena Padučeva, 773–789. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793Search in Google Scholar

Timberlake, Alan. 1974. The nominative object in Slavic, Baltic, and West Finnic. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.10.3726/b12499Search in Google Scholar

Tkačenko, Orest. V. 1979. Sopostavitel’no-istoričeskaja frazeologija slavjanskih i finno-ugorskih jazykov [Comparative-historical phraseology of Slavic and Finno-Ugric languages]. Kiev: Naukova Dumka.Search in Google Scholar

Turunen, Rigina. 2010. A typology of verbless predication in Erzya. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Search in Google Scholar

Västi, Katja. 2012. Verbittömät tapahtumanilmaukset [Verbless expressions of event]. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. Series B. Humaniora 107. Tampere: Juvenes print.Search in Google Scholar

Veenker, Wolfgang. 1967. Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache. Bloomington: Indiana University.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner-Nagy, Beata. 2011. On the Typology of Negation in Ob-Ugric and Samoyedic Languages. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, Daniel. 2012. Verb serialization in North East Europe: The case of Russian and its Finno-Ugric neighbours. Björn Wiemer, Bernhard Wälchli & Björn Hansen (eds.). Grammatical replication and grammatical borrowing in language contact, 611–646. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110271973.611Search in Google Scholar

Zaliznjak, Andrey. A. 2008. Drevnerusskie enklitiki [Old East Slavic enclitics]. Moscow: SCL.Search in Google Scholar

Zlatanova, Rumyana. 1973. Sastavno skazuemo s nerealizirana kopula v starobalgarski [Complex predicate with zero copula in Old Bulgarian]. In L͡iubomir Andreĭchin & Kiril Mirchev (eds.). Slavistichen sbornik: po sluchaĭ VII Mezhduanroden kongres na slavistite vŭv Varshava, 73–83. Sofia: BAN.Search in Google Scholar

Zlobina, Vieno E. 1971. Yazykovye kontakty i izmeneniya v grammaticheskom stroe yazykov [Language contacts and the changes in grammatical structure of languages]. Pribaltiisko-finskoe yazykoznanie, 33–37. Leningrad: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar