Startseite On the variation of the Einstein–Hilbert action in pseudohermitian geometry
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

On the variation of the Einstein–Hilbert action in pseudohermitian geometry

  • Claudio Afeltra , Jih-Hsin Cheng , Andrea Malchiodi EMAIL logo , Paul Yang und Xiaodong Wang
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. Juni 2024

Abstract

In this paper, we compute the first and second variation of the normalized Einstein–Hilbert functional on CR manifolds. We characterize critical points as pseudo-Einstein structures. We then turn to the second variation on standard spheres. While the situation is quite similar to the Riemannian case in dimension greater than or equal to five, in three dimensions, we observe a crucial difference, which mainly depends on the embeddable character of the perturbed CR structure.

Award Identifier / Grant number: MOST 111-2115-M-001-005

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS-1509505

Funding statement: J.-H. Cheng is supported by the project MOST 111-2115-M-001-005 of Ministry of Science and Technology and NCTS of Taiwan. A. Malchiodi is supported by the project Geometric Problems with Loss of Compactness from Scuola Normale Superiore. He is also a member of GNAMPA as part of INdAM. P. Yang acknowledges support from the NSF for the grant DMS 1509505.

A Appendix

It is a well-known fact in Kahler geometry that a Kahler metric 𝜔 on a closed complex manifold 𝑀 with constant scalar curvature must be Kahler–Einstein if the Kahler class [ ω ] is proportional to the first Chern class c 1 ( M ) . In this appendix, we discuss a CR analogue of this result.

We still follow [21] as our standard reference on CR geometry. Let 𝑀 be a CR manifold of dimension 2 n + 1 . The first Chern class of the complex vector bundle T 1 , 0 M will be simply denoted by c 1 ( M ) . Given a pseudohermitian structure 𝜃, we always work with the Tanaka–Webster connection ∇, and 2 π c 1 ( M ) is then represented by the closed 2-form

ρ θ = i [ R μ ν ̄ θ μ θ ν ̄ + A α γ , α ̄ θ γ θ A γ ̄ α ̄ , α θ γ ̄ θ ] ,

where R μ ν ̄ is the Ricci curvature and 𝐴 is the torsion of the Tanaka–Webster connection. Throughout this section, we always work with a local unitary frame { Z α α = 1 , , n } .

Lemma A.1

Suppose ϕ = f μ ν ̄ θ μ θ ν ̄ is a ( 1 , 1 ) -form. Let Λ ( ϕ ) = μ = 1 n f μ μ ̄ be its trace. Then d ϕ = f α ν ̄ , α ̄ θ ν ̄ + f μ α ̄ , α θ μ + i Λ ( ϕ ) θ , where d the dual of 𝑑 with respect to the adapted Riemannian metric.

Proof

By a standard formula, in terms of the Levi–Civita connection ̃ ,

d ϕ = T ̃ T ϕ + Z α ̃ Z ̄ α ϕ + Z ̄ α ̃ Z α ϕ .

We recall the relationship between the Levi–Civita connection ̃ and the Tanaka–Webster connection, that can be found in [14]: for X , Y horizontal,

̃ T T = 0 , ̃ X T = A X + 1 2 J X , ̃ X Y = X Y [ A X , Y + 1 2 d θ ( X , Y ) ] T .

We compute, using the above identities,

T ̃ T ϕ = f μ ν ̄ ( ̃ T θ μ ( T ) θ ν ̄ ̃ T θ ν ̄ ( T ) θ μ ) = f μ ν ̄ ( θ μ ( ̃ T T ) θ ν ̄ + θ ν ̄ ( ̃ T T ) θ μ ) = 0 ,
Z α ̃ Z ̄ α ϕ = Z ̄ α f α ν ̄ θ ν ̄ + f μ ν ̄ ̃ Z ̄ α θ μ ( Z α ) θ ν ̄ f μ ν ̄ ̃ Z ̄ α θ ν ̄ ( Z α ) θ μ + f α ν ̄ ̃ Z ̄ α θ ν ̄ = Z ̄ α f α ν ̄ θ ν ̄ f μ ν ̄ θ μ ( ̃ X ̄ α Z α ) θ ν ̄ + f μ ν ̄ θ ν ̄ ( ̃ Z ̄ α Z α ) θ μ f α ν ̄ ( θ ν ̄ ( ̃ Z ̄ α Z β ) θ β + θ ν ̄ ( ̃ Z ̄ α Z ̄ β ) θ β ̄ + θ ν ̄ ( ̃ Z ̄ α T ) θ ) = Z ̄ α f α ν ̄ θ ν ̄ f μ ν ̄ θ μ ( Z ̄ α Z α ) θ ν ̄ + f μ ν ̄ θ ν ̄ ( Z ̄ α Z α ) θ μ f α ν ̄ ( θ ν ̄ ( Z ̄ α Z β ) θ β + θ ν ̄ ( Z ̄ α Z β ̄ ) θ β ̄ + i 2 δ α ν θ ) = f α ν ̄ , α ̄ θ ν ̄ + i 2 Λ ( ϕ ) θ ,
and similarly,

Z ̄ α ̃ Z α ϕ = Z α f μ α ̄ θ μ f μ ν ̄ ̃ Z α θ ν ̄ ( X ̄ α ) θ μ + f μ ν ̄ ̃ Z α θ μ ( Z ̄ α ) θ ν ̄ f μ α ̄ ̃ Z α θ μ = Z α f μ α ̄ θ μ + f μ ν ̄ θ ν ̄ ( ̃ Z α X ̄ α ) θ μ f μ ν ̄ θ μ ( ̃ Z α Z ̄ α ) θ ν ̄ + f μ α ̄ ( θ μ ( ̃ Z α Z β ) θ β + θ μ ( ̃ Z α Z ̄ β ) θ ̄ β + θ μ ( ̃ Z α T ) θ ) = Z α f μ α ̄ θ μ + f μ ν ̄ θ ν ̄ ( Z α Z ̄ α ) θ μ f μ ν ̄ θ μ ( Z α Z ̄ α ) θ ν ̄ + f μ α ̄ ( θ μ ( Z α Z β ) θ β + θ μ ( Z α Z ̄ β ) θ ̄ β + i 2 δ α μ θ ) = f μ α ̄ , α θ μ + i 2 Λ ( ϕ ) θ .

We remark that, in the calculations, the torsion 𝐴 does not appear because it anti-commutes with 𝐽 and therefore maps a ( 1 , 0 ) -vector to a ( 0 , 1 ) -vector and vice versa. Combining these results yields d ϕ = f α ν ̄ , α ̄ θ ν ̄ + f μ α ̄ , α θ μ + i Λ ( ϕ ) θ , concluding the proof. ∎

Recall that a pseudohermitian structure 𝜃 is called pseudo-Einstein if R μ ν ̄ = W n δ μ ν ̄ , where 𝑊 is the scalar curvature. When n = 1 , this is always true. From now on, we assume n 2 . Lee showed in [21] that a necessary condition for the existence of a pseudo-Einstein structure is c 1 ( M ) = 0 .

Proposition A.2

Suppose 𝑀 is a closed CR manifold of dimension 2 n + 1 5 with c 1 ( M ) = 0 . If 𝜃 is a pseudohermitian structure with zero torsion and constant scalar curvature, then it is pseudo-Einstein.

Proof

Let ϕ = ρ θ W n d θ . Since A = 0 , we have

ϕ = i R μ ν ̄ θ μ θ ν ̄ W n d θ = i ( R μ ν ̄ W n δ μ ν ̄ ) θ μ θ ν ̄ .

It is a real ( 1 , 1 ) -form with Λ ( ϕ ) = 0 . As A = 0 , we have R α ν ̄ , α = R μ α ̄ , α = 0 by the Bianchi identities. Together with 𝑊 being constant, we see that we have d ϕ = 0 by Lemma A.1. As c 1 ( T 1 , 0 M ) = 0 , ρ θ is exact, i.e. there is a real 1-form 𝜒 such that ρ θ = d χ . Then ϕ = d χ ̃ , where χ ̃ = χ W n θ . It follows

ϕ 2 = ϕ , d χ ̃ = d ϕ , χ ̃ = 0 .

Therefore, ϕ = 0 , i.e. 𝜃 is pseudo-Einstein. ∎

Acknowledgements

J.-H. Cheng (P. Yang, resp.) is grateful to Scuola Normale Superiore and Princeton University (Academia Sinica in Taiwan, resp.) for the kind hospitality. A. Malchiodi would like to thank Academia Sinica in Taiwan and Princeton University for arranging some collaboration visits.

References

[1] T. Aubin, Équations différentielles non linéaires et problème de Yamabe concernant la courbure scalaire, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 55 (1976), no. 3, 269–296. Suche in Google Scholar

[2] T. Aubin, Some nonlinear problems in Riemannian geometry, Springer Monogr. Math., Springer, Berlin 1998. 10.1007/978-3-662-13006-3Suche in Google Scholar

[3] J. Bland and T. Duchamp, Moduli for pointed convex domains, Invent. Math. 104 (1991), no. 1, 61–112. 10.1007/BF01245067Suche in Google Scholar

[4] J. Bland and T. Duchamp, Normal forms for convex domains, Several complex variables and complex geometry, Part 2 (Santa Cruz 1989), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 52, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1991), 65–81. 10.1090/pspum/052.2/1128536Suche in Google Scholar

[5] J. S. Bland, Contact geometry and CR structures on S 3 , Acta Math. 172 (1994), no. 1, 1–49. 10.1007/BF02392789Suche in Google Scholar

[6] L. Boutet de Monvel, Intégration des équations de Cauchy–Riemann induites formelles, Séminaire Goulaouic–Lions–Schwartz 1974–1975: Équations aux dérivées partielles linéaires et non linéaires, École Polytechnique, Paris (1975), Exp. No. 9. Suche in Google Scholar

[7] S. Chanillo, H.-L. Chiu and P. Yang, Embeddability for 3-dimensional Cauchy–Riemann manifolds and CR Yamabe invariants, Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), no. 15, 2909–2921. 10.1215/00127094-1902154Suche in Google Scholar

[8] S.-C. Chen and M.-C. Shaw, Partial differential equations in several complex variables, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 19, American Mathematical Society, Providence 2001. 10.1090/amsip/019Suche in Google Scholar

[9] J. H. Chêng, Curvature functions for the sphere in pseudo-Hermitian geometry, Tokyo J. Math. 14 (1991), no. 1, 151–163. 10.3836/tjm/1270130496Suche in Google Scholar

[10] J. H. Chêng and J. M. Lee, A local slice theorem for 3-dimensional CR structures, Amer. J. Math. 117 (1995), no. 5, 1249–1298. 10.2307/2374976Suche in Google Scholar

[11] J.-H. Cheng, A. Malchiodi and P. Yang, A positive mass theorem in three dimensional Cauchy–Riemann geometry, Adv. Math. 308 (2017), 276–347. 10.1016/j.aim.2016.12.012Suche in Google Scholar

[12] J.-H. Cheng, A. Malchiodi and P. Yang, On the Sobolev quotient of three-dimensional CR manifolds, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 39 (2023), no. 6, 2017–2066. 10.4171/rmi/1412Suche in Google Scholar

[13] H.-L. Chiu, The sharp lower bound for the first positive eigenvalue of the sublaplacian on a pseudohermitian 3-manifold, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 30 (2006), no. 1, 81–96. 10.1007/s10455-006-9033-9Suche in Google Scholar

[14] S. Dragomir and G. Tomassini, Differential geometry and analysis on CR manifolds, Progr. Math. 246, Birkhäuser, Boston 2006. Suche in Google Scholar

[15] A. E. Fischer and J. E. Marsden, The manifold of conformally equivalent metrics, Canad. J. Math. 29 (1977), no. 1, 193–209. 10.4153/CJM-1977-019-xSuche in Google Scholar

[16] G. B. Folland, The tangential Cauchy–Riemann complex on spheres, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 171 (1972), 83–133. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1972-0309156-XSuche in Google Scholar

[17] D. Geller, The Laplacian and the Kohn Laplacian for the sphere, J. Differential Geom. 15 (1980), no. 3, 417–435. 10.4310/jdg/1214435651Suche in Google Scholar

[18] D. Jerison and J. M. Lee, Extremals for the Sobolev inequality on the Heisenberg group and the CR Yamabe problem, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 1 (1988), no. 1, 1–13. 10.1090/S0894-0347-1988-0924699-9Suche in Google Scholar

[19] N. Koiso, On the second derivative of the total scalar curvature, Osaka Math. J. 16 (1979), no. 2, 413–421. Suche in Google Scholar

[20] J. M. Lee, The Fefferman metric and pseudo-Hermitian invariants, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 296 (1986), no. 1, 411–429. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1986-0837820-2Suche in Google Scholar

[21] J. M. Lee, Pseudo-Einstein structures on CR manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 110 (1988), no. 1, 157–178. 10.2307/2374543Suche in Google Scholar

[22] J. M. Lee and T. H. Parker, The Yamabe problem, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N. S.) 17 (1987), no. 1, 37–91. 10.1090/S0273-0979-1987-15514-5Suche in Google Scholar

[23] S.-Y. Li and X. Wang, An Obata-type theorem in CR geometry, J. Differential Geom. 95 (2013), no. 3, 483–502. 10.4310/jdg/1381931736Suche in Google Scholar

[24] A. Lichnerowicz, Géométrie des groupes de transformations, Trav. Rec. Math. III, Dunod, Paris 1958. Suche in Google Scholar

[25] A. Malchiodi and F. Uguzzoni, A perturbation result for the Webster scalar curvature problem on the CR sphere, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 81 (2002), no. 10, 983–997. 10.1016/S0021-7824(01)01249-1Suche in Google Scholar

[26] R. Schoen, Conformal deformation of a Riemannian metric to constant scalar curvature, J. Differential Geom. 20 (1984), no. 2, 479–495. 10.4310/jdg/1214439291Suche in Google Scholar

[27] R. M. Schoen, Variational theory for the total scalar curvature functional for Riemannian metrics and related topics, Topics in calculus of variations (Montecatini Terme 1987), Lecture Notes in Math. 1365, Springer, Berlin (1989), 120–154. 10.1007/BFb0089180Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Y. Takeuchi, Nonnegativity of the CR Paneitz operator for embeddable CR manifolds, Duke Math. J. 169 (2020), no. 18, 3417–3438. 10.1215/00127094-2020-0051Suche in Google Scholar

[29] N. Tanaka, A differential geometric study on strongly pseudo-convex manifolds, Lectures in Math., Kyoto University, Tokyo 1975. 10.3792/pja/1195518896Suche in Google Scholar

[30] N. S. Trudinger, Remarks concerning the conformal deformation of Riemannian structures on compact manifolds, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (3) 22 (1968), 265–274. Suche in Google Scholar

[31] J. A. Viaclovsky, Critical metrics for Riemannian curvature functionals, Geometric analysis, IAS/Park City Math. Ser. 22, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2016), 197–274. 10.1090/pcms/022/05Suche in Google Scholar

[32] X. Wang, On a remarkable formula of Jerison and Lee in CR geometry, Math. Res. Lett. 22 (2015), no. 1, 279–299. 10.4310/MRL.2015.v22.n1.a14Suche in Google Scholar

[33] S. M. Webster, Pseudo-Hermitian structures on a real hypersurface, J. Differential Geom. 13 (1978), no. 1, 25–41. 10.4310/jdg/1214434345Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-05
Revised: 2024-04-08
Published Online: 2024-06-04
Published in Print: 2024-08-01

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 25.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2024-0031/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen