Startseite Geistlose Hirne und hirnlose Geister
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Geistlose Hirne und hirnlose Geister

Zum Umgang mit dem Begriff psychischer Krankheit
  • Andreas Heinz EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. April 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Mental disorders have been suggested to differ from somatic diseases because they lack an organic correlate. We show that this argument is both empirically wrong and theoretically irrelevant, because diseases are defined by functional impairments and not biological variation. Due to human diversity, a multitude of functions can be defined, and any selection of medically relevant functional impairments is necessarily value-based. We suggest that such values include individual survival and living in a shared world with others, and that their definition requires public debate and a critical reflection by Philosophical Anthropology. However, the presence of functional impairments that are generally relevant for human life and survival only fulfils the so-called disease criterion, which is necessary but not sufficient to diagnose a clinically relevant malady. This would only be justified if such functional impairments cause individual harm, either because they are accompanied by suffering (the illness criterion) or because they interfere with basic activities of daily living such as personal hygiene and food intake (the sickness criterion of a clinically relevant malady). We apply this theory to mental disorders, conclude that only a fraction of such “disorders” currently listed in international classifications of diseases are clinically relevant mental maladies, suggest focusing on the needs of persons with such maladies and recommend avoiding “pathologization” of human diversity.

Literatur

American Psychiatric Association (2000), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders, DSM-IV. Text revision (DSM-IV TR), Washington, D. C.Suche in Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5), Washington, D. C.10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596Suche in Google Scholar

Bauer, A., u. Vollmann, J. (2002), Einwilligungsfähigkeit bei psychisch Kranken. Eine Übersicht empirischer Untersuchungen, in: Nervenarzt 73, 1031–1038.10.1007/s00115-002-1297-0Suche in Google Scholar

Boorse, C. (1976), What a Theory of Mental Health should be, in: Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 6, 61–84.10.1111/j.1468-5914.1976.tb00359.xSuche in Google Scholar

Boorse, C. (1977), Health as a Theoretical Concept, in: Philosophical Science 44, 542–573.10.1086/288768Suche in Google Scholar

Boorse, C. (1997), A Rebuttal on Health, in: Humber, J. M., u. Almender, R. F. (Hg.), What is Disease?, Totowa, N. J., 3–134.10.1007/978-1-59259-451-1_1Suche in Google Scholar

Canguilhem, G. (1974), Das Normale und das Pathologische, München.Suche in Google Scholar

Frances, A. (2013), Saving Normal. An Insider’s Revolt against Out-of-control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life, New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1994), Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Fulford, M. (2018), Was ist eine psychische Störung? Die Philosophie der normalen Sprache als Ausgangspunkt, in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 66.2, 205–227.10.1515/dzph-2018-0017Suche in Google Scholar

Gehring, P. (2015), Therapiebedarf lässt sich immer anmelden, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 8.1.2015, 10.Suche in Google Scholar

Heinz, A. (1998), Colonial perspectives in the construction of the psychotic patient as primitive man, in: Critique of Anthropology 18, 421–444.10.1177/0308275X9801800404Suche in Google Scholar

Heinz, A. (2014), Der Begriff der psychischen Krankheit, Berlin.Suche in Google Scholar

Heinz, A. (2016), Psychische Gesundheit – Begriffe und Konzepte, Stuttgart.10.17433/978-3-17-029937-5Suche in Google Scholar

Honneth, A. (2011), Das Recht der Freiheit, Berlin.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaspers, K. (1946), Allgemeine Psychopathologie, Berlin u. Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-52895-8Suche in Google Scholar

Kendell, R. E. (1975), The Concept of Disease and its Implications for Psychiatry, in: British Journal of Psychiatry 127, 305–315.10.1192/bjp.127.4.305Suche in Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (1989), Gegenseitige Hilfe in der Tier- und Menschenwelt, Grafenau.Suche in Google Scholar

Krüger, H. P. (2010), Gehirn, Verhalten und Zeit. Philosophische Anthropologie als Forschungsrahmen, Berlin.10.1524/9783050087672Suche in Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1985) Gesammelte Aufsätze 1, Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Mundt, A. P., Cow, W. S., Arduino, M., Barrionuevo, H., Fritsch, R., Girala, N., Minoletti, A., Mitkiewicz, F., Rivera, G., Tavares, M., u. Priebe, S. (2015), Psychiatric Hospital Beds and Prison Populations in South America since 1990: Does the Penrose Hypothesis apply?, in: JAMA Psychiatry 72, 112–118.10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2433Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Plessner, H. (1975), Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch, Berlin u. New York.10.1515/9783110845341Suche in Google Scholar

Sartorius, N. (2010), Meta-effects of classifying mental disorders, in: Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Kuhl, G. A., u. Kupfer, D. J. (Hg.), The Conceptual Evolution of DSM 5, Arlington, Va., 59–77.Suche in Google Scholar

Szasz, T. S. (1975), Der Mythos der Geisteskrankheit, in: ders., Psychiatrie, die verschleierte Macht, Olten u. Freiburg, 22–34.Suche in Google Scholar

Wakefield, J. C. (2012) Der Begriff der psychischen Störung: An der Grenze zwischen biologischen Tatsachen und gesellschaftlichen Werten, in: Schramme, T. (Hg.), Krankheitstheorien, Frankfurt am Main, 239–262.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-4-20
Published in Print: 2018-4-2

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 12.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2018-0018/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen