Home Business & Economics Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior – A Longitudinal Study of Entrepreneurial Intentions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior – A Longitudinal Study of Entrepreneurial Intentions

  • Richard Hanage , Mark Alexander Phillip Davies , Pekka Stenholm ORCID logo and Jonathan Matthew Scott ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: October 20, 2022
Entrepreneurship Research Journal
From the journal Entrepreneurship Research Journal Volume 14 Issue 3

Abstract

Most recent research about entrepreneurial intent (EI) examines EI and its determinants as a one-time event, but whether and how EI is continuously changing during early-stage entrepreneurship has not been adequately addressed. We track the shifts in the EI of young creative sector early-stage entrepreneurs vis-à-vis their changing external circumstances and their developing perceptions of the realities of business start-up. Our findings of 11 established and 10 new determinants of EI contribute to the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and guide our appreciation of EI as a dynamic, longitudinal construct, which is the link between intent and realized action. Our findings have profound implications for policy-makers and practitioners, for instance those wishing to help early-stage entrepreneurs to establish businesses when they only possess limited entrepreneurial experience. This research study, therefore, responds to calls for more longitudinal qualitative research into the determinants of EI, entrepreneurial processes, and early business exit.

Keywords: entrepreneurial intent; theory of planned behavior (TPB); creative sector; business exit; dynamic entrepreneurial processes
Corresponding author: Richard Hanage, Teesside University Business School, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participants for their involvement in this research, and colleagues (anonymized), the anonymous referees and attendees at conferences for their comments on earlier drafts which were extremely helpful.

  1. Declaration of interest: No conflicts of interest exist.

References

Ahmed, T., J. E. Klobas, and T. Ramayah. 2019. “Personality Traits, Demographic Factors and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Improved Understanding from a Moderated Mediation Study.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 11 (4): 20170062, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0062.Search in Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.Search in Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. 1999. “Dual-mode Processing in the Pursuit of Insight Is No Vice.” Psychological Inquiry 10 (2): 110–2.10.1207/S15327965PL100202Search in Google Scholar

Aldrich, H., and E. R. Auster. 1986. “Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications.” Research in Organizational Behavior 8: 165–98.Search in Google Scholar

Audet, J. 2004. “A Longitudinal Study of the Entrepreneurial Intentions of University Students.” Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal 10 (1): 3–16.Search in Google Scholar

Ball, L., E. Pollard, N. Stanley, and J. Oakley. 2010. Creative Graduates Creative Futures. London: Institute of Employment Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Bird, B. 1988. “Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case for Intention.” Academy of Management Review 13 (3): 442–53, https://doi.org/10.2307/258091.Search in Google Scholar

Bonesso, S., F. Gerli, C. Pizzi, and L. Cortellazzo. 2018. “Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Role of Prior Learning Experiences and Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Competencies.” Journal of Small Business Management 56 (S1): 215–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12399.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, M. 2018. “‘Shit is Hard, Yo’: Young People Making a Living in the Creative Industries.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 26 (4): 524–43, https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1547380.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, C. 2015. “The Careers of Fine Artists and the Embedded Creative.” Journal of Education and Work 28 (4): 407–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.997686.Search in Google Scholar

Carsrud, A., and M. Brännback. 2011. “Entrepreneurial Motivations: What Do We Still Need to Know?” Journal of Small Business Management 49 (1): 9–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2010.00312.x.Search in Google Scholar

Casas, T., and M. Hilb. 2016. “Founders in the Living-Dead Trap: A Theoretical Exploration at Entrepreneurship’s Dark Core.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 6 (4): 401–23, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0029.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, M. H., Y. Y. Chang, H. Y. Wang, and M. H. Chen. 2017. “Understanding Creative Entrepreneurs’ Intention to Quit: The Role of Entrepreneurial Motivation, Creativity, and Opportunity.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 7 (3): 20160001, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2016-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Cope, J. 2011. “Entrepreneurial Learning from Failure: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” Journal of Business Venturing 26 (6): 604–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Corner, P. D., and K. Pavlovich. 2007. “Entrepreneurship Research: Follow the Yellow-Brick Road?” Journal of Management & Organization 13 (4): 288–94, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1833367200003552.Search in Google Scholar

Cunningham, S., P. Higgs, S. Freebody, and P. Anderson. 2010. What’s Your Other Job? A Census Analysis of Arts Employment in Australia. Sydney: The Australia Council for the Arts.Search in Google Scholar

Davidsson, P. 1991. “Continued Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing 6 (6): 405–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90028-c.Search in Google Scholar

DCMS. 2006. Developing Entrepreneurship for the Creative Industries: The Role of HE & FE. London: DCMS.Search in Google Scholar

Donaldson, C. 2019. “Intentions Resurrected: A Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Intention Research from 2014 to 2018 and Future Research Agenda.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 15 (3): 953–75, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00578-5.Search in Google Scholar

Donaldson, C., F. Liñán, and J. Alegre. 2021. “Entrepreneurial Intentions: Moving the Field Forwards.” Journal of Entrepreneurship 30 (1): 30–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355720974801.Search in Google Scholar

Elfving, J. 2008. Contextualizing Entrepreneurial Intentions. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Elfving, J., M. Brännback, and A. Carsrud. 2009. “Towards a Contextual Model of Entrepreneurial Intentions.” In Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind: Opening the Black Box, edited by A. Carsrud, and M. Brännback, 23–33. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-0443-0_2Search in Google Scholar

Elfving, J., M. Brännback, and A. Carsrud. 2017. “Revisiting a Contextual Model of Entrepreneurial Intentions.” In Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind: Inside the Black Box: An Expanded Edition, edited by M. Brännback, and A. Carsrud, 211–8. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-45544-0_14Search in Google Scholar

Entrialgo, M., and V. Iglesias. 2017. “Are the Intentions to Entrepreneurship of Men and Women Shaped Differently? The Impact of Entrepreneurial Role-Model Exposure and Entrepreneurship Education.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 8 (1): 20170013, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0013.Search in Google Scholar

Fayolle, A., and F. Liñán. 2014. “The Future of Research on Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Journal of Business Research 67 (5): 663–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.024.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, R. 2007. Technobohemians or the New Cybertariat? New Media Work in Amsterdam a Decade After the Web. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.Search in Google Scholar

Giordano Martínez, K. R., A. Fernández-Laviada, and C. Á. Herrero. 2018. “Influence of Business Incubators Performance on Entrepreneurial Intentions and Its Antecedents During the Pre-Incubation Stage.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 8 (2): 20160095.10.1515/erj-2016-0095Search in Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P., and V. Brandstätter. 1997. “Implementation Intentions and Effective Goal Pursuit.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (1): 186–99, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.186.Search in Google Scholar

Gregorio, S., and J. Davidson. 2008. Qualitative Research Design for Software Users. London: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hanage, R., P. Stenholm, J. M. Scott, and M. A. P. Davies. 2021. “Journey’s End: A Dynamic Framework of Entrepreneurial Processes and Capitals Relating to Early Stage Business Exit.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 27 (7): 1776–97.10.1108/IJEBR-11-2020-0768Search in Google Scholar

Harkins, J., and N. Forster-Holt. 2014. “Resource Dependence and the Exits of Young Firms.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 4 (4): 323–49, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0063.Search in Google Scholar

Hindle, K., K. Klyver, and D. Jennings. 2009. “An ‘Informed’ Intent Model: Incorporating Human Capital, Social Capital, and Gender Variables into the Theoretical Model of Entrepreneurial Intentions.” In Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind: Opening the Black Box, edited by A. Carsrud, and M. Brännback, 35–50. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-0443-0_3Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–91, https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.Search in Google Scholar

Kautonen, T., M. Van Gelderen, and E. T. Tornikoski. 2013. “Predicting Entrepreneurial Behaviour: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Applied Economics 45 (6): 697–707, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.610750.Search in Google Scholar

Kautonen, T., M. Van Gelderen, and M. Fink. 2015. “Robustness of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39 (3): 655–74, https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056.Search in Google Scholar

Kessler, A., and H. Frank. 2009. “Nascent Entrepreneurship in a Longitudinal Perspective.” International Small Business Journal 27 (6): 720–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242609344363.Search in Google Scholar

Kohn, K., and S. A. Wewel. 2018. “Skills, Scope and Success: An Empirical Look at the Start-Up Process in Creative Industries in Germany.” Creativity and Innovation Management 27 (3): 295–318, https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12279.Search in Google Scholar

Kolvereid, L. 1996. “Prediction of Employment Status Choice Intentions.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 21 (1): 47–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879602100104.Search in Google Scholar

Kolvereid, L., and E. Isaksen. 2006. “New Business Start-Up and Subsequent Entry into Self-Employment.” Journal of Business Venturing 21 (6): 866–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.008.Search in Google Scholar

Krueger, N. F., M. D. Reilly, and A. L. Carsrud. 2000. “Competing Models of Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Journal of Business Venturing 15 (5–6): 411–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00033-0.Search in Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, B. 2016. “Emergence and Emergents in Entrepreneurship: Complexity Science Insights into New Venture Creation.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 6 (1): 43–52, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0052.Search in Google Scholar

Liñán, F., and Y.-W. Chen. 2009. “Development and Cross-Cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33 (3): 593–617.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lüthje, C., and N. Franke. 2003. “The ‘Making’ of an Entrepreneur: Testing a Model of Entrepreneurial Intent Among Engineering Students at MIT.” R&D Management 33 (2): 135–47.10.1111/1467-9310.00288Search in Google Scholar

Mair, J., and E. Noboa. 2006. “Social Entrepreneurship: How Intentions to Create a Social Venture are Formed.” In Social Entrepreneurship, edited by J. Mair, J. Robinson, and K. Hockerts, 121–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230625655_8Search in Google Scholar

Miettinen, M. R., and H. Littunen. 2013. “Factors Contributing to the Success of Start-Up Firms Using Two-Point or Multiple-Point Scale Models.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 3 (4): 449–81, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2012-0012.Search in Google Scholar

Monteiro, G. F. A., T. Iwai, and A. B. Bortoluzzo. 2023. “Local Institutional Profile and the Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Intention.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 13 (2): 503–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2020-0337.Search in Google Scholar

Mullins, J. W. 2006. New Business Road Test. Harlow: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Mullins, J. W., and R. Komisar. 2009. Getting to Plan B. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Search in Google Scholar

Oftedal, E. M., T. A. Iakovleva, and L. Foss. 2018. “University Context Matter: An Institutional Perspective on Entrepreneurial Intentions of Students.” Education + Training 60 (7/8): 873–90, https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2016-0098.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Fernández, H., J. B. Delgado-García, N. Martín-Cruz, and A. I. Rodríguez-Escudero. 2022. “The Role of Affect in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 12 (2): 20190124. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2019-0124.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, M., and M. Davies. 2001. “Moderator Teams: An Extension to Focus Group Methodology.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 4 (4): 207–16, https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000005902.Search in Google Scholar

Ram, M., P. Edwards, T. Jones, T. A. Kiselinchev, and L. Muchenje. 2014. “Pulling the Levers of Agency – Implementing Critical Realist Action Research.” In Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide, edited by P. K. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, and S. Vincent, 206–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665525.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Rogoff, E. J., M.-S. Lee, and D. C. Suh. 2004. “‘Who Done It?’ Attributions by Entrepreneurs and Experts of the Factors that Cause and Impede Small Business Success.” Journal of Small Business Management 42 (4): 364–76, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2004.00117.x.Search in Google Scholar

Samuelsson, M., and P. Davidsson. 2009. “Does Venture Opportunity Variation Matter? Investigating Systematic Process Differences Between Innovative and Imitative New Ventures.” Small Business Economics 33 (2): 229–55, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9093-7.Search in Google Scholar

Schlaegel, C., and M. Koenig. 2014. “Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intent: A Meta-Analytic Test and Integration of Competing Models.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38 (2): 291–332, https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12087.Search in Google Scholar

