Startseite Constructing online tourist destination images: a visual discourse analysis of the official Beijing Tourism website
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Constructing online tourist destination images: a visual discourse analysis of the official Beijing Tourism website

  • Wenjin Qi

    Wenjin Qi (1983) is a lecturer at School of Foreign Studies, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng, Shanxi, China and a PhD candidate at the Sol International School, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea. Her main research interests include critical discourse analysis, social semiotics, and language education. Her publications include “Linguistic landscape for Korean learning: A survey of perception, attitude, and practice of Korean beginners at a Korean university” (2020).

    EMAIL logo
    und Nadezda Sorokina

    Nadezda Sorokina (1981) is an assistant professor at the Sol International School, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea. Her main research interests include medical tourism, sustainable tourism, and semiotics. Her publications include “Medical tourists from low-trust countries and South Korean medical tourism: The case of Kazakhstan” (2020), “Tourism and water” (2016), “Sustainable event management: A practical guide” (2015).

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. August 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Having the right image as a tourist destination brings immense benefits for a city’s international recognition in an increasingly competitive tourist industry. Official tourism websites as effective platforms to project a destination image online are able to provide substantial information about the tourist destination and attract a wider potential for inbound tourists from a global market. However, a lack of sufficient research has been noted regarding the integration of tourism studies and the study of website discourse, particularly visual discourse. This study, drawing on the theory of metafunctions in semiotics, conducts a visual discourse analysis by examining the three metafunctional meanings of visual images extracted from the official Beijing Tourism website. The results of both quantitative and qualitative analyses showed that the investigated website constructs an online city destination image through a multiplicity of tourist resources. The study concludes by outlining the practical benefits for tourism website designers and implications for future research.

1 Introduction

Starting from the implementation of the reform and opening-up policy in 1978, China’s tourism industry has gone through fast development, and China has emerged as one of the leading tourist markets in the world (Ye and Jeon 2020). Meanwhile, the advancement of information and communication technology has tremendously supported the promotion of tourist destinations.

In this digital era, Web 2.0 technologies create numerous opportunities to advertise and promote a city in the global context. National tourism organizations (NTOs) and destination marketing organizations (DMOs) take this opportunity to present the ideal characteristics of tourism products and offerings at a destination on official tourist destination websites (Dobers and Hallin 2009; Francesconi 2014; Mak 2017; Stoian 2015). These websites create and project favorable online destination images by providing potential tourists with information about the destination in order to attract them to it (Kotoua and Ilkan 2017a; Malenkina and Ivanov 2018). More and more regions and countries have acknowledged the significance of online destination images and have therefore put intensive efforts into designing tourism websites to promote their products and reach both a national and international audience (Hunter 2016; Mak 2017; Marine-Roig and Clavé 2016; Molinillo et al. 2018).

An online destination image is defined as the online representation of the knowledge, ideas, feelings, collective beliefs, and overall impressions of a destination. The construction of online destination images has gained increasing attention as a most influential determinant affecting the selection of a destination by potential tourists and consequently the reputation and success of the destination (Deng and Li 2018; Mak 2017). Therefore, the content on an official tourism website is a good source to understand the projected online destination image (Choi et al. 2007; Francesconi 2014; Mak 2017; Vinyals-Mirabent 2019). Hunter (2016) proposes that a destination image is a reflection of online sign systems. In other words, tourism websites have developed a language of tourism (Dann 1996) to promote and introduce tourist destinations, and they form texts far beyond written words (McCormick 2018). They use a semiotic entity resulting from the interplay of various resources, for instance, written language and pictorial (images, icons), graphic (layout, typographic features), and acoustic elements (sounds, music) to showcase the prominent features as an ideal representation of the place (Horng and Tsai 2010; Wu 2018). Therefore, the content and layout of an online destination image constitute a particular discourse (González-Rodríguez et al. 2016; Qian et al. 2018; Xue and Kerstetter 2018).

However, a lack of sufficient research has been noted regarding the integration of tourism studies and the study of discourse, particularly multimodal discourse (Chik and Vásquez 2017; Hunter 2016; Salim 2017; Stoian 2018; Wu 2018). And applying multimodal discourse analysis to tourism websites can benefit tourism marketers in acknowledging the meaning being communicated to viewers and how the range of semiotic resources can be used in website design to form a positive destination image and attract the targeted audience (Nekic 2015; Michelson and Álvarez Valencia 2016; Stoian 2018).

Building on extant research, this study attempts to contribute to the body of literature by exploring the discursive construction of the Beijing destination image through a visual discourse analysis of images extracted from the official Beijing Tourism website (http://english.visitbeijing.com.cn/). Drawing on the theory of metafunctions in semiotics, this paper tries to answer the following two research questions: (1) What is the destination image of Beijing projected on its official tourism website? (2) How is it constructed through the visual discourse?

2 Literature review

In the age of digital communication, digital media is used in the processes of data collection and dissemination. Accordingly, tourist destination promotion should be disseminated online as a more effective and cost-efficient platform (Wang and Zhang 2019). In particular, tourism websites, as one major digital media in the context of tourism, play a paramount role in helping prospective visitors to learn about destinations and develop strong and positive attitudes about them (Kotoua and Ilkan 2017b; Lee and Gretzel 2012). Official tourist destination websites are gaining increasingly more recognition as a means of accessing abundant information about destinations (Briciu et al. 2019; Malenkina and Ivanov 2018; Vinyals-Mirabent et al. 2019; Xiang et al. 2008).

In tourism destination promotion, the language of tourism plays an essential role in constructing a detailed description of the potential tourist destination (Dann 1996). Together with other different elements such as speech and visual elements, they constitute the discourse of tourism to enhance the destination image. Yet it was not until 2010 that the discourse of tourism websites began to gain the attention of more researchers (e.g. Duffy and Pang 2020; Hallett and Kaplan-Weinger 2010; Krisjanous 2016; Manca 2013, 2016; Nekic 2015; Zuliani 2013). New forms of representations, such as written texts, images, video clips, hyperlinks, and so on, are demonstrated on tourism websites. The paradigm shifts away from a focus on “monomodality” (Kress and van Leeuwen 2001) and toward a “multimodal ensemble” (Kress 2006). The choice of multimodality and the way each mode interacts with the others exert potential sway over what information website viewers acquire in terms of how viewers navigate their way through the website, create reading pathways through texts, interpret meanings from their perspectives, and more importantly shape their perceived image of the targeted destination. The various possibilities of combining modes on the Internet have forced scholars to think about the particular characteristics of these modes and the way they semiotically function in the modern discourse worlds (Manca 2016; Ventola et al. 2004). This finds its evidence in the assumption underpinning multimodality that people orchestrate meaning through their selection and configuration of modes, and the interaction between modes is significant for meaning-making (Adami and Pinto 2019; Jewitt 2009; Knight et al. 2018).

In social semiotics, it is believed that semiotic resources, for instance signs and codes, are socially constructed (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006; O’Halloran et al. 2011). Multimodal signs are shaped by the norms and rules operating at the moment of sign-making and influenced by the motivations and interests of sign-makers in a specific social context (He 2017). In other words, in general, sign-makers design websites based on past experience, existing examples, or technological considerations (Lee and Gretzel 2012). It is evident that strategies for destination promotion are vital in communicating a city’s image and identity (Wang and Zhang 2019), therefore, tourism websites have been gaining more and more attention, and interest in multimodal research is increasing, with an attempt to adopt a systematic and critical stance in perspectives of how different modes work together to create meanings in online communication.

However, little is known about the discursive constructions that aim to persuade consumers and change their minds. It is particularly the case for tourism websites, which are seldom investigated with a multimodal discourse analysis perspective (Hallett and Kaplan-Weinger 2010; Manca 2016; Stoian 2018; Wu 2018). It is only in recent years that a multimodal turn has taken place in the research of destination images, particularly concerning visual analyses (Chik and Vásquez 2017; Hunter 2012; Mak 2017; Salim 2017; Thurlow and Jaworski 2010; Zhang et al. 2019). Now there is a growing body of interdisciplinary studies utilizing multimodal discourse analysis to investigate tourism promotions in new media formats (Chen and Huang 2018; Holsanova 2012; Hunter 2016; Liu 2017; Thomas 2014; Wang and Zhang 2019).

The tourism website has become a principal tool to promote a destination (Avraham and Ketter 2017; González-Rodríguez et al. 2016; Law et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2018). Its content and design are essential features in portraying the destination image as well as attracting, encouraging, and persuading viewers in the process of decision-making. In particular, the visual practices on tourism websites affect knowledge and recognition about the destination and also structure a body of representational social discourse (de Bernardi 2019; Krisjanous 2016; Salim and Som 2018). In this visual discourse, an emerging trend lies in promotional tourism videos which convey feelings, emotions, and knowledge with immediacy and efficacy through the delivery of clear and direct visual effects (Chen et al. 2020; Losada and Mota 2019; Yan and Santos 2009). The advantages of videos are stressed by Butler’s (1990) statement that videos play a particularly convincing role in shaping images and increasing visitation.

Despite the increasing popularity and availability of promotional tourism videos, less research has focused on the effects of static pictures presented on destination websites, even though the significance of visual images has been acknowledged in the construction of projected destination images (Hunter 2016; Mak 2017; Nechita et al. 2019; Önder and Marchiori 2017; Wacker and Groth 2020) and support travel decision-making processes (Lee and Gretzel 2012; Lian and Yu 2019). Furthermore, even fewer studies adopt a social semiotic perspective in the context of tourism website discourse (Bernardi 2019; Hallett 2018; Krisjanous 2016; Manca 2016; Salim and Som 2018; Stoian 2018).

In the case of Beijing’s destination image, existing studies have identified it through examining the online tourist-generated content of inbound tourists’ Beijing-related photos posted on social media (Deng et al. 2018; Su et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019) and through analyzing promotional Beijing Tourism videos (Wang and Zhang 2019; Yan and Santos 2009). However, little research has identified Beijing’s destination image on tourism websites, particularly on Beijing’s official tourism website. Hence, this study intends to examine the destination image of Beijing projected on its official tourism website and identify how the visual discourse constructs Beijing’s destination image.

3 Methodology

3.1 The theoretical framework

The integration of linguistic and visual elements constructs a specific discourse of tourism to develop the destination image on official tourism websites. Visual communication, as well as language, both shapes and is shaped by society. The above theoretical framework, derived from Stoian (2015), consists of two key concepts: linguistic elements and visual elements. The first concept is the language of tourism as a linguistic part of discourse of tourism. Language is utilized to enlighten potential tourists about what can be experienced and to direct their gaze through an anticipation of intense pleasures (Dann 1996). Following Halliday’s (1978) theory of the metafunctions, it presents the tools for analyzing linguistic elements on the website. The second concept is the visual part of tourism discourse. Drawing on Halliday and Matthiessen's (2014) systemic functional grammar, Kress and van Leeuwen (1996, 2006 developed a theoretical framework, a “grammar of visual analysis,” which has been considered as the “map” for the analysis of multimodal visual-based communicative discourse (He 2017). It aims to investigate the possibilities of meaning-making that apply to all forms of visual presentation (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: 
						Theoretical framework of the study.
Figure 1:

Theoretical framework of the study.

In systemic functional linguistics, metafunctions are groups of semantic systems that make meanings of a related kind (Halliday and Matthiessen 2014). They consist of three sub-metafunctions: ideational metafunction, interpersonal metafunction, and textual metafunction (Halliday 1978). And this notion of “metafunction” was adopted by Kress and van Leeuwen (2006) in defining the representational meaning of semiotic modes as “representing objects and their relations in a world outside the representational system”(Kress and van Leeuwen 2006: 42). Similarly, they adapted the metafunctional theory, named the three metafunctions as representational, interactive, and compositional meanings, and applied them in visual communication. In specific, while the representational meaning is captured in the ideational metafunction, the interactive meaning of semiotic modes is captured in the interpersonal metafunction to represent the social relations between producer, viewer, and object represented. Finally, the compositional meaning is captured in the textual metafunction to realize different textual meanings of semiotic modes (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006).

In advertising and marketing research, metafunctional theory has been widely used to explore information and persuasion conveyed via a diversified range of texts (Chen and Cheung 2020; Mehmet and Clarke 2016; Wagner 2015). This paper is a preliminary study which adopts a partial theoretical framework of visual elements. It analyzes the three metafunctions embedded in the visual images extracted from the official website of Beijing Tourism.

3.2 Method

In exploring the structure of investigated images, two main components which realize representational meaning are analyzed: process types and participants. According to Kress and van Leeuwen (2006), images are grouped into two categories of process types: narrative processes and conceptual processes. The narrative processes represent participants in terms of “doing” and “happening” (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006: 59). In contrast, the conceptual processes represent the world as “being something, or meaning something, or belonging to some category, or having certain characteristics or components” (Jewitt and Oyama 2001: 141).

Further categorization of different kinds of narrative process and the conceptual process is presented in Figure 2, which is an adapted framework based on Guo and Feng’s (2015) model. It is worth pointing out that even though the narrative process can be divided into five kinds of process (action process, behavioral process, speech process, mental process, and conversion process), we only chose action process for analysis for the reason that all our extracted images, which belong to the narrative process, fall exclusively into this kind of process whereas images of conceptual processes are seen to be distributed extensively across classificational process, analytical process, and symbolic process.

Figure 2: 
						Elements for exploring the representational meaning of images extracted from the Beijing Tourism website.
Figure 2:

Elements for exploring the representational meaning of images extracted from the Beijing Tourism website.

The second main component for this analysis of representational meaning is to obtain a comprehensive picture of participants in the images, which is conducted from three different perspectives: (1) as generic or specific; (2) as groups or individuals; (3) as photographic or cartoonic. The classification of the first two perspectives is in line with the categories of the visual representation of social actors (van Leeuwen 2008), while the last perspective is drawn from “modality” (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006) as a significant dimension of representation of multiplicity in cultural and religious tourism resources. In accordance with this analytical framework, this study presents a systemic structure that enables a comprehensive analysis of image representations from the website in both the quantitative and qualitative analyses.

3.3 Data set

Beijing Tourism, a non-profit website, was established in 2010 and has been operated by the Information Center under the authorization of the Beijing Municipal Culture and Tourism Bureau. As the official tourism website of Beijing, it is dedicated as a portal to exhibit Beijing’s rich tourism resources to the world, and provide the most updated, credible, and accurate travel information and quality assurance to visitors. It functions as a platform to broadcast Chinese tourist culture, and also as a window to serve tourists from all around the world in the aim of building Beijing into a top tourist destination.

The Beijing Tourism website provides a comprehensive introduction to the city and its tourist attractions under the caption of “About Beijing” on the homepage. Detailed descriptions are listed under “Beijing Facts,” where five types of tourism resources are recognized, namely, recreational tourism, cultural tourism, historical tourism, architectural tourism, and religious tourism. Each category has several subcategories with quite a few pictures to support written texts in demonstrating the individual tourist attraction. All of the pictures are static images, and 278 pictures are selected from the above five types of tourism resources for analysis.

4 Data analysis

4.1 Quantitative analysis

The number of images for the respective type of tourism resource and the proportional distribution across five types serve to describe the construction of the projected destination image of Beijing. Meanwhile, the representational meaning of all visual images facilitates and reinforces the functions of the five types of tourism resources in building up the city’s destination image from a quantitative perspective.

4.1.1 Percentage distribution of images across five types of tourism resources

The number of images belonging to five types of tourism is calculated respectively, and the percentage for each type of tourism is distributed as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: 
							Distribution of images for five types of tourism resources on the Beijing Tourism website.
Figure 3:

Distribution of images for five types of tourism resources on the Beijing Tourism website.

An overwhelming percentage (46.8%) of images has been used to introduce various aspects of Beijing’s local culture, from World Cultural Heritage to food culture, from folk art and local products to local life, which constitutes the major part of cultural tourism in Beijing. And 63 pictures (22.7%, almost half of the number of images for cultural tourism) have been taken to depict natural landscapes for recreational tourism in Beijing. There are ten five-star natural scenic destinations in Beijing and many more attractions of four-star and lower levels which provide a wide range of choices for recreational tourism-oriented tourists. This study collects data from the ten five-star destinations and an additional eleven destinations of four-star level for a relatively large sample size.

Historical tourism takes up 12.9% of the images, which cover two five-star museums and eight four-star museums. Beijing is a capital city with a long history. Naturally significant parts of the city’s history has been recorded by museums of various themes, such as the Palace Museum, the China Science and Technology Museum, the Red Sandalwood Museum, the Chinese People’s Anti-Japanese War Museum, the Peking Man Museum, the Chinese Aviation Museum, and so on.

A sum of 29 pictures (10.4%) were extracted to showcase two representative architectural styles, that is, traditional classic architectures (palace, Hutong, Siheyuan, temple, etc.) and modern architecture (skyscrapers in the central business district, international brand hotels, etc.). Religious tourism represents only 7.2%. These pictures include places of different religious worship, such as Taoism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and Catholicism, as well as many other folk religions.

This website puts more emphasis on cultural tourism to produce a cultural image of Beijing with diverse Chinese cultural attributes. Beijing’s image as a cultural destination is well received by inbound tourists, as discovered in relevant studies which identify Beijing’s destination image from the tourists’ perspective in an analysis of user-generated content. It is discovered that Beijing’s traditional and cultural attractions make up a large proportion of the user-generated photographic content (Deng et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2019). Moreover, one of Deng et al.’s (2018) findings, i.e. that natural scenes contribute significantly to the formation of Beijing’s destination image, could be evidenced by the second highest percentage of recreational tourism in the above figure. Altogether five major types of tourism resources, covering all aspects of Beijing, constitute the content for marketing and destination image promotion. They help the viewers form an impression of Beijing as a city with abundant tourist attractions of all sorts. And the theme of multiplicity in tourism resources stands out clearly.

4.1.2 Representational meaning of images across five types of tourism resources

The images are put into categories of processes of representational meanings according to the grammar of visual semiotic analysis (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006) (see Table 1).

Table 1:

Types of process and types of participants distributed across five types of tourism resources on the Beijing Tourism website.

Cultural tourism (N = 130)(%) Recreational tourism (N = 63)(%) Historical tourism (N = 36)(%) Architectural tourism (N = 29)(%) Religious tourism (N = 20)(%)
Narrative process Action process 13.85 7.94 0.00 0.00 0.00
Conceptual process Classification process 15.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Analytical process 43.85 92.06 100 100 100
Symbolic process 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Participants Generic 26.15 20.63 16.67 41.38 15.00
Specific 0.77 0.00 2.78 0.00 15.00
Group 19.23 15.87 16.67 31.03 20.00
Individual 8.46 4.76 2.78 10.34 10.00
Cartoonic 5.38 3.17 0.00 6.90 15.00
Photography 23.08 17.46 19.44 34.48 15.00

Firstly, cultural tourism has the largest number of pictures (130 pictures), among which pictures of the conceptual process occupy more than half (60%) and those of the narrative process hold only 13.85%. Within the conceptual process, pictures of the analytical process take up the largest proportion of 43.85%, followed by those of the classification process (15.38%) and the symbolic process (0.77%).

Compared with other types of tourism, cultural tourism has a greater percentage of pictures which belong to action process for the reason that more participants who are preoccupied with the process of handcrafting local products, performing folk art, cooking specialty food, and shopping on the international plaza, appear in pictures related to Beijing local culture. It echoes with the nature of cultural tourism, which is highly people-involved.

As for the conceptual process, pictures that depict individual parts of places of World Cultural Heritage have been labeled as an analytical process. And this also applies to pictures of Beijing’s time-honored brands and shopping plazas as well. In all, they constitute up to 43.85% to form a perspective into the modern fashion life of Beijingers. Pictures of the classification process are the second most under the category of the conceptual process (15.38%). It mainly includes pictures of Beijing local products, representing unique Chinese traditional art and craftsmanship, such as Lord Rabbit, gold inlaid lacquer, cloisonne, Zi Sha pot, Chinese clay figurines, Qi Pao, jade ware, embroidered shoes, dough figurines, and so on. Pictures of the symbolic process (0.77%) are those that show the specific facial makeup of the Peking Opera or a series of such images.

Secondly, recreational tourism adopts a large percentage of images of the analytical process (92.06%), displaying natural and scenic landscapes of theme parks with no participants at all most of the time. Images for recreational tourism include pictures taken of three subcategories on the website (spring outing, theme parks, and landscape). It is dedicated to showcasing the natural beauties of scenic spots in vivid detail, such as various parts of destinations without much of the trace of tourists. For images with participants, there are more pictures of groups of tourists (15.87%) than those of individual tourists (4.76%).

Group participants are shown impersonally, as strangers with whom the viewers do not need to become acquainted, as “trees in a landscape” (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006). They are at a public distance where the viewers can see the torsos of a few tourists. Represented participants are supposed to be nameless and be blending in the landscape as general tourists, and viewers look at them as strangers/others. The role a general crowd of people plays is to complete the image of a destination. Usually, it is a picture taken from a distance or at a high angle, and the tourists appear quite blurry from the front, or sometimes the image merely shows the backs of tourists visiting the destination. Therefore, it is natural that the analytical process in recreational tourism is applied more extensively. As for individual participants in the images, most of the time, they remain at a far social distance, where viewers see the whole figure “with space around it” (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006). They don’t even look directly at the camera. If they sometimes do, they do so from such a distance that it barely affects the viewers. Indeed, their facial features can be hardly distinguished from a long distance. Cartoonic images account for the smallest percentage of only 3.17% in recreational tourism, and this is mostly designed to attract tourists (especially young children) and excite them for more authentic natural tourism afterwards.

Thirdly, historical tourism includes pictures of ten museums with such different themes as royal palace, city planning exhibition, science and technology, red sandalwood, anti-Japanese war, ancient Peking primitive man, aviation in China, and auto museum. Due to the introductory and descriptive characteristics of museum exhibitions, all the images fall into the analytical process type (100%), which is captured in the conceptual process. As for the participants in images, most of the participants (16.67%) are groups of general tourists without any specific demographic information about them. All of the participants are photographic participants (19.44%) with no cartoonic participants appearing in these images.

Fourthly, all the images for architectural tourism can similarly be categorized as analytical process (100%), under the conceptual processes type. The representational meaning is evident in the images of Siheyuan and Hutong, as both are typical representatives of architectural features in Beijing. Accordingly, images in this category are designed to be descriptive in terms of the structure of architecture rather than as actions. The descriptive images demonstrate traditional historical streets (Huhong) and residential architecture (Siheyuan) of a Beijing character (Su et al. 2019). As for the participants, 31.03% of them form generic groups of tourists (or local residents) embedded in the image as a background. And 10.34% are generic individual tourists (or local residents), among which 6.9% of them are cartoonic participants.

Lastly, images of religious tourism are pictures taken of five widely known temples among many others in Beijing. All of them are of the analytical process (100%). As shown in the above table, a relatively smooth proportion is uncovered across different types of participants. Generic participants, either in groups (20%) or individual (10%), are general tourists or pilgrims paying respects in temples. And the specific participants (15%) in the images are the Buddha, a folk God or Goddess, or people coming to worship. Both types of participants occupy the same percentage (15%), from which can be concluded that a variety of images of religious tourism resources are provided to attract readers and build their interest in religious tourism in Beijing.

4.2 Qualitative analysis

A social semiotic approach to visual analysis focuses primarily on the ways in which given visual resources can be deployed within and across texts to generate a range of meaning potentials so as to achieve specific ends (Aiello and Dickinson 2014). Hence, a qualitative study of four images is conducted in the perspective of visual discourse analysis. Figures 4 and 5 are selected from a special promotional volume entitled The Memoir Of Old Beijing; Figure 6 is selected from the Beijing Tourist Map, and Figure 7 is a cover image for the 2019 Beijing Tourism promotion activities throughout the world. All of the images are extracted from the investigated website, and they fall into three categories: cultural tourism, recreational tourism, and historical tourism. These three categories constitute the top three types of tourism resources in Beijing. Hence, they represent key features of the whole body of tourism resources.

Figure 4: 
						Intangible cultural heritage of old Beijing.
Figure 4:

Intangible cultural heritage of old Beijing.

Figure 5: 
						Time-honored brands of Beijing cuisine.
Figure 5:

Time-honored brands of Beijing cuisine.

Figure 6: 
						Tourist map on the Beijing Tourism website.
Figure 6:

Tourist map on the Beijing Tourism website.

Figure 7: 
						Tourism promotion image extracted from the Beijing Tourism website.
Figure 7:

Tourism promotion image extracted from the Beijing Tourism website.

4.2.1 Multiplicity of cultural tourism resources

The Beijing Opera actress in Figure 4 is helping her friend (whose reflection in the mirror is blocked) put on makeup for the show. It is an image reflecting “action process,” categorized under the “narrative process,” representing “doing and happening” by an “individual human participant.”

In visual discourse, any semiotic mode has to be able to project the relations between the producer of a sign and the receiver of that sign (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006). The actress is not addressing viewers directly but looking away from the camera. This conveys the absence of a sense of interaction between the depicted actress and the viewer. However, the choice of distance can suggest different relations between the represented participants and the viewers, and sometimes it could be an imaginary relation. In this relation, a close scrutinization of this actress is offered as though she were a specimen in a display case (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006). And this close-up shot of the actress exhibits a close personal distance with viewers. The mirror of the camera and that in the picture somehow provides a whole representation of the actress from her front to her back, from her made-up appearance to her opera costume. In this way, viewers can experience a close-to-authentic taste of what Beijing Opera, as the most dominant form of Chinese operas, looks like. And more importantly, the actress, as a hostess, manages to attract viewers with mystery and excitement to embark on a journey of exotic oriental Chinese cultural shows. Therefore, as a cover image, it is placed as a prelude to theatrical activities to demonstrate the multiplicity of Beijing culture, from folk music, performance, and handicraft products to local cuisine and urban life.

Visual practices construct cultural embodiments and symbols that identify a certain culture and people and thereby structure a body of representational social discourse (Aiello and Parry 2019; Tzanelli 2006). The actress brings Beijing Opera to the viewers and, more importantly, extends an inviting welcome to experience the colorful local culture through her interaction with viewers.

The above figure, extracted from the Beijing Travel Feature Volume 7: The Memoir of Old Beijing posted on the website, illustrates the local food culture of old Beijing with six instances of time-honored brand restaurants. It is a set of images with a “classificational process,” which is one type of “conceptual process” representing “being a kind of/kinds of” cultural tourism resource.

The content falls on two pages of this volume (pages 14 and 15) with a symmetrical layout. Page 14 consists of two columns: the column of writing and the column of images. The column of writing on the left side consists of three “blocks,” each with a heading (the name of the time-honored brand), a brief introduction to the brand and its specialty food, and the address of the restaurant at the bottom. The column of images, which is on the right side of the same page, consists of three pictures of the same square size, depicting either the authentic cuisines or the brand sign of the restaurant. The layout on this page mirrors that on the next page, and altogether, they form a complete overview with six images in the middle and writing on both sides in a balanced aesthetic way. It could be inferred that this description identifies the entities in a proper and sufficient arrangement to introduce time-honored brands of old Beijing. Therefore, the layout, as a mode, has fulfilled the function of orienting viewers toward a selection of specialty food and time-honored brands in Beijing representing the gastronomic variety of the local cuisine.

4.2.2 Multiplicity of recreational tourism resources

Figure 6 is a tourist map demonstrating several representative landmarks in Beijing. It is an image involving a “classificational process,” representing “being a kind of/kinds of” recreational tourism resources. The multiple kinds of recreational tourism resources can be seen not only from the number of attractions depicted in the image but also from the layout.

Space and the relation of the simultaneously present elements in that space provide the underlying semiotic logics which offer distinct potentials for making meanings by the arrangement of entities in the framed space (Kress 2006). In analyzing the vertical composition design in the above image, the focus should be on such phenomenon as the up-to-down placement of items as well as on the salient positioning of one item compared to other items within the same visual space (Hallett and Kaplan-Weinger 2010).

In specific, the attraction of the Summer Palace occupies the upper and larger space. In comparison, the lower and smaller space is packed with the landmarks of several attractions, including Beijing World Towers, LG Twin Towers, Wangfujing Department Store, Water Cube, CCTV Headquarters, and National Center for the Performing Arts of China. The Summer Palace, as a theme park, is an aggregation of tourism resources, including cultural tourism, recreational tourism, historical tourism, architectural tourism, and religious tourism. The multiple types of tourism resources within the Summer Palace justify the salient position it takes on this image.

Meanwhile, the juxtaposition of eight destinations in the lower space serves to offer a series of tourism options, ranging from business tourism, shopping tourism, and sports tourism to leisure tourism and art tourism. On the whole, it is not hard to conclude that all the elements are designed to encode a message whose interpretation is central to understanding the visual text. That is, the semiotic modes help to uncover the content of varieties in recreational tourism resources and how they are presented in the image.

4.2.3 Multiplicity of historical tourism resources

Figure 7 is designed as the publicity image for 2019 Beijing Tourism promotion activities. It can be segmented into two sections: top and bottom. Both of the two sections represent a “symbolic process,” which is one type of “conceptual process.” And they are thematically similar, showcasing the ancient history and contemporary urbanization of Beijing city. The top is a panoramic view of the royal Imperial Palace, while the bottom is an overview of a metropolis city featured with high buildings and skyscrapers.

As metaphor can also be constructed and interpreted through elements of visual semiotic design (Feng 2019; Hallett and Kaplan-Weinger 2010; Kadry 2016), this image metaphorically depicts the sharply contrasting juxtaposition of the ancient and the contemporary. The overall image provides a discursive space to map out the binary relationship between tradition and modernity (Wang and Zhang 2019; Yan and Santos 2009). And rich connotations can be drawn in interpreting Beijing as a hybrid city of long history and huge potential for the future.

Interestingly, both the top and bottom sections are marked with repetition – the top of the building (both Palace and Skyscraper) repeatedly appear in the image. Repetition, according to Tannen (2007), is a technique used to reinforce a message. Here, the reinforced meaning portrays the ancient as traditional, mysterious, stable, and mature and the contemporary as modern, evolving, dynamic and youthful. As a whole, the image connotes the ties to the past and the future with an implication of multiplicity in historical tourism resources.

5 Findings and discussion

5.1 Quantitative results

The results of analyzing the representational meaning of extracted images from the official website of Beijing Tourism suggest a strong and culturally colored voice in the image design of the website. The features are summarized in Figure 8.

Figure 8: 
						Process types of images extracted from the Beijing Tourism website.
Figure 8:

Process types of images extracted from the Beijing Tourism website.

Firstly, all images are categorized into two process types: the narrative process and the conceptual process. From the figure, it is clear that images of the conceptual process occupy a majority proportion (91.73%), while those of the narrative process account for only a small percentage (8.27%). Due to the fact that conceptual processes represent the world as “being something, or belonging to some category” (Jewitt and Oyama 2001), it is safe to say that a vast majority of images are adopted to represent the ancient history and traditional culture of Beijing, as well as tangible heritages such as historical monuments, archaeological sites, and buildings. Meanwhile, narrative processes represent participants in terms of “doing” and “happening” (Kress and van Leeuwen 2006: 59). Images of this process type would attract the readers’ attention and interest by depicting actions and happenings at various tourist events. Yet they account for only a small number. The imbalance of overuse of conceptual processes creates a unidirectional way to transmit information to the reader. And the reader, as the receiver of the information, becomes distanced from the visual text. Luque (2016) confirms it in the statement that focusing on the product inevitably leads to ignorance of the real target. To put it another way, with the emphasis mainly on informational facts, the text is prone to ignore the readers or prospective visitors.

Secondly, among sub-types of conceptual processes, images of analytical process dominate proportionally (90.5%) over those of classification process (9.05%) and even those of symbolic process (0.45%). In the semiotic visual analysis, images of analytical process present portraits of the natural environment, existential objects, or physical entities. They serve to illustrate linguistic texts introducing tourism destinations. They are intended to provide the reader with visual support and a virtual experience of more tangible aspects of the destination. The conceptual classification process includes images that represent a kind of folk art or folk craftsmanship. And the only image of a symbolic process is a picture of facial makeup at the Peking Opera, symbolizing the most dominant form of Chinese opera.

Images that facilitate the process of promoting a destination as a visual source are found to be utilized to a substantial extent on the official tourism website. And it is more likely that these images convey facts and truth in an objective way. It is assumed that readers will be willing to visit the city when they learn about more details on its long history and rich culture. This designing idea can be explained by the characteristics of Chinese history over 2,000 years, that is, respect for authority has been a salient value in Chinese culture (Prah and Pardo 2016). Chinese people conform to the majority and the objective reality as the authoritative, the experienced, and the knowledgeable to establish credibility.

When it comes to the participants in the images, three features could be drawn from the data, as shown in Figure 9: a) generic participants (94.44%) appear much more than specific participants (5.56%); b) group participants (72.97%) surpass individual participants (27.03%) to a great extent; c) photography with human participants (81.33%) is much higher than that with cartoonic figures (18.67%).

Figure 9: 
						Types of participant images extracted from the Beijing Tourism website.
Figure 9:

Types of participant images extracted from the Beijing Tourism website.

The website puts more emphasis on information and function and less on emotional and interactive communication. It is noted that few images are able to realize the function of interactive communication with the reader for the reasons that participants in the images are either a general group of tourists, or residents without any specific identification, or an anonymous individual. There is also a lack of direct eye contact cast from participants in images, and there is almost no expression of emotion, but mostly a reflection of the attractions in a non-interactive way. Sun (2019) stressed that the image of an innocent, adorable child is believed to be a generic solution for promoting everything. However, images of children, women, or ethnic minorities are rarely found on this website. Consequently, it does not seem helpful for the viewer to recognize Chinese people or distinguish Chinese culture, let alone to define and construct the identity of Beijingers.

Deng et al. (2018) point out that Beijing-related photographs of social activities posted on Flickr by inbound tourists are manifested as the cognitive component of a Beijing destination image. In other words, visual images of participants in tourist activities bring viewers closer in an engaging way. And tourists should be offered more experiential activities (Zhang et al. 2019). Therefore, it becomes more essential to create persuasive website designs which are able to facilitate readers learning about the destination in an affective and interactive way and forming positive attitudes toward them (Adewoyin and Ayogu 2019; Keib et al. 2018; King et al. 2020; Lee and Gretzel 2012) and ultimately leading to approval of the investigated destination as a favorable place to visit.

5.2 Qualitative results

The meanings of semiotic elements, such as action, participant, space, and layout, are culturally made, socially agreed, and socially and culturally specific (Kress 2006). Such elements are concluded to be interpreted in the context of Chinese culture as the following.

Three metafunctional meanings in visual grammar are shown across the four images discussed above: the representational meaning of the Beijing Opera actress (Figure 4) is utilized as a symbolic prelude to a journey through dynamic local cultural tourism resources. And her action serves as an inviting and welcome gesture in a relation of interactive communication; compositional meanings are achieved in both Figures 5 and 6 in the layout of semiotic entities to demonstrate varieties in food culture and recreational tourism resources, and Figure 7 depicts Beijing as a hybrid city of tradition and modernity via representational and compositional metafunctions. It portrays Beijing as an ancient city with a thousand-year history of the Chinese civilization and also as a beautiful world capital and global city with great charm.

One of the salient themes interpreted from the above four images is a myriad of different types of tourism resources in Beijing. The website intends to attract and impress viewers with the recognition that Beijing is rich in tourism resources of many kinds and in the levels of satisfactions it could bring to its visitors.

6 Conclusion

This study, drawing on the theory of metafunctions in semiotics, examines the three metafunctional meanings of visual images extracted from the official Beijing Tourism website in both quantitative and qualitative analyses. In the quantitative analysis, the number of images and the proportional distribution of process types of those images contributed to disclosing that the intention of the website design is to impress and attract viewers, with an emphasis on projecting Beijing as a city of rich and diverse tourism resources both in depth and width and ultimately turn the viewers into prospective visitors to the destination. In the qualitative analysis, the four images highlight the theme of multiple tourism resources and demonstrate ways to achieve persuasiveness through different semiotic modes.

It was found that, on this official tourism website, Beijing is positioned and communicated internationally as a city with a multiplicity of tourism resources to fulfill its promotional purpose of attracting potential inbound tourists with different needs and preferences from a global market. And the viewers are addressed with the meanings interpreted via utilization of visual semiotic resources, both in the number of visual images and in the quality of featured images on the website.

Although it manages to input factual information objectively, the website is observed to lack interactive communication with its viewers. The structural design of the visual images indicates a certain absence of communicative purpose on this tourism website. These findings contribute to the body of knowledge by introducing social semiotics to online tourism discourse research methodology, and by developing an effective research methodology based on methods of social semiotics. In particular, it illuminates semiotic attributes of visual images on the website and identifies the semiotic patterns in the multimodal discourse. More importantly, it provides practical implications for tourism marketers to realize the substantial influence of pictorial images on viewers’ perception of destination image of the place. And great marketing efforts need to be made to promote a more persuasive website which could facilitate viewers learning about the destination on an effective, interactive, and low-budget platform before making an informed travel decision. The ultimate goal is for official tourism websites to evolve into a widely acknowledged online communication channel in the context of tourism marketing.

This study focused on the theme of a multiplicity of tourism resources interpreted from the visual images, and there are other themes that could be explored for further investigation. Future research could examine the website from the reader’s perspective in terms of the interpersonal and textual metafunctions of images to determine whether there is consistency between the tourism website design and the readers’ requirements and preferences.


Corresponding author: Wenjin Qi, School of Foreign Studies, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng, Shanxi, China; and Sol International School, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea, E-mail:

Funding source: Shanxi Academy of Social Sciences (Shanxi Provincial People's Government Development Research Center) 2021 Youth Project

Award Identifier / Grant number: YWQN202135

About the authors

Wenjin Qi

Wenjin Qi (1983) is a lecturer at School of Foreign Studies, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng, Shanxi, China and a PhD candidate at the Sol International School, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea. Her main research interests include critical discourse analysis, social semiotics, and language education. Her publications include “Linguistic landscape for Korean learning: A survey of perception, attitude, and practice of Korean beginners at a Korean university” (2020).

Nadezda Sorokina

Nadezda Sorokina (1981) is an assistant professor at the Sol International School, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea. Her main research interests include medical tourism, sustainable tourism, and semiotics. Her publications include “Medical tourists from low-trust countries and South Korean medical tourism: The case of Kazakhstan” (2020), “Tourism and water” (2016), “Sustainable event management: A practical guide” (2015).

  1. Research funding: This research has received funding from the Shanxi Academy of Social Sciences (Shanxi Provincial People’s Government Development Research Center) 2021 Youth Project (Project Number: YWQN202135).

References

Adami, Elisabetta & Sara Ramos Pinto. 2019. Meaning-(re)making in a world of untranslated signs: Towards a research agenda on multimodality, culture, and translation. In Tomalin Marcus, Monica Boria, Ángeles Carreres & Maria Noriega-Sánchez (eds.), Beyond words: Translation and multimodality, 71–93. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429341557-4Suche in Google Scholar

Adewoyin, Oluwande & Bosede Ayogu. 2019. My freedom: Assessing reactance in a high freedom persuasive website. FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology 4(2). 58–64. https://doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v4i2.323.Suche in Google Scholar

Aiello, Giorgia & Greg Dickinson. 2014. Beyond authenticity: A visual-material analysis of locality in the global redesign of Starbucks stores. Visual Communication 13(3). 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357214530054.Suche in Google Scholar

Aiello, Giorgia & Katy Parry. 2019. Visual communication: Understanding images in media culture. London: SAGE Publications Limited.10.4135/9781529721522Suche in Google Scholar

Avraham, Eli & Eran Ketter. 2017. Destination image repair while combatting crises: Tourism marketing in Africa. Tourism Geographies 19(5). 780–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2017.1357140.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernardi, Cecilia de. 2019. Authenticity as a compromise: A critical discourse analysis of Sámi tourism websites. Journal of Heritage Tourism 14(3). 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873x.2018.1527844.Suche in Google Scholar

Briciu, Victor-Alexandru, Robert Demeter, Florin Nechita, Androniki Kavoura & Arabela Briciu. 2019. A proposed online platform for ranking place brands [sic] identity characteristics of official tourism websites. In Androniki Kavoura, Efstathios Kefallonitis & Apostolos Giovanis (eds.), Strategic innovative marketing and tourism, 755–762. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-12453-3_87Suche in Google Scholar

Butler, Richard. 1990. The influence of the media in shaping international tourist patterns. Tourism Recreation Research 15(2). 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.1990.11014584.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Jieqi, Haizhou Zhang, Lin Lu, Hongmei Zhang & Yuchen Xu. 2020. The persuasive effect of promotional tourist videos: A longitudinal tracking study based on crisis scenarios. Tourism Tribune 35(4). 64–75.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Linda Jianlin & Jianbin Huang. 2018. Sign markup language in a multimodal context: Cognitive mechanisms and memes. Chinese Semiotic Studies 14(1). 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2018-0001.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Zhen Troy & Ming Cheung. 2020. Consumption as extended carnival on Tmall in contemporary China: A social semiotic multimodal analysis of interactive banner ads. Social Semiotics. 1–21. 21 February 2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10350330.2020.1720992 (accessed 21 August 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Chik, Alice & Camilla Vásquez. 2017. A comparative multimodal analysis of restaurant reviews from two geographical contexts. Visual Communication 16(1). 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216634005.Suche in Google Scholar

Choi, Soojin, Xinran Lehto & Alastair Morrison. 2007. Destination image representation on the web: Content analysis of Macau travel related websites. Tourism Management 28(1). 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Dann, Graham M. S. 1996. The language of tourism: A sociolinguistic perspective. Wallingford: CAB International.10.1079/9780851989990.0000Suche in Google Scholar

Deng, Ning & Xiang Robert Li. 2018. Feeling a destination through the “right” photos: A machine learning model for DMOs’ photo selection. Tourism Management 65(2). 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Deng, Ning, Lina Zhong & Li Hong. 2018. Perception of travel destination image based on user-generated photograph metadata: The case of Beijing. Tourism Tribune 33(1). 53–62.Suche in Google Scholar

Dobers, Peter & Anette Hallin. 2009. The use of internet in building the brand of Stockholm: The capital of Scandinavia. In Mila Gascó-Hernandez & Teresa Torres-Coronas (eds.), Information communication technologies and city marketing: Digital opportunities for cities around the world, 265–294. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-60566-134-6.ch013Suche in Google Scholar

Duffy, Andrew & Annabel Pang. 2020. The omnivore at home and abroad: The value to the state of food tourism discourse of diversity. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 16(2). 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00023_1.Suche in Google Scholar

Feng, Dezheng William. 2019. Integrating social semiotic and conceptual metaphor theories. In Chris Shei (ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis, 65–81. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Francesconi, Sabrina. 2014. Reading tourism texts: A multimodal analysis. Toronto: Channel View Publications.10.21832/9781845414283Suche in Google Scholar

González-Rodríguez, Rosario, Rocio Martínez-Torres & Sergio Toral. 2016. Post-visit and pre-visit tourist destination image through eWOM sentiment analysis and perceived helpfulness. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 28(11). 2609–2627. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-02-2015-0057.Suche in Google Scholar

Guo, Nancy Songdan & Dezheng Feng. 2015. Infusing multiliteracies into English language curriculum: The visual construction of knowledge in English textbooks from an ontogenetic perspective. Linguistics and Education 31(3). 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Hallett, Richard. 2018. Teaching the sociolinguistics of tourism. In Magdalena Bielenia-Grajewska & Enriqueta Cortes de los Rios (eds.), Innovative perspectives on tourism discourse, 214–228. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.Suche in Google Scholar

Hallett, Richard & Judith Kaplan-Weinger. 2010. Official tourism websites: A discourse analysis perspective. Toronto: Channel View Publications.10.21832/9781845411381Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.10.4324/9780203783771Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Suche in Google Scholar

He, Xianzhong. 2017. Transitivity of kinetic typography: Theory and application to a case study of a public service advertisement. Visual Communication 16(2). 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216684080.Suche in Google Scholar

Holsanova, Jana. 2012. New methods for studying visual communication and multimodal integration. Visual Communication 11(3). 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412912446558.Suche in Google Scholar

Horng, Jeou-Shyan & Chen-Tsang Simon Tsai. 2010. Government websites for promoting East Asian culinary tourism: A cross-national analysis. Tourism Management 31(1). 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.01.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Hunter, William Cannon. 2012. Projected destination image: A visual analysis of Seoul. Tourism Geographies 14(3). 419–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2011.613407.Suche in Google Scholar

Hunter, William Cannon. 2016. The social construction of tourism online destination image: A comparative semiotic analysis of the visual representation of Seoul. Tourism Management 54(4). 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Jewitt, Carey. 2009. The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Jewitt, Carey & Rumiko Oyama. 2001. Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In Theo vanLeeuwen & Carey Jewitt (eds.), A handbook of visual analysis, 134–156. London: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9780857020062.n7Suche in Google Scholar

Kadry, Amira. 2016. The persuasive effect of using visual metaphors in advertising design. International Design Journal 26(56). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.12816/0036425.Suche in Google Scholar

Keib, Kate, Camila Espina, Yen-I. Lee, Bartosz Wojdynski, Dongwon Choi & Hyejin Bang. 2018. Picture this: The influence of emotionally valenced images, on attention, selection, and sharing of social media news. Media Psychology 21(2). 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1378108.Suche in Google Scholar

King, Andy, Allison Lazard & Shawna White. 2020. The influence of visual complexity on initial user impressions: Testing the persuasive model of web design. Behaviour & Information Technology 39(5). 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2019.1602167.Suche in Google Scholar

Knight, Janine, Melinda Dooly & Elena Barberà. 2018. Multimodal meaning making: Navigational acts in online speaking tasks. System 78(3). 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.07.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Kotoua, Selira & Mustafa Ilkan. 2017a. Online tourism destination marketing in Kumasi Ghana. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 22(6). 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2017.1308394.Suche in Google Scholar

Kotoua, Selira & Mustafa Ilkan. 2017b. Tourism destination marketing and information technology in Ghana. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 6(2). 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.04.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther. 2006. Sociolinguistics and social semiotics. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 82–98. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203996089-15Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728Suche in Google Scholar

Krisjanous, Jayne. 2016. An exploratory multimodal discourse analysis of dark tourism websites: Communicating issues around contested sites. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 5(4). 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Law, Rob, Shanshan Qi & Dimitrios Buhalis. 2010. Progress in tourism management: A review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tourism Management 31(3). 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.11.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Woojin & Ulrike Gretzel. 2012. Designing persuasive destination websites: A mental imagery processing perspective. Tourism Management 33(5). 1270–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.10.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Lian, Tonghui & Caihua Yu. 2019. Impacts of online images of a tourist destination on tourist travel decision. Tourism Geographies 21(4). 635–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2019.1571094.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Wenling. 2017. Peirce’s semiotics in a commercial context: Signboards as cultural signs. Chinese Semiotic Studies 13(3). 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2017-0013.Suche in Google Scholar

Losada, Nieves & Gonçalo Mota. 2019. “Slow down, your movie is too fast”: Slow tourism representations in the promotional videos of the Douro region (Northern Portugal). Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 11(1). 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.12.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Luque, Adrián Fuentes. 2016. Branding and selling a country through translated tourism advertising: Spain’s image. Journal of Languages for Specific Purposes 22(2). 84–103. https://doi.org/10.20420/rlfe.2016.318.Suche in Google Scholar

Mak, Athena. 2017. Online destination image: Comparing national tourism organisation’s and tourists’ perspectives. Tourism Management 60. 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.12.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Malenkina, Nadezhda & Stanislav Ivanov. 2018. A linguistic analysis of the official tourism websites of the seventeen Spanish autonomous communities. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 9(1). 204–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.01.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Manca, Elena. 2013. Describing through the five senses: A contrastive socio-cultural and linguistic analysis of Italian and British tourist websites. In Elena Manca & Francesca Bianchi (eds.), Tourism and tourist promotion around the world: A linguistic and socio-cultural perspective, 109–124. Universita del Salento: Lecce.Suche in Google Scholar

Manca, Elena. 2016. Persuasion in tourism discourse: Methodologies and models. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Marine-Roig, Estela & Salvador Anton Clavé. 2016. Destination image gaps between official tourism websites and user-generated content. In Alessandro Inversini & Roland Schegg (eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2016, 253–265. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_19Suche in Google Scholar

McCormick, Tracey. 2018. Yes master! Multimodal representations of BDSM bodies on a South African website. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 36(2). 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2018.1476161.Suche in Google Scholar

Mehmet, Mehmet & Rodney Clarke. 2016. B2B social media semantics: Analysing multimodal online meanings in marketing conversations. Industrial Marketing Management 54. 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.12.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Michelson, Kristen & José Aldemar Álvarez Valencia. 2016. Study abroad: Tourism or education? A multimodal social semiotic analysis of institutional discourses of a promotional website. Discourse & Communication 10(3). 235. 0150256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315623893.Suche in Google Scholar

Molinillo, Sebastian, Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, Rafael Anaya-Sánchez & Dimitrios Buhalis. 2018. DMO online platforms: Image and intention to visit. Tourism Management 65(4). 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.021.Suche in Google Scholar

Nechita, Florin, Robert Demeter, Victor-Alexandru Briciu, Sotiris Varelas & Androniki Kavoura. 2019. Projected destination images versus visitor-generated visual content in Brasov, Transylvania. In Androniki Kavoura, Efstathios Kefallonitis & Apostolos Giovanis (eds.), Strategic innovative marketing and tourism, 613–622. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-12453-3_70Suche in Google Scholar

Nekic, Melani. 2015. Tourist activities in multimodal texts: An analysis of Croatian and Scottish tourism websites. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Halloran, Kay, Sabine Tan, Bradley Smith & Alexey Podlasov. 2011. Multimodal analysis within an interactive software environment: Critical discourse perspectives. Critical Discourse Studies 8(2). 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.558687.Suche in Google Scholar

Önder, Irem & Elena Marchiori. 2017. A comparison of pre-visit beliefs and projected visual images of destinations. Tourism Management Perspectives 21(4). 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.11.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Prah, Kwesi Kwaa & María Laura Pardo. 2016. Discourses of the developing world: Researching properties, problems and potentials. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Qian, Jianwei, Jiewen Wei & Rob Law. 2018. Review of critical discourse analysis in tourism studies. International Journal of Tourism Research 20(4). 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2202.Suche in Google Scholar

Salim, Muhammad Arfin Muhammad. 2017. Enhancing destination image on tourism brochure of Barru Regency Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia: A tourism discourse perspective. Turizam: međunarodni znanstveno-stručni časopis [International Journal of Tourism] 65(2). 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824862183-012.Suche in Google Scholar

Salim, Muhammad Arfin Muhammad & Ahmad Puad Mat Som. 2018. Shaping tourist destinations through language and visual elements on tourism websites: A tourism discourse perspective. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7(4.34). 364–369. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.34.26874.Suche in Google Scholar

Stoian, Claudia Elena. 2015. The discourse of tourism and national heritage: A contrastive study from a cultural perspective. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Stoian, Claudia Elena. 2018. The discourse of tourism from a systemic functional perspective: The case of tourism websites. In Magdalena Bielenia-Grajewska & Enriqueta Cortes de los Rios (eds.), Innovative perspectives on tourism discourse, 181–200. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-2930-9.ch011Suche in Google Scholar

Su, Ming, Geoffrey Wall & Zhong Ma. 2019. A multi-stakeholder examination of destination image: Nanluoguxiang heritage street, Beijing, China. Tourism Geographies 21(1). 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2017.1385031.Suche in Google Scholar

Sun, Zhen. 2019. Utopia, nostalgia, and femininity: Visually promoting the Chinese Dream. Visual Communication 18(1). 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217740394.Suche in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618987Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Martin. 2014. Evidence and circularity in multimodal discourse analysis. Visual Communication 13(2). 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357213516725.Suche in Google Scholar

Thurlow, Crispin & Adam Jaworski. 2010. Tourism discourse: Language and global mobility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Tzanelli, Rodanthi. 2006. Reel western fantasies: Portrait of a tourist imagination in The Beach. Mobilities 1(1). 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489296.Suche in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Ventola, Eija, Cassily Charles & Martin Kaltenbacher. 2004. Perspectives on multimodality. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ddcs.6Suche in Google Scholar

Vinyals-Mirabent, Sara. 2019. European urban destinations’ attractions at the frontier between competitiveness and a unique destination image: A benchmark study of communication practices. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 12. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.02.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Vinyals-Mirabent, Sara, Mihalis Kavaratzis & José Fernández-Cavia. 2019. The role of functional associations in building destination brand personality: When official websites do the talking. Tourism Management 75(2). 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.04.022.Suche in Google Scholar

Wacker, Adriana & Aleksander Groth. 2020. Projected and perceived destination image of Tyrol on Instagram. In Julia Neidhardt & Wolfgang Wörndl (eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2020, 103–114. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-36737-4_9Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Karin. 2015. Reading packages: Social semiotics on the shelf. Visual Communication 14(2). 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357214564281.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Qian & Dan Zhang. 2019. Branding city destinations. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15(3). 379–410. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0022.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Geqi. 2018. Official websites as a tourism marketing medium: A contrastive analysis from the perspective of appraisal theory. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 10(4). 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Xiang, Zheng, Karl Wöber & Daniel Fesenmaier. 2008. Representation of the online tourism domain in search engines. Journal of Travel Research 47(2). 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287508321193.Suche in Google Scholar

Xue, Lan & Deborah Kerstetter. 2018. Discourse and power relations in community tourism. Journal of Travel Research 57(6). 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517714908.Suche in Google Scholar

Yan, Grace & Carla Almeida Santos. 2009. “CHINA, FOREVER”: Tourism discourse and self-orientalism. Annals of Tourism Research 36(2). 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.01.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Ye, Zhaoyuan & Hyeong-Yeon Jeon. 2020. Chinese city brands and semiotic image scales: A tourism perspective. Social Semiotics 31. 115–129. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10350330.2020.1769405 (accessed 21 August 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Tong, Catherine Cheung & Rob Law. 2018. Functionality evaluation for destination marketing websites in smart tourism cities. Journal of China Tourism Research 14(3). 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2018.1488641.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Kun, Ye Chen & Chunlin Li. 2019. Discovering the tourists’ behaviors and perceptions in a tourism destination by analyzing photos’ visual content with a computer deep learning model: The case of Beijing. Tourism Management 75(3). 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.07.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Zuliani, Alessandra. 2013. A journey to Portugal: The official tourist promotion of Turismo de Portugal. In Elena Manca & Francesca Bianchi (eds.), Tourism and tourist promotion around the world: A linguistic and socio-cultural perspective, 61–80. Lecce: Universita del Salento.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-08-18
Published in Print: 2021-08-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 23.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/css-2021-2006/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen