Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Taking Possession of Vacant Buildings to House Refugees in Germany: Is the Constitutional Property Clause an Insurmountable Hurdle?

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 17, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Germany faces a challenge unknown since the end of the Second World War. In 2015, around 1.1 million asylum seekers and refugees registered in Germany. The German authorities must provide temporary housing for hundreds of thousands of refugees and asylum seekers to safeguard their human dignity, life, health, and physical integrity. As there already is a shortage of housing in the major metropolitan areas, the legislature of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg authorised its authorities temporarily to take possession of vacant privately owned buildings if there is not enough space for refugees in reception camps. This deprivation of the use of the buildings begs the question whether this law complies with the constitutional property clause (Art. 14 of the German Basic Law). In this contribution I argue that the law is not contrary to Art. 14. As Art. 14 requires, taking possession of the buildings is a suitable and necessary means to protect the refugees and asylum seekers. However, as the competent authority imposes an excessive burden upon a small number of owners, the authority will have to award equitable compensation on the basis of the adopted law to ensure the proportionality of the measure.

Published Online: 2016-5-17
Published in Print: 2016-5-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eplj-2016-0002/html
Scroll to top button