Hypothetical mistakes: hedging wrong answers with conditional language in initiation-response-evaluation (IRE) sequences in an American high school classroom

References

Arthur, Rebecca & Daniel Fenyi. 2022. Metadiscourse markers of hedging in classroom interaction: A descriptive analysis. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science 2(3). 288–309.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. Maxwell (ed.). 1985. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finnegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1). 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93.Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Maureen P. 2023. Teacher talk that supports student thinking and talking together: Three markers of a dialogic instructional stance. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 39. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100695.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian. 1977. Listening to spoken English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 1987. The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Duran, Derya & Olcay Sert. 2021. Student-initiated multi-unit questions in EMI classrooms. Linguistics and Education 65. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100980.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, Becky. 2006. Heroes or zeroes? The discursive positioning of “underachieving boys” in English neo-liberal education policy. Journal of Education Policy 21(2). 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500500278.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, Becky, Christine Skelton & Barbara Read. 2010. The simultaneous production of educational achievement and popularity: How do some pupils accomplish it? British Educational Research Journal 36(2). 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902919265.Search in Google Scholar

Fields, Susan S. & Katherine K. Frankel. 2021. A case study of one youth’s stance toward the discourse of literary analysis in a secondary English classroom. Research in the Teaching of English 55(4). 393–415. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202131258.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual; Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Gribanova, Tatiana & Tamara Gaidukova. 2019. Hedging in different types of discourse. Training Language and Culture 3. 85–99. https://doi.org/10.29366/2019tlc.3.2.6.Search in Google Scholar

Herbel-Eisenmann, Beth, David Wagner & Viviana Cortes. 2010. Lexical bundle analysis in mathematics classroom discourse: The significance of stance. Educational Studies in Mathematics 75(1). 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9253-6.Search in Google Scholar

Herbel-Eisenmann, Beth & David Wagner. 2010. Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse: Obligation and choice. Educational Studies in Mathematics 75. 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9240-y.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, Brittany, M. Lynn Breyfogle & Jason Dressler. 2009. The power of incorrect answers (Includes Reflect and Discuss). Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 15(4). 232–238. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtms.15.4.0232.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1990. Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language and Communication 10(3). 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(90)90002-s.Search in Google Scholar

Hosman, Lawrence A. 1989. The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research 15(3). 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00190.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken & John Milton. 1997. Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 6. 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90033-3.Search in Google Scholar

Irving, Paul & Eleanor Sayre. 2016. Identity statuses in upper-division physics students. Cultural Studies of Science Education 11(4). 1155–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9682-8.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Diane. 2015. Oral error feedback for English learners in the cotaught content classroom. TESOL Journal 6(4). 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.180.Search in Google Scholar

Kääntä, Leila. 2012. Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction. Classroom Discourse 3(2). 166–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.716624.Search in Google Scholar

Kayima, Festo & Selina Thomas Mkimbili. 2019. How do chemistry teachers deal with students’ incorrect/undesired responses to oral classroom questions? Exploring effective feedback practices. Research in Science Education 51. 647–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09876-y.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1973a. The logic of politeness, or minding your P’s and Q’s. In Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 292–305. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1973b. Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4). 458–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00262952.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

Lehtinen, Esa. 2013. Hedging, knowledge and interaction: Doctors’ and clients’ talk about medical information and client experiences in genetic counseling. Patient Education and Counseling 92(1). 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.005.Search in Google Scholar

Louwerse, Max, Scott Crossley & Patrick Jeuniaux. 2008. What if? Conditionals in educational registers. Linguistics and Education 19(1). 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Mandel, David & Darrin Lehman. 1996. Counterfactual thinking and ascriptions of cause and preventability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(3). 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.450.Search in Google Scholar

Margutti, Piera. 2011. Teachers reproaches and managing discipline in the classroom: When teachers tell students what they do wrong. Language and Education 22(4). 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.015.Search in Google Scholar

Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674420106Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, Alandeom. 2010. Developing elementary teachers’ understandings of hedges and personal pronouns in inquiry-based science classroom discourse. Journal of Science Teacher Education 21(1). 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9157-4.Search in Google Scholar

Pietikainen, Kaisa. 2020. On second language/nonnative speakerism in conversation analysis: A study of emic orientations to language in multilingual/lingua franca couple interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 169. 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.017.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen, Charles Bosk & Joel Frader. 1982. On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In J. Di Pietro (ed.), Linguistics and the professions, 83–97. Norwood & New Jersey: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Reinsvold, Lori & Kathryn Cochran. 2017. Power dynamics and questioning in elementary science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education 23(7). 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9235-2.Search in Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1995. I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. The Journal of TESOL France 2(2). 127–143.Search in Google Scholar

Skelton, John. 1988. The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT Journal 42(1). 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.1.37.Search in Google Scholar

Steensig, Jakob & Drew Paul. 2008. Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies 10(1). 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085581.Search in Google Scholar

Tainio, Liisa & Anu Laine. 2015. Emotion work and affective stance in the mathematics classroom: The case of IRE sequences in Finnish classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics 89(1). 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9591-5.Search in Google Scholar

Varenne, Herve & Ray McDermott. 1999. Successful failure: The school America builds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yuliarti, Arina & Warsono Warsono. 2016. Hedges in classroom speeches by English students in graduate program. English Education Journal 6(1). 11–19.Search in Google Scholar

Zerr, Jessica & Ryan Zerr. 2011. Learning from their mistakes: Using students’ incorrect proofs as a pedagogical tool. Primus: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies 21(6). 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970903386915.Search in Google Scholar