Startseite Resident-faculty overnight discrepancy rates as a function of number of consecutive nights during a week of night float
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Resident-faculty overnight discrepancy rates as a function of number of consecutive nights during a week of night float

  • Christine Peterson EMAIL logo , Michael Moore , Nabeel Sarwani , Eric Gagnon , Michael A. Bruno und Sangam Kanekar
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. Oktober 2020
Diagnosis
Aus der Zeitschrift Diagnosis Band 8 Heft 3

Abstract

Objectives

In 2018, the ACGME (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) made a change to the maximum permissible number of consecutive nights a resident trainee can be on “night float,” from six to seven nights. To our knowledge, although investigators have studied overall discrepancy rates and discrepancy rates as a function of shift length or perceived workload of a particular shift, no study has been performed to evaluate resident-faculty discrepancy rates as a quality/performance proxy, to see whether resident performance declines as a function of the number of consecutive nights. Our hypothesis is that we would observe a progressive increase in significant overnight resident – attending discrepancies over the 7 days’ time.

Methods

A total of 8,488 reports were extracted between 4/26/2019 to 8/22/2019 retrospectively. Data was obtained from the voice dictation system report server. Exported query was saved as a .csv file format and analyzed using Python packages. A “discrepancy checker” was created to search all finalized reports for the departmental standard heading of “Final Attending Report,” used to specify any significant changes from the preliminary interpretation.

Results

Model estimates varied on different days however there were no trends or patterns to indicate a deterioration in resident performance throughout the week. There were comparable probabilities throughout the week, with 2.17% on Monday, 2.35% on Thursday and 2.05% on Friday.

Conclusions

Our results reveal no convincing trend in terms of overnight report discrepancies between the preliminary report generated by the night float resident and the final report issued by a faculty the following morning. These results are in support of the ACGME’s recent change in the permissible number of consecutive nights on night float. We did not prove our hypothesis that resident performance on-call in the domain of report accuracy would diminish over seven consecutive nights while on the night float rotation. Our results found that performance remained fairly uniform over the course of the week.


Corresponding author: Christine Peterson, MD, Associate Professor of Radiology, Milton S. Hershey Penn State Medical Center, Radiology, 500 University Drive, Mail Code H066, Hershey, PA. 17033, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: Per institutional IRB, this study was determined to be exempt.

References

1. Gergenti, L, Olympia, RP. Etiology and disposition associated with radiology discrepancies on emergency department patients. AJEM (Am J Emerg Med) 2019;37:2015–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.027.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Gardner, A, Lim, G, Minard, C, Guffey, D, Pillow, T. A cross-specialty examination of resident error disclosure and communication skills using simulation. J Grad Med Educ 2018;10:438–41. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-17-00603.1.Suche in Google Scholar

3. McWilliams, S, Smith, C, Oweis, Y, Mawad, K, Raptis, C, Mellnick, V. The clinical impact of resident attending discrepancies in on-call radiology reporting: a retrospective assessment. Acad Radiol 2018;25:727–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.016.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Mellnick, V, Raptis, C, McWilliams, S, Picus, D, Wahl, R. On-call radiology resident discrepancies: categorization by patient location and severity. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:1233–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.04.020.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Ruutiainen, A, Durand, D, Scanlon, M, Itri, J. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight. Acad Radiol 2013;20:305–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.09.028.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Cooper, V, Goodhartz, L, Nemcek, AJr, Ryu, R. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies. Acad Radiol 2008;15:1198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.011.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Weinberg, B, Richter, M, Champine, J, Morriss, M, Browning, T. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.08.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Davenport, M, Ellis, J, Khalatbari, S, Myles, J, Klein, K. Effect of work hours, caseload, shift type, and experience on resident call performance. Acad Radiol 2010;17:921–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.006.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Ruma, J, Klein, K, Chong, S, Wesolowski, J, Kazerooni, E, Ellis, J, et al. Cross-sectional examination interpretation discrepancies between on-call diagnostic radiology residents and subspecialty faculty radiologists: analysis by imaging modality and subspecialty. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:409–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.01.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Tobriner, B, Cline, B, Swenson, C, Allen, B, Maxfield, C. Evaluating resident on call performance: does volume Affect discrepancy rate?. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018;47:364–7. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.12.009.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Hanna, T, Loehfelm, T, Khosa, F, Rohatgi, S, Johnson, J-O. Overnight shift work: factors contributing to diagnostic discrepancies. Emerg Radiol 2016;23:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1355-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Cooper, V, Goodhartz, L, Nemcek, AJr, Ryu, R. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies. Acad Radiol 2008;15:1198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.011.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Jakanani, G, Botchu, R, Gupta, S, Entwisle, J, Bajaj, A. Out of hours multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography: are specialist resident reports reliable?. Acad Radiol 2012;19:191–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.010.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Ruutiainen, A, Scanlon, M, Itri, J. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:644–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.04.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Wildenberg, J, Chen, P-H, Scanlon, M, Cook, T. Attending radiologist variability and its effect on radiology resident discrepancy rates. Acad Radiol 2017;24:694–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Tamjeedi, B, Correa, J, Semionov, A, Mesurolle, B. Interobserver agreement between on-call radiology resident and general radiologist interpretations of CT pulmonary angiograms and CT venograms. PloS One 2015;10:e0126116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126116.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Bruno, M, Duncan, J, Bierhals, A, Tappouni, R. Overnight resident versus 24-hour attending radiologist coverage in academic medical centers. Radiology 2018;289:809–13. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180690.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Maloney, E, Lomasney, L, Schomer, L. Application of the RADPEER™ scoring language to interpretation discrepancies between diagnostic radiology residents and faculty radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:264–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.11.016.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Shah, N, Hoch, M, Willis, A, Betts, B, Patel, H, Hershey, B. Correlation among on-call resident study volume, discrepancy rate, and turnaround time. Acad Radiol 2010;17:1190–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.06.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Kung, J, Melenevsky, Y, Hochman, M, Didolkar, M, Yablon, C, Eisenberg, et al. On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists. AJR 2013;200:856–9. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.9100.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-06-23
Accepted: 2020-07-27
Published Online: 2020-10-28
Published in Print: 2021-08-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Chest pain management and biomarkers: the lack of trust in cardiac troponins measurement
  4. Reviews
  5. Bringing the clinical laboratory into the strategy to advance diagnostic excellence
  6. Atrial fibrillation: is there a role for cardiac troponin?
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Towards better metainterpretation: improving the clinician’s interpretation of the radiology report
  9. The challenges of diagnosing diabetes in childhood
  10. Guidelines and Recommendations
  11. Measuring patient experience of diagnostic care and acceptability of testing
  12. Original Articles
  13. Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test
  14. Delayed treatment of bacteremia during the COVID-19 pandemic
  15. Strengths and weaknesses in the diagnostic process of endometriosis from the patients’ perspective: a focus group study
  16. Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors
  17. Handshake antimicrobial stewardship as a model to recognize and prevent diagnostic errors
  18. Uncertain diagnoses in a children’s hospital: patient characteristics and outcomes
  19. The effects of rudeness, experience, and perspective-taking on challenging premature closure after pediatric ICU physicians receive hand-off with the wrong diagnosis: a randomized controlled simulation trial
  20. Resident-faculty overnight discrepancy rates as a function of number of consecutive nights during a week of night float
  21. CONUT: a tool to assess nutritional status. First application in a primary care population
  22. Is there a real need for sputum culture for community-acquired pneumonia diagnostics? Results from a retrospective study in Russia
  23. Differentiating solid breast masses: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of shear wave elastography and magnetic resonance imaging
  24. Short Communication
  25. Chest pain management: use of troponins in internal medicine wards
  26. Case Report
  27. Learning from tragedy – The Jessica Barnett story: challenges in the diagnosis of long QT syndrome
  28. Letters to the Editor
  29. Usability of non-medicinal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection to circumvent supply shortages
  30. Medical decision making during the COVID-19 epidemic: an opportunity to think how we think
Heruntergeladen am 28.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2020-0092/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen