Abstract
Given a polarized projective variety
Funding statement: The author was funded by ERC ALKAGE (ERC Advanced Grant 670846).
A A result concerning comparable metrics with zero relative energy
We have used, in the proof of Theorem 5.1.5 and Theorem 6.1.1, the fact that if two comparable metrics have the same Monge–Ampère energy, then they are equal, i.e. Proposition 3.3.2. In this appendix, we prove this result. To that end, we will need another bifunctional acting on continuous psh metrics, the I energy.
Definition A.1.
Let
Their relative J-energy is defined as
Given a reference metric
The functionals I and J then, much like E, admit an extension to
Note that we have that
so that the I-energy is always nonnegative. This result relies on a special case of the local Hodge index theorem, as in [13, Proposition 2.26]. That the J-energy is nonnegative follows from the very expression of the Monge–Ampère energy.
We now prove Proposition 3.3.2, the statement of which we recall here.
Proposition A.2.
Let
Proof.
The main argument has been communicated to the author by S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, as part of works on finite-energy spaces currently in writing.
Approximate
in the notations of Section 3.3. Since
where the vanishing follows from continuity of E along decreasing nets, and the fact that
Pick any positive measure μ that can be expressed as
By the nontrivially-valued version of the estimate [16, Lemma 7.30] (which is proved similarly as in the trivially-valued case), given four Fubini–Study metrics
In our case, we then have
recalling that we have defined
while we have established before that
We then find that
and the right-hand side vanishes, while the left-hand side converges as
The key point now is to find a measure
and
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank his advisors Sébastien Boucksom and Catriona Maclean for their continuous support throughout the writing of this article. He also thanks Tamás Darvas for some discussion and remarks on the construction of the
References
[1] A. Barría Comicheo and K. Shamseddine, Summary on non-Archimedean valued fields, Advances in ultrametric analysis, Contemp. Math. 704, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2018), 1–36. 10.1090/conm/704/14158Search in Google Scholar
[2] V. G. Berkovich, Spectral theory and analytic geometry over non-Archimedean fields, Math. Surveys Monogr. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence 1990. Search in Google Scholar
[3] R. Berman and S. Boucksom, Growth of balls of holomorphic sections and energy at equilibrium, Invent. Math. 181 (2010), no. 2, 337–394. 10.1007/s00222-010-0248-9Search in Google Scholar
[4] R. Berman, S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, A variational approach to the Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (2021), no. 3, 605–652. 10.1090/jams/964Search in Google Scholar
[5] R. Berman, T. Darvas and C. Lu, Convexity of the extended K-energy and the large time behavior of the weak Calabi flow, Geom. Topol. 21 (2017), no. 5, 2945–2988. 10.2140/gt.2017.21.2945Search in Google Scholar
[6] B. Berndtsson, Probability measures related to geodesics in the space of Kähler metrics, preprint (2009), https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.1806. Search in Google Scholar
[7] H. Blum, Y. Liu, C. Xu and Z. Zhuang, The existence of the Kähler–Ricci soliton degeneration, preprint (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15278. Search in Google Scholar
[8] S. Bosch, U. Güntzer and R. Remmert, Non-Archimedean analysis, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 261, Springer, Berlin 1984. 10.1007/978-3-642-52229-1Search in Google Scholar
[9] S. Boucksom and D. Eriksson, Spaces of norms, determinant of cohomology and Fekete points in non-Archimedean geometry, Adv. Math. 378 (2021), Paper No. 107501. 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107501Search in Google Scholar
[10] S. Boucksom, P. Eyssidieux, V. Guedj and A. Zeriahi, Monge–Ampère equations in big cohomology classes, Acta Math. 205 (2010), no. 2, 199–262. 10.1007/s11511-010-0054-7Search in Google Scholar
[11] S. Boucksom, C. Favre and M. Jonsson, Solution to a non-Archimedean Monge–Ampère equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), no. 3, 617–667. 10.1090/S0894-0347-2014-00806-7Search in Google Scholar
[12] S. Boucksom, C. Favre and M. Jonsson, Singular semipositive metrics in non-Archimedean geometry, J. Algebraic Geom. 25 (2016), no. 1, 77–139. 10.1090/jag/656Search in Google Scholar
[13] S. Boucksom, W. Gubler and F. Martin, Differentiability of relative volumes over an arbitrary non-Archimedean field, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2022 (2022), no. 8, 6214–6242. 10.1093/imrn/rnaa314Search in Google Scholar
[14] S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, Tropical and non-Archimedean limits of degenerating families of volume forms, J. Éc. polytech. Math. 4 (2017), 87–139. 10.5802/jep.39Search in Google Scholar
[15] S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, A non-Archimedean approach to K-stability, preprint (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11160. Search in Google Scholar
[16] S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, Global pluripotential theory over a trivially valued field, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 31 (2022), no. 3, 647–836. 10.5802/afst.1705Search in Google Scholar
[17] A. Chambert-Loir and A. Ducros, Formes différentielles réelles et courants sur les espaces de Berkovich, preprint (2012), https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6277. Search in Google Scholar
[18] H. Chen and C. Maclean, Distribution of logarithmic spectra of the equilibrium energy, Manuscripta Math. 146 (2015), no. 3–4, 365–394. 10.1007/s00229-014-0712-8Search in Google Scholar
[19] H. Chen and A. Moriwaki, Extension property of semipositive invertible sheaves over a non-archimedean field, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 18 (2018), no. 1, 241–282. 10.2422/2036-2145.201601_004Search in Google Scholar
[20] X. Chen, The space of Kähler metrics, J. Differential Geom. 56 (2000), no. 2, 189–234. 10.4310/jdg/1090347643Search in Google Scholar
[21] T. Darvas, The Mabuchi geometry of finite energy classes, Adv. Math. 285 (2015), 182–219. 10.1016/j.aim.2015.08.005Search in Google Scholar
[22] T. Darvas, The Mabuchi completion of the space of Kähler potentials, Amer. J. Math. 139 (2017), no. 5, 1275–1313. 10.1353/ajm.2017.0032Search in Google Scholar
[23] T. Darvas, Geometric pluripotential theory on Kähler manifolds, Advances in complex geometry, Contemp. Math. 735, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2019), 1–104. 10.1090/conm/735/14822Search in Google Scholar
[24] T. Darvas and C. H. Lu, Geodesic stability, the space of rays and uniform convexity in Mabuchi geometry, Geom. Topol. 24 (2020), no. 4, 1907–1967. 10.2140/gt.2020.24.1907Search in Google Scholar
[25] T. Darvas, C. H. Lu and Y. A. Rubinstein, Quantization in geometric pluripotential theory, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 73 (2020), no. 5, 1100–1138. 10.1002/cpa.21857Search in Google Scholar
[26] T. Darvas and Y. A. Rubinstein, Kiselman’s principle, the Dirichlet problem for the Monge–Ampère equation, and rooftop obstacle problems, J. Math. Soc. Japan 68 (2016), no. 2, 773–796. 10.2969/jmsj/06820773Search in Google Scholar
[27] Y. Fang, W. Gubler and K. Künnemann, On the non-archimedean Monge–Ampere equation in mixed characteristic, preprint (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12282. Search in Google Scholar
[28] P. Gérardin, Immeubles des groupes linéaires généraux, Noncommutative harmonic analysis and Lie groups, Lecture Notes in Math. 880, Springer, Berlin (1981), 138–178. 10.1007/BFb0090408Search in Google Scholar
[29] W. Gubler, Tropical varieties for non-Archimedean analytic spaces, Invent. Math. 169 (2007), no. 2, 321–376. 10.1007/s00222-007-0048-zSearch in Google Scholar
[30] W. Gubler, P. Jell, K. Künnemann and F. Martin, Continuity of plurisubharmonic envelopes in non-archimedean geometry and test ideals, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 69 (2019), no. 5, 2331–2376. 10.5802/aif.3296Search in Google Scholar
[31] C. O. Kiselman, The partial Legendre transformation for plurisubharmonic functions, Invent. Math. 49 (1978), no. 2, 137–148. 10.1007/BF01403083Search in Google Scholar
[32] C. O. Kiselman, Plurisubharmonic functions and their singularities, Complex potential theory, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci. 439, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1994), 273–323. 10.1007/978-94-011-0934-5_7Search in Google Scholar
[33] C. Li, G. Tian and F. Wang, On the Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture for singular Fano varieties, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 74 (2021), no. 8, 1748–1800. 10.1002/cpa.21936Search in Google Scholar
[34] T. Mabuchi, Some symplectic geometry on compact Kähler manifolds. I, Osaka J. Math. 24 (1987), no. 2, 227–252. Search in Google Scholar
[35] D. H. Phong and J. Sturm, The Monge–Ampère operator and geodesics in the space of Kähler potentials, Invent. Math. 166 (2006), no. 1, 125–149. 10.1007/s00222-006-0512-1Search in Google Scholar
[36]
J. Poineau,
La droite de Berkovich sur
[37] B. Poonen, Maximally complete fields, Enseign. Math. (2) 39 (1993), no. 1–2, 87–106. Search in Google Scholar
[38] A. Prékopa, On logarithmic concave measures and functions, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 34 (1973), 335–343. Search in Google Scholar
[39] R. Reboulet, The asymptotic Fubini–Study operator over general non-Archimedean fields, Math. Z. 299 (2021), no. 3–4, 2341–2378. 10.1007/s00209-021-02770-2Search in Google Scholar
[40] B. Rémy, A. Thuillier and A. Werner, Bruhat–Tits buildings and analytic geometry, Berkovich spaces and applications, Lecture Notes in Math. 2119, Springer, Cham (2015), 141–202. 10.1007/978-3-319-11029-5_5Search in Google Scholar
[41] J. Ross and D. Witt Nyström, Analytic test configurations and geodesic rays, J. Symplectic Geom. 12 (2014), no. 1, 125–169. 10.4310/JSG.2014.v12.n1.a5Search in Google Scholar
[42] S. Semmes, Complex Monge–Ampère and symplectic manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 114 (1992), no. 3, 495–550. 10.2307/2374768Search in Google Scholar
[43] A. Thuillier, Théorie du potentiel sur les courbes en géométrie analytique non Archimédienne. Applications à la théorie d’Arakelov, PhD thesis, Institut de Recherche Mathématique de Rennes, 2005. Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Kähler–Einstein metrics with prescribed singularities on Fano manifolds
- Plurisubharmonic geodesics in spaces of non-Archimedean metrics of finite energy
- Hermitian K-theory via oriented Gorenstein algebras
- Components of symmetric wide-matrix varieties
- Tangent curves to degenerating hypersurfaces
- Local noncollapsing for complex Monge–Ampère equations
- Entropy bounds, compactness and finiteness theorems for embedded self-shrinkers with rotational symmetry
- Hitting estimates on Einstein manifolds and applications
- Special values of L-functions of one-motives over function fields
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Kähler–Einstein metrics with prescribed singularities on Fano manifolds
- Plurisubharmonic geodesics in spaces of non-Archimedean metrics of finite energy
- Hermitian K-theory via oriented Gorenstein algebras
- Components of symmetric wide-matrix varieties
- Tangent curves to degenerating hypersurfaces
- Local noncollapsing for complex Monge–Ampère equations
- Entropy bounds, compactness and finiteness theorems for embedded self-shrinkers with rotational symmetry
- Hitting estimates on Einstein manifolds and applications
- Special values of L-functions of one-motives over function fields