Startseite Was ist orthodoxe Kritische Theorie?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Was ist orthodoxe Kritische Theorie?

  • Fabian Freyenhagen EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. Juli 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Lukács’ famously asked: “What is orthodox Marxism?” His answer was that a certain method was quintessential. What if we ask the orthodox question about Critical Theory? The answer in this case, I propose, is not a particular method. Moreover, what’s critical about Critical Theory is also not – contrary to prevailing opinions in the literature – a program of justification. In fact, only without such a program can Critical Theory be adequately and appropriately critical. The position I advocate returns to insights from Horkheimer’s writings of the 1930s (and Adorno’s work). Indeed, it is also orthodox in another sense: taking the conviction of a partisan interest – the interest in abolishing social injustice, misery and unfreedom – as the only general criterion for Critical Theory. Its task is to contribute to the struggle against the aforementioned negative elements through conceptual work, self-reflection, and a critical appropriation of the genuine insights of traditional theorising. I conclude by outlining briefly the implications of this position for the mode of approaching social philosophy (and specifically the idea of social pathology).

Literatur

Adorno, T. W. (1966), Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (2003a), Minima Moralia [1951] (= Gesammelte Schriften 4), hg. v. Tiedemann, R., Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (2003b), Wozu noch Philosophie [1962], in: Gesammelte Schriften 10.2, hg. v. Tiedemann, R., Frankfurt am Main, 459–473.Suche in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1985), Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Honneth, A. (2011), Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit, Berlin.Suche in Google Scholar

Honneth, A. (2014), Die Krankheiten der Gesellschaft. Annäherung an einen nahezu unmöglichen Begriff, in: WestEnd 11.1, 45–60.Suche in Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M. (1988a), Materialismus und Moral [1933], in: Gesammelte Schriften 3, 111–149.Suche in Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M. (1988b), Nachtrag [1937], in: Gesammelte Schriften 4, hg. v. Schmidt, A., Frankfurt am Main, 217–225.Suche in Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M. (1988c)‚ Traditionelle und kritische Theorie [1937], in: Gesammelte Schriften 4, hg. v. Schmidt, A., Frankfurt am Main, 162–216 [TKT].Suche in Google Scholar

Lukács, G. (1968), Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein [1923], in: Frühschriften II (= Werke 2), Neuwied, 161–518.Suche in Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. (1965), Philosophie und Kritische Theorie [1937], in: Kultur und Gesellschaft 1, Frankfurt am Main, 102–127.Suche in Google Scholar

Schaub, J. (2015), Misdevelopments, Pathologies, and Normative Revolutions: Normative Reconstruction as Method of Critical Theory, in: Critical Horizons 16.2, 107–130.10.1179/1440991715Z.00000000043Suche in Google Scholar

Stahl, T. (2013), Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique, in: Constellations 20.4, 533–552.10.1111/1467-8675.12057Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-7-27
Published in Print: 2017-7-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 12.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2017-0031/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen