A new interpretation of Lachmann’s Law

Lexica

DELL = Ernout, Alfred & Meillet, Antoine. 2001 [1932]. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Histoire des mots, 4th edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

de Vaan, Michiel. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

LIV = Rix, Helmut (ed.). 2001 [1991]. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen. Unter Leitung von Helmut Rix und der Mitarbeit vieler anderer bearbeitet von Martin Kümmel, Thomas Zehnder, Reiner Lipp, Brigitte Schirmer, 2nd edn. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

REW = Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1935. Romanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Untermann, Jurgen. 2000. Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Other works

Adams, James N. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511843433Search in Google Scholar

Allen, W. Sidney. 1965. Vox Latina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Audollent, Auguste. 1967. Defixionum Tabellae. Frankfurt: Minerva.Search in Google Scholar

Bakkum, Gabriël. 2009. The Latin dialect of the Ager Faliscus. 150 years of scholarship. Part I. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.5117/9789056295622Search in Google Scholar

Biville, Frédérique. 1990. Les emprunts du latin au grec. Approche phonétique. Tome I: Introduction et consonantisme. Leuven-Paris: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Buck, Carl D. 1905. Elementarbuch der Oskisch-Umbrischen Dialekte. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. & Dan I. Slobin. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58(2). 265–289.10.1353/lan.1982.0021Search in Google Scholar

Collinge, Neville Edgar. 1985. The Laws of Indo-European. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/cilt.35Search in Google Scholar

Cowgill, Warren. 1970. Italic and Celtic superlatives and the dialects of Indo-European. In George Cardona, Henry M. Hoenigswald & Alfred Senn (eds.), Indo-European and Indo-Europeans: Papers presented at the third Indo-European conference at the University of Pennsylvania, 113–153. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9781512801200-009Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, Michael H. 2011. Imagines Italicae. A corpus of Italic inscriptions, 3 vol. London: University of London, Institute of Classical Studies.Search in Google Scholar

De Angelis, Alessandro. 2014. I verbi greci in -σσω da originaria occlusiva sonora: un caso di riorganizzazione dei paradigmi? In Anna Maria Bartolotta (ed.), The Greek verb. Morphology, syntax and semantics. Proceedings of the 8th international meeting on Greek linguistics (Agrigento, October 1–3, 2009), 93–122. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

De Chene, Brent & Stephen R. Anderson. 1979. Compensatory Lengthening. Language 55(3). 505–535.10.2307/413316Search in Google Scholar

Del Tutto Palma, Loretta. 1996. Grafia e scrittura nella Tavola di Agnone. In Loretta Del Tutto Palma (ed.), La Tavola di Agnone nel contesto italico. Convegno di Studio (Agnone, 13–15 aprile 1994), 413–433. Florence: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar

Drinka, Bridget. 1991. Lachmann’s law: A phonological solution. Indogermanische Forschungen 96. 52–74.Search in Google Scholar

EDR = Epigraphic Database Roma. http://www.edr-edr.it (accessed 5 August 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Eichner, Heiner. 1982. Rekonstruktion des urindogermanischen Formensystems und Dokumentation seiner einzelsprachlichen Vertretung bei den niedener Kardinalia ‘zwei’ bis ‘fünf’. Regensburg: Universität Regensburg (Habilitationsschrift).Search in Google Scholar

Fleuriot, Léon. 1964. Le vieux breton. Éléments d’une grammaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Forssman, Berthold. 2001. Lettische Grammatik. Dettelbach: Röll.Search in Google Scholar

Gernia Porzio, Maria Luisa. 1976. Tendenze strutturali della sillaba latina in età arcaica e classica. In Maria LuisaPorzio Gernia (ed.), Scritti in onore di G. Bonfante, 757–779. Brescia: Paideia. (repr. Porzio Gernia, Maria Luisa. 2013. Simul ante retroque prospiciens. Studi di linguistica storica, ed. Mario Iodice. Alessandria: Dell’Orso. 91–113).Search in Google Scholar

Giacomelli, Gabriella. 1955–1956. Forme parallele a sancio e sanctus nei dialetti italici. Studi Etruschi 24(2). 337–342.Search in Google Scholar

Giacomelli, Gabriella. 1963. La lingua falisca. Florence: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar

Giannini, Stefania. 1995. L’indebolimento della coda sillabica in latino: un caso di mutamento a lungo termine. In Roberto Ajello & Saverio Sani (eds.), Scritti linguistici e filologici in onore di Tristano Bolelli, 265–281. Pisa: Pacini Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2). 253–306.Search in Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Jay H. 2004. Plus ça change … Lachmann’s Law in Latin. In John H. W. Penney (ed.), Indo-European perspectives: Studies in honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies, 405–416. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1965. Phonological change (unpublished MIT dissertation).Search in Google Scholar

Kümmel, Martin J. 2012–2013. Etymologie und Phonologie: Umbrisch amboltu. Die Sprache 50(1–2). 31–43.Search in Google Scholar

Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1968. A remark on Lachmann’s Law. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 72. 295–299.10.2307/311084Search in Google Scholar

Lachmann, Karl. 1979 [1850]. Lucretius: De rerum natura, 2nd edn. New York and London: Garland Publishing Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel. 1971. Inscriptions de Rossano di Vaglio. Rendiconti dell’Accademia dei Lincei. Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche s. VIII(26). 663–684.Search in Google Scholar

Leumann, Manu. 1977 [1926–1928]. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Mancini, Marco. 1998. Sulla posizione dialettale del latino pesarese. Incontri Linguistici 21. 11–33.Search in Google Scholar

Mancini, Marco. 2000. Tra dialettologia latina e dialettologia italo-romanza: sul trattamento di lat. -kt-. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 116(1). 107–140.10.1515/zrph.2000.116.1.107Search in Google Scholar

Maniet, Albert. 1956. La ‘loi de Lachmann’ et les antinomies de l’allongement compensatoire. In Marcel Renard & Georges Redard (eds.), Hommages à Max Niedermann, vol. 23, 230–237. Brussels: Berchem, Collection Latomus.Search in Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1908–1909. Sur la quantité des voyelles fermées. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 15. 265–268.Search in Google Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard. 1986. Lautgeschichte der umbrischen Sprache. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Niedermann, Max. 1953 [1906] Précis de phonétique historique du latin, 4th edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Odden, David. 2011. The representation of vowel length. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth. V. Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 1, General issues and segmental phonology, 465–490. London: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0020Search in Google Scholar

Osthoff, Hermann. 1884. Zur Geschichte des Perfects im Indogermanischen. Strasbourg: K. J. Trubner.10.1515/9783111497259Search in Google Scholar

Pisani, Vittore. 1978. Le lingue preromane d’Italia: origini e fortune. In Aldo Luigi Prosdocimi (ed.), Popoli e civiltà dell’Italia antica, vol. 6, 15–78. Rome: Biblioteca di Storia Patria.Search in Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo, Poli, Diego & Santini, Carlo. 1999. Una storia della lingua latina. Rome: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo. 2006. Notes de linguistique italique. 3. L’attestation osque du terme pour «consul» et le traitement de [ns] avec ses reflets latins et romans. Revue des Études latines 84. 27–36.Search in Google Scholar

Prosdocimi, Aldo Luigi. 1992. Latino (e) italico e indoeuropeo: appunti sul fonetismo. Messana 12. 93–160.Search in Google Scholar

Prosdocimi, Aldo Luigi. 1996. La Tavola di Agnone. Una interpretazione. In Loretta Del Tutto Palma (ed.), La Tavola di Agnone nel contesto italico, 435–630. Florence: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar

Prosdocimi, Aldo Luigi & Marinetti, Anna. 1993. Appunti sul verbo italico (e) latino. In Helmut Rix (ed.), Oskisch-Umbrisch. Texte und Grammatik, 219–279. Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft und der Società Italiana di Glottologia vom 25. bis 28. September 1991 in Freiburg. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Ritschl, Friedrich. 1878. Die Tesserae gladiatoriae der Römer. In Friedrich Ritschl, Opuscula Philologica IV, 572–656. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut. 2002. Sabellische Texte. Die Texte des Oskischen, Umbrischen und Südpikenischen. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Rocca, Giovanna. 1996. Ancora sul dossier italico di Cerere. In Loretta Del Tutto Palma (ed.), La Tavola di Agnone nel contesto italico, 645–658. Florence: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar

Romagno, Domenica. 2004. Come la scelta genera la norma. Contraddizioni nel vocalismo gallipolino. L’Italia Dialettale 65(3, 1). 111–122.Search in Google Scholar

Romagno, Domenica. 2013. L’aoristo sanscrito in -siṣ-: fra rianalisi e connessionismo. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 98. 41–50.Search in Google Scholar

Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1966. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. 1: Fonetica. Turin: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psycology 4. 328–350.10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor & Mervis, Carolyn B. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psycology 7(4). 573–605.10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1885. Sur un point de la phonétique des consonnes en indo-européen. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 6. 246–257.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale, Charles Bally, Albert Riedlinger & Albert Sechehaye (eds.). Lausanne & Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar

Scheid, John. 1998. Commentarii Fratrum Arvalium qui supersunt. Les copies épigraphiques des protocoles annuels de la confrérie arvale, 21 av.–304 ap. J.C. Rome: École française de Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Schirru, Giancarlo 2010. La fonologia. In Grazia Basile, Federica Casadei, Luca Lorenzetti, Giancarlo Schirru & Anna M. Thornton (eds.), Linguistica generale, 101–153. Rome: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar

Shevelov, George Y. 1979. A historical phonology of the Ukrainian language. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Sihler, Andrew L. 1995. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sommer, Ferdinand. 1948 [1902]. Handbuch der Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 2nd edn. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1915. Zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft. 4: Lachmanns Gesetz. Indogermanische Forschungen 35. 195–196.10.1515/9783110242751.182Search in Google Scholar

Strunk, Klaus. 1976. Lachmanns Regel für das Lateinische: eine Revision. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2004. Phonetics and philology. Sound change in Italic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257737.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sukač, Roman. 2012. Lachmann’s Law (part 1). Linguistica Brunensia 60. 13–36.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Väänänen, Veikko. 1959. Le latin vulgaire des inscriptions pompéiennes. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783112537206Search in Google Scholar

Väänänen, Veikko. 1963. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Von Planta, Robert. 1892. Grammatik der Oskisch-Umbrischen Dialekte. Erster Band. Einleitung und Lautlehre, Strassburg: Trübner.Search in Google Scholar

Wachter, Rudolf. 1987. Altlateinische Inschriften. Bern-Frankfurt am Main-New York& Paris: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1970. A further remark in Lachmann’s Law. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74. 55–65.10.2307/310998Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, Michael. 2009. Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor & New York: Beech Stave Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar