Home Die Vorteile des Pragmatismus in Theorien Kosmopolitischer Gerechtigkeit
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Die Vorteile des Pragmatismus in Theorien Kosmopolitischer Gerechtigkeit

  • Daniel Bray EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 24, 2016

Abstract

This article explores the Pragmatist and Rawlsian forms of cosmopolitanism that have emerged in recent decades in efforts to extend theories of justice to the global level. The Pragmatist approach is critical and problem-centred, using an account of the problematic situation and a reconstruction of inherited ideals to develop normative theories for action in a specific political context. The Rawlsian approach is abstract and systemic, deducing ideal institutional principles from thought experiments that require later implementation in the non-ideal world. The main argument of the article is that Pragmatists employ three methodological elements that give them important practical advantages over Rawlsians in providing action-guiding norms. First, a detailed account of the problem of injustice provides an indispensable empirical grounding that frames normative responses. Second, a critical reconstruction of the normative vocabulary relating to the problem ensures that the ideals used to guide action are historically relevant to the community of action. And finally, an account of normative theories in terms of their concrete requirements and means of realisation in the particular situation ensures they are attuned to its political constraints and possibilities for change.

Literatur

Bankovsky, M. (2012), Perfecting Justice in Rawls, Habermas and Honneth: A Deconstructive Perspective, London.Search in Google Scholar

Beitz, C. R. (1979), Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton, N. J.Search in Google Scholar

Bray, D. (2011). Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: Representation and Leadership in Transnational Democracy, Basingstoke.10.1057/9780230342965Search in Google Scholar

Bray, D. (2013), Pragmatic Ethics and the Will to Believe in Cosmopolitanism, International Theory 5.3, 446–476.10.1017/S1752971913000298Search in Google Scholar

Bloch, E. (1985), Das Prinzip Hoffnung (= Werke 5), Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938), Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, New York.Search in Google Scholar

James, W. (1904), The Pragmatic Method, in: Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1.25, 673–687.10.2307/2012198Search in Google Scholar

James, W. (1912), The Will to Believe, And Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Pappas, G. F. (2008), John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience, Bloomington, Ind.10.2979/5158.0Search in Google Scholar

Pogge, T. (1989), Realizing Rawls, Ithaca, N. Y.Search in Google Scholar

Pogge, T. (1992), Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty, in: Ethics 103.1, 48–75.10.1086/293470Search in Google Scholar

Pogge, T. (2008), World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1999), The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. (1997), Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-11-24
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2016-0057/html
Scroll to top button