Home Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2009, Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Cristina Rodríguez Nogueira, Case C-40/08
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2009, Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Cristina Rodríguez Nogueira, Case C-40/08

  • Chantal Mak
Published/Copyright: November 4, 2010
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
European Review of Contract Law
From the journal Volume 6 Issue 4

On those grounds, the Court (First Chamber) hereby rules:

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a national court or tribunal hearing an action for enforcement of an arbitration award which has become final and was made in the absence of the consumer is required, where it has available to it the legal and factual elements necessary for that task, to assess of its own motion whether an arbitration clause in a contract concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer is unfair, in so far as, under national rules of procedure, it can carry out such an assessment in similar actions of a domestic nature. If that is the case, it is for that court or tribunal to establish all the consequences thereby arising under national law, in order to ensure that the consumer is not bound by that clause.

Published Online: 2010-11-04
Published in Print: 2010-December
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ercl.2010.437/html
Scroll to top button