Startseite Exploring structurally conservative blocks as universal templates for modeling eukaryotic cytochrome P450s
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Exploring structurally conservative blocks as universal templates for modeling eukaryotic cytochrome P450s

  • Youbin Tu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. August 2012
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of crystal structures for eukaryotic P450s have been published, which provided the chance to explore more structural features and construct some knowledge-based methods to facilitate modeling.

Methods: The crystal structures of 14 cytochrome P450s (CYP450) were selected to extract generic spatial anchors typical for three-dimensional (3D) structures of eukaryotic P450s. Multiple sequence alignment and structural superimposition were applied to recognize evolutionarily conserved regions.

Results: Regions containing uninterrupted helical components were identified as structurally conservative blocks (SCBs). The reliability and robustness of the SCBs were further evaluated by sequence entropy and structural deviation. Finally, these SCBs were applied and tested directly in constructing the homology model of the P450 1B1.

Conclusions: SCBs could potentially be applied as universal template to standardize the homology modeling procedure and help predict drug metabolism preferences for eukaryotic P450s.


Corresponding author: Youbin Tu, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Department of Bioinformatics, School of Basic Medicine and Biological Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, P.R. China, Phone: +86-512-65882235, Fax: +86-512-67780961

The author would like to thank Xiaolong Zhao for his help with data collection. The work was supported by the start-up fund from Soochow University. Computing and modeling studies were performed at the Structural Bioinformatics Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Biological Sciences, Soochow University.

Conflict of interest statement

Author’s conflict of interest disclosure: The author stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Nelson DR, Koymans L, Kamataki T, Stegeman JJ, Feyereisen R, Waxman DJ, et al. P450 superfamily: update on new sequences, gene mapping, accession numbers and nomenclature. Pharmacogenetics 1996;6:1–42.10.1097/00008571-199602000-00002Suche in Google Scholar

2. Kemp CA, Marechal JD, Sutcliffe MJ. Progress in cytochrome P450 active site modeling. Arch Biochem Biophys 2005;433:361–8.10.1016/j.abb.2004.08.026Suche in Google Scholar

3. Tu Y, Deshmukh R, Sivaneri M, Szklarz GD. Application of molecular modeling for prediction of substrate specificity in cytochrome P450 1A2 mutants. Drug Metab Dispos 2008;36:2371–80.10.1124/dmd.108.022640Suche in Google Scholar

4. Williams PA, Cosme J, Sridhar V, Johnson EF, McRee DE. Mammalian microsomal cytochrome P450 monooxygenase: structural adaptations for membrane binding and functional diversity. Mol Cell 2000;5:121–31.10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80408-6Suche in Google Scholar

5. Wester MR, Johnson EF, Marques-Soares C, Dansette PM, Mansuy D, Stout CD. Structure of a substrate complex of mammalian cytochrome P450 2C5 at 2.3 Å resolution: evidence for multiple substrate binding modes. Biochemistry 2003;42: 6370–9.10.1021/bi0273922Suche in Google Scholar

6. Wester MR, Johnson EF, Marques-Soares C, Dijols S, Dansette PM, Mansuy D, et al. Structure of mammalian cytochrome P450 2C5 complexed with diclofenac at 2.1 A resolution: evidence for an induced fit model of substrate binding. Biochemistry 2003;42:9335–45.10.1021/bi034556lSuche in Google Scholar

7. Gotoh O. Substrate recognition sites in cytochrome P450 family 2 (CYP2) proteins inferred from comparative analyses of amino acid and coding nucleotide sequences. J Biol Chem 1992;267:83–90.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)48462-1Suche in Google Scholar

8. Peterson JA, Graham-Lorence SE. Bacterial P450s. In: Ortiz de Montellano PR, editor. Cytochrome P-450: structure, mechanism, and biochemistry, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press, 1995:151–80.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Szklarz GD, Paulsen MD. Molecular modeling of cytochrome P450 1A1: enzyme-substrate interactions and substrate binding affinities. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2002;20:155–62.10.1080/07391102.2002.10506831Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Lewis DF, Lake BG, Dickins M, Ueng YF, Goldfarb PS. Homology modelling of human CYP1A2 based on the CYP2C5 crystallographic template structure. Xenobiotica 2003;33:239–54.10.1080/0049825021000048791Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Liu J, Ericksen SS, Besspiata D, Fisher CW, Szklarz GD. Characterization of substrate binding to cytochrome P450 1A1 using molecular modeling and kinetic analyses: case of residue 382. Drug Metab Dispos 2003;31:412–20.10.1124/dmd.31.4.412Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Liu J, Ericksen SS, Sivaneri M, Besspiata D, Fisher CW, Szklarz GD. The effect of reciprocal active site mutations in human cytochromes P450 1A1 and 1A2 on alkoxyresorufin metabolism. Arch Biochem Biophys 2004;424:33–43.10.1016/j.abb.2003.12.040Suche in Google Scholar

13. Bujnicki JM. Protein-structure prediction by recombination of fragments. Chembiochem 2006;7:19–27.10.1002/cbic.200500235Suche in Google Scholar

14. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2947–8.10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404Suche in Google Scholar

15. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD – visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996;14:33–8.10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5Suche in Google Scholar

16. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27:379–423.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSuche in Google Scholar

17. Wang J, Wang W. A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:1033–8.10.1038/14918Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Wang A, Savas U, Stout CD, Johnson EF. Structural characterization of the complex between alpha-naphthoflavone and human cytochrome P450 1B1. J Biol Chem 2011;286:5736–43.10.1074/jbc.M110.204420Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Buchan DW, Ward SM, Lobley AE, Nugent TC, Bryson K, Jones DT. Protein annotation and modelling servers at University College London. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38(Suppl):W563–8.10.1093/nar/gkq427Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779–815.10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, version 0.99rc6. Portland, OR, USA: Schrödinger, LLC.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Seifert A, Pleiss J. Identification of selectivity-determining residues in cytochrome P450 monooxygenases: a systematic analysis of the substrate recognition site 5. Proteins 2009;74:1028–35.10.1002/prot.22242Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Li YC, Chiang CW, Yeh HC, Hsu PY, Whitby FG, Wang LH, et al. Structures of prostacyclin synthase and its complexes with substrate analog and inhibitor reveal a ligand-specific heme conformation change. J Biol Chem 2008;283:2917–26.10.1074/jbc.M707470200Suche in Google Scholar

24. Kirton SB, Baxter CA, Sutcliffe MJ. Comparative modelling of cytochromes P450. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002;54:385–406.10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00010-8Suche in Google Scholar

25. Lee TS. Reverse conservation analysis reveals the specificity determining residues of cytochrome P450 family 2 (CYP 2). Evol Bioinform Online 2008;4:7–16.10.4137/EBO.S291Suche in Google Scholar

26. Hasemann CA, Kurumbail RG, Boddupalli SS, Peterson JA, Deisenhofer J. Structure and function of cytochromes P450: a comparative analysis of three crystal structures. Structure 1995;3:41–62.10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00134-4Suche in Google Scholar

27. Sigrist CJ, Cerutti L, Hulo N, Gattiker A, Falguet L, Pagni M, et al. PROSITE: a documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors. Brief Bioinform 2002;3:265–74.10.1093/bib/3.3.265Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Werck-Reichhart D, Feyereisen R. Cytochromes P450: a success story. Genome Biol 2000;1:3003.1–9.10.1186/gb-2000-1-6-reviews3003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Mestres J. Structure conservation in cytochromes P450. Proteins 2005;58:596–609.10.1002/prot.20354Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2012-6-18
Accepted: 2012-7-9
Published Online: 2012-08-29
Published in Print: 2012-12-01

©2012 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dmdi-2012-0023/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen