Startseite Seeing what is not there: negative evidence, diagnostic inertia, and the tuberculosis legacy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Seeing what is not there: negative evidence, diagnostic inertia, and the tuberculosis legacy

  • Robert I. Gluck EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. Oktober 2025
Diagnosis
Aus der Zeitschrift Diagnosis

Abstract

In the early 20th century, tuberculosis (TB) reigned as the prototypical granulomatous disease, deeply embedded in the diagnostic mindset and reasoning of Western medicine. This article traces the diagnostic inertia that delayed recognition of Crohn’s disease by examining how the TB framework suppressed emerging patterns of negative evidence. While gastrointestinal tuberculosis (GITB) and Crohn’s disease are distinct entities, although they can closely mimic one another in clinical and histopathological presentation. We draw from the unpublished 1893 student notebook of Albert A. Berg – later a pioneering surgeon at Mount Sinai Hospital – and analyze its detailed descriptions of TB pathology, including identification of caseous necrosis, phthisis, and giant cell formation. These types of observations were foundational to medical education at the time and shaped generations of clinicians trained to see chronic intestinal inflammation as a variant of TB. The misclassification of Crohn’s disease persisted even into the 1930s, despite mounting clinical and surgical evidence suggesting a distinct entity. By anchoring our analysis in historical sources, including Berg’s personal records and published surgical literature, we show how TB’s diagnostic dominance represents a case study in medical paradigm entrenchment. We argue that the underemphasis of negative evidence – findings that failed to support the TB diagnosis – contributed to the decades-long lag in recognizing Crohn’s disease. While the article draws lessons from history that are relevant to modern paradigms, we note that in certain contemporary high-TB-burden settings such as India, where Crohn’s incidence is rising while GITB remains prevalent, diagnostic decisions may be shaped by a deliberate preference to treat presumptively for TB in order to avoid the potentially catastrophic consequences of inappropriate immunosuppression. (Choudhury A, Dhillon J, Sekar A, Gupta P, Singh H, Sharma V. Differentiating gastrointestinal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease: challenges and clinical importance. BMC Gastroenterol 2023;23:123; Makharia GK, Srivastava S, Das P, Goswami P, Singh U, Tripathi M, et al. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological differentiations between Crohn’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis. Gut 2006;55:1413–9). Notwithstanding, the historical narrative carries contemporary relevance, illuminating how medical education, cognitive framing, and clinical culture continue to struggle with ambiguity and diagnostic alternatives. We conclude with implications for today’s clinical training: educators must explicitly teach the recognition and integration of negative evidence, challenge entrenched diagnostic heuristics, and highlight the possibility that what is absent may be just as diagnostic as what is present. These goals align with established competency frameworks that emphasize clinical reasoning, diagnostic accuracy, and cognitive flexibility.


Corresponding author: Robert I. Gluck, MD, Associate Professor, Graduate Nursing, Hofstra-Northwell School of Nursing and Physician Assistant Studies, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Joanne Willey of the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell for her thoughtful discussion and insights on the topic.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: The author used ChatGPT (OpenAI) for minor editing and to improve language.

  5. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflicts of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable. The unpublished 1893 notebook by Albert A. Berg referenced in the manuscript is part of the author’s personal collection and is available upon reasonable request for scholarly purposes.

References

1. Choudhury, A, Dhillon, J, Sekar, A, Gupta, P, Singh, H, Sharma, V. Differentiating gastrointestinal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease: challenges and clinical importance. BMC Gastroenterol 2023;23:123.10.1186/s12876-023-02887-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Makharia, GK, Srivastava, S, Das, P, Goswami, P, Singh, U, Tripathi, M, et al.. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological differentiations between Crohn’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis. Gut 2006;55:1413–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2005.082982.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Crohn, BB, Ginzburg, L, Oppenheimer, GD. Regional ileitis: a pathologic and clinical entity. JAMA 1932;99:1323–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1932.02740680019005.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Arnheim, EE. Dr. Albert A. Berg: a memoir. J Mt Sinai Hosp NY 1951;17:351–2.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Davies, PDO. The white plague: tuberculosis as a social disease. JAMA 1993;270:2145–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.270.18.2145.Suche in Google Scholar

6. The Nobel Prize. The nobel prize in physiology or medicine 1905. NobelPrize.org. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1905/summary/[Accessed 14 Jun 2025].Suche in Google Scholar

7. Gradmann, C. A spirit of scientific rigour: Koch’s postulates in twentieth-century medicine. Microbes Infect. 2014;16:885–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2014.08.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Fleck, C. Pathogens, prestige and politics: nobel prizes in medical microbiology. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2006;61:463–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrl021.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Sherman, JM. Historical account of tuberculosis in the Jewish immigrant population. Am Rev Tuberc 1935;31:472–81.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Zlotogora, J, Zimmerman, J, Rachmilewitz, D. Prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in family members of Jewish Crohn’s disease patients in Israel. Dig Dis Sci 1991;36:471–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01298876.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Kuhn, TS. The structure of scientific revolutions, 4th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Daniel, TM. The history of tuberculosis. Am J Pathol 2006;168:388–95. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2006.050979.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Berg, DHW. Physician, 79, dies; consultant was authority on tuberculosis. New York Times 1938;21. https://www.nytimes.com/1938/12/23/archives/dr-henry-w-berg-physician-79-dies-consultant-was-authority-on.html [Accessed 14 Jun 2025].Suche in Google Scholar

14. New York Academy of Medicine. The berg brothers: bibliophile surgeons. NYAM Center for History 2016. https://nyamcenterforhistory.org/2015/02/25/the–g [Accessed 14 Jun 2025].Suche in Google Scholar

15. Berg, AA. A textbook of surgery: for practitioners and students. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1917.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Osler, W. The principles and practice of medicine: designed for the use of practitioners and students of medicine. New York: D. Appleton; 1892.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Graber, ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:ii21–27. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001615.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Hafferty, FW, Franks, R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med 1994;69:861–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199411000-00001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Cunningham, N, Cook, H, Leach, D, Klein, J, Harrison, J. Demystifying cognitive bias in the diagnostic process for frontline clinicians and educators; new words for old ideas. Diagnosis 2025;12. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0016.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Royce, CS, Hayes, MM, Schwartzstein, RM. Teaching critical thinking: a case for instruction in cognitive biases to reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient safety. Acad Med 2019;94:187–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Thompson, J, Bujalka, H, McKeever, S, Lipscomb, A, Moore, S, Hill, N, et al.. Educational strategies in the health professions to mitigate cognitive and implicit bias impact on decision making: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2023;23:455. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04371-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Choi, JJ, Gribben, J, Lin, M, Abramson, EL, Aizer, J. Using an experiential learning model to teach clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias: an evaluation of a first-year medical student curriculum. Med Educ Online 2023;28:2153782. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2153782.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Hosseini, A, Ghasemi, E, Nasrabadi, AN, Sayadi, L. Strategies to improve hidden curriculum in nursing and medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2023;23:658. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04652-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Hinshaw, HC, Feldman, WH, Pfuetze, KH. Treatment of tuberculosis with streptomycin: a summary of observations on one hundred cases. JAMA 1946;132:132–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1946.02870480024007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Association of American Medical Colleges. Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: curriculum developers’ guide. Washington, DC: AAMC; 2014. https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/coreepas [Accessed 16 Jun 2025].Suche in Google Scholar

26. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The milestones guidebook, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: ACGME; 2021. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/PDFs/Milestones/MilestonesGuidebook.pdf [Accessed 16 Jun 2025].Suche in Google Scholar

27. National Board of Medical Examiners. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: NBME; 2016. https://www.nbme.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/Constructing-Written-Test-Questions-2016.pdf [Accessed 16 Jun 2025].Suche in Google Scholar

28. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials: core competencies for professional nursing education. Washington, DC: AACN; 2021. https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials [Accessed Jun 2025].Suche in Google Scholar

29. Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) Institute. QSEN competencies. Chapel Hill, NC: QSEN Institute. https://qsen.org/competencies [Accessed Jun 2025].Suche in Google Scholar

30. American Nurses Association. Nursing: scope and standards of practice, 4th ed. Silver Spring, MD: ANA; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-06-24
Accepted: 2025-09-11
Published Online: 2025-10-13

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 16.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2025-0090/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen