Home Pragmatic functions of repetitions in spontaneous spoken dialect discourse
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Pragmatic functions of repetitions in spontaneous spoken dialect discourse

  • Danila Zuljan Kumar EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 8, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Repetition is a natural phenomenon employed to perform a variety of cognitive, psychological, interactional, stylistic, didactic and pragmatic functions in spoken and written discourse. Adopting the method of discourse analysis, the study attempts to explore the pragmatic functions of repetitions as used in spoken dialect narrative discourse.

On a propositional level, only those repetitions which establish and maintain co-reference are necessary, all other forms seem to be redundant. However, if we take into account their pragmatic functions, they are not, as the data gathered in the study show. In fact, speakers use them, deliberately or not, as an effective communication strategy in the following functions: to extend the planning time to find a suitable lexeme, to enhance the importance of a lexeme, to emphasize the length of an event, after an interruption, to eliminate uncertainty and to confirm the correctness of the co-speaker’s statement. They also reveal the speakers emotions, like his/her emotional shock, and are used as a part of the so-called conversational duet.

The data include the transcripts of the interviews with 6 dialect speakers in the Brda/Collio region, western Slovenia.

Abbreviations and marks

Br.

= the Briško dialect

Friul.

= Friulian

[xxx]

marks the missing text

əəə

marks filled pause

marks false start and/or hesitation

*xxx*

marks overlapping speech

/

marks pause

/.../

marks the omitted text

References

Chiari, Isabella. 2007. Redundancy elimination: The case of artificial languages. Journal of Universal Language 8: 7–38.10.22425/jul.2007.8.2.7Search in Google Scholar

Bamford, Julia. 2000. You can say that again: Repetition in discourse Bologna: Clueb.Search in Google Scholar

Barbaresi Merlini, Lavinia. 1996. Markedness reversal in dialogic repetition. In Repetition in dialogue 104–118, ed. Carla Bazzanella (Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 11). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Bazzanella, Carla. 2011. Redundancy, repetition, and intensity in discourse. Language Sciences 33: 243–254.10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Beaman, Karen. 1984. Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse. In Coherence in spoken and written discourse 45–80, ed. Deborah Tannen. Norwood (New Yersey): Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Beaugrande, Robert de, Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler, Aleksandra Derganc & Tjaša Miklič. 1992. Uvod v besediloslovje [Introduction to text linguistics]. Ljubljana: Park.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johannsson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 2000. The Longman grammar of spoken and written English Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Bublitz, Wolfram. 1996. I bought a freezer – you’ve bought a freezer – they’ve brought a freezer. Repetition as a text-building device. In Repetition in dialogue 16–28, ed. Carla Bazzanella (Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 11). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2004. Working with spoken discourse London/New Delhi: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1995. The negotiation of coherence in face-to-face interaction. Some examples from the extreme bounds. In Coherence in spontaneous text 41– 58, eds. Ann Morton Gernsbacher & Thomas Givón. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.31.03coaSearch in Google Scholar

Egner, Inge. 1996. Other-repetition in question form. In Repetition in dialogue 66– 77, ed. Carla Bazzanella (Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 11). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, Fleisher Carol & David Kalmar. 1996. You can’t step in the same river twice. In Repetition in dialogue 78–89, ed. Carla Bazzanella (Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 11). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Sylvie De Cock 2013. Errors and disfluencies in spoken corpora: Setting the scene. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16: 141– 172.10.1075/ijcl.16.2.01gilSearch in Google Scholar

Genç, Bilal, Mustafa Mavaşoğlu & Erdoğan Bada. 2010. Types and functions of repetitions in the narrations of Turkish speakers of French. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 4 (2): 216–224. pdfs.semantic scholar. org/5ae7/ 29aa4fcbf72bf74de5ecc6b1fd7265b1b329.pdf (acc. 22 Feb 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Götz, Sandra. 2013. Fluency in native and nonnative English speech (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 53). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.53Search in Google Scholar

Gráf, Tomáš. 2017. Repeats in advanced spoken English of learners with Czech as L1. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philologica 3Phonetica Pragensia 65–78.10.14712/24646830.2017.34Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John. 1992. Discourse strategies (Studies in interactional sociolinguistics 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 1994. Repetition in discourse. Interdisciplinary perspectives. In Advances in discourse processes 1–20, ed. Barbara Johnstone. New Jersey: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London/New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Kjellmer, Goran. 2008. Self-repetition in spoken English discourse. In The dynamics of linguistic variation: Corpus evidence on English past and present 37–60, eds. Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta & Minna Korhonen (Studies in Language Variation 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/silv.2.06kjeSearch in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 2000. Grammar of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented Research. Language Learning 50: 675–72.10.1111/0023-8333.00143Search in Google Scholar

Leinfellner-Rupertsberger, Elisabeth. 1989. Connexity, coherence, and the semantic net. In Text and discourse connectedness 463–481, eds. Maria-Elisabeth Conte, Jànos S. Petöfi & Emel Sözel. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.16.37leiSearch in Google Scholar

Merritt, Marilyn. 1994. Repetition in situated discourse. Exploring its forms and functions. In Advances in discourse processes 23–36, ed. Barbara Johnstone. New Jersey: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Mönnink, Johan. Repeating as monitoring. In Repetition in dialogue 120–128, ed. Carla Bazzanella (Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 11). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal. 1987. Functions of repetition in conversation. Text 7: 245–264.10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.245Search in Google Scholar

Perrin, Laurent, Denise Deshaies & Claude Paradis. 2003. Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetitions in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 1843–1860.10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00117-6Search in Google Scholar

Rees, M. Agnes van. 1996. Functions of repetition in informal discourse. In Repetition in dialogue 141–155, ed. Carla Bazzanella (Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 11). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1996. Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 102: 161–216.10.1086/230911Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1997. Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Dicourse Processes 23: 499–545.10.1080/01638539709545001Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. l987a. Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language 63: 574–605.10.1017/CBO9780511618987.004Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. l987b. Repetition in conversation as spontaneous formulaicity. Text 87: 215–243.10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.215Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking voices. Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (Studies in Interactional Linguistics 6). Washington DC: Georgetown University.10.1017/CBO9780511618987Search in Google Scholar

Zuljan Kumar, Danila. 2006. Ponovitev kot potrditev in konverzacijski duet [Repetition as confirmation and conversational duet]. In Diahronija in sinhronija v dialektoloških raziskavah 432–438, eds. Mihaela Koletnik & Vera Smole (Zora 41). Maribor: Zora.Search in Google Scholar

Zuljan Kumar, Danila. 2007. Narečni diskurz [Dialect discourse]. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC.10.3986/9789612540050Search in Google Scholar

Zuljan Kumar, Danila. 2014. Podredne stavčne strukture v nadiškem in briškem narečju [Subordinate Clausal Structures in the briško and the nadiško dialects]. Annales: anali za istrske in mediteranske študije, Series historia et sociologia 24/2: 331–342.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-11-08
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dialect-2019-0007/html
Scroll to top button