Startseite Medizin Radio-nanomaterials for biomedical applications: state of the art
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Radio-nanomaterials for biomedical applications: state of the art

  • Weifei Lu

    Weifei Lu acquired his PhD degree in Biochemistry from Henan Agriculture University (HAU), China in 2014 and is currently an Associate Professor in HAU. As an active member of Chinese Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, his research interest is focused on the development of gene therapy vectors, study of gene functions, protein engineering, and targeted drug delivery. He is now a visiting professor under the supervision of Dr. Hao Hong for design and synthesis of novel PET tracers based on biodegradable nanomaterials and engineered proteins. He also participates actively in different major research projects funded by NSF China.

    , Hao Hong

    Hao Hong started his postion as a Research Assistant Professor of Radiology at the University of Michigan in 2014. He received his PhD degree in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from Nanjing University (P.R. China) in 2008. He acquired his postdoctoral training from 2008 to 2013 in the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. His research interest is in the design and optimization of new imaging tracers for cancer as well as modification/application of nanomaterials for image-guided therapeutic delivery. Dr. Hong has published >90 peer-reviewed manuscripts (citation >3400 in Google scholar) and received many awards.

    EMAIL logo
    und Weibo Cai

    Weibo Cai is currently an Associate Professor of Radiology and Medical Physics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received his PhD in Chemistry from UC San Diego in 2004. After postdoctoral training at Stanford University, he launched his career at UW-Madison in early 2008. His research is primarily focused on molecular imaging and nanotechnology (http://mi.wisc.edu/), investigating the biomedical applications of various agents developed in his laboratory for imaging and therapy of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Dr. Cai has authored ~200 peer-reviewed publications with H-index of >50, received many awards, and served on numerous grant review panels.

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. Juni 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The incorporation of radioactive isotope(s) into conventional nanomaterials can bring extra properties which are not possessed by original materials. The resulting radioactive nanomaterials (radio-nanomaterials), with added physical/chemical properties, can be used as important tools for different biomedical applications. In this review, our goal is to provide an up-to-date overview on these applications using radio-nanomaterials. The first section illustrates the utilization of radio-nanomaterials for understanding of in vivo kinetics of their parent nanomaterials. In the second section, we focus on two primary applications of radio-nanomaterials: imaging and therapeutic delivery. With various methods being used to form radio-nanomaterials, they can be used for positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and multimodal imaging. Therapeutic isotopes-loading radio-nanomaterials can possess selective killing efficacy of diseased cells (e.g. tumor cells) and can provide promises for certain isotopes which are not able to be used in a conventional manner. The successful and versatile biomedical applications of radio-nanomaterials warrants further investigations of those materials and their optimizations can pave the way to future imaging guidable, personalized treatments in patients.

Award Identifier / Grant number: NIBIB/NCI R01CA169365

Award Identifier / Grant number: P30CA014520

Funding source: American Cancer Society

Award Identifier / Grant number: 125246-RSG-13-099-01-CCE

Funding statement: This work was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (NIBIB/NCI R01CA169365, P30CA014520), the American Cancer Society (125246-RSG-13-099-01-CCE), and the Pardee Foundation Grant (to H.H.).

About the authors

Weifei Lu

Weifei Lu acquired his PhD degree in Biochemistry from Henan Agriculture University (HAU), China in 2014 and is currently an Associate Professor in HAU. As an active member of Chinese Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, his research interest is focused on the development of gene therapy vectors, study of gene functions, protein engineering, and targeted drug delivery. He is now a visiting professor under the supervision of Dr. Hao Hong for design and synthesis of novel PET tracers based on biodegradable nanomaterials and engineered proteins. He also participates actively in different major research projects funded by NSF China.

Hao Hong

Hao Hong started his postion as a Research Assistant Professor of Radiology at the University of Michigan in 2014. He received his PhD degree in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from Nanjing University (P.R. China) in 2008. He acquired his postdoctoral training from 2008 to 2013 in the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. His research interest is in the design and optimization of new imaging tracers for cancer as well as modification/application of nanomaterials for image-guided therapeutic delivery. Dr. Hong has published >90 peer-reviewed manuscripts (citation >3400 in Google scholar) and received many awards.

Weibo Cai

Weibo Cai is currently an Associate Professor of Radiology and Medical Physics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received his PhD in Chemistry from UC San Diego in 2004. After postdoctoral training at Stanford University, he launched his career at UW-Madison in early 2008. His research is primarily focused on molecular imaging and nanotechnology (http://mi.wisc.edu/), investigating the biomedical applications of various agents developed in his laboratory for imaging and therapy of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Dr. Cai has authored ~200 peer-reviewed publications with H-index of >50, received many awards, and served on numerous grant review panels.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (NIBIB/NCI R01CA169365, P30CA014520), the American Cancer Society (125246-RSG-13-099-01-CCE), and the Pardee Foundation Grant (to H.H.).

  1. Conflict of interest statement: The authors state no conflict of interest. All authors have read the journal’s publication ethics and publication malpractice statement available at the journal’s website and hereby confirm that they comply with all its parts applicable to the present scientific work.

References

1. Cole JT, Holland NB. Multifunctional nanoparticles for use in theranostic applications. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2015;5:295–309.10.1007/s13346-015-0218-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Chen F, Ehlerding EB, Cai W. Theranostic nanoparticles. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1919–22.10.2967/jnumed.114.146019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. He C, Lin W. Hybrid nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. Cancer Treat Res 2015;166:173–92.10.1007/978-3-319-16555-4_8Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Soni G, Yadav KS. Applications of nanoparticles in treatment and diagnosis of leukemia. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2015;47:156–64.10.1016/j.msec.2014.10.043Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Cheng Z, Al Zaki A, Hui JZ, Muzykantov VR, Tsourkas A. Multifunctional nanoparticles: cost versus benefit of adding targeting and imaging capabilities. Science 2012;338:903–10.10.1126/science.1226338Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Kharisov BI, Kharissova OV, Berdonosov SS. Radioactive nanoparticles and their main applications: recent advances. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 2014;8:79–96.10.2174/187221050802140618143846Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Chen F, Ellison PA, Lewis CM, Hong H, Zhang Y, Shi S, et al. Chelator-free synthesis of a dual-modality PET/MRI agent. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2013;52:13319–23.10.1002/anie.201306306Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Ellison PA, Barnhart TE, Chen F, Hong H, Zhang Y, Theuer CP, et al. High yield production and radiochemical isolation of isotopically pure arsenic-72 and novel radioarsenic labeling strategies for the development of theranostic radiopharmaceuticals. Bioconjug Chem 2016;27:179–88.10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00592Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Chakravarty R, Valdovinos HF, Chen F, Lewis CM, Ellison PA, Luo H, et al. Intrinsically germanium-69-labeled iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and in-vivo dual-modality PET/MR imaging. Adv Mater 2014;26:5119–23.10.1002/adma.201401372Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Al Faraj A, Alotaibi B, Shaik AP, Shamma KZ, Al Jammaz I, Gerl J. Sodium-22-radiolabeled silica nanoparticles as new radiotracer for biomedical applications: in vivo positron emission tomography imaging, biodistribution, and biocompatibility. Int J Nanomedicine 2015;10:6293–302.10.2147/IJN.S93523Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Sun X, Cai W, Chen X. Positron emission tomography imaging using radiolabeled inorganic nanomaterials. Acc Chem Res 2015;48:286–294.10.1021/ar500362ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Volotskova O, Sun C, Stafford JH, Koh AL, Ma X, Cheng Z, et al. Efficient radioisotope energy transfer by gold nanoclusters for molecular imaging. Small 2015;11:4002–8.10.1002/smll.201500907Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Hughes MF, Long TC, Boyes WK, Ramabhadran R. Whole-body retention and distribution of orally administered radiolabelled zerovalent iron nanoparticles in mice. Nanotoxicology 2013;7:1064–9.10.3109/17435390.2012.700337Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Perez-Campana C, Gomez-Vallejo V, Puigivila M, Martin A, Calvo-Fernandez T, Moya SE, et al. Biodistribution of different sized nanoparticles assessed by positron emission tomography: a general strategy for direct activation of metal oxide particles. ACS Nano 2013;7:3498–505.10.1021/nn400450pSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Black KC, Wang Y, Luehmann HP, Cai X, Xing W, Pang B, et al. Radioactive 198Au-doped nanostructures with different shapes for in vivo analyses of their biodistribution, tumor uptake, and intratumoral distribution. ACS Nano 2014;8:4385–94.10.1021/nn406258mSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Wang H, Kumar R, Nagesha D, Duclos RI Jr, Sridhar S, Gatley SJ. Integrity of 111In-radiolabeled superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in the mouse. Nucl Med Biol 2015;42:65–70.10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.08.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Benezra M, Hambardzumyan D, Penate-Medina O, Veach DR, Pillarsetty N, Smith-Jones P, et al. Fluorine-labeled dasatinib nanoformulations as targeted molecular imaging probes in a PDGFB-driven murine glioblastoma model. Neoplasia 2012;14:1132–43.10.1593/neo.121750Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Wennerberg A, Jimbo R, Allard S, Skarnemark G, Andersson M. In vivo stability of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles coated on titanium implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1161–6.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Sun Y, Liu Q, Peng J, Feng W, Zhang Y, Yang P, et al. Radioisotope post-labeling upconversion nanophosphors for in vivo quantitative tracking. Biomaterials 2013;34:2289–95.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.047Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Yang Y, Sun Y, Cao T, Peng J, Liu Y, Wu Y, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of NaLuF4:153Sm,Yb,Tm nanoparticles and their application in dual-modality upconversion luminescence and SPECT bioimaging. Biomaterials 2013;34:774–83.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.022Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Sanchez-Martinez M, da Costa Martins R, Quincoces G, Gamazo C, Caicedo C, Irache JM, et al. Radiolabeling and biodistribution studies of polymeric nanoparticles as adjuvants for ocular vaccination against brucellosis. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2013;32:92–7.10.1016/j.remnie.2013.01.009Suche in Google Scholar

22. Woods A, Patel A, Spina D, Riffo-Vasquez Y, Babin-Morgan A, de Rosales RT, et al. In vivo biocompatibility, clearance, and biodistribution of albumin vehicles for pulmonary drug delivery. J Control Release 2015;210:1–9.10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.05.269Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Lee CM, Jeong HJ, Kim DW, Sohn MH, Lim ST. The effect of fluorination of zinc oxide nanoparticles on evaluation of their biodistribution after oral administration. Nanotechnology 2012;23:205102.10.1088/0957-4484/23/20/205102Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Yeh TK, Chen JK, Lin CH, Yang MH, Yang CS, Chou FI, et al. Kinetics and tissue distribution of neutron-activated zinc oxide nanoparticles and zinc nitrate in mice: effects of size and particulate nature. Nanotechnology 2012;23:085102.10.1088/0957-4484/23/8/085102Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Lin YY, Li JJ, Chang CH, Lu YC, Hwang JJ, Tseng YL, et al. Evaluation of pharmacokinetics of 111In-labeled VNB-PEGylated liposomes after intraperitoneal and intravenous administration in a tumor/ascites mouse model. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2009;24:453–60.10.1089/cbr.2008.0572Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Xie H, Goins B, Bao A, Wang ZJ, Phillips WT. Effect of intratumoral administration on biodistribution of 64Cu-labeled nanoshells. Int J Nanomedicine 2012;7:2227–38.10.2147/IJN.S30699Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Tian M, Lu W, Zhang R, Xiong C, Ensor J, Nazario J, et al. Tumor uptake of hollow gold nanospheres after intravenous and intra-arterial injection: PET/CT study in a rabbit VX2 liver cancer model. Mol Imaging Biol 2013;15:614–24.10.1007/s11307-013-0635-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Beloqui A, Solinis MA, Delgado A, Evora C, del Pozo-Rodriguez A, Rodriguez-Gascon A. Biodistribution of nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) after intravenous administration to rats: influence of technological factors. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2013;84:309–14.10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.01.029Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Chakravarty R, Hong H, Cai W. Positron emission tomography image-guided drug delivery: current status and future perspectives. Mol Pharm 2014;11:3777–97.10.1021/mp500173sSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Chen F, Goel S, Valdovinos HF, Luo H, Hernandez R, Barnhart TE, et al. In vivo integrity and biological fate of chelator-free zirconium-89-labeled mesoporous silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2015;9:7950–9.10.1021/acsnano.5b00526Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Zhao Y, Sultan D, Detering L, Cho S, Sun G, Pierce R, et al. Copper-64-alloyed gold nanoparticles for cancer imaging: improved radiolabel stability and diagnostic accuracy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2014;53:156–9.10.1002/anie.201308494Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Zeng J, Jia B, Qiao R, Wang C, Jing L, Wang F, et al. In situ 111In-doping for achieving biocompatible and non-leachable 111In-labeled Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Chem Commun (Camb) 2014;50:2170–2.10.1039/c3cc48948eSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Khawar IA, Kim JH, Kuh HJ. Improving drug delivery to solid tumors: priming the tumor microenvironment. J Control Release 2015;201:78–89.10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Sheng Y, Liao LD, Thakor NV, Tan MC. Nanoparticles for molecular imaging. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2014;10:2641–76.10.1166/jbn.2014.1937Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Srivatsan A, Chen X. Recent advances in nanoparticle-based nuclear imaging of cancers. Adv Cancer Res 2014;124:83–129.10.1016/B978-0-12-411638-2.00003-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Albernaz Mde S, Ospina CA, Rossi AM, Santos-Oliveira R. Radiolabelled nanohydroxyapatite with 99mTc: perspectives to nanoradiopharmaceuticals construction. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2014;42:88–91.10.3109/21691401.2013.785954Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Sakurai Y, Kajimoto K, Hatakeyama H, Harashima H. Advances in an active and passive targeting to tumor and adipose tissues. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2015;12:41–52.10.1517/17425247.2015.955847Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Hong H, Zhang Y, Engle JW, Nayak TR, Theuer CP, Nickles RJ, et al. In vivo targeting and positron emission tomography imaging of tumor vasculature with 66Ga-labeled nano-graphene. Biomaterials 2012;33:4147–56.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.031Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Hong H, Yang K, Zhang Y, Engle JW, Feng L, Yang Y, et al. In vivo targeting and imaging of tumor vasculature with radiolabeled, antibody-conjugated nanographene. ACS Nano 2012;6:2361–70.10.1021/nn204625eSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Shi S, Yang K, Hong H, Valdovinos HF, Nayak TR, Zhang Y, et al. Tumor vasculature targeting and imaging in living mice with reduced graphene oxide. Biomaterials 2013;34:3002–9.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.047Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Cornelissen B, Able S, Kersemans V, Waghorn PA, Myhra S, Jurkshat K, et al. Nanographene oxide-based radioimmunoconstructs for in vivo targeting and SPECT imaging of HER2-positive tumors. Biomaterials 2013;34:1146–54.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.054Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Chen F, Hong H, Shi S, Goel S, Valdovinos HF, Hernandez R, et al. Engineering of hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for remarkably enhanced tumor active targeting efficacy. Sci Rep 2014;4:5080.10.1038/srep05080Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Perez-Medina C, Tang J, Abdel-Atti D, Hogstad B, Merad M, Fisher EA, et al. PET imaging of tumor-associated macrophages with 89Zr-labeled high-density lipoprotein nanoparticles. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1272–7.10.2967/jnumed.115.158956Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Chen F, Hong H, Zhang Y, Valdovinos HF, Shi S, Kwon GS, et al. In vivo tumor targeting and image-guided drug delivery with antibody-conjugated, radiolabeled mesoporous silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2013;7:9027–39.10.1021/nn403617jSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Chen Y, Chen H, Shi J. In vivo bio-safety evaluations and diagnostic/therapeutic applications of chemically designed mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Adv Mater 2013;25:3144–76.10.1002/adma.201205292Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Zhu J, Chin J, Wangler C, Wangler B, Lennox RB, Schirrmacher R, Rapid 18F-labeling and loading of PEGylated gold nanoparticles for in vivo applications. Bioconjug Chem 2014;25:1143–50.10.1021/bc5001593Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Melancon MP, Zhou M, Zhang R, Xiong C, Allen P, Wen X, et al. Selective uptake and imaging of aptamer- and antibody-conjugated hollow nanospheres targeted to epidermal growth factor receptors overexpressed in head and neck cancer. ACS Nano 2014;8:4530–8.10.1021/nn406632uSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Sun X, Huang X, Yan X, Wang Y, Guo J, Jacobson O, et al. Chelator-free 64Cu-integrated gold nanomaterials for positron emission tomography imaging guided photothermal cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2014;8:8438–46.10.1021/nn502950tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Phillips WT, Goins BA, Bao A. Radioactive liposomes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2009;1:69–83.10.1002/wnan.3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Silindir M, Ozer AY, Erdogan S. The use and importance of liposomes in positron emission tomography. Drug Deliv 2012;19:68–80.10.3109/10717544.2011.635721Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Silindir M, Erdogan S, Ozer AY, Dogan AL, Tuncel M, Ugur O, et al. Nanosized multifunctional liposomes for tumor diagnosis and molecular imaging by SPECT/CT. J Liposome Res 2013;23:20–7.10.3109/08982104.2012.722107Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Rangger C, Helbok A, Sosabowski J, Kremser C, Koehler G, Prassl R, et al. Tumor targeting and imaging with dual-peptide conjugated multifunctional liposomal nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 2013;8:4659–71.10.2147/IJN.S51927Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

53. Orocio-Rodriguez E, Ferro-Flores G, Santos-Cuevas CL, Ramirez Fde M, Ocampo-Garcia BE, Azorin-Vega E, et al. Two novel nanosized radiolabeled analogues of somatostatin for nuroendocrine tumor imaging. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2015;15:4159–69.10.1166/jnn.2015.9620Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Narunsky L, Oren R, Bochner F, Neeman M. Imaging aspects of the tumor stroma with therapeutic implications. Pharmacol Ther 2014;141:192–208.10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.10.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

55. Li J, Zhuang Z, Jiang B, Zhao P, Lin C. Advances and perspectives in nanoprobes for noninvasive lymph node mapping. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2015;10:1019–36.10.2217/nnm.14.201Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Majmudar MD, Yoo J, Keliher EJ, Truelove JJ, Iwamoto Y, Sena B, et al. Polymeric nanoparticle PET/MR imaging allows macrophage detection in atherosclerotic plaques. Circ Res 2013;112:755–61.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300576Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

57. Luehmann HP, Pressly ED, Detering L, Wang C, Pierce R, Woodard PK, et al. PET/CT imaging of chemokine receptor CCR5 in vascular injury model using targeted nanoparticle. J Nucl Med 2014;55:629–34.10.2967/jnumed.113.132001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Bogdanov AA Jr, Gupta S, Koshkina N, Corr SJ, Zhang S, Curley SA, et al. Gold nanoparticles stabilized with MPEG-grafted poly(l-lysine): in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a potential theranostic agent. Bioconjug Chem 2015;26:39–50.10.1021/bc5005087Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

59. Hwang H, Kwon J, Oh PS, Lee TK, Na KS, Lee CM, et al. Peptide-loaded nanoparticles and radionuclide imaging for individualized treatment of myocardial ischemia. Radiology 2014;273:160–7.10.1148/radiol.14132942Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Peng J, Sun Y, Zhao L, Wu Y, Feng W, Gao Y, et al. Polyphosphoric acid capping radioactive/upconverting NaLuF4: Yb,Tm,153Sm nanoparticles for blood pool imaging in vivo. Biomaterials 2013;34:9535–44.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.098Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Frigell J, Garcia I, Gomez-Vallejo V, Llop J, Penades S. 68Ga-labeled gold glyconanoparticles for exploring blood-brain barrier permeability: preparation, biodistribution studies, and improved brain uptake via neuropeptide conjugation. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:449–57.10.1021/ja411096mSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Das S, Thorek DL, Grimm J. Cerenkov imaging. Adv Cancer Res 2014;124:213–34.10.1016/B978-0-12-411638-2.00006-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

63. Guo W, Sun X, Jacobson O, Yan X, Min K, Srivatsan A, et al. Intrinsically radioactive [64Cu]CuInS/ZnS quantum dots for PET and optical imaging: improved radiochemical stability and controllable Cerenkov luminescence. ACS Nano 2015;9:488–95.10.1021/nn505660rSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

64. Sun X, Huang X, Guo J, Zhu W, Ding Y, Niu G, et al. Self-illuminating 64Cu-doped CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals for in vivo tumor imaging. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:1706–9.10.1021/ja410438nSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

65. Kotagiri N, Niedzwiedzki DM, Ohara K, Achilefu S. Activatable probes based on distance-dependent luminescence associated with Cerenkov radiation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2013;52: 7756–60.10.1002/anie.201302564Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66. Wang Y, Liu Y, Luehmann H, Xia X, Wan D, Cutler C, et al. Radioluminescent gold nanocages with controlled radioactivity for real-time in vivo imaging. Nano Lett 2013;13:581–5.10.1021/nl304111vSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

67. Hu H, Huang P, Weiss OJ, Yan X, Yue X, Zhang MG, et al. PET and NIR optical imaging using self-illuminating 64Cu-doped chelator-free gold nanoclusters. Biomaterials 2014;35:9868–76.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.038Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

68. James ML, Gambhir SS. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol Rev 2012;92:897–965.10.1152/physrev.00049.2010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

69. Pichler BJ, Judenhofer MS, Catana C, Walton JH, Kneilling M, Nutt RE, et al. Performance test of an LSO-APD detector in a 7-T MRI scanner for simultaneous PET/MRI. J Nucl Med 2006;47:639–47.Suche in Google Scholar

70. Ai F, Ferreira CA, Chen F, Cai W. Engineering of radiolabeled iron oxide nanoparticles for dual-modality imaging. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2015.10.1002/wnan.1386Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

71. Kim TJ, Chae KS, Chang Y, Lee GH. Gadolinium oxide nanoparticles as potential multimodal imaging and therapeutic agents. Curr Top Med Chem 2013;13:422–33.10.2174/1568026611313040003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

72. Zhou J, Yu M, Sun Y, Zhang X, Zhu X, Wu Z, et al. Fluorine-18-labeled Gd3+/Yb3+/Er3+ co-doped NaYF4 nanophosphors for multimodality PET/MR/UCL imaging. Biomaterials 2011;32:1148–56.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.071Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

73. Hu H, Li D, Liu S, Wang M, Moats R, Conti PS, et al. Integrin alpha2beta1 targeted GdVO4:Eu ultrathin nanosheet for multimodal PET/MR imaging. Biomaterials 2014;35:8649–58.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.059Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

74. Chen D, Dougherty CA, Zhu K, Hong H. Theranostic applications of carbon nanomaterials in cancer: focus on imaging and cargo delivery. J Control Release 2015;210:230–45.10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.04.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

75. Luo J, Wilson JD, Zhang J, Hirsch JI, Dorn HC, Fatouros PP, et al. A dual PET/MR imaging nanoprobe: 124I labeled Gd3N@ C80. Appl Sci 2012;2:465–78.10.3390/app2020465Suche in Google Scholar

76. Abou DS, Thorek DL, Ramos NN, Pinkse MW, Wolterbeek HT, Carlin SD, et al. 89Zr-labeled paramagnetic octreotide-liposomes for PET-MR imaging of cancer. Pharm Res 2013;30:878–88.10.1007/s11095-012-0929-8Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

77. Crossgrove J, Zheng W. Manganese toxicity upon overexposure. NMR Biomed 2004;17:544–53.10.1002/nbm.931Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

78. Huang J, Xie J, Chen K, Bu L, Lee S, Cheng Z, et al. HSA coated MnO nanoparticles with prominent MRI contrast for tumor imaging. Chem Commun (Camb) 2010;46:6684–6.10.1039/c0cc01041cSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

79. Graves SA, Hernandez R, Fonslet J, England CG, Valdovinos HF, Ellison PA, et al. Novel preparation methods of 52Mn for immunoPET imaging. Bioconjug Chem 2015;26:2118–24.10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00414Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

80. Hu K, Wang H, Tang G, Huang T, Tang X, Liang X, et al. In vivo cancer dual-targeting and dual-modality imaging with functionalized quantum dots. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1278–84.10.2967/jnumed.115.158873Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

81. Chen F, Nayak TR, Goel S, Valdovinos HF, Hong H, Theuer CP, et al. In vivo tumor vasculature targeted PET/NIRF imaging with TRC105(Fab)-conjugated, dual-labeled mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 2014;11:4007–14.10.1021/mp500306kSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

82. Bradbury MS, Phillips E, Montero PH, Cheal SM, Stambuk H, Durack JC, et al. Clinically-translated silica nanoparticles as dual-modality cancer-targeted probes for image-guided surgery and interventions. Integr Biol 2013;5:74–86.10.1039/c2ib20174gSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

83. Phillips E, Penate-Medina O, Zanzonico PB, Carvajal RD, Mohan P, Ye Y, et al. Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:260ra149.10.1126/scitranslmed.3009524Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

84. Rieffel J, Chen F, Kim J, Chen G, Shao W, Shao S, et al. Hexamodal imaging with porphyrin-phospholipid-coated upconversion nanoparticles. Adv Mater 2015;27:1785–90.10.1002/adma.201404739Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

85. Tsuchimochi M, Hayama K, Toyama M, Sasagawa I, Tsubokawa N. Dual-modality imaging with 99mTc and fluorescent indocyanine green using surface-modified silica nanoparticles for biopsy of the sentinel lymph node: an animal study. EJNMMI Res 2013;3:33.10.1186/2191-219X-3-33Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

86. Zhang Y, Hong H, Cai W. Photoacoustic imaging. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011;1015–25.10.1101/pdb.top065508Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

87. Cheng K, Kothapalli SR, Liu H, Koh AL, Jokerst JV, Jiang H, et al. Construction and validation of nano gold tripods for molecular imaging of living subjects. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:3560–71.10.1021/ja412001eSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

88. Fan Q, Cheng K, Hu X, Ma X, Zhang R, Yang M, et al. Transferring biomarker into molecular probe: melanin nanoparticle as a naturally active platform for multimodality imaging. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:15185–94.10.1021/ja505412pSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

89. Zhang R, Fan Q, Yang M, Cheng K, Lu X, Zhang L, et al. Engineering melanin nanoparticles as an efficient drug-delivery system for imaging-guided chemotherapy. Adv Mater 2015;27:5063–9.10.1002/adma.201502201Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Park JC, Yu MK, An GI, Park SI, Oh J, Kim HJ, et al. Facile preparation of a hybrid nanoprobe for triple-modality optical/PET/MR imaging. Small 2010;6:2863–8.10.1002/smll.201001418Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

91. Kang KW. Preliminary pre-clinical results and overview on PET/MRI/fluorescent molecular imaging. Open Nuclear Med J 2010;2:153–6.10.2174/1876388X01002010153Suche in Google Scholar

92. Yang M, Cheng K, Qi S, Liu H, Jiang Y, Jiang H, et al. Affibody modified and radiolabeled gold–iron oxide hetero-nanostructures for tumor PET, optical and MR imaging. Biomaterials 2013;34:2796–806.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

93. Xie J, Chen K, Huang J, Lee S, Wang J, Gao J, et al. PET/NIRF/MRI triple functional iron oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2010;31:3016–22.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

94. Huang X, Zhang F, Lee S, Swierczewska M, Kiesewetter DO, Lang L, et al. Long-term multimodal imaging of tumor draining sentinel lymph nodes using mesoporous silica-based nanoprobes. Biomaterials 2012;33:4370–8.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.060Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

95. Cui X, Mathe D, Kovács N, Horváth I, Jauregui-Osoro M, Torres Martin de Rosales R, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and application of core-shell Co0. 16Fe2. 84O4@ NaYF4 (Yb, Er) and Fe3O4@ NaYF4 (Yb, Tm) nanoparticle as trimodal (MRI, PET/SPECT, and optical) imaging agents. Bioconjug Chem 2016;27:319–28.10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00338Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

96. Parus JL, Mikolajczak R, Beta-emitting radionuclides for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Curr Top Med Chem 2012;12:2686–93.10.2174/1568026611212230006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

97. Vilchis-Juarez A, Ferro-Flores G, Santos-Cuevas C, Morales-Avila E, Ocampo-Garcia B, Diaz-Nieto L, et al. Molecular targeting radiotherapy with cyclo-RGDFK(C) peptides conjugated to 177Lu-labeled gold nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2014;10:393–404.10.1166/jbn.2014.1721Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

98. Yook S, Cai Z, Lu Y, Winnik MA, Pignol JP, Reilly RM. Radiation nanomedicine for EGFR-positive breast cancer: panitumumab-modified gold nanoparticles complexed to the beta-particle-emitter, 177Lu. Mol Pharm 2015;12:3963–72.10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00425Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

99. McLaughlin MF, Woodward J, Boll RA, Wall JS, Rondinone AJ, Kennel SJ, et al. Gold coated lanthanide phosphate nanoparticles for targeted alpha generator radiotherapy. PLoS One 2013;8:e54531.10.1371/journal.pone.0054531Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

100. Laznickova A, Biricova V, Laznicek M, Hermann P. Mono(pyridine-N-oxide) DOTA analog and its G1/G4-PAMAM dendrimer conjugates labeled with 177Lu: radiolabeling and biodistribution studies. Appl Radiat Isot 2014;84:70–7.10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.10.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

101. Buckway B, Frazier N, Gormley AJ, Ray A, Ghandehari H. Gold nanorod-mediated hyperthermia enhances the efficacy of HPMA copolymer-90Y conjugates in treatment of prostate tumors. Nucl Med Biol 2014;41:282–9.10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.12.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

102. Bouchat V, Nuttens VE, Michiels C, Masereel B, Feron O, Gallez B, et al. Radioimmunotherapy with radioactive nanoparticles: biological doses and treatment efficiency for vascularized tumors with or without a central hypoxic area. Med Phys 2010;37:1826–1839.10.1118/1.3368599Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

103. Pillai MR, Dash A, Knapp FF Jr Rhenium-188: availability from the 188W/188Re generator and status of current applications. Curr Radiopharm 2012;5:228–43.10.2174/1874471011205030228Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

104. Tang QS, Chen DZ, Xue WQ, Xiang JY, Gong YC, Zhang L, et al. Preparation and biodistribution of 188Re-labeled folate conjugated human serum albumin magnetic cisplatin nanoparticles (188Re-folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs) in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine 2011;6:3077–85.10.2147/IJN.S24322Suche in Google Scholar

105. Tang Q, Chen D. Study of the therapeutic effect of 188Re labeled folate targeting albumin nanoparticle coupled with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum cisplatin on human ovarian cancer. Biomed Mater Eng 2014;24:711–22.10.3233/BME-130859Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

106. Cui W, Zhang Y, Xu X, Shen YM. Synthesis and 188Re radiolabelling of dendrimer polyamide amine (PAMAM) folic acid conjugate. Med Chem 2012;8:727–31.10.2174/157340612801216256Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

107. Hosseini-Salekdeh SL, Jalilian AR, Yousefnia H, Shafaii K, Pouladian M, Mahmoudi M. Evaluation of radiogallium-labeled, folate-embedded superparamagnetic nanoparticles in fibrosarcoma-bearing mice. J Cancer Res Ther 2012;8:204–8.10.4103/0973-1482.98971Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

108. Munaweera I, Levesque-Bishop D, Shi Y, Di Pasqua AJ, Balkus KJ Jr Radiotherapeutic bandage based on electrospun polyacrylonitrile containing holmium-166 iron garnet nanoparticles for the treatment of skin cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2014;6:22250–6.10.1021/am506045kSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

109. Shukla R, Chanda N, Zambre A, Upendran A, Katti K, Kulkarni RR, et al. Laminin receptor specific therapeutic gold nanoparticles (198AuNP-EGCg) show efficacy in treating prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:12426–31.10.1073/pnas.1121174109Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

110. Gudkov SV, Shilyagina NY, Vodeneev VA, Zvyagin AV. Targeted radionuclide therapy of human tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17.10.3390/ijms17010033Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

111. Kim YS, Brechbiel MW. An overview of targeted alpha therapy. Tumour Biol 2012;33:573–90.10.1007/s13277-011-0286-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

112. Scheinberg DA, McDevitt MR. Actinium-225 in targeted alpha-particle therapeutic applications. Curr Radiopharm 2011;4:306–20.10.2174/1874471011104040306Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

113. McLaughlin MF, Robertson D, Pevsner PH, Wall JS, Mirzadeh S, Kennel SJ. LnPO4 nanoparticles doped with Ac-225 and sequestered daughters for targeted alpha therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2014;29:34–41.10.1089/cbr.2013.1546Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

114. Matson ML, Villa CH, Ananta JS, Law JJ, Scheinberg DA, Wilson LJ. Encapsulation of alpha-particle-emitting 225Ac3+ ions within carbon nanotubes. J Nucl Med 2015;56:897–900.10.2967/jnumed.115.158311Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

115. Kemp JA, Shim MS, Heo CY, Kwon YJ. “Combo” nanomedicine: co-delivery of multi-modal therapeutics for efficient, targeted, and safe cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016;98:3–18.10.1016/j.addr.2015.10.019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

116. Radovic M, Vranjes-Duric S, Nikolic N, Jankovic D, Goya GF, Torres TE, et al. Development and evaluation of 90Y-labeled albumin microspheres loaded with magnetite nanoparticles for possible applications in cancer therapy. J Mater Chem 2012;22:24017–25.10.1039/c2jm35593kSuche in Google Scholar

117. Radovic M, Calatayud MP, Goya GF, Ibarra MR, Antic B, Spasojevic V, et al. Preparation and in vivo evaluation of multifunctional 90Y-labeled magnetic nanoparticles designed for cancer therapy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2015;103:126–34.10.1002/jbm.a.35160Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

118. Yinghuai Z, Hosmane NS. Applications and perspectives of boron-enriched nanocomposites in cancer therapy. Future Med Chem 2013;5:705–14.10.4155/fmc.13.47Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

119. Jhaveri A, Deshpande P, Torchilin V. Stimuli-sensitive nanopreparations for combination cancer therapy. J Control Release 2014;190:352–70.10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

120. Liu Y, Rohrs J, Wang P. Advances and challenges in the use of nanoparticles to optimize PK/PD interactions of combined anti-cancer therapies. Curr Drug Metab 2014;15:818–28.10.2174/1389200216666150223152958Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-4-18
Accepted: 2016-5-3
Published Online: 2016-6-2
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 28.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ejnm-2016-0011/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen