Home Ultraviolet high-transmitting cross-linked polymer materials derived from mercaptopropyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane
Article Open Access

Ultraviolet high-transmitting cross-linked polymer materials derived from mercaptopropyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane

  • Sun Fuqian EMAIL logo , Wang Xiaoyu , Deng Zhaoyang and Zeng Guoping
Published/Copyright: August 22, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, several cross-linked polymer materials with high light-transmitting properties are presented. First, mercaptopropyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS-SH) was synthesized via the hydrolytic condensation of 3-mercaptopropyl triethoxysilane. Then, glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and allylmethacrylate were allowed to polymerize with POSS-SH, yielding a hybridized composite. The volumetric shrinkage, thermal, and light-transmitting properties of the materials were studied and investigated using a pycnometer, differential scanning calorimeter, and ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer. The results indicated that POSS-SH decreased the volumetric shrinkage of the GMA-based materials. Thermal analysis indicated that the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the hybrid composite decreased as the POSS-SH content increased, while the Tc and Tm of the hybrid composite increased slightly. The light transmittance of the hybrid composite increased as the POSS-SH content increased. When the POSS-SH content increased to 42.9%, the hybrid composite exhibited average light transmittance values of 96% at wavelengths ranging from 200 to 400 nm and 97% at wavelengths ranging from 400 to 800 nm.

1 Introduction

Organic-inorganic hybrid polymer nanocomposites bridge the differences between organic and inorganic materials, and bear unique properties from both inorganic and organic components (1–3).

Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSSs) can exhibit a combination of organic and inorganic material properties. In the past decade, POSSs have received considerable attention in research concerning organic and inorganic hybrid nanomaterials (4–8). POSSs consist of an inorganic Si8O12 core that can be designed through the attachment of a functional group that is able to undergo polymerization, grafting, and cross-linking (9–12). POSSs are a new class of high-performance hybrid materials that are commonly used as nanostructured filters to modify various polymeric systems. Numerous studies have indicated that the incorporation of POSS into polymeric matrixes could improve the comprehensive properties of composites, such as their service temperature (13), decomposition temperature (14), oxidation resistance (15), surface modification (16), mechanical (17), and flammability resistance (18) properties.

In the field of optical materials, inorganic quartz glass is normally used as an optical instrument owing to its high light transparence, particularly its ultraviolet (UV) transmittance. However, quartz glass is brittle and difficult to process, which limit its applications in many optical fields. Although polymers used as optical materials can be processed well, they cannot transmit UV light, which limits their applications in some fields. As mentioned previously, organic-inorganic hybrid polymer nanocomposites can exhibit the high UV transmittance properties of quartz glass as well as the processing properties of polymers.

In this paper, a new type of cross-linked polymer materials based on POSS with high light-transmitting properties is presented. Mercaptopropyl POSS (POSS-SH) was synthesized and incorporated into a methacrylate system (glycidyl methacrylate and allylmethacrylate) in order to form a hybrid composite material. The volumetric shrinkage, thermal, and light-transmitting properties of the materials were investigated. The results indicated that the cross-linked polymer materials derived from the incorporation of POSS-SH into the methacrylate system exhibited high ultraviolet and visible light-transmitting properties.

2 Experimental

2.1 Materials

The 3-mercaptopropyl triethoxysilane (MPTS; 98%) used in this study was purchased from Hangzhou Feidian Chemical Co. Ltd. (Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China). Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and allylmethacrylate (AMA) were purchased from Guangzhou Heshibi Chemical Co. Ltd. (Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China). Photoinitiator 1173 was purchased from Guangzhou Guanchuan Trade Development Co. Ltd. (Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China). The remaining chemicals used in this study were obtained from our laboratory.

2.2 Preparation of the POSS-SH

POSS-SH was prepared according to the methods used in previous studies (19–21). First, 2.7 ml of deionized water, 20 ml of ethanol, 0.2 ml of concentrated hydrochloric acid (37%), and 23 ml (0.1 mol) of MPTS were charged into a 100-ml flask and stirred vigorously with a magnetic stirrer. Next, the mixture was refluxed for 36 h at 60°C, producing POSS-SH as a white precipitate. The crude product was washed with MeOH three times to remove excess MPTS. A viscous liquid was obtained after the removal of the solvent through a reduction in the pressure using a vacuum pump. The resulting viscous liquid was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and then washed three times with H2O. The CH2Cl2 phase was dried with anhydrous Mg2SO4 and concentrated, resulting in an 87% yield of POSS-SH. The product was characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H NMR and 29Si NMR).

FTIR (KBr, cm-1): 2920 (-CH2-); 2556 (-SH); 1259 (Si-C); 1032 (Si-O-Si).

1H NMR (d, ppm, CDCl3): 0.78 (-Si-CH2-), 1.4 (-SH), 1.72 (-CH2-), 2.58 (-CH2-S). 29Si NMR (d, ppm, CDCl3): 266.8(s).

2.3 Preparation of the GMA and POSS-SH cross-linked polymer materials

The GMA, AMA, and POSS-SH as well as photoinitiator 1173 were mixed at the desired ratios to form a homogeneous transparent mixture. Then, the mixture was poured into molds and sealed. The sealed molds were exposed to ultraviolet radiation for 3 min to initiate monomer polymerization and cross-linking. The molds were then unpacked, and the cross-linked polymer materials were obtained. The component ratios and weight percentages of POSS-SH are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Components and physical properties of the cross-linked polymer materials. The photoinitiator 1173 comprised 0.5 wt.% of the monomer components.

Sample nameCompositionWeight ratioPOSH-SH (wt.%)Refractive indexShrinkage (%)
GP0GMA301.443611.2
GAP0GMA/AMA3:101.4362ND
GAP1GMA/AMA/POSS-SH3:1:0.511.11.44907.1
GAP2GMA/AMA/POSS-SH3:1:120.01.45426.2
GAP3GMA/AMA/POSS-SH3:1:1.527.31.46705.2
GAP4GMA/AMA/POSS-SH3:1:233.31.47504.8
GAP5GMA/AMA/POSS-SH3:1:342.91.48024.7

GP0, GMA-based material; GAP0, GMA/AMA-based material without POSS-SH; GAP1–GAP5, typical hybrid composites; ND, not determined.

2.4 Characterization

The refractive index of the components was determined using an Abbe refractometer (WYA-2W, Shanghai Jingke Instruments Ltd., Shanghai, China) at room temperature.

Calorimetric measurements were performed with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC7020, SINO, Japan) in a N2 atmosphere. The samples were heated from room temperature to 500°C, and the thermograms were record at a heating rate of 10°C/min.

The light-transmitting properties of the cross-linked polymer materials were determined using an ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer (UV2550, Shimadzu, Japan) at room temperature, with wavelengths ranging from 200 to 800 nm. The samples were placed in the quartz cuvette equipped on the spectrophotometer, and the transmittances of the samples were recorded using the wavelength scanning method.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Refractive indices and ratios of the components

The various ratio components of the cross-linked polymer materials are listed in Table 1. GMA was used to reduce the viscosity of the mixture (20). AMA was selected as a cross-linker and reactive diluent for the GMA and POSS-SH mixed system. GMA and POSS-SH are incompatible when they are mixed without other solvents, resulting in the production of opaque materials. These opaque materials were not studied in this paper. However, when AMA is added to a GMA and POSS-SH mixed system, the mixture becomes transparent. AMA has two reactive groups, methacrylate and vinyl, which can react with the methacrylate group of GMA and the mercapto group of POSS-SH, respectively. Thus, AMA was added to the GMA and POSS-SH mixed system. All of the cured cross-linked hybrid composites were transparent, indicating that no phase separation had occurred.

The physical properties of the composites are summarized in Table 1. The refractive index of the GMA, AMA, and POSS-SH monomer components was equal to 1.4436, 1.4302, and 1.5195, respectively. As shown in Table 1, the refractive index of the mixture increased as the POSS-SH content increased. The GMA and AMA mixture with a weight ratio of 3:1 without POSS-SH had a refractive index of 1.4362. When the GMA/AMA/POSS-SH mixture had a weight ratio of 3:1:3, the POSS-SH content was equal to 42.9% and the mixture had a refractive index of 1.4802 owing to the high refractive index of POSS-SH. The relationship between the refractive index of the mixture and the POSS-SH content was further investigated, and the results of this investigation are shown in Figure 1. The refractive index of the mixture increased slightly as the POSS-SH content increased. The linear correlation coefficient of the line was equal to 0.9989 when the POSS-SH content ranged from 0 to 42.9%. The relatively high refractive index of the mixture improved the light-emitting diode (LED) packaging materials.

Figure 1: Refractive indices of the hybrid composites containing different POSS-SH weight contents.
Figure 1:

Refractive indices of the hybrid composites containing different POSS-SH weight contents.

After the incorporation of POSS-SH into the methacrylate-based composites, the volumetric shrinkage decreased significantly. The GMA-based material (GP0) had a volume shrinkage of 11.2%. In this study, the GMA/AMA-based material without POSS-SH (GAP0) did not polymerize well enough to form completely cured materials. In addition, the volumetric shrinkage of GAP0 was not determined. Compared to the typical GMA-based material, the bulk volume shrinkage of the typical hybrid composite (GAP5) was equal to 4.7%, which was lower than that of the GMA-based system (GP0: 11.2%). This lower shrinkage value could be due to the thiol-ene photopolymerization of POSS-SH (22).

3.2 Thermal properties of the cross-linked polymer materials

The differential scanning calorimetry curves of the hybrid composites containing different POSS-SH contents are shown in Figure 2 and temperature data according to curves are list in Table 2. Although no clear glass transition temperature (Tg) exists for pure (methyl) acrylate, the hybrid composite with a GMA/AMA/POSS-SH weight ratio of 3:1:3 had a Tg of 112°C. The Tg value increased slightly as the POSS-SH content increased. The effects of POSS cages on the Tg of hybrids have been proven to be dependent on the types of corner R groups on the POSS cages and on the interactions among the R groups and matrix polymer (23). The results of this study could be explained by the hindrance of the polymer chain motions of POSS cages noted in previous studies (24).

Table 2

Temperatures of the hybrid composites containing different POSS-SH weight contents.

Sample namePOSS-SH (wt.%)Tg (°C)Tm (°C)Td (°C)
GAP111.1318395
GAP220.0108301397
GAP327.3109293398
GAP433.3110290399
GAP542.9112282400

Furthermore, the endothermic peak of approx. 300°C was attributed to the Tm of the hybrid composite. The Tm decreased as the POSS-SH content increased. The hybrid composite with a GMA/AMA/POSS-SH weight ratio of 3:1:0.5 had a Tm of 318°C, while the hybrid composite with a GMA/AMA/POSS-SH weight ratio of 3:1:3 had a Tm of 282°C. The endothermic peak of approx. 400°C was attributed to the decomposition temperature (Td) of the hybrid composite. The Td increased slightly as the POSS-SH content increased. This indicated that the incorporation of POSS-SH into the hybrid composite did not significantly influence the Td of the hybrid composite.

Figure 2: DSC curves of the hybrid composites containing different POSS-SH weight contents.
Figure 2:

DSC curves of the hybrid composites containing different POSS-SH weight contents.

3.3 Light-transmitting properties of the cross-linked polymer materials

The light-transmitting properties of the hybrid composites were determined using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer via the wavelength scanning method; the results are listed in Figure 3. The transparence values of the hybrid composites increased as the POSS-SH content increased. The hybrid composite with a GMA/AMA/POSS-SH weight ratio of 3:1:0.5 had an average transparence of 45% at a wavelength range of 200–300 nm and 86% at a wavelength range of 300–400 nm. At a wavelength range from 400 to 800 nm, the average transparence of this hybrid composite remained constant at 86%. The average transparence of the hybrid composite with a GMA/AMA/POSS-SH weight ratio of 3:1:1 at a wavelength range from 200 to 800 nm was greater than that of the hybrid composite with a GMA/AMA/POSS-SH weight ratio of 3:1:0.5. When the POSS-SH content increased to 42.9%, the hybrid composite had an average transparence of 96% at a wavelength range from 200 to 400 nm and 97% at a wavelength range from 400 to 800 nm. This indicated that the hybrid composite with a POSS-SH content of 42.9% had a high ultraviolet and visible light transparence. The hybrid composites had a high ultraviolet and visible light transparence compared to inorganic quartz. Thus, the results suggested that hybrid composites could be applied to precision optics.

Figure 3: Light-transmitting properties of the hybrid composites.
Figure 3:

Light-transmitting properties of the hybrid composites.

4 Conclusions

In this study, POSS-SH was synthesized and incorporated into a GMA-based photocuring system in order to obtain cross-linked polymer materials with high light-transmitting properties. The volumetric shrinkage decreased significantly with the incorporation of POSS-SH into the methacrylate-based mixture. The thermal analysis indicated that the Tg of the hybrid composite decreased as the POSS-SH content increased, while the Tc and Tm of the hybrid composite increased slightly. The hybrid composite exhibited a high ultraviolet and visible light transparence and, thus, could be applied to precision optics.


Corresponding author: Sun Fuqian, Institute of Applied Chemistry, Jiangxi Academy of Science, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330029, China, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51463009) and the Jiangxi Province Science and Technology Support Program (20142BBE50007) for their financial support.

References

1. Sanchez CB, Chapu LF, Boilot JP. Optical properties of functional hybrid organic-inorganic nanocomposites. Adv Mater. 2003;15(23):1969–94.10.1002/adma.200300389Search in Google Scholar

2. Sanchez C, Soler-Illia G, Ribot F, Lalot T, Mayer CR, Cabuil V. Designed hybrid organic-inorganic nanocomposites from functional nanobuilding blocks. Chem Mater. 2001;13(10):3061–83.10.1021/cm011061eSearch in Google Scholar

3. Zandi-zand R, Ershad-langroudi A, Rahimi A. Silica based organic-inorganic hybrid nanocomposite coatings for corrosion protection. Prog Org Coat. 2005;53(4):286–91.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2005.03.009Search in Google Scholar

4. Li G, Wang L, Ni H, Pittman Jr CU. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) polymers and copolymers: a review. J Inorg Organomet Polym. 2001;11(3):123–54.10.1023/A:1015287910502Search in Google Scholar

5. Phillips SH, Haddad TS, Tomczak SJ. Developments in nanoscience: polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-polymers. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2004;8:21–9.10.1016/j.cossms.2004.03.002Search in Google Scholar

6. Joshi M, Butolaa BS. Polymeric nanocomposites – Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) as hybrid nanofiller. J Macromol Sci Part C: Polym Rev. 2004;44(4):389–410.10.1081/MC-200033687Search in Google Scholar

7. Wu J, Mather PT. POSS polymers: physical properties and biomaterials applications. J Macromol Sci Part C: Polym Rev. 2009;49(1):25–63.10.1080/15583720802656237Search in Google Scholar

8. Cordes DB, Lickiss PD, Rataboul F. Recent developments in the chemistry of cubic polyhedral oligosilsesquioxanes. Chem Rev. 2010;110(4):2081–173.10.1021/cr900201rSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Constantopoulos K, Clarke DJ, Markovic E, Uhrig D, Clarke SR, Matisons JG, Simon G. New family of POSS monomers suitable for forming urethane polymerizable nanocomposite coatings. Abstr Pap Am Chem Soc. 2004;227:U441.Search in Google Scholar

10. Lee A, Lichtenhan JD. Viscoelastic responses of polyhedral oligosilsesquioxane reinforced epoxy systems. Macromolecules 1998;31(15):4970–4.10.1021/ma9800764Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Lee J, Cho HJ, Jung BJ, Cho NS, Shim HK. Stabilized blue luminescent polyfluorenes: introducing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane. Macromolecules 2004;37(23):8523–9.10.1021/ma0497759Search in Google Scholar

12. Xu HY, Kuo SW, Lee JS, Chang FC. Glass transition temperatures of poly(hydroxystyrene-co-vinylpyrrolidone-co-isobutylstyryl polyhedral oligosilsesquioxanes). Polymer. 2002;43(19):5117–24.10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00402-0Search in Google Scholar

13. Huang JC, Xiao Y, Mya KY, Liu XM, He CB, Dai J, Siow YP. Thermomechanical properties of polyimide-epoxy nanocomposites from cubic silsesquioxane epoxides. J Mater Chem. 2004;14(19):2858–63.10.1039/b405427jSearch in Google Scholar

14. Huang JC, He CB. Xiao Y, Mya KY, Dai J, Siow YP. Polyimide/POSS nanocomposites: interfacial interaction, thermal properties and mechanical properties. Polymer 2003;44(16):4491–9.10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00434-8Search in Google Scholar

15. Vilà Ramirez N, Sanchez-Soto M. Effects of POSS nanoparticles on ABS-g-Ma thermo oxidation resistance. Polym Compos. 2012;33(10):1707–18.10.1002/pc.22304Search in Google Scholar

16. Wohl CJ, Belcher MA, Ghose S, Connell JW. Modification of the surface properties of polyimide films using polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane deposition and oxygen plasma exposure. Appl Surf Sci. 2009;255(18):8135–44.10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.030Search in Google Scholar

17. Chen DZ, Liu Y, Huang C. Synergistic effect between POSS and fumed silica on thermal stabilities and mechanical properties of room temperature vulcanized (RTV) silicone rubbers. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2012;97:308–15.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.12.016Search in Google Scholar

18. Fina A, Abbenhuis HC. Metal funct ionalized POSS as fire retardants in polypropylene. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2006;91(10):2257–540.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.04.014Search in Google Scholar

19. Lin H, Wan X, Jiang XS, Wang QK, Yin J. A nanoimprint lithography hybrid photoresist based on the thiol-ene system. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21:2960–7.10.1002/adfm.201100692Search in Google Scholar

20. Fu JF, Shi LY, Chen Y, Yuan S, Wu J, Liang XL, Zhong QD. Epoxy nanocomposites containing mercaptopropyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane: morphology, thermal properties, and toughening mechanism. J Appl Polym Sci. 2008;109(1): 340–9.10.1002/app.27917Search in Google Scholar

21. Xu ZQ, Ni CH, Yao BL, Tao L, Zhu CP, Han QB, Mi JQ. The preparation and properties of hybridized hydrogels based on cubic thiol-functionalized silsesquioxane covalently linked with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Colloid Polym Sci. 2011;289 (15–16):1777–82.10.1007/s00396-011-2510-0Search in Google Scholar

22. Hoyle CE, Lee TY, Roper T. Thiol-enes: chemistry of the past with promise for the future. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem. 2004;42(21):5301–38.10.1002/pola.20366Search in Google Scholar

23. Dodiuk H, Kenig S, Blinsky I, Dotan A, Buchman A. Nanotailoring of epoxy adhesives by polyhedral-oligomeric-sil-sesquioxanes (POSS). Int J Adhes Adhes. 2005;25(3):211–8.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.07.003Search in Google Scholar

24. Xu HY, Kuo SW, Lee JS, Chang FC. Properties, and Tg increase mechanism of inorganic/organic hybrid polymers based on polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. Macromolecules 2002;35(23):8788–93.10.1021/ma0202843Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-4-2
Accepted: 2015-7-24
Published Online: 2015-8-22
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 4.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/epoly-2015-0079/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button