Agnathia-otocephaly complex: a case report and a literature review on recurrence risk

Lievelijn Vanhees; Ellen Denayer; Anke Thaens; Sabine Fransis; Marie-Rose Van Hoestenberghe

doi:10.1515/crpm-2020-0041

Article Open Access

Agnathia-otocephaly complex: a case report and a literature review on recurrence risk

Lievelijn Vanhees , Ellen Denayer , Anke Thaens , Sabine Fransis and Marie-Rose Van Hoestenberghe

Published/Copyright: August 24, 2020

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Case Reports in Perinatal Medicine Volume 9 Issue 1

Abstract

Objectives

Agnathia-otocephaly complex (AOC) is an extremely rare, lethal disorder causing obstruction of the upper airway at birth due to absence of the mandible and hypoplasia of the oral cavity. Implications for future pregnancies need to be elucidated by parental counselling, as recurrence of AOC or associated comorbidities are possible. Very little is known on this subject, because of the rarity of the disorder and scarce data on genetic causes of this complex. The objectives of this study were to determine the recurrence risk and mode of inheritance for AOC based on current literature.

Recurrence of AOC or associated comorbidities within the family of an index case was reported in eight articles, describing 7 and 27 relatives, respectively. There were eight AOC cases in which the genetic cause was known. Mutations in 2 genes, orthodenticle homeobox 2 (OTX2) and paired related homeobox 1 (PRRX1), have been described. Due to its mainly sporadic appearance, recurrence risk is low. Counselling on recurrence risk is difficult, because of a broad heterogeneity with complex inheritance patterns and variability in phenotypic expression.

Outlook

Chromosomal analysis and exome sequencing in children with AOC will help unravel current aetiological uncertainties and could help in further reproductive decisions. We emphasize the need for timely diagnosis through ultrasound, providing parents with the opportunity to receive multidisciplinary counselling, giving them the chance to contemplate their management decisions.

Keywords: agnathia-otocephaly complex; foetal anomaly; parental counselling; recurrence risk

Introduction

Agnathia-otocephaly complex (AOC) is an exceptionally uncommon congenital developmental defect. It is marked by (1) hypoplasia or absence of the mandible (agnathia), (2) underdevelopment of the oral orifice (microstomia) and (3) ventral and horizontal positioning of the ears (melotia) with or without midline fusion (synotia). This triad results in an obstruction of the upper airway, with a high risk of mortality. Unless an artificial airway is created, death shortly after birth is imminent. Prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound is possible; however, often the pathology is only recognized late during pregnancy, leaving parents in pressing need of guidance in informed decision making [1]. After having lost a child, parents often fear reoccurrence of events during future pregnancies. Information on the topic of the aetiology and recurrence risk is scant, rendering counselling difficult.

In this report we present a new case of AOC and give a brief literature review to estimate recurrence risk and to clarify the mode of inheritance for some AOC cases on the basis of the current genetic knowledge.

Case presentation

A 29 year-old woman was referred to our centre at a postmenstrual age of 25 weeks 0 days because of polyhydramnion and facial abnormalities in the foetus. It was the firstborn of non-consanguineous parents, the pregnancy had been uneventful and the non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at 12 weeks gestation was normal. Ultrasound showed severe hypoplasia of the mandible and central fusion of the ears. Counselling regarding the high risk of mortality because of the obstructive airway was provided. The parents opted for termination of pregnancy, but before a decision by the ethical committee, the mother went into spontaneous preterm labour.

She delivered a boy with a weight of 645 g (25th percentile), a length of 34.5 cm (80th percentile) and a head circumference of 22.7 cm (45th percentile). The child had Apgar scores of 2 and 1 after 1 and 5 min. Clinical examination showed a midfacial protuberance containing a cranially displaced nose and very small oral orifice (proboscis), caudally displaced orbitae with down-slanting palpebral fissures in a hypoteloric position as well as horizontally and medially displaced ears fusing on the midline (Figure 1). The mandible was absent and there was no air entry on auscultation.

Figure 1:

Anterior and lateral images showing microstomia, synotia and agnathia.

The parents opted for a non-active management. The child was placed skin-to-skin with his mother and was given analgesia. The boy died of respiratory failure shortly after birth. Psychological support was delivered to the parents. Besides the facial abnormalities, autopsy showed hypoplasia of the lungs, turbid cornea and atretic external auditory canals. The internal organs were found to be normal, as well as the genitalia and extremities. Microarray CGH analysis was done and was found to be normal (array CGH 46, XY). Mendeliome analysis on 6210 genes couldn’t find an explanation for the phenotype. Gene analysis of paired related homeobox 1 (PRRX1) and orthodenticle homeobox 2 (OTX2) did not show mutations. The parents were counselled for a probably low recurrence risk. Expertise ultrasound surveillance during a following pregnancy was suggested.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective literature study in February 2020, searching the PubMed/Medline database using following search words or Mesh terms: [otocephaly], “agnathia otocephaly complex”, “isolated agnathia” or “dysgnathia complex”. We looked for English articles on human cases of AOC, without imposing restrictions on publication dates. The articles were screened for inclusion, first by abstract, then by full text, if available. As a definition of AOC, we used the presence of the clinical triad of mandibular hypoplasia/agnathia, microstomia and melotia/synotia. Attention was made that cases were only enlisted once. We collected data on sex, time of diagnosis, gestational age at diagnosis, gestational age at birth, termination of pregnancy, associated comorbidities, genetic studies and recurrence of AOC or comorbidities in the family. Because this was a retrospective literature search, permission of the Ethical Commission was emitted.

The goal of this work was to delineate the AOC population and to get insight into the underlying genetic causes and recurrence within the family. With this information, parental counselling can be optimized.

Results

Our search yielded 100 results, of which 43 articles were found to be relevant. Twenty-four items were unattainable. By screening of the reference lists of the 43 articles, we were able to include another 14 reports. A total of 97 cases were identified. Table 1 lists the most important characteristics of the population.

Table 1:

Characteristics of cases with AOC.

Characteristics of cases with AOC
Sex	41 girls	45 boys	11 N.A.
Type of AOC	22 isolated	65 associated comorbidities	10 N.A.
Time of diagnosis	50 prenatally	17 at birth	30 N.A.
Termination of pregnancy	21 yes	16 no	8 N.A.

AOC, agnathia-otocephaly complex; N.A.: information not available.

There is a slight uneven distribution of boys and girls. In 22/87 (25.2%) AOC was isolated, whereas 65/87 (74.7%) had associated comorbidities, with holoprosencephaly being the most common. In 17 patients (25.3%), the congenital anomaly was unanticipated and was discovered at birth, at a mean gestational age of 29w6d. The diagnosis was made prenatally in 50 pregnancies (74.6%), at a mean gestational age of 23w3d. Respectively 5, 39 and 16 subjects were diagnosed during the first (0d–12w6d), second (13w0d–26w6d) and third (≥27w0d) trimester of pregnancy. If we set the cut-off at 24w0d, the ethical boundary of viability in Belgium, 25/50 of the prenatal diagnoses were made <24w0d, the other half ≥24w0d (results not shown in table). Termination of pregnancy was opted in 28/50 (56%) subjects when a prenatal diagnosis was made. There were 2 events of parents opting for termination of pregnancy, but due to legislation in the country of origin it was not completed.

Table 2 shows the genetic defects that have been described in AOC cases and in known recurrent cases of AOC or other comorbidities within family. Associated malformations are described.

Table 2:

Overview of genetic defects in AOC and recurrence in family members.

Author, year	Genetic defect in AOC index case	Recurrence of AOC/associated comorbidities & genetic defect in relatives	Type of AOC (isolated vs. associated malformations)
Pauli, 1983 [2] Krassikoff, 1989 [3]	Unbalanced translocation: 46,XX, der18, t(6;18) (p24.1;p11.2)pat	1 sibling with AOC: no genetic testing done	Index case: AOC + holoprosencephaly Sibling: AOC + holoprosencephaly
Porteous, 1993 [4]	No genetic testing done	1 sibling with AOC: no genetic testing done	Index case: AOC + other malformations: Cutis aplasia, absent right eyelids, distal arthrogryposis, brachydactyly, syndactyly (2/3) and displacement of the fourth toes, imperforate anus, absent falx cerebri, asymmetric frontal bones, flat skull base, cerebellar hypoplasia, malformation of the truncus arteriosus, VSD, malrotation, hypoplastic right kidney and absent left kidney, single umbilical artery Sibling: AOC + other malformations: Distal arthrogyposis, displacement of the fourth toes, imperforate anus
Rust, 1999 [5]	Normal male karyotype, 46,XY	1 sibling with AOC: normal female karyotype. Mother with micrognathia & melotia: no genetic testing done	Index case: AOC + other malformations: Imperforate anus Sibling: AOC + other malformations: Retroflexion of sacrum
Sergi, 2011 [6]	Normal karyotype. De novo heterozygous point mutation in exon 2 of PRRX1 leading to a missense mutation with loss-of-function (p.Phe113Ser)	Not assessed	Index case: AOC + other malformations: anal atresia, partial renal agenesis and skeletal defects
Donnelly, 2012 [7]	Normal karyotype. De novo heterozygous c.267delA frameshift mutation in exon 2 of PRRX1 leading to loss-of-function (p.Lys90Argfs*131)	Not assessed	Index case: Isolated
Çelik, 2012 [8]	Normal karyotype. Homozygous mutation in exon 4 of PRRX1, leading to a missense mutation with loss-of-function (p.Ala231Pro)	Not assessed; parents consanguineous	Index case: AOC + other malformations: ASD
Chassaing, 2012 [9]	No genetic testing done	1 sibling and a third cousin with AOC: no genetic testing done 18 other family members with micro-/anophthalmia +/− micrognathia: c.316delC mutation in exon 3 of OTX2 in 7/18 family members with associated comorbidities (other 11 no genetic testing done)	Index case: N.A.
Dasouki, 2013 [10]	No genetic testing done	1 sibling with AOC: no genetic testing done 1 sibling with micrognathia: de novo heterozygous c.266_269dupAAAA mutation in exon 2 of PRRX1	Index case: N.A.
Akiyama, 2013 [11]	No genetic testing done	1 sibling with micrognathia, mother with left anophthalmia-left sensineural hearing loss: no genetic testing done	Index case: Isolated
Patat, 2013 [12] (Case 1)	De novo deletion 14q23.1, whole OTX2 gene deleted	Not assessed	Index case: AOC + other malformations: club feet
Patat, 2013 [12] (Case 4)	Normal karyotype. Autosomal dominant mutation in OTX2 gene, leading to a nonsense mutation with loss-of-function (p.Arg97*)	4 generations of microphthalmia (maternal), c.289C>T nonsense mutation in OTX2 (p.Arg97*) in mother	Index case: AOC + other malformations: Microphthalmia, absence of optic chiasm and pituitary gland, brachymesophalangy of the fifth finger and bilateral talus valgus
Sergouniotis, 2015 [13]	Autosomal dominant duplication mutation in exon 4 of OTX2 (p.Gln91dup)	1 sibling with AOC and 1 sibling with micrognathia: Heterozygous duplication mutation in exon 4 of OTX2 (p.Gln91dup) in both siblings	Index case: N.A.

AOC, agnathia-otocephaly complex; ASD, atrial septal defect; N.A.: information not available.

Of the 97 AOC cases, eight had a genetic defect reported. Out of 58 karyotype analyses, one unbalanced translocation between chromosomes 6 and 18 was found [2].

There were three patients with mutations in the PRRX1 gene [6], [7], [8] and 4 with a genetic defect in the OTX2 gene [12], [13], with all mutations leading to a loss-of-function of the processed protein. In the majority of cases there were no results of genomic screening, because of unavailable DNA of the probands and/or family members.

Recurrence of AOC in siblings or other family members was described in six articles [2], [3], [4], [5], [9], [10], [13]. Occurrence of associated comorbidities in relatives, ranging from micrognathia, ophthalmological abnormalities to sensineural hearing loss, was described in six articles [5], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. In 9 family members across three families with associated comorbidities, mutations in OTX2 were shown. One de novo mutation in PRRX1 was found in a sibling with micrognathia [10].

Various types of associated malformations on top of AOC were found: holoprosencephaly and other neurological malformations, skeletal deformities, cardiac malformations, urinary tract malformations, gastro-intestinal malformations, ophthalmological abnormalities and dermatological abnormalities.

Discussion

AOC (OMIM #202650; also known as dysgnathia complex, agnathia-holoprosencephaly, otocephaly) is a very rare congenital anomaly with an incidence of less than 1 in 70.000 births. A defect in blastogenesis causes the first branchial arch to fail to develop into the lower jawbone, parts of the ear and the anterior two-thirds of the tongue [1]. Often, comorbidities such as holoprosencephaly, ophthalmologic abnormalities, situs inversus or skeletal deformities are associated [1], [7], [13]. The ventral position of the ears differentiates the anomaly from other syndromic pathologies such as Treacher Collins syndrome, Goldenhar, Pierre Robin sequence or Nager syndrome [10]. Few children have been known to survive the perinatal period and needed extensive reconstructive surgery, aside from tracheostomy and gastrostomy feeding [1].

The aetiology of this birth defect is still an area of research. Teratogens, such as amidopyrine, salicylates and theophylline have been reported [10] and could account for discordance in phenotypes of monozygotic diamniotic twins with AOC [14]. Most reported cases occurred sporadic; although a few familial cases are known, indicating a genetic background. A clear inheritance pattern, however, could not yet be established.

Since 2011, mutations have been found in two genes that are involved in and co-operate on the normal organogenesis of the first branchial arch development: PRRX1 and OTX2 [9], [10], [13]. Apart from craniofacial organization, PRRX1 and OTX2 are involved in regulation of central nervous system, eye and limb development [6]. This discovery has started to shed some light upon the aetiological mechanisms behind AOC.

Genetic mutations in AOC cases

Most of the AOC cases were sporadic, as was previously found in the literature [1]. However, a few causatives mutations have been found to date (Table 2). We note 1 translocation, three variations in the PRRX1 gene and four OTX2 mutations in AOC patients.

The translocation between chromosomes 6 and 18 described by Pauli et al. [2] and Krassikoff et al. [3] was the only karyotypical anomaly we came across. Chromosome 18 has been involved in other craniofacial anomalies in the past, such as premaxillary agenesis or hypoplasia of the tongue and mandible [15].

Our search identified two dominant de novo mutations in PRRX1 [6], [7] and one autosomal recessive mutation in PRRX1 inherited from both parents, who were heterozygous carriers [8]. Çelik et al. [8] state that genetic testing only identifies a mutation in PRRX1 in less than 15% of the AOC cases. In our observations, there was a mutation in PRRX1 in three out of 97 AOC cases, but genomic testing was not performed in most cases.

Patat et al. [12] and Sergouniotis et al. [13] presented three causative variations in OTX2: 2 were inherited autosomal dominantly and 1 was a de novo mutation. Sergouniotis et al. [13] reported that 40% of the OTX2 mutations were de novo. Our, however very limited, study results show one de novo mutation in three.

Results of mutation analysis for PRRX1 and OTX2 in respectively three and four other AOC patients remained negative [12], [16], [17], [18]. This suggests that mutations in these two genes can only partially explain the aetiology of the pathology. Since craniofacial development and formation of the branchial arches is a complex mechanism involving multiple genes, it is probable that other, currently unknown genes might play a role. Other aetiologies such as non-genetic (i.e. teratogenicity) or multifactorial/polygenic might also play a role [1], [14].

Recurrence

Recurrence of AOC and/or associated symptoms within the same family has been published in eight articles (Table 2).

The recurrence of agnathia-otocephaly was observed in seven family members across six families [2], [3], [4], [5], [9], [10], [13]. Among the recurrent AOC cases there was only 1 causative mutation found, in OTX2 [13]. Recurrence of associated comorbidities, such as micro- and anophthalmia, micrognathia, hearing loss or learning disabilities, was seen more often: 27 relatives across six families were described [5], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Mutations in PRRX1 and OTX2 were found in two and nine patients, respectively [9], [10], [12], [13].

Looking at families with multiple affected cases, it is striking that mutations in OTX2 can present as heterogenic phenotypes. We illustrate with 2 examples.

Sergouniotis et al. [13] describe a family with a first child with AOC that died in the perinatal period, a second child with AOC for whom pregnancy was terminated at 17 weeks, a third micrognathic child and their asymptomatic father. There was no genomic sequencing done for the first child. All three of the other subjects were screened and were shown to share the same mutation: a heterozygous duplication mutation in exon four of OTX2, even though they present with different phenotypes.

Second, Chassaing et al. [9] note a single frameshift mutation in seven family members, caused by a deletion in exon three of OTX2, resulting in different physical characteristics, varying from isolated microphthalmia, anophthalmia with/without intellectual disability. For the other 14 affected subjects (3 with AOC, 11 with ophthalmological and/or mandibular developmental defects) further genetic testing wasn’t performed.

Mutations in OTX2 have been known to present as many different phenotypes: AOC, a variety of ophthalmological abnormalities, a spectrum of mandibular developmental defects from slight micrognathia to agnathia, pituitary anomalies, short stature, learning disabilities, mental retardation or even combinations. In OTX2 mutations, variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance have been previously documented, and the role of modifier genes has been implied [9], [12], [13]. Together with different modes of inheritance (de novo, recessive, dominant) and possible polygenic and/or multifactorial aetiology, these findings illustrate the genetic complexity behind AOC.

Prenatal diagnosis

Lastly, this literature review has shown that the diagnosis of AOC is often made rather late, with 25% of cases (17/67) only being discovered at birth. In 50% of the casese (25/50), prenatal diagnosis was made after the ethical limit of viability. However, the mandible should be visible on ultrasound starting late in the first trimester [1], [19]. Gekas et al. [1] report that the absence of the mandible frequently remains unnoticed, and that more often AOC is discovered incidentally when associated malformations are found by ultrasonography. Isolated AOC has often been missed. Therefore, in case of difficult visualization of the mandible on two-dimensional ultrasound, further investigations are necessary. Three-dimensional ultrasound, CT and MRI have been implemented successfully [1]. In our 97 cases, use of 3D ultrasound was only noted 16 times. We note, however, that 3D ultrasound was not available in all cases, due to early publication dates. Timely diagnosis allows parents to receive counselling and gives them time to consider the options in management, either therapeutic or termination of pregnancy.

Conclusions

Agnathia otocephaly complex is a severe congenital, lethal defect that is often diagnosed late during pregnancy, or even only at birth.

This literature searches uncovered 97 cases of AOC, most of them with a sporadic appearance. We found eight articles describing recurrence of AOC or associated symptoms within families, such as ophthalmological abnormalities and other forms of mandibular developmental defects. We were able to identify 8 cases of AOC with an underlying genetic defect. Because AOC mainly occurs sporadic, recurrence risk is low. The broad heterogeneity with complex inheritance patterns and variability in phenotypic expression continues to make an estimation of recurrence risk very difficult.

In the future, we hope to have a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms causing AOC, their inheritance pattern and the recurrence risks. Further studies with exome/genome sequencing will probably shed more light on these questions. We recommend sequencing of PRRX1 and OTX2 in cases of AOC.

Finally, we would like to emphasize the importance of early prenatal diagnosis of AOC. Visualization of the mandible is described to be possible on ultrasound from 12 weeks gestational age and upward. In case of doubt, 3D ultrasound, or even MRI or CT imaging can be used as confirmation [1], [10]. An early diagnosis could lead to prompt multidisciplinary counselling, allowing parents to contemplate further management.

Corresponding author: Lievelijn Vanhees, Department of Paediatrics, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium, E-mail: lievelijnvanhees@gmail.com

Research funding: None declared.
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. Gekas, J, Li, B, Kamnasaran, D. Current perspectives on the etiology of agnathia-otocephaly. Eur J Med Genet 2010;53:358–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2010.09.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Pauli, RM, Pettersen, JC, Arya, S, Gilbert, EF. Familal agnathia-holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet 1983;14:677–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320140411.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Krassikoff, N, Sekhon, G. Familial agnathia-holoprosencephaly caused by an inherited unbalanced translocation and not autosomal recessive inheritance. Am J Med Genet 1989;34:255–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320340227.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Porteous, ME, Wright, C, Smith, D, Burn, J. Agnathia-holoprosencephaly: a new recessive syndrome? Clin Dysmorphol 1993;2:161–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019605-199304000-00012.Search in Google Scholar

5. Rust, OA, Bofill, JA, Boch, HG, Roberts, WE. Familial inheritance of mandibular arch malformations affecting three individuals in one family. South Med J 1999;92:505–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-199905000-00011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Sergi, C, Kamnasaran, D. PRRX1 is mutated in a fetus with agnathia-otocephaly. Clin Genet 2011;79:293–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01531.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Donnelly, M, Todd, E, Wheeler, M, Winn, VD, Kamnasaran, D. Prenatal diagnosis and identification of heterozygous frameshift mutation in PRRX1 in an infant with agnathia-otocephaly. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:903–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.3910.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Çelik, T, Simsek, PO, Sozen, T, Ozyuncu, O, Utine, GE, Talim, B. PRRX1 is mutated in an otocephalic newborn infant conceived by consanguineous parents. Clin Genet 2012;81:294–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01730.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Chassaing, N, Sorrentino, S, Davis, EE, Martin-Coignard, D, Iacovelli, A, Paznekas, W, et al. OTX2 mutations contribute to the otocephaly-dysgnathia complex. J Med Genet 2012;49:373–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100892.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Dasouki, M, Andrews, B, Parimi, P, Kamnasaran, D. Recurrent agnathia-otocephaly caused by DNA replication slippage in PRRX1. Am J Med Genet 2013;161:803–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35879.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Akiyama, M, Okubo, T, Yasuo, T, Iwasaku, K, Kitawaki, J. Prenatal diagnosis of agnathia-otocephaly using sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32:1515–26. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.8.1522.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Patat, O, van Ravenswaaij-Arts, CMA, Tantau, J, Corsten-Janssen, N, van Tintelen, JP, Dijkhuizen, T, et al. Otocephaly-dysgnathia complex: description of four cases and confirmation of the role of OTX2. Mol Syndromol 2013;4:302–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353727.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Sergouniotis, PI, Urquhart, JE, Williams, SG, Bhaskar, SS, Black, GC, Lovell, SC, et al. Agnathia-otocephaly complex and asymmetric velopharyngeal insufficiency due to an in-frame duplication in OTX2. J Hum Genet 2015;60:199–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2014.122.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Reinecke, P, Figge, C, Majewski, F, Borchard, F. Otocephaly and holoprosencephaly in only one monozygotic twin. Am J Med Genet 2003;19:395–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.20073.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Schiffer, C, Tariverdian, G, Schiesser, M, Thomas, MC, Sergi, C. Agnathia-otocephaly complex: report of three cases with involvement of two different Carnegie stages. Am J Med Genet 2002;112:203–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.10672.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Herman, S, Delio, M, Morrow, B, Samanich, J. Agnathia-otocephaly complex: a case report and examination of the OTX2 and PRRX1 genes. Gene 2012;494:124–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2011.11.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Kauvar, EF, Solomon, BD, Curry, CJR, Van Essen, AJ, Janssen, N, Dutra, A, et al. Holoprosencephaly and agnathia spectrum: presentation of two new patients and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 2010;154:158–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30235.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Kamnasaran, D, Morin, F, Gekas, J. Prenatal diagnosis and molecular genetic studies on a new case of agnathia-otocephaly. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2010;29:207–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/15513811003796946.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Rodriguez, N, Casabuenas, A, Andreeva, E, Odegova, N, Wong, AE, Sepulveda, W. First-trimester diagnosis of agnathia-otocephaly complex: a series of 4 cases and review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2019;38:805–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14759.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-05-27

Accepted: 2020-07-16

Published Online: 2020-08-24

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/crpm-2020-0041

Keywords for this article

agnathia-otocephaly complex; foetal anomaly; parental counselling; recurrence risk

Creative Commons

BY 4.0

Agnathia-otocephaly complex: a case report and a literature review on recurrence risk

Article

Abstract

Objectives

Contents

Outlook

Introduction

Case presentation

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

Genetic mutations in AOC cases

Recurrence

Prenatal diagnosis

Conclusions

References

Articles in the same Issue

Articles in the same Issue

Articles in the same Issue