Abstract
Writing has emerged not only as a means of creative expression but also as a promising tool for promoting emotional well-being in educational settings. As students face increasing academic and personal pressures, the integration of writing interventions into classroom practices offers potential benefits for their holistic development. This study explores the healing potential of writing interventions in educational settings and their implications for student well-being. Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on 12 peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2023. Findings indicate that writing practices such as journaling, expressive, and reflective writing can reduce stress, anxiety, and trauma while supporting identity formation and emotional regulation. The impact of these interventions is influenced by factors such as age, socio-cultural background, and prior trauma. Grounded in trauma-informed pedagogy and socio-emotional learning frameworks, writing emerges as a practical, low-cost strategy to enhance holistic student development. The study recommends exploring digital platforms and AI tools to expand accessibility and engagement in future applications.
1 Introduction
Writing has long served as a powerful medium for self-expression and communication (Barton et al. 2023; Maanmieli and Ihanus 2021; Yeganeh 2021). In recent years, scholars have increasingly explored its potential to promote emotional well-being and healing – not only in therapeutic contexts, but also in educational environments (Chiew 2021; Miller Dyce et al. 2022; Ruini 2022). While there is substantial evidence supporting writing’s benefits in clinical settings, its integration into classroom practice and its impact on student well-being and educational outcomes remain underexamined.
Emerging studies suggest that expressive writing – such as journaling, reflective writing, and creative storytelling – can reduce stress and anxiety, support identity development, and enhance emotional intelligenece among students (Kurniawan 2025; Trinh et al. 2022). These findings challenge the notion that writing for healing belongs solely in therapeutic domains and highlight its potential as a pedagogical strategy. Yet despite encouraging results, research in this area remains limited and fragmented, with few comprehensive reviews synthesizing its educational implications.
The growing emphasis on holistic education – one that values not only academic success but also students’ emotional, social, and psychological development – has amplified interest in interventions that support well-being in schools. Within this context, writing offers a low-cost, accessible, and adaptable tool for fostering personal insight, emotional regulation, and social connection. It can help students navigate challenges, explore their identities, and communicate with peers and educators (Haertl 2019; Hanci-Azizoglu 2020), thereby creating more inclusive and supportive learning environments. Beyond its individual benefits, writing also complements broader educational practices by equipping students with coping strategies, promoting resilience, and reinforcing self-regulation (Chu 2020; Váradi-Kusztos 2022). When embedded into classroom routines, writing for healing can enhance engagement, motivation, and academic performance.
To strengthen the theoretical grounding and enhance the novelty of this review, this study also draws upon emerging frameworks such as trauma-informed pedagogy and socio-emotional learning (SEL) models. Trauma-informed pedagogy emphasizes the need for educational practices that acknowledge the widespread impact of trauma and aim to foster safety, empowerment, and healing within the classroom (Davis et al. 2022). Likewise, SEL frameworks prioritize the development of self-awareness, emotional regulation, social skills, and empathy – competencies that align closely with the goals of writing for healing. By situating writing interventions within these frameworks, this review not only synthesizes existing findings but also reinterprets them through a contemporary lens that is highly relevant to current educational challenges, especially in the post-pandemic era. This theoretical anchoring enables a more nuanced understanding of how writing can function as both a therapeutic and pedagogical tool, offering fresh insights into its role in promoting student well-being and holistic development.
The research question for this research is (a). What is the impact of writing for healing interventions on student well-being in educational settings? (b). How can the integration of writing for healing practices into educational settings contribute to improved educational practices? The aim of this research is to conduct a systematic literature review to explore the healing power of writing in the classroom and its implications for student well-being and educational practices. Thus, the research benefits are: enhanced student well-being by providing insights into practices that can support students’ emotional, fostering a positive and supportive classroom environment, and improving educational practices.
2 Methods
This research uses Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PRISMA is a widely recognized and accepted guideline for conducting systematic literature reviews (Rethlefsen et al. 2021; Selçuk 2019). It provides a structured and transparent approach to ensure the reliability and rigor of the review process. The PRISMA guideline consists of a checklist of essential items that should be addressed in the review, as well as a flow diagram that illustrates the process of study selection.
There first step for conducting PRISMA design is defining the research question. Then, planning and documenting the review protocol by developing a detailed review protocol that outlines the criteria for study selection, data extraction, and data synthesis. The inclusion and exclusion data are serving in Table 1.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria in keywords searching.
| I/E | Criteria | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Exclusion | Search engine research | A paper has only title, author, year, but not its abstract and full text. |
| Non-related data | Studies conducted in non-educational settings (e.g., clinical or therapeutic environments). | |
| Studies that do not specifically investigate the use of writing for healing interventions or practices. | ||
| Loosely related | Studies that do not directly address the impact of writing for healing interventions on student well-being, emotional health, or educational experiences. | |
| Language | Only English required. | |
| Inclusion | Partially related | Studies conducted in educational settings (e.g., schools, colleges, universities). |
| Studies employing various research designs, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and case studies. | ||
| Closely related | Studies that focus on the impact of writing for healing interventions on student well-being, emotional health, and educational experiences. | |
| Year | Between 2013 and 2023 |
The temporal scope of this review covers studies published between 2013 and 2023, as specified in the inclusion criteria. This ten-year window was selected to ensure the inclusion of contemporary research reflecting current educational practices and socio-emotional challenges in learning environments. A review of the selected articles shows an increasing research interest over the past decade, particularly in the period between 2018 and 2023. This trend suggests a growing recognition of the role of emotional well-being in education and the potential of writing as a supportive intervention tool. The focus of the more recent studies also appears to shift toward broader applications of writing interventions – moving from individual therapeutic effects to their integration within classroom settings and curriculum design.
The search was conducted using Publish or Perish software with Google Scholar and Scopus-indexed sources as the primary databases. Keywords included combinations of “writing for healing,” “expressive writing,” “student well-being,” and “educational interventions.” A total of 471 records were initially identified. After duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, and full-text assessments, 12 articles were selected for inclusion. Figure 1 presents the PRISMA flow diagram used in the selection process.

Flowchart diagram of PRISMA.
To justify the inclusion of these 12 articles, a quality assessment of each study was conducted using appropriate critical appraisal tools. For studies employing qualitative designs, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist was used to evaluate aspects such as clarity of research aims, appropriateness of methodology, recruitment strategy, data collection, ethical considerations, and rigor of analysis. In terms of geographic coverage, the selected articles represent a diverse mix of global perspectives. Studies included come from the United States, United Kingdom, China, Indonesia, the Netherlands, Turkey, and Australia, among others. This geographic diversity enhances the external validity of the findings and ensures a more comprehensive understanding of how writing interventions are perceived and applied in varied educational and cultural contexts. However, the review acknowledges that certain regions – such as Africa and South America – remain underrepresented in the existing literature and may warrant future research attention. The 12 included studies summarized in Table 3.
A standardized data extraction form was used to capture key details from the selected studies, including author(s), year, country of study, research design, sample size, intervention type, outcomes measured, and main findings. These data were then subjected to thematic content analysis to generate insights across three key areas: intervention implementation, impact on educational practices, and contextual factors influencing effectiveness (as summarized in Table 2).
Summary of included studies (data extraction table).
| Author(s) & year | Country | Study design | Intervention type | Sample size | Population | Outcomes measured | Key findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malyn (2020) | Australia | Quantitative | Ratio skills writing | Not reported | Students | Academic performance | Writing prior to lessons improved learning outcomes in ratio concepts |
| Mesghina and Richland (2020) | United States | Quantitative | Emotional writing | Not reported | School-aged children | Anxiety reduction | Expressive writing led to lower anxiety, especially among girls |
| Robertson et al. (2021) | United States | Quantitative | Emotional writing | 120 | First-year college students | Anxiety reduction, linguistic analysis | Reduction in anxiety and insights into therapeutic writing features |
| Lin et al. (2022) | China | Mixed Methods | Reflective writing | 68 | College students | Self-awareness, academic performance | Reflective writing promoted healing and enhanced self-awareness |
| Wald (2016) | United States | Qualitative | Reflective writing | Not reported | Medical faculty and senior students | Resilience, self-reflection | Writing workshops improved resilience and personal insight |
| Hermans and Meijers (2019) | Netherlands | Qualitative | Identity writing | Not reported | High school students | Identity formation | Writing the self enhanced student identity transformation |
| Hanci-Azizoglu (2020) | Turkey | Qualitative | Multilingual well-being writing | Not reported | Language learners | Stress, growth, emotional expression | Writing in native languages fostered emotional healing |
| Griffith (2018) | United States | Qualitative | Trauma/anti-bullying writing | Not reported | K–12 students | Trauma healing, empathy | Trauma writing helped students address bullying and build empathy |
| Jannah et al. (2019) | Indonesia | Quantitative | Expressive writing | 45 | Student-athletes | Anxiety reduction | Expressive writing reduced cognitive anxiety in student-athletes |
| Mukhlis (2020) | Indonesia | Quantitative | Expressive writing | 100+ | Islamic boarding school students | Stress level reduction | Writing helped reduce stress among new students |
| Walker (2019) | United States | Quantitative | Expressive writing | 60 | College undergraduates | Emotional intelligence | Positive effects of expressive writing on emotional intelligence |
| Deveney and Lawson (2022) | United Kingdom | Qualitative | Creative writing | Not reported | Adults with mental health needs | Emotional processing, well-being | Creative writing facilitated emotion processing and improved mental health |
Content of analysis.
| Criteria | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Intervention implementation | – Evaluate the articles based on their focus on the implementation of writing for healing interventions in educational practices. – Look for studies that provide detailed descriptions of how the interventions were implemented, including the specific strategies, activities, or approaches used. |
| Impact on educational practices | – Consider the relevance of the articles to educational practices by examining the extent to which they address the implications of writing for healing interventions on pedagogical approaches, instructional strategies, and overall educational practices. – Look for studies that provide insights into how the integration of writing for healing can enhance student engagement, classroom dynamics, and teaching methodologies. |
| Context of effect | – Analyse the articles for their consideration of the contextual factors that influence the effects of writing for healing interventions in educational settings. – Contextual factors may include the grade level of students, cultural backgrounds, socioeconomic status, or specific educational contexts. – Understanding the contextual nuances will help identify the relevance and applicability of the findings to diverse educational environments. |
The implications are discussed and interpreted, considering their relevance to educational practices, student well-being, and the classroom environment. Finally, a comprehensive report is compiled, outlining the selected articles, methodology employed, synthesized findings, and implications for educational practices. These steps ensure a rigorous and systematic analysis of the data, leading to valuable insights on the implications of writing for healing interventions in educational contexts.
The inclusion of only 12 articles reflects a genuine research gap rather than limitations in the search strategy. The review applied broad keyword combinations and utilized widely accepted academic databases, including Google Scholar and Scopus, to ensure comprehensive coverage. Despite this, relatively few studies met the inclusion criteria, particularly those focusing specifically on writing for healing within educational settings. This scarcity suggests that the healing power of writing in formal education remains an under-researched field. The limited number of high-quality, relevant studies underscores the need for more empirical research on the integration of writing interventions for emotional well-being and holistic student development in diverse classroom contexts. By highlighting this gap, the present review aims to contribute foundational insights and encourage further inquiry in this emerging area.
3 Result and Discussion
3.1 An Overview of Articles Retrieval for Analysis
Based on the data retrieved, the overview of the articles includes a diverse range of studies examining the implications of writing for healing interventions in educational settings (see Figure 2).

The overview of articles retrieval.
The retrieved articles collectively affirm the value of writing interventions in educational settings, with impacts observed in areas such as anxiety, trauma, reconciliation, loneliness, and stress. However, while the overall trend is positive, not all interventions were equally effective, and the degree of impact varied depending on several contextual and individual factors.
One key pattern that emerged is that emotional and expressive writing interventions appeared particularly effective in reducing anxiety and stress among adolescents and college students. These age groups are typically in stages of identity formation and emotional turbulence, making them more responsive to introspective and reflective exercises. In contrast, academic-focused writing was more effective in structured, performance-oriented environments, especially when paired with immediate feedback or integrated with instructional content. This suggests that developmental stage may mediate the impact of different types of writing interventions, with younger learners potentially requiring more scaffolding and structured prompts, while older students benefit more from open-ended, emotionally focused tasks.
Moreover, socio-cultural context emerged as a significant moderating variable. Studies conducted in collectivist cultures emphasized the communal aspects of writing – such as storytelling and sharing reflections in group settings – while those in individualist cultures leaned toward personal insight and self-regulation. These differences highlight how cultural norms regarding emotional expression and social interaction can influence both the uptake and outcomes of writing interventions. For instance, a reflective journaling activity may foster healing in one context but evoke discomfort or resistance in another.
Another key variable is prior trauma. Interventions that directly addressed trauma (e.g., trauma-focused expressive writing) were generally effective when implemented in trauma-informed educational environments, where safety, consent, and support structures were emphasized. In contrast, the same activities had less impact – or even adverse effects – when introduced without sufficient emotional scaffolding. This underscores the need for trauma-sensitive implementation strategies and suggests that pre-existing emotional vulnerabilities may moderate intervention effectiveness.
Contrasts also emerged in the duration and frequency of the interventions. Short-term interventions (e.g., single-session expressive writing) showed some immediate emotional relief but lacked long-term impact unless reinforced over time. On the other hand, interventions embedded within the curriculum or repeated over weeks led to more sustained benefits. This points to exposure and consistency as important mediators of long-term change. Importantly, some inconsistencies in findings reveal potential areas for further exploration. For example, while several studies showed that writing reduced stress, one study found no significant improvement in academic performance despite reduced anxiety levels. This suggests a possible disconnect between emotional relief and measurable academic outcomes, and invites future researchers to examine how emotional gains may (or may not) translate into cognitive or behavioural gains in the classroom.
Taken together, these findings indicate that while writing interventions hold strong promise, their success is not universal. Instead, their effectiveness is shaped by a complex interplay of individual (age, trauma history), contextual (cultural background, classroom climate), and structural (intervention duration, instructional support) factors. Understanding these nuances allows educators and policymakers to move beyond a “one-size-fits-all” approach and toward more differentiated, inclusive, and evidence-based implementations of writing for healing in diverse educational contexts.
3.2 Intervention Strategies and Approaches
The interventions from analysis articles review demonstrate the diverse range of writing practices employed to target specific outcomes, such as academic performance, emotional well-being, identity formation, trauma healing, and professional development. Each intervention approach addresses distinct aspects of personal growth and well-being within the context of the classroom or professional setting (see Table 4).
Intervention of writing.
| Intervention | Description | Purpose | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio skills intervention (Malyn 2020) | Writing manipulations prior to a video lesson on ratio | To investigate the impact of writing interventions on learning outcomes in ratio skills | Academic-focused intervention |
| Emotional writing intervention (Mesghina and Richland 2020; Robertson et al. 2021) | Participants assigned to complete emotional writing (EW) intervention | To examine the effects of emotional writing on anxiety reduction | Emotional well-being intervention |
| Reflective writing intervention (Lin et al. 2022; Wald 2016) | Students asked to complete reflective statements | To explore the relationship between reflective-writing skills and academic success | Academic-focused intervention with a reflective component |
| Writing for identity formation (Hermans and Meijers 2019) | “Writing the self” approach using creative, expressive, and reflective writing | To work on identity formation and transformation through engaging with emotions and cognitive steps | Identity-focused intervention |
| Multilingual writing or well-being (Hanci-Azizoglu 2020) | Using writing as a skill to express emotions for well-being and growth | To provide creative spaces and ease stress, turmoil, and crisis | Well-being and personal growth intervention |
| Anti-bullying and trauma writing (Griffith 2018) | Incorporating trauma writing to address anti-school bullying | To promote awareness, healing, and understanding of traumatic experiences | Anti-bullying and trauma-focused intervention |
| Expressive writing intervention (Jannah et al. 2019; Mukhlis 2020; Walker 2019) | Participants engaged in expressive writing sessions | To assess the effects of expressive writing on emotional intelligence and perceived stress | Emotional well-being intervention |
The classification of the interventions mentioned above provides a comprehensive overview of the diverse approaches used to incorporate writing in educational settings. These interventions span a range of focuses, including academic performance, emotional well-being, identity formation, trauma healing, anti-bullying, and professional development. Such a variety of intervention types reflects the recognition of writing as a versatile tool that can address multiple aspects of students’ lives.
Academic-focused interventions, such as the ratio skills intervention and reflective writing intervention (Malyn 2020), emphasize the use of writing to enhance learning outcomes and academic success. By integrating writing manipulations or reflective activities, these interventions aim to deepen students’ understanding, promote critical thinking, and foster self-reflection. These approaches recognize the value of writing as a means of consolidating knowledge, articulating thoughts, and refining communication skills within an academic context (Chen and Gao 2022).
Several studies provide support for the effectiveness of academic-focused interventions that incorporate writing to enhance learning outcomes and academic success. For example, the study on the ratio skills intervention involved pre- and post-testing of students’ understanding of ratio, with a writing manipulation introduced prior to a video lesson (van Alten et al. 2020). The integration of writing manipulations aimed to engage students in active learning and promote a deeper understanding of the mathematical concept. The findings of this study may suggest that the act of writing, whether it is through problem-solving, explanation, or reflection, facilitates the consolidation of knowledge and improves students’ performance in academic assessments.
Additionally, the research on reflective writing interventions supports the notion that reflective activities can enhance academic success. In one study, students were asked to complete reflective statements, and regression procedures were conducted to examine the relationship between reflective-writing skills and academic performance in different assessment formats (Deveci and Wyatt 2022). The findings indicated a positive association between reflective writing and academic success, suggesting that the process of reflecting on one’s learning experiences and articulating thoughts through writing can promote deeper understanding, critical thinking, and the application of knowledge in various academic tasks.
Second, emotional well-being interventions, including emotional writing and expressive writing interventions, highlight the therapeutic aspects of writing. These interventions recognize that writing can serve as a channel for expressing and processing emotions, reducing anxiety, and enhancing emotional intelligence. These interventions support students’ mental and emotional well-being, promoting self-awareness, and emotional regulation by providing a space for self-expression and introspection.
Emotional well-being interventions, such as emotional writing and expressive writing, recognize the therapeutic aspects of writing. These interventions acknowledge that writing can be a powerful tool for expressing and processing emotions, reducing anxiety, and enhancing emotional intelligence (Deveney and Lawson 2022; Fuentes et al. 2021). These interventions support the mental and emotional well-being of students, fostering self-awareness and emotional regulation. Through engaging in emotional writing, individuals have the opportunity to explore and articulate their deepest thoughts and feelings, leading to a greater understanding of personal experiences and emotions. The act of expressive writing has been associated with various benefits, including improved mood, reduced stress, increased self-awareness, and enhanced psychological well-being (Castillo et al. 2019).
Identity-focused interventions, such as the writing for identity formation approach, recognize the role of writing in exploring personal narratives and constructing one’s sense of self. These interventions acknowledge that writing can facilitate the journey of self-discovery, transformation, and personal growth. These interventions allow students to develop a deeper understanding of themselves, their beliefs, and their aspirations through engaging with emotions, cognitive processes, and personal values.
The writing for identity formation approach emphasizes the process of using various writing exercises to express one’s I-positions, which represent what is important to an individual. Through this approach, individuals are encouraged to engage in creative, expressive, and reflective forms of writing, allowing them to navigate their personal stories and transition from a first story characterized by negativity, distress, or victimhood to a second story that is life-giving and empowering. This approach aligns with the principles of dialogical self-theory, where writing is used to broaden and deepen one’s understanding of their own perspectives and values (Tang 2024).
Trauma-focused interventions and anti-bullying interventions recognize the potential of writing as a tool for healing and reconciliation. These interventions aim to provide a platform for individuals to process traumatic experiences, express emotions, and promote understanding and empathy. By incorporating trauma writing or addressing anti-bullying themes, these interventions contribute to creating safe and supportive environments for students, fostering empathy, resilience, and a sense of community.
Trauma-focused interventions often incorporate trauma writing as a therapeutic approach. Through guided writing exercises, individuals are encouraged to explore and articulate their experiences, feelings, and thoughts related to traumatic events. This process allows them to externalize their emotions and gain a deeper understanding of their trauma. Similarly, anti-bullying interventions often incorporate writing activities that address themes of empathy, respect, and conflict resolution. By engaging students in writing about the impacts of bullying, the experiences of victims, or strategies for promoting kindness and inclusivity, these interventions aim to foster empathy and understanding among students. Writing provides a safe and expressive outlet for individuals to reflect on the consequences of bullying, examine their own behaviours, and develop a sense of responsibility towards creating a supportive and inclusive environment.
Both trauma-focused and anti-bullying interventions contribute to creating safe and supportive environments for students. The interventions provide individuals with a platform to express their emotions, share their experiences, and promote empathy and understanding among peers. Writing allows individuals to communicate their pain, struggles, and resilience, fostering a sense of validation and connection with others who may have had similar experiences (Den Elzen et al. 2023).
The findings from the classification of intervention writing in the classroom highlight the diverse ways in which writing can be utilized to support students’ academic, emotional, and identity-related needs. Academic-focused interventions emphasize the role of writing in enhancing learning outcomes and academic success by promoting critical thinking, knowledge consolidation, and communication skills. Emotional well-being interventions recognize the therapeutic potential of writing, providing a space for self-expression, emotional processing, and the development of emotional intelligence. Identity-focused interventions emphasize the power of writing in exploring personal narratives, constructing one’s sense of self, and promoting personal growth and empowerment. Additionally, trauma-focused and anti-bullying interventions recognize writing as a tool for healing, reconciliation, and fostering empathy and understanding. Collectively, these intervention approaches demonstrate the multifaceted nature of writing in the classroom, supporting students’ holistic development and creating inclusive and supportive educational environments.
3.3 Implications for Student
The findings demonstrates that writing interventions in the classroom have wide-ranging implications for students. These interventions can enhance academic success, support emotional well-being, aid in identity formation, promote healing and reconciliation, and foster inclusivity and connection.
The systematic literature review reveals that writing interventions in educational settings have a significant impact on academic success. Academic-focused interventions emphasize the importance of writing in enhancing learning outcomes and academic performance. Promoting critical thinking, facilitating knowledge consolidation, and improving communication skills, these interventions offer valuable tools for students to excel academically. Whether through problem-solving, explanation, or reflection, the act of writing appears to facilitate the consolidation of knowledge and can lead to improved performance in academic assessments.
The research findings underscore the therapeutic potential of writing in promoting students’ emotional well-being. Emotional well-being interventions, including emotional and expressive writing, provide a safe space for students to express and process their emotions. This process reduces anxiety and enhances emotional intelligence, ultimately contributing to improved mental and emotional health. Engaging in emotional writing allows individuals to explore and articulate their deepest thoughts and feelings, resulting in improved mood, reduced stress, and heightened psychological well-being.
Identity-focused interventions acknowledge the crucial role of writing in the journey of self-discovery and personal growth. These interventions encourage students to delve into personal narratives, exploring their beliefs, aspirations, and personal values. Through creative, expressive, and reflective forms of writing, students navigate their personal stories, transitioning from negative or distressing narratives to life-affirming and empowering ones. This approach aligns with dialogical self-theory, where writing is used to broaden and deepen one’s understanding of their perspectives and values.
Trauma-focused and anti-bullying interventions recognize writing as a powerful tool for healing and reconciliation. These interventions provide a platform for individuals to process traumatic experiences, express their emotions, and promote understanding and empathy among students. Trauma-focused interventions often incorporate guided writing exercises that encourage individuals to explore and articulate their feelings and thoughts related to trauma, leading to a deeper understanding of their experiences. Similarly, anti-bullying interventions utilize writing activities to foster empathy and promote kindness and inclusivity, creating a supportive and safe environment for all students.
Both trauma-focused and anti-bullying interventions leverage writing to promote inclusivity and connection among students. These interventions allow individuals to communicate their pain, struggles, and resilience, fostering a sense of validation and connection with others who may have had similar experiences. By engaging students in writing about the impacts of bullying, the experiences of victims, or strategies for promoting kindness, these interventions aim to build empathy, responsibility, and a sense of community among students.
In summary, the classification of intervention approaches highlights the diverse ways in which writing can be used to support students’ academic, emotional, and identity-related needs. By incorporating writing into educational practices, educators and institutions can contribute to students’ holistic development and create inclusive and supportive educational environments. Writing emerges as a multifaceted tool that not only enhances academic success but also promotes emotional well-being, self-discovery, healing, and a sense of belonging, ultimately enriching the overall educational experience for students.
3.4 Key Areas for Practical Improvement and Future Research
While this review highlights the wide-ranging benefits of writing interventions in educational settings, several areas warrant further development to enhance their applicability and impact. First, many of the reviewed studies utilized different forms of writing interventions – such as expressive writing, reflective writing, and identity writing – but often lacked clear distinctions between these types. This inconsistency can pose challenges for educators seeking to implement evidence-based practices. Future research should work toward standardizing the definitions and protocols of writing interventions. Establishing more precise classifications and implementation guidelines would support educators in selecting and applying interventions that best suit their instructional goals and the needs of their students.
Second, there is a need for greater attention to contextual adaptation. Many studies in the review did not adequately consider cultural, socioeconomic, or age-related factors that might influence students’ engagement with writing interventions. Writing activities are not one-size-fits-all; their effectiveness can vary depending on students’ identities and backgrounds. Future studies should explore how writing practices can be tailored to diverse educational contexts to ensure inclusivity and relevance.
Third, most of the existing research has focused on short-term effects. While immediate outcomes are important, the long-term impact of writing interventions remains underexplored. Longitudinal research is necessary to determine whether writing-based approaches to healing and academic development result in sustained benefits over time. Such studies could track students across school years or academic transitions to better understand the durability of intervention effects.
Fourth, given the increasing prevalence of technology in educational environments, the integration of digital tools in writing interventions offers promising new directions. Online journaling platforms, digital storytelling applications, and AI-assisted writing feedback systems may enhance engagement, accessibility, and personalization. Research into how such technologies can be ethically and effectively integrated into writing for healing interventions would expand their applicability in modern classrooms.
Finally, few studies address how teachers are trained to facilitate writing interventions, particularly those involving emotionally sensitive content. Teachers play a central role in implementing and moderating these activities, yet many may feel unprepared or unsupported. Future research and policy efforts should prioritize the development of training programs that equip educators with the psychological, pedagogical, and ethical knowledge required to guide students through emotionally meaningful writing experiences. Addressing these areas would not only improve the implementation and evaluation of writing interventions but also ensure that such practices are inclusive, sustainable, and beneficial across diverse educational settings.
3.5 Practical Recommendations for Educators
The findings of this review underscore the value of writing interventions in promoting both academic achievement and emotional well-being. To make these interventions more actionable in real-world classrooms, educators are encouraged to implement writing strategies through the lens of established frameworks such as the CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning) model and trauma-informed pedagogy. For instance, within the CASEL framework, educators can facilitate daily or weekly reflective journaling exercises that promote self-awareness and emotional regulation. Prompts such as “What emotion did you feel strongest today?” or “What would you like to let go of this week?” can help students better understand their inner experiences while also building writing fluency.
Trauma-informed principles – such as safety, choice, and empowerment – should also guide how writing is used in classrooms, especially when asking students to explore personal or emotional topics. Teachers can offer optional narrative or expressive writing activities, ensuring that students have autonomy over whether and how much to share. Establishing trust and clearly communicating the boundaries of confidentiality are critical in maintaining a psychologically safe writing environment. Also, writing can be used to cultivate empathy and community. Shared classroom practices such as anonymous journal entries, collaborative storytelling, or peer-to-peer letter writing can foster connection, reduce social isolation, and build a sense of belonging. These activities also encourage perspective-taking and mutual understanding, which are key elements of socio-emotional development.
Writing interventions can also be embedded into interdisciplinary learning. For example, in science classes, students might write short narratives about a scientific discovery from the perspective of a historical figure, or reflect on how a topic relates to a current issue they care about. In mathematics, students might write about how they felt when solving a complex problem or describe the process of overcoming confusion. Such reflective activities not only deepen subject comprehension but also promote emotional engagement and resilience.
4 Conclusions
This study highlights the transformative potential of writing within the classroom, extending its reach beyond the traditional confines of academic achievement. It underscores the importance of recognizing writing as a powerful vehicle for personal growth, emotional well-being, and community building within the educational context. As educators and institutions continue to explore and implement these insights, they can create more inclusive, empathetic, and empowering learning environments that benefit students in a multitude of ways.
Looking forward, future research should explore the role of technology in enhancing the accessibility and scalability of writing interventions. Digital journaling platforms, for example, offer students private, consistent opportunities to reflect and express themselves, while also allowing educators to track engagement trends and offer support when necessary. AI-powered tools – such as writing assistants that offer tone or sentiment feedback – could help students develop a deeper awareness of how their language reflects their emotions, and even generate prompts tailored to individual emotional states or experiences. Additionally, gamified writing applications may increase motivation and engagement, especially among younger learners, by framing writing as an interactive and rewarding activity.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP), Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia, for generously funding this research.
-
Funding: This research was funded by the Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP), Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.
-
Author contributions: Zulkarnain: Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, writing– original draft, writing – review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition. Redite Kurniawan: Literature search, data extraction, validation, writing – review and editing. Imam Karya Bakti: Data analysis, validation, writing – review and editing. Ayuningtias Yarun: Literature screening, quality assessment, writing – review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
-
Data availability statement: The data supporting the findings of this systematic literature review are derived from publicly available sources. A complete list of the 12 articles analyzed in this review is provided in Table 3. The PRISMA flow diagram and data extraction forms used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
References
Barton, G., Khosronejad, M., Ryan, M., Kervin, L., and Myhill, D. (2023). Teaching creative writing in primary schools: a systematic review of the literature through the lens of reflexivity. Aust. Edu. Res. 51: 1311–1330, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00641-9.Search in Google Scholar
Castillo, Y.A., Fischer, J., and Davila, S. (2019). Managing emotions: relationships among expressive writing and emotional intelligence. Integrated Res. Adv. 6: 1–8.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, W. and Gao, J. (2022). Creating an online community of inquiry: learner practice and perceptions of community-based feedback giving in academic writing. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 37: 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2043381.Search in Google Scholar
Chiew, F. (2021). Writing as healing. In: Palgrave encyclopedia of the health humanities. Springer, pp. 1–6.10.1007/978-3-030-26825-1_142-1Search in Google Scholar
Chu, Q., Wu, I.H.C., and Lu, Q. (2020). Expressive writing intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder among Chinese American breast cancer survivors: the moderating role of social constraints. Qual. Life Res. 29: 891–899, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02385-5.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, W., Petrovic, L., Whalen, K., Danna, L., Zeigler, K., Brewton, A., Joseph, M., Baker, C.N., Overstreet, S., and the New Orleans Trauma‐Informed Learning Collaborative (2022). Centering trauma‐informed approaches in schools within a social justice framework. Psychol. Sch. 59: 2453–2470, https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22664.Search in Google Scholar
Den Elzen, K., Breen, L.J., and Neimeyer, R.A. (2023). Rewriting grief following bereavement and non-death loss: a pilot writing-for-wellbeing study. Br. J. Guid. Counsell. 51: 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2022.2160967.Search in Google Scholar
Deveci, T. and Wyatt, M. (2022). Reflective writing and the self-perceived development of intrapersonal communication skills among first-year university students in the UAE. Reflective Pract. 23: 68–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1978066.Search in Google Scholar
Deveney, C. and Lawson, P. (2022). Writing your way to well-being: an IPA analysis of the therapeutic effects of creative writing on mental health and the processing of emotional difficulties. Counsell. Psychother. Res. 22: 292–300, https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12435.Search in Google Scholar
Fuentes, A.M.M., Kahn, J.H., and Lannin, D.G. (2021). Emotional disclosure and emotion change during an expressive-writing task: do pronouns matter? Curr. Psychol. 40: 1672–1679, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0094-2.Search in Google Scholar
Griffith, J.J. (2018). Writing through pain: how teachers can support writing as therapy for students processing trauma. In: Contending with Gun Violence in the English language classroom, Query date: 2022-12-13 07:55:32, pp. 106–112.10.4324/9780429424779-14Search in Google Scholar
Haertl, K. and Ero-Phillips, A.M. (2019). The healing properties of writing for persons with mental health conditions. Arts Health 11: 15–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2017.1413400.Search in Google Scholar
Hanci-Azizoglu, E.B. (2020). Expressive multilingual writing: a transformational healing skill for a pandemic challenge. In: Futuristic and linguistic perspectives on teaching writing to second language students, pp. 235–250.10.4018/978-1-7998-6508-7.ch014Search in Google Scholar
Hermans, H. and Meijers, F. (2019). The pursuit of happiness. In: British Journal of Guidance & Counselling (Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 139–142). Taylor & Francis.10.1080/03069885.2019.1612515Search in Google Scholar
Jannah, M., Widohardhono, R., Fatimah, F., Dewi, D.K., and Umanailo, M.C.B. (2019). Managing cognitive anxiety through expressive writing in student-athletes. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 8: 1615–1618.Search in Google Scholar
Kurniawan, R., Kholis, N., and Suryani, S. (2025). Islamic expressive writing for psychological healing. Islamic Guidance Counseling J. 8, https://doi.org/10.25217/0020258552800.Search in Google Scholar
Lin, Y., Chang, H.-M., and Chang, T.-S. (2022). Narrative self-healing: analysis of the benefits of an integrated listening, reading, and writing course for Chinese colleges. J. Contemp. Edu. Res. 6: 29–35, https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v6i9.4260.Search in Google Scholar
Maanmieli, K. and Ihanus, J. (2021). Therapeutic metaphors and personal meanings in group poetry therapy for people with schizophrenia. J. Poetry Therapy 34: 213–222, https://doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2021.1951900.Search in Google Scholar
Malyn, B.O., Thomas, Z., and Ramsey‐Wade, C.E. (2020). Reading and writing for well-being: a qualitative exploration of the therapeutic experience of older adult participants in a bibliotherapy and creative writing group. Counsell. Psychother. Res. 20: 715–724, https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12304.Search in Google Scholar
Mesghina, A. and Richland, L.E. (2020). Impacts of expressive writing on children’s anxiety and mathematics learning: developmental and gender variability. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 63: 101926, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101926.Search in Google Scholar
Miller Dyce, C., Ford, J.R., and Propst, B.S. (2022). Detoxing the trauma of academic writing for Black scholars: vulnerability, authenticity, and healing. Multicult. Perspect. 24: 170–179, https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2022.2127401.Search in Google Scholar
Mukhlis, H., Kristianingsih, A., Fitrianti, F., Pribadi, T., Kumalasari, D., Febriyanti, H., et al.. (2020). The effect of expressive writing technique to stress level decrease of new student at Al-Falah Putri Islamic Boarding School, Margodadi, Tanggamus. Ann. Trop. Med. Publ. Health 23: 758–766, https://doi.org/10.36295/ASRO.2020.23624.Search in Google Scholar
Rethlefsen, M.L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A.P., Moher, D., Page, M.J., Koffel, J.B., et al.. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 10: 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.Search in Google Scholar
Robertson, S.M., Short, S.D., Sawyer, L., and Sweazy, S. (2021). Randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of expressive writing in reducing anxiety in first-year college students: the role of linguistic features. Psychol. Health 36: 1041–1065, https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1827146.Search in Google Scholar
Ruini, C. and Mortara, C.C. (2022). Writing technique across psychotherapies–from traditional expressive writing to new positive psychology interventions: a narrative review. J. Contemp. Psychother. 52: 23–34, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09520-9.Search in Google Scholar
Selçuk, A.A. (2019). A guide for systematic reviews: PRISMA. Turkish Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 57: 57–58, https://doi.org/10.5152%2Ftao.2019.4058.10.5152/tao.2019.4058Search in Google Scholar
Tang, S., Peng, W., Qian, X., and Chen, Y. (2024). Healing grief–an online self-help intervention programme for bereaved Chinese with prolonged grief: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 15: 2323422, https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2323422.Search in Google Scholar
Trinh, E., Le, G., Dong, H.B., Tran, T., and Tran, V. (2022). Memory rewriting as a method of inquiry: when returning becomes collective healing. Qual. Rep. 27: 824–841, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5245.Search in Google Scholar
van Alten, D.C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., and Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Comput. Edu. 158: 104000, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000.Search in Google Scholar
Váradi-Kusztos, G. (2022). Letter to the inner child–expressive writing in literary context. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Theol. Reformata Transylvanica 67: 53–63, https://doi.org/10.24193/subbtref.67.1.03.Search in Google Scholar
Wald, H., Haramati, A., Bachner, Y.G., and Urkin, J. (2016). Promoting resiliency for interprofessional faculty and senior medical students: outcomes of a workshop using mind-body medicine and interactive reflective writing. Med. Teacher 38: 525–528, https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1150980.Search in Google Scholar
Walker, E.H. (2019). The Effects of Expressive Writing on Emotional Intelligence in College Undergraduates, PhD thesis. Walden University.Search in Google Scholar
Yeganeh, H. (2021). Orality, literacy and the “great divide” in cultural values. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 42: 564–582, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2021-0088.Search in Google Scholar
© 2026 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Pedagogical System for Hybrid Training of Future Special Educators
- The Creativity-Centric Framework: Redefining Academic Performance through Task Completion and Cognitive Synergies
- Enhancing Cognitive Load, Collaboration Tendency, and Enjoyment Through 3D Augmented Reality in Engineering Education
- The Influence of Grit and Social Support on University Students’ Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Problem-Focused Coping
- Augmented Reality as a Supporting Tool for Building Mathematical Knowledge: The Case of Parallel Projection, Perpendicular Projection, and Representation of a Figure in Space
- Marriage Obstacles for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities from Their Perspectives
- Extending the UTAUT Model with External Variables in Inclusive Schools: An Analysis of Teacher Satisfaction and AI-STEM Use Using SEM and ANN Models
- Moral Agency in Saudi Education: Defining Suitable Outcomes Within Curriculum Reform
- The Influence of English Proficiency on Comprehending Referential Types among EFL Students in Jordan
- Review Articles
- Unlocking the Healing Power of Writing in the Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review on the Implications for Educational Practices
- Digital Literacy as a Tool for Developing Computational Thinking in Young Learners: A Literature Review
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Pedagogical System for Hybrid Training of Future Special Educators
- The Creativity-Centric Framework: Redefining Academic Performance through Task Completion and Cognitive Synergies
- Enhancing Cognitive Load, Collaboration Tendency, and Enjoyment Through 3D Augmented Reality in Engineering Education
- The Influence of Grit and Social Support on University Students’ Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Problem-Focused Coping
- Augmented Reality as a Supporting Tool for Building Mathematical Knowledge: The Case of Parallel Projection, Perpendicular Projection, and Representation of a Figure in Space
- Marriage Obstacles for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities from Their Perspectives
- Extending the UTAUT Model with External Variables in Inclusive Schools: An Analysis of Teacher Satisfaction and AI-STEM Use Using SEM and ANN Models
- Moral Agency in Saudi Education: Defining Suitable Outcomes Within Curriculum Reform
- The Influence of English Proficiency on Comprehending Referential Types among EFL Students in Jordan
- Review Articles
- Unlocking the Healing Power of Writing in the Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review on the Implications for Educational Practices
- Digital Literacy as a Tool for Developing Computational Thinking in Young Learners: A Literature Review