Home Medicine Impact of diagnostic management team on patient time to diagnosis and percent of accurate and clinically actionable diagnoses
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Impact of diagnostic management team on patient time to diagnosis and percent of accurate and clinically actionable diagnoses

  • Jessica Brashear , Ryan Mize , Michael Laposata and Christopher Zahner EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 30, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

Diagnostic management teams (DMT) are groups of experts with specialized knowledge to guide test selection and interpretation of results. They have been active in institutions over the past 20 years. To date, there are limited data on whether the presence of experts to advise healthcare providers on appropriate laboratory test selection and interpretation of complex test results positively impacts patient care.

Methods

A retrospective study at a regional healthcare system with 257,000 patient encounters between 2011 and 2022 reviewing test interpretations provided by clinical laboratory experts on a diagnostic management team.

Results

Cases reviewed by the coagulation DMT were 6 times more likely to have an established, scientifically based diagnosis compared to those without a DMT. Patients who have a coagulation DMT review were twice as likely to receive a diagnosis vs. having no diagnosis.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that for several objective clinical outcomes, specifically diagnostic conclusions and length of stay, a DMT of coagulation experts assessing patients’ test results has had a major impact on outcomes and delivery of care.


Corresponding author: Christopher Zahner, MD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555 USA, Phone: (409) 772-9454, Fax: (409) 772-5683, E-mail:
Jessica Brashear and Ryan Mize share first authorship.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jose Salazar, Peter McCaffrey, Vicki Freeman, and Carol Carmen for their guidance and recommendations.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Freedman, DB. Towards better test utilization – strategies to improve physician ordering and their impact on patient outcomes. EJIFCC 2015;26:15–30.Search in Google Scholar

2. Newman-Toker, DE, Zhu, Y, Saber Tehrani, AS, Fanai, M, Hassoon, A, Nassery, N, et al.. Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Qual Saf 2023. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Singh, H, Graber, ML. Improving diagnosis in health care – the next imperative for patient safety. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2493–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1512241.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Whitehead, NS, Williams, L, Meleth, S, Kennedy, S, Epner, P, Singh, H, et al.. Interventions to improve follow-up of laboratory test results pending at discharge: a systematic review. J Hosp Med 2018;13:631–6. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.2944.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Forsman, RW. Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations? Clin Chem 1996;42:813–16, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/42.5.813.Search in Google Scholar

6. Wade, J, Dean, CL, Krummey, SM, Roback, JD, Sullivan, HC. How do I implement diagnostic management teams in transfusion medicine? Transfusion 2020;60:237–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15618.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Seegmiller, AC, Kim, AS, Mosse, CA, Levy, MA, Thompson, MA, Kressin, MK, et al.. Optimizing personalized bone marrow testing using an evidence-based, interdisciplinary team approach. Am J Clin Pathol 2013;140:643–50. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP8CKE9NEINQFL.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2023-12-19
Accepted: 2023-12-30
Published Online: 2024-01-30

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Opinion Paper
  3. Exploring synthesis as a vital cognitive skill in complex clinical diagnosis
  4. Original Articles
  5. Physiologic measurements of cognitive load in clinical reasoning
  6. Impact of diagnostic management team on patient time to diagnosis and percent of accurate and clinically actionable diagnoses
  7. Game-based learning to improve diagnostic accuracy: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
  8. A patient follow-up intervention to improve medical decision making at an internal medicine residency program
  9. Application of a diagnosis flow draft based on appearance impression for detection of vulvar disease
  10. The consequences of delayed diagnosis and treatment in persons with multiple sclerosis given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  11. Troponin testing in routine primary care: observations from a dynamic cohort study in the Amsterdam metropolitan area
  12. Use of saliva-based qPCR diagnostics for the accurate, rapid, and inexpensive detection of strep throat
  13. Short Communications
  14. Improving communication of diagnostic uncertainty to families of hospitalized children
  15. Association of diagnostic error education and recognition frequency among Japanese medical students: a nationwide cross-sectional study
  16. Updated statistics on Influenza mortality
  17. Letters to the Editor
  18. How case reports can be used to improve diagnosis
  19. Clinical assessment of Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 antigen chemiluminescence immunoassay
  20. Convicting a wrong molecule?
  21. Case Reports - Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
  22. Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a woman brought to a halt
  23. Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: shoulder pain as the first and only manifestation of lung cancer
  24. Congress Abstracts
  25. The Future of Diagnosis: Achieving Excellence and Equity
  26. The Future of Diagnosis: Navigating Uncertainty
Downloaded on 11.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2023-0175/pdf
Scroll to top button