Schofield, J. W. 2000. “Increasing the Generalizability of Qualitative Research.” In Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts, edited by R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, and P. Foster, 69–97. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9780857024367.d8Search in Google Scholar

Segal, G., D. Borgia, and J. Schoenfeld. 2005. “The Motivation to Become an Entrepreneur.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 11 (1): 42–57, https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550510580834.Search in Google Scholar

Shook, C., R. Priem, and J. McGee. 2003. “Venture Creation and the Enterprising Individual: A Review and Synthesis.” Journal of Management 29 (3): 379–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00016-3.Search in Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. “Social Structures and Organizations.” In Handbook of Organizations, edited by J. G. March, 142–93. Chicago: Rand McNally.Search in Google Scholar

Storey, D. 2011. “Optimism and Chance: The Elephants in the Entrepreneurship Room.” International Small Business Journal 29 (4): 303–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611403871.Search in Google Scholar

Storey, D., and J. Frankish. 2016. “The Financing of New Firms: What Governments Need to Know.” Small Enterprise Research 23 (3): 276–92.10.1080/13215906.2016.1269298Search in Google Scholar

Tornikoski, E., and A. Maalaoui. 2019. “Critical Reflections – The Theory of Planned Behaviour: An Interview with Icek Ajzen with Implications for Entrepreneurship Research.” International Small Business Journal 37 (5): 536–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619829681.Search in Google Scholar

Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2003. “Temporal Construal.” Psychological Review 110 (3): 403–21, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403.Search in Google Scholar

Ucbasaran, D., D. Shepherd, A. Lockett, and S. J. Lyon. 2013. “Life After Business Failure: The Process and Consequences of Business Failure for Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Business Management 39 (1): 163–202, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457823.Search in Google Scholar

Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199226290.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, M., M. Brand, M. van Praag, W. Bodewes, E. Poutsma, and A. van Gils. 2008. “Explaining Entrepreneurial Intentions by Means of the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Career Development International 13 (6): 538–59, https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810901688.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, M. S., and J. D. Rowe. 2011. “Nowhere to Run and Nowhere to Hide: The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Success and Feelings of Entrapment.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 1 (4): 20124005, https://doi.org/10.2202/2157-5665.1034.Search in Google Scholar

Woronkowicz, J., and D. S. Noonan. 2019. “Who Goes Freelance? The Determinants of Self-Employment for Artists.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 43 (4): 651–72, https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717728067.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Y., and S. M. Danes. 2015. “Resiliency and Resilience Process of Entrepreneurs in New Venture Creation.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 5 (1): 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0076.Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. 2017. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 6th ed. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Zahra, S. A. 2007. “Contextualizing Theory Building in Entrepreneurship Research.” Journal of Business Venturing 22 (3): 443–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

Zahra, S. A., and M. Wright. 2011. “Entrepreneurship’s Next Act.” Academy of Management Perspectives 25 (4): 67–83, https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2010.0149.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, P., D. D. Wang, and C. L. Owen. 2015. “A Study of Entrepreneurial Intention of University Students.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 5 (1): 61–82, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2014-0004.Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2022-04-08
Accepted: 2022-09-30
Published Online: 2022-10-20

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Competitive Research Articles
  3. Entrepreneurship in Times of Crisis: A Comprehensive Review with Future Directions
  4. Entrepreneurial Failure: Structuring a Widely Overlooked Field of Research
  5. Why Peer Support Matters: Entrepreneurial Stressors, Emotional Exhaustion, and Growth Intentions of Women Entrepreneurs
  6. “And Yet It Moves”: National Entrepreneurial Culture and Entrepreneurship-Friendly Policies: Evidence From OECD Countries
  7. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Dual Social Network Embeddedness Combined Ambidexterity on Entrepreneurial Performance of Returning Migrant Workers
  8. Holding Friends Closer or Keeping Them at a Distance: The Intimacy with Founding Members and Its Effect on Entrepreneurs’ Effectual Problem Setting
  9. Entrepreneurs’ Personality Traits and Social Enterprise: A Legitimation Perspective
  10. The Antecedents to Habitual Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Role of Entrepreneurs’ Narcissism and Educational Level
  11. Network Insight and Entrepreneurial Performance of New Ventures: Understanding the Roles of Resource Integration and Dynamic Management Capability
  12. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior – A Longitudinal Study of Entrepreneurial Intentions
  13. Patterns of Technological Entrepreneurship and Their Determinants: Evidence from Technology-Based Manufacturing Firms in China
  14. The Relationship between Cognitive and Contextual Factors: A Self-Regulatory Mechanism Underlying Persistence in Nascent Entrepreneurs
  15. Is e-Government a Driver to Enhance Entrepreneurship? An Empirical Investigation of European Countries
  16. Investigating the Relationship between Technological Entrepreneurship and National Innovativeness: Moderating Effects of Intellectual Property Protection and R&D Transfer Environment
  17. How Does Subsidiary Autonomy Influence Performance in the Emerging Economy: Different Moderating Effects of Subsidiary Entrepreneurship
  18. Resource Orchestration in Hub-Based Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Case Study on the Seaweed Industry
  19. How Does the Combination of Factors Influence Entrepreneurs’ Decision-Making Logic? A Qualitative Comparative analysis
  20. Competitive Strategy in Everyday Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Self-determination Theory Perspective
  21. Should Start-Ups Be Green? Corporate Environmental Responsibility, Institutional Contexts, and Financial Performance of New Ventures
  22. Success Factors in Equity Crowdfunding – Evidence from Crowdcube
https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2022-0142
Keywords for this article
entrepreneurial intent; theory of planned behavior (TPB); creative sector; business exit; dynamic entrepreneurial processes

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Competitive Research Articles
  3. Entrepreneurship in Times of Crisis: A Comprehensive Review with Future Directions
  4. Entrepreneurial Failure: Structuring a Widely Overlooked Field of Research
  5. Why Peer Support Matters: Entrepreneurial Stressors, Emotional Exhaustion, and Growth Intentions of Women Entrepreneurs
  6. “And Yet It Moves”: National Entrepreneurial Culture and Entrepreneurship-Friendly Policies: Evidence From OECD Countries
  7. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Dual Social Network Embeddedness Combined Ambidexterity on Entrepreneurial Performance of Returning Migrant Workers
  8. Holding Friends Closer or Keeping Them at a Distance: The Intimacy with Founding Members and Its Effect on Entrepreneurs’ Effectual Problem Setting
  9. Entrepreneurs’ Personality Traits and Social Enterprise: A Legitimation Perspective
  10. The Antecedents to Habitual Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Role of Entrepreneurs’ Narcissism and Educational Level
  11. Network Insight and Entrepreneurial Performance of New Ventures: Understanding the Roles of Resource Integration and Dynamic Management Capability
  12. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior – A Longitudinal Study of Entrepreneurial Intentions
  13. Patterns of Technological Entrepreneurship and Their Determinants: Evidence from Technology-Based Manufacturing Firms in China
  14. The Relationship between Cognitive and Contextual Factors: A Self-Regulatory Mechanism Underlying Persistence in Nascent Entrepreneurs
  15. Is e-Government a Driver to Enhance Entrepreneurship? An Empirical Investigation of European Countries
  16. Investigating the Relationship between Technological Entrepreneurship and National Innovativeness: Moderating Effects of Intellectual Property Protection and R&D Transfer Environment
  17. How Does Subsidiary Autonomy Influence Performance in the Emerging Economy: Different Moderating Effects of Subsidiary Entrepreneurship
  18. Resource Orchestration in Hub-Based Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Case Study on the Seaweed Industry
  19. How Does the Combination of Factors Influence Entrepreneurs’ Decision-Making Logic? A Qualitative Comparative analysis
  20. Competitive Strategy in Everyday Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Self-determination Theory Perspective
  21. Should Start-Ups Be Green? Corporate Environmental Responsibility, Institutional Contexts, and Financial Performance of New Ventures
  22. Success Factors in Equity Crowdfunding – Evidence from Crowdcube
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2026 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 1.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/erj-2022-0142/html
Scroll to top button