Home Plurisubharmonic geodesics in spaces of non-Archimedean metrics of finite energy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Plurisubharmonic geodesics in spaces of non-Archimedean metrics of finite energy

  • Rémi Reboulet EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 29, 2022

Abstract

Given a polarized projective variety ( X , L ) over any non-Archimedean field, assuming continuity of envelopes, we define a metric on the space of finite-energy metrics on L, related to a construction of Darvas in the complex setting. We show that this makes finite-energy metrics on L into a geodesic metric space, where geodesics are given as maximal psh segments. Given two continuous psh metrics, we show that the maximal segment joining them is furthermore continuous. Our results hold in particular in all situations relevant to the study of degenerations and K-stability in complex geometry.

Funding statement: The author was funded by ERC ALKAGE (ERC Advanced Grant 670846).

A A result concerning comparable metrics with zero relative energy

We have used, in the proof of Theorem 5.1.5 and Theorem 6.1.1, the fact that if two comparable metrics have the same Monge–Ampère energy, then they are equal, i.e. Proposition 3.3.2. In this appendix, we prove this result. To that end, we will need another bifunctional acting on continuous psh metrics, the I energy.

Definition A.1.

Let ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 be two continuous L-psh metrics. Their relative I-energy is defined as

I ( ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 ) = X ( ϕ 0 - ϕ 1 ) ( MA ( ϕ 1 ) - MA ( ϕ 0 ) ) .

Their relative J-energy is defined as

J ( ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 ) = - E ( ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 ) + X ( ϕ 0 - ϕ 1 ) MA ( ϕ 1 ) .

Given a reference metric ϕ ref , we write

I ( ϕ 0 ) = I ( ϕ 0 , ϕ ref ) and J ( ϕ 0 ) = J ( ϕ 0 , ϕ ref ) .

The functionals I and J then, much like E, admit an extension to 1 ( L ) , which is continuous along decreasing nets.

Note that we have that

X ( ϕ 0 - ϕ 1 ) MA ( ϕ 0 ) E ( ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 ) X ( ϕ 0 - ϕ 1 ) MA ( ϕ 0 ) ,

so that the I-energy is always nonnegative. This result relies on a special case of the local Hodge index theorem, as in [13, Proposition 2.26]. That the J-energy is nonnegative follows from the very expression of the Monge–Ampère energy.

We now prove Proposition 3.3.2, the statement of which we recall here.

Proposition A.2.

Let ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 E 1 ( L ) . If E ( ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 ) = 0 and ϕ 0 ϕ 1 , then ϕ 0 = ϕ 1 .

Proof.

The main argument has been communicated to the author by S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, as part of works on finite-energy spaces currently in writing.

Approximate ϕ 0 and ϕ 1 by decreasing nets ϕ 0 k , ϕ 1 k ( L ) . Up to taking the maximum of the two sequences, we can assume without loss of generality that for all k, ϕ 0 k ϕ 1 k . We have

E ( ϕ 0 k , ϕ 1 k ) = 1 dim X + 1 i X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) MA ( ϕ 0 k , ( i ) ϕ 1 k ) ( dim X - i ) ,

in the notations of Section 3.3. Since ϕ 0 ϕ 1 , all of the terms in the above sum are integrals against positive measures of nonnegative functions, hence they are all positive. In particular,

0 I ( ϕ 0 k , ϕ 1 k ) = X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) MA ( ϕ 1 k ) ( dim X + 1 ) E ( ϕ 0 k , ϕ 1 k ) 0 ,

where the vanishing follows from continuity of E along decreasing nets, and the fact that E ( ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 ) = 0 .

Pick any positive measure μ that can be expressed as MA ( ϕ ) for some ϕ ( L ) , and write for x X an ,

μ ( { x } ) ( ϕ 0 k ( x ) - ϕ 1 k ( x ) ) - X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) MA ( ϕ 1 k )
= X μ ( { x } ) ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) δ x - X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) MA ( ϕ 1 k )
X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) μ - X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) MA ( ϕ 1 k )
X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) ( μ - MA ( ϕ 1 k ) ) .

By the nontrivially-valued version of the estimate [16, Lemma 7.30] (which is proved similarly as in the trivially-valued case), given four Fubini–Study metrics ϕ i ( L ) , i { 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 } , there exists constants C , a , b depending only on dim X such that

X ( ϕ 0 - ϕ 1 ) ( MA ( ϕ 2 ) - MA ( ϕ 3 ) ) C I ( ϕ 0 , ϕ 1 ) a I ( ϕ 2 , ϕ 3 ) a max i J ( ϕ i ) b .

In our case, we then have

X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) ( μ - MA ( ϕ 1 k ) )
C I ( ϕ 0 k , ϕ 1 k ) a I ( ϕ , ϕ 1 k ) a max ( J ( ϕ 0 k ) , J ( ϕ 1 k ) , J ( ϕ ) ) b ,

recalling that we have defined μ = MA ( ϕ ) . Now, by the continuity of the extensions of I and J along decreasing nets,

I ( ϕ , ϕ 1 k ) a max ( J ( ϕ 0 k ) , J ( ϕ 1 k ) , J ( ϕ ) ) b I ( ϕ , ϕ 1 ) a max ( J ( ϕ 0 ) , J ( ϕ 1 ) , J ( ϕ ) ) b

while we have established before that

I ( ϕ 0 k , ϕ 1 k ) 0 .

We then find that

μ ( { x } ) ( ϕ 0 k ( x ) - ϕ 1 k ( x ) ) - X ( ϕ 0 k - ϕ 1 k ) MA ( ϕ 1 k )
C I ( ϕ 0 k , ϕ 1 k ) a I ( ϕ , ϕ 1 k ) a max ( J ( ϕ 0 k ) , J ( ϕ 1 k ) , J ( ϕ ) ) b

and the right-hand side vanishes, while the left-hand side converges as k to the nonnegative quantity

μ ( { x } ) ( ϕ 0 ( x ) - ϕ 1 ( x ) ) .

The key point now is to find a measure μ = MA ( ϕ ) with positive Dirac mass at x. Now, we recall that a psh function is uniquely determined by its restriction to the set of divisorial points in X an , and that for any such point x we may find a Monge–Ampère measure μ x associated to a projective model of X which has an atom at x, as in [9, Example 8.11]. As we then have

0 μ x ( { x } ) ( ϕ 0 ( x ) - ϕ 1 ( x ) ) = 0 ,

and μ x ( { x } ) > 0 , we have that ϕ 0 = ϕ 1 on all divisorial points of X an , hence on X an . ∎

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank his advisors Sébastien Boucksom and Catriona Maclean for their continuous support throughout the writing of this article. He also thanks Tamás Darvas for some discussion and remarks on the construction of the d 1 metric geometry, and the anonymous referee for many valuable suggestions on the improvement and organization of the article, as well as for pointing out some gaps in certain proofs.

References

[1] A. Barría Comicheo and K. Shamseddine, Summary on non-Archimedean valued fields, Advances in ultrametric analysis, Contemp. Math. 704, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2018), 1–36. 10.1090/conm/704/14158Search in Google Scholar

[2] V. G. Berkovich, Spectral theory and analytic geometry over non-Archimedean fields, Math. Surveys Monogr. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence 1990. Search in Google Scholar

[3] R. Berman and S. Boucksom, Growth of balls of holomorphic sections and energy at equilibrium, Invent. Math. 181 (2010), no. 2, 337–394. 10.1007/s00222-010-0248-9Search in Google Scholar

[4] R. Berman, S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, A variational approach to the Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (2021), no. 3, 605–652. 10.1090/jams/964Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. Berman, T. Darvas and C. Lu, Convexity of the extended K-energy and the large time behavior of the weak Calabi flow, Geom. Topol. 21 (2017), no. 5, 2945–2988. 10.2140/gt.2017.21.2945Search in Google Scholar

[6] B. Berndtsson, Probability measures related to geodesics in the space of Kähler metrics, preprint (2009), https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.1806. Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. Blum, Y. Liu, C. Xu and Z. Zhuang, The existence of the Kähler–Ricci soliton degeneration, preprint (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15278. Search in Google Scholar

[8] S. Bosch, U. Güntzer and R. Remmert, Non-Archimedean analysis, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 261, Springer, Berlin 1984. 10.1007/978-3-642-52229-1Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. Boucksom and D. Eriksson, Spaces of norms, determinant of cohomology and Fekete points in non-Archimedean geometry, Adv. Math. 378 (2021), Paper No. 107501. 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107501Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Boucksom, P. Eyssidieux, V. Guedj and A. Zeriahi, Monge–Ampère equations in big cohomology classes, Acta Math. 205 (2010), no. 2, 199–262. 10.1007/s11511-010-0054-7Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. Boucksom, C. Favre and M. Jonsson, Solution to a non-Archimedean Monge–Ampère equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), no. 3, 617–667. 10.1090/S0894-0347-2014-00806-7Search in Google Scholar

[12] S. Boucksom, C. Favre and M. Jonsson, Singular semipositive metrics in non-Archimedean geometry, J. Algebraic Geom. 25 (2016), no. 1, 77–139. 10.1090/jag/656Search in Google Scholar

[13] S. Boucksom, W. Gubler and F. Martin, Differentiability of relative volumes over an arbitrary non-Archimedean field, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2022 (2022), no. 8, 6214–6242. 10.1093/imrn/rnaa314Search in Google Scholar

[14] S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, Tropical and non-Archimedean limits of degenerating families of volume forms, J. Éc. polytech. Math. 4 (2017), 87–139. 10.5802/jep.39Search in Google Scholar

[15] S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, A non-Archimedean approach to K-stability, preprint (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11160. Search in Google Scholar

[16] S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, Global pluripotential theory over a trivially valued field, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 31 (2022), no. 3, 647–836. 10.5802/afst.1705Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Chambert-Loir and A. Ducros, Formes différentielles réelles et courants sur les espaces de Berkovich, preprint (2012), https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6277. Search in Google Scholar

[18] H. Chen and C. Maclean, Distribution of logarithmic spectra of the equilibrium energy, Manuscripta Math. 146 (2015), no. 3–4, 365–394. 10.1007/s00229-014-0712-8Search in Google Scholar

[19] H. Chen and A. Moriwaki, Extension property of semipositive invertible sheaves over a non-archimedean field, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 18 (2018), no. 1, 241–282. 10.2422/2036-2145.201601_004Search in Google Scholar

[20] X. Chen, The space of Kähler metrics, J. Differential Geom. 56 (2000), no. 2, 189–234. 10.4310/jdg/1090347643Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. Darvas, The Mabuchi geometry of finite energy classes, Adv. Math. 285 (2015), 182–219. 10.1016/j.aim.2015.08.005Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. Darvas, The Mabuchi completion of the space of Kähler potentials, Amer. J. Math. 139 (2017), no. 5, 1275–1313. 10.1353/ajm.2017.0032Search in Google Scholar

[23] T. Darvas, Geometric pluripotential theory on Kähler manifolds, Advances in complex geometry, Contemp. Math. 735, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2019), 1–104. 10.1090/conm/735/14822Search in Google Scholar

[24] T. Darvas and C. H. Lu, Geodesic stability, the space of rays and uniform convexity in Mabuchi geometry, Geom. Topol. 24 (2020), no. 4, 1907–1967. 10.2140/gt.2020.24.1907Search in Google Scholar

[25] T. Darvas, C. H. Lu and Y. A. Rubinstein, Quantization in geometric pluripotential theory, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 73 (2020), no. 5, 1100–1138. 10.1002/cpa.21857Search in Google Scholar

[26] T. Darvas and Y. A. Rubinstein, Kiselman’s principle, the Dirichlet problem for the Monge–Ampère equation, and rooftop obstacle problems, J. Math. Soc. Japan 68 (2016), no. 2, 773–796. 10.2969/jmsj/06820773Search in Google Scholar

[27] Y. Fang, W. Gubler and K. Künnemann, On the non-archimedean Monge–Ampere equation in mixed characteristic, preprint (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12282. Search in Google Scholar

[28] P. Gérardin, Immeubles des groupes linéaires généraux, Noncommutative harmonic analysis and Lie groups, Lecture Notes in Math. 880, Springer, Berlin (1981), 138–178. 10.1007/BFb0090408Search in Google Scholar

[29] W. Gubler, Tropical varieties for non-Archimedean analytic spaces, Invent. Math. 169 (2007), no. 2, 321–376. 10.1007/s00222-007-0048-zSearch in Google Scholar

[30] W. Gubler, P. Jell, K. Künnemann and F. Martin, Continuity of plurisubharmonic envelopes in non-archimedean geometry and test ideals, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 69 (2019), no. 5, 2331–2376. 10.5802/aif.3296Search in Google Scholar

[31] C. O. Kiselman, The partial Legendre transformation for plurisubharmonic functions, Invent. Math. 49 (1978), no. 2, 137–148. 10.1007/BF01403083Search in Google Scholar

[32] C. O. Kiselman, Plurisubharmonic functions and their singularities, Complex potential theory, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci. 439, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1994), 273–323. 10.1007/978-94-011-0934-5_7Search in Google Scholar

[33] C. Li, G. Tian and F. Wang, On the Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture for singular Fano varieties, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 74 (2021), no. 8, 1748–1800. 10.1002/cpa.21936Search in Google Scholar

[34] T. Mabuchi, Some symplectic geometry on compact Kähler manifolds. I, Osaka J. Math. 24 (1987), no. 2, 227–252. Search in Google Scholar

[35] D. H. Phong and J. Sturm, The Monge–Ampère operator and geodesics in the space of Kähler potentials, Invent. Math. 166 (2006), no. 1, 125–149. 10.1007/s00222-006-0512-1Search in Google Scholar

[36] J. Poineau, La droite de Berkovich sur 𝐙 , Astérisque 34, Société Mathématique de France, Paris (2010). Search in Google Scholar

[37] B. Poonen, Maximally complete fields, Enseign. Math. (2) 39 (1993), no. 1–2, 87–106. Search in Google Scholar

[38] A. Prékopa, On logarithmic concave measures and functions, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 34 (1973), 335–343. Search in Google Scholar

[39] R. Reboulet, The asymptotic Fubini–Study operator over general non-Archimedean fields, Math. Z. 299 (2021), no. 3–4, 2341–2378. 10.1007/s00209-021-02770-2Search in Google Scholar

[40] B. Rémy, A. Thuillier and A. Werner, Bruhat–Tits buildings and analytic geometry, Berkovich spaces and applications, Lecture Notes in Math. 2119, Springer, Cham (2015), 141–202. 10.1007/978-3-319-11029-5_5Search in Google Scholar

[41] J. Ross and D. Witt Nyström, Analytic test configurations and geodesic rays, J. Symplectic Geom. 12 (2014), no. 1, 125–169. 10.4310/JSG.2014.v12.n1.a5Search in Google Scholar

[42] S. Semmes, Complex Monge–Ampère and symplectic manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 114 (1992), no. 3, 495–550. 10.2307/2374768Search in Google Scholar

[43] A. Thuillier, Théorie du potentiel sur les courbes en géométrie analytique non Archimédienne. Applications à la théorie d’Arakelov, PhD thesis, Institut de Recherche Mathématique de Rennes, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-28
Revised: 2022-05-24
Published Online: 2022-09-29
Published in Print: 2022-12-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2022-0059/html
Scroll to top button