Startseite Wirtschaftswissenschaften How Bonding and Bridging Ties Shape Green Innovation: Evidence from Director Networks in China
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

How Bonding and Bridging Ties Shape Green Innovation: Evidence from Director Networks in China

  • Lin Chen , Fei Li EMAIL logo , Longfeng Zhao und Guanghua Xie
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. Januar 2026

Abstract

Since firms struggle to achieve green innovation by merely relying on internal resources, the director network has emerged as a critical channel through which to address this challenge. We explore how network features, specifically bonding and bridging ties, affect green innovation from a meso-level network community perspective. For Chinese Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed firms, we discover that bridging ties have a more positive effect on green innovation than do bonding ties. Mechanism tests show that this phenomenon is related to heterogeneous knowledge. Further analysis shows that firms with greater dynamic capability and a strong guanxi culture can better leverage bridging ties rather than bonding ties to enhance green innovation. We provide further empirical evidence on driving green innovation by clarifying the significantly different roles of bonding and bridging ties.


Corresponding author: Fei Li, Northwestern Polytechnical University School of Management, Xi’an, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Shaanxi Provincial Social Science Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2022R024

Funding source: Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University

Award Identifier / Grant number: SOMBC202508

Funding source: Shaanxi Provincial Soft Science Project

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2025KG-YBXM-003

Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: 72471195

Appendix Ⅰ The Industry Distribution of the Sample Firms

Industry Code N Percent Industry Code N Percent
Computers, communications and other electronic equipment C39 318 10.6 Agricultural and sideline food processing industry C13 39 1.3
Accommodation and food I 244 8.133 Wine, beverage and refined tea C15 38 1.267
Chemical material and products C26 226 7.533 Cultural, physical and entertainment R 38 1.267
Electrical machinery and equipment C38 215 7.167 Leasehold and business service L 36 1.2
Special equiment manufacturing C35 205 6.833 Textile C17 33 1.1
Medicine C27 196 6.533 Apparel C18 31 1.033
General equipment C34 124 4.133 Farming, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery A 29 0.967
Automobile C36 120 4 Paper making and paper products C22 27 0.9
Construction E 89 2.967 Ferrous metal foundries and presses C31 27 0.9
Traffic, storage and mail business F 81 2.7 Other manufacturing C41 25 0.833
Non-metal mineral products C30 76 2.533 Furniture manufacturing C21 23 0.767
Mining B 73 2.433 Chemical fibers C28 21 0.7
Production and Supply of Electric Power, Heat Power, Gas and Water D 72 2.4 Petroleum processing, coking and nuclear fuel processing C25 16 0.533
Rubber and plastic products C29 66 2.2 Cultural, educational, arts, sports and entertainment products C24 15 0.5
Non-ferrous metal foundries and presses C32 63 2.1 Public administration and social organization S 11 0.367
Metal products C33 61 2.033 Timber processing and bamboo, cane, palm, straw products C20 9 0.3
Transport, Storage and Post G 59 1.967 Printing and recording media reproduction C23 9 0.3
Scientific Research and Technical Services M 45 1.5 Leather, fur, feather and their products and footwear C19 7 0.233
Instrument industry C40 45 1.5 Education P 6 0.2
Railway, ship, aerospace and other transportation equipment C37 44 1.467 Sanitation, social security and social welfare Q 6 0.2
Foodstuff manufacturing C14 43 1.433 Information transfer, computer service and software H 4 0.133
Scientific research, technical service and geologic examination N 41 1.367 Comprehensive utilization of waste resources C42 3 0.1
Realty business K 41 1.367
  1. Firms are classified according to the industry classification criteria of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Manufacturing industry is assigned two-digit codes, while other industries are categorized using broad industry classifications.

Appendix Ⅱ The Provincial Distribution of the Sample Firms

Province N Percent Province N Percent
Guangdong 512 17.067 Chongqing 39 1.3
Zhejiang 396 13.2 Jiangxi 36 1.2
Jiangsu 348 11.6 Xinjiang 34 1.133
Beijing 261 8.7 Jilin 31 1.033
Shanghai 205 6.833 Shanxi 31 1.033
Shandong 174 5.8 Guangxi 29 0.967
Fujian 114 3.8 Yunnan 28 0.933
Hunan 95 3.167 Gansu 25 0.833
Anhui 91 3.033 Heilongjiang 25 0.833
Sichuan 91 3.033 Guizhou 23 0.767
Hubei 77 2.567 Hainan 21 0.7
Henan 66 2.2 Inner Mongolia 20 0.667
Liaoning 59 1.967 Tibet 13 0.433
Hebei 53 1.767 Ningxia 9 0.3
Tianjin 46 1.533 Qinghai 8 0.267
Shaanxi 40 1.333

References

Adler, P. S., and S.-W. Kwon. 2002. “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept.” Academy of Management Review 27 (1): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367.Suche in Google Scholar

Ai, Y., and D. Peng. 2021. “Innovation Model of China’s High-End Equipment Industry: Do Social Capital and Dynamic Capabilities Matter for the COVID-19 Crisis?” Frontiers in Public Health 9: 683120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.683120.Suche in Google Scholar

Akbar, A., X. Jiang, M. A. Qureshi, and M. Akbar. 2021. “Does Corporate Environmental Investment Impede Financial Performance of Chinese Enterprises? The Moderating Role of Financial Constraints.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (41): 58007–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14736-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Artz, K. W., P. M. Norman, D. E. Hatfield, and L. B. Cardinal. 2010. “A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of R&D, Patents, and Product Innovation on Firm Performance.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (5): 725–40.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.xSuche in Google Scholar

Ben Arfi, W., L. Hikkerova, and J.-M. Sahut. 2018. “External Knowledge Sources, Green Innovation and Performance.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 129: 210–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017.Suche in Google Scholar

Blondel, V. D., J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. 2008. “Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks.” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 (10): P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008.Suche in Google Scholar

Cainelli, G., V. De Marchi, and R. Grandinetti. 2015. “Does the Development of Environmental Innovation Require Different Resources? Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms.” Journal of Cleaner Production 94 (May): 211–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, J. L. 2007. “Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Academy of Management Review 32 (3): 946–67. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684.Suche in Google Scholar

Cao, Q., Z. Simsek, and J. J. P. Jansen. 2015. “CEO Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Orientation of the Firm.” Journal of Management 41 (7): 1957–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312469666.Suche in Google Scholar

Chang, X., K. Fu, A. Low, and W. Zhang. 2015. “Non-Executive Employee Stock Options and Corporate Innovation.” Journal of Financial Economics 115 (1): 168–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Chang, C., and Q. Wu. 2021. “Board Networks and Corporate Innovation.” Management Science 67 (6): 3618–54. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3587.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Z., X. Hao, and F. Chen. 2023. “Green Innovation and Enterprise Reputation Value.” Business Strategy and the Environment 32 (4): 1698–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3213.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, L., F. Li, M. Wu, and R. Niu. 2025. “Independent Director Network and Carbon Information Disclosure: Evidence from China.” Social Responsibility Journal 21 (7): 1466–83, https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2024-0541.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, C. C. J., S.-H. Hsu, and C. Sheu. 2023. “How Can Green Innovation from Manufacturers Benefit from Supplier Networks?” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 28 (3): 559–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-09-2021-0443.Suche in Google Scholar

Coles, J. L., N. D. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2008. “Boards: Does One Size Fit All?” Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 329–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008.Suche in Google Scholar

DeBacker, J., B. T. Heim, and A. Tran. 2015. “Importing Corruption Culture from Overseas: Evidence from Corporate Tax Evasion in the United States.” Journal of Financial Economics, NBER Conference on the Causes and Consequences of Corporate Culture 117 (1): 122–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.11.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Fulton, B. R. 2021. “Bridging and Bonding: Disentangling Two Mechanisms Underlying the Diversity – Performance Relationship.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 50 (1): 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020939654.Suche in Google Scholar

Gao, K., L. Wang, T. Liu, and H. Zhao. 2022. “Management Executive Power and Corporate Green Innovation – Empirical Evidence from China’s State-Owned Manufacturing Sector.” Technology in Society 70: 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102043.Suche in Google Scholar

Gong, Y., J. Zhou, and S. Chang. 2013. “Core Knowledge Employee Creativity and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Riskiness Orientation, Firm Size, and Realized Absorptive Capacity.” Personnel Psychology 66 (2): 443–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12024.Suche in Google Scholar

Gu, J., F. Zhang, X. Xu, and C. Xue. 2023. “Stay or Switch? The Impact of Venture Capitalists’ Movement Across Network Communities on Enterprises’ Innovation Performance.” Technovation 125: 102770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102770.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, Y.-F., and C.-J. Chen. 2010. “The Impact of Technological Diversity and Organizational Slack on Innovation.” Technovation 30 (7–8): 420–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.01.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, K., J. Chi, J. Liao, and M. K. Yuen. 2025. “In the Heat of the Moment, Secrets Will Out: Oil Price Uncertainty and Firm Green Innovation Disclosure.” International Review of Economics & Finance 98: 103934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103934.Suche in Google Scholar

Juo, W., and C. Wang. 2022. “Does Green Innovation Mediate the Relationship between Green Relational View and Competitive Advantage?” Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (5): 2456–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3037.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Y., S. L. Jarvenpaa, and B. Gu. 2018. “External Bridging and Internal Bonding: Unlocking the Generative Resources of Member Time and Attention Spent in Online Communities.” MIS Quarterly 42 (1): 265–83. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2018/13278.Suche in Google Scholar

Kostopoulos, K., A. Papalexandris, M. Papachroni, and G. Ioannou. 2011. “Absorptive Capacity, Innovation, and Financial Performance.” Journal of Business Research 64 (12): 1335–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Kraft, P. S., and A. Bausch. 2018. “Managerial Social Networks and Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Bonding and Bridging Effects Across Institutional Environments.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 35 (6): 865–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12450.Suche in Google Scholar

Kumar, P., and A. Zaheer. 2019. “Ego-Network Stability and Innovation in Alliances.” Academy of Management Journal 62 (3): 691–716. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0819.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Y., G. G. Tian, and X. Wang. 2021. “The Effect of Guanxi Culture on the Voting of Independent Directors: Evidence from China.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 67: 101524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101524.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, W., J. Z. Zhang, and R. Ding. 2023. “Impact of Directors’ Network on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China.” Journal of Business Ethics 183 (2): 551–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05092-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, C., P. Lin, F. M. Song, and C. Li. 2011. “Managerial Incentives, CEO Characteristics and Corporate Innovation in China’s Private Sector.” Journal of Comparative Economics 39 (2): 176–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2009.12.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, J., J. Wei, and T. Zou. 2024. “Bridging and Bonding: Exploring the Influence of Community-Level Networks on Product Innovation in Video Game Communities.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 71: 6044–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2024.3375312.Suche in Google Scholar

Melander, L., and A. Pazirandeh. 2019. “Collaboration Beyond the Supply Network for Green Innovation: Insight from 11 Cases.” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 24 (4): 509–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-08-2018-0285.Suche in Google Scholar

Nie, Y., Y. Qiu, A. Yang, and Y. Zhao. 2024. “Risk-Limiting Dispatching Strategy Considering Demand Response in Multi-Energy Microgrids.” Applied Energy 353: 122088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122088.Suche in Google Scholar

Ning, L., and R. Guo. 2022. “Technological Diversification to Green Domains: Technological Relatedness, Invention Impact and Knowledge Integration Capabilities.” Research Policy 51 (1): 104406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104406.Suche in Google Scholar

Nunn, N., and L. Wantchekon. 2011. “The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa.” American Economic Review 101 (7): 3221–52. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.7.3221.Suche in Google Scholar

Omer, T. C., M. K. Shelley, and F. M. Tice. 2020. “Do Director Networks Matter for Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Audit Committee Connectedness and Restatements.” Management Science 66 (8): 3361–88. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3331.Suche in Google Scholar

Ooi, S. K., C. H. Lee, and A. Amran. 2023. “Assessing the Influence of Social Capital and Innovations on Environmental Performance of Manufacturing SMEs.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30 (6): 3242–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2550.Suche in Google Scholar

Østergaard, C. R., B. Timmermans, and K. Kristinsson. 2011. “Does a Different View Create Something New? the Effect of Employee Diversity on Innovation.” Research Policy 40 (3): 500–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Park, S. H., and Y. Luo. 2001. “Guanxi and Organizational Dynamics: Organizational Networking in Chinese Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 22 (5): 455–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.167.Suche in Google Scholar

Pavlou, P. A., and O. A. El Sawy. 2011. “Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities.” Decision Sciences 42 (1): 239–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Perry-Smith, J. E., and P. V. Mannucci. 2017. “From Creativity to Innovation: The Social Network Drivers of the Four Phases of the Idea Journey.” Academy of Management Review 42 (1): 53–79. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462.Suche in Google Scholar

Poncet, S., W. Steingress, and H. Vandenbussche. 2010. “Financial Constraints in China: Firm-Level Evidence.” China Economic Review 21 (3): 411–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramasamy, B., K. W. Goh, and M. C. H. Yeung. 2006. “Is Guanxi (Relationship) a Bridge to Knowledge Transfer?” Journal of Business Research 59 (1): 130–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Renneboog, L., and Y. Zhao. 2011. “Us Knows Us in the UK: On Director Networks and CEO Compensation.” Journal of Corporate Finance, Special Section: Managerial Compensation 17 (4): 1132–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.04.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Rodan, S., and C. Galunic. 2004. “More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness.” Strategic Management Journal 25 (6): 541–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.398.Suche in Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., M. Del Giudice, C. J. Chiappetta Jabbour, H. Latan, and A. S. Sohal. 2022. “Stakeholder Pressure, Green Innovation, and Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Role of Green Dynamic Capabilities.” Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (1): 500–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2906.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonia, B. Mahmood, and A. Chaudhary. 2025. “Unleashing Green Innovation Through Social Capital: A Systematic Review of Literature.” Social Science Review Archives 3 (3): 1564–78, https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i3.982.Suche in Google Scholar

Stam, W., S. Arzlanian, and T. Elfring. 2014. “Social Capital of Entrepreneurs and Small Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual and Methodological Moderators.” Journal of Business Venturing 29 (1): 152–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Steininger, D. M., P. Mikalef, A. Pateli, and A. Ortiz-de-Guinea. 2022. “Dynamic Capabilities in Information Systems Research: A Critical Review, Synthesis of Current Knowledge, and Recommendations for Future Research.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 22 (2): 447–90. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00736.Suche in Google Scholar

Sytch, M., and A. Tatarynowicz. 2014. “Exploring the Locus of Invention: The Dynamics of Network Communities and Firms’ Invention Productivity.” Academy of Management Journal 57 (1): 249–79. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0655.Suche in Google Scholar

Sytch, M., A. Tatarynowicz, and R. Gulati. 2012. “Toward a Theory of Extended Contact: The Incentives and Opportunities for Bridging Across Network Communities.” Organization Science 23 (6): 1658–81. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0712.Suche in Google Scholar

Tan, Y., X. Liu, H. Sun, and C. Zeng. 2022. “Population Ageing, Labour Market Rigidity and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China.” Research Policy 51 (2): 104428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104428.Suche in Google Scholar

Tang, T., E. Ya, E. Fang, and W. J. Qualls. 2020. “More is Not Necessarily Better: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective on Network Effects in Open Source Software Development Communities.” MIS Quarterly 44 (4): 1651–78. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2020/13991.Suche in Google Scholar

Tawiah, V., E. Gyapong, and M. Usman. 2024. “Returnee Directors and Green Innovation.” Journal of Business Research 174: 114369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114369.Suche in Google Scholar

Teece, D. J. 2007. “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.Suche in Google Scholar

Torrejón, M.-J., and A. Martin-Matthews. 2022. “A Qualitative Approach to Bridging and Bonding Social Capital: Experiences of a Cohort of Chilean Older People.” Social Science & Medicine 296: 114710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114710.Suche in Google Scholar

Tortoriello, M., R. Reagans, and B. McEvily. 2012. “Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units.” Organization Science 23 (4): 1024–39. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0688.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, C. L., and P. K. Ahmed. 2007. “Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 9 (1): 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, L., Y. Su, H. Huang, Y. Gong, and W. Wang. 2023. “Director’s Network Location and Corporate Environmental Investment in the Carbon Neutrality Age.” Business Strategy and the Environment 32 (6): 3178–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3294.Suche in Google Scholar

Wei, Y., D. Kang, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Geography, Culture, and Corporate Innovation.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 56: 310–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.06.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Wijekoon, A., S. Salunke, and G. A. Athaide. 2021. “Customer Heterogeneity and Innovation-Based Competitive Strategy: A Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 38 (3): 315–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12576.Suche in Google Scholar

Xie, X., J. Sun, M. Zhou, L. Yan, and M. Chi. 2024. “Network Embeddedness and Manufacturing SMEs’ Green Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Resource Orchestration Capability.” Business Process Management Journal (Leeds) 30 (3): 884–908. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-08-2023-0676.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, C., C. Zhu, and K. Albitar. 2024. “ESG Ratings and Green Innovation: A U-Shaped Journey Towards Sustainable Development.” Business Strategy and the Environment 33 (5): 4108–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3692.Suche in Google Scholar

Ye, J., B. Hao, and P. C. Patel. 2016. “Orchestrating Heterogeneous Knowledge: The Effects of Internal and External Knowledge Heterogeneity on Innovation Performance.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 63 (2): 165–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2016.2541863.Suche in Google Scholar

Ye, W., X. Li, H. Zhu, and L. Liu. 2016. “Informal Institution: The Guanxi Index Construction and Measurement.” Quarterly Journal of Management 1 (Z1): 73–91.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhan, J., Z. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. Zhao, and F. Wang. 2023. “Manufacturing Servitization in the Digital Economy: A Configurational Analysis from Dynamic Capabilities and Lifecycle Perspective.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 123 (1): 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-05-2022-0302.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, M., and J. L. Hartley. 2018. “Guanxi, IT Systems, and Innovation Capability: The Moderating Role of Proactiveness.” Journal of Business Research 90: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.036.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, M., L. M, B. Zhang, and Z. Yi. 2016. “Pyramidal Structure, Political Intervention and Firms’ Tax Burden: Evidence from China’s Local SOEs.” Journal of Corporate Finance 36: 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, X., and V. Venkatesh. 2013. “Explaining Employee Job Performance: The Role of Online and Offline Workplace Communication Networks.” MIS Quarterly 37 (3): 695–722. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.02.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhao, L., and R. Zhao. 2025. “Ecological Rule of Law and Enterprise Green Innovation – Evidence from China’s Environmental Courts.” Journal of Environmental Management 374: 124081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124081.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhou, B., Y. Li, F. Sun, and Z. Zhou. 2021. “Executive Compensation Incentives, Risk Level and Corporate Innovation.” Emerging Markets Review 47: 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100798.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-05-06
Accepted: 2025-12-11
Published Online: 2026-01-06

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 15.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/erj-2025-0220/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen