Home Simulation and optimization of Venturi type bubble generator to improve cavitation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Simulation and optimization of Venturi type bubble generator to improve cavitation

  • Salehe Allami , Ebrahim Nemati Lay EMAIL logo , Minou Atharifar and Amirhossein Oudi
Published/Copyright: February 24, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study carried out the simulation and optimization of a Venturi tube with the aim of producing more micro-nanobubbles (MNBs) and preventing their aggregation to increase mass transfer. In the first step, fluid flow in a steady state in a simple Venturi tube was simulated. In the next step, a tube will be added to the throat. The test design will investigate and optimize the effects of three geometrical parameters: length, diameter, and rotation angle of the tube on two responses pressure and velocity in the throat. Also, from the design of the experiment, it was found that the angle of rotation and the diameter of the tube, compared to the length of the tube, have a greater effect on increasing the velocity and reducing the pressure in the throat, and their values ​​were 90°, 1.5 mm, and 5 mm, respectively. From the simulation of the Venturi tube in the second state with the optimal values ​​obtained, a 51 % reduction in the cavitation number was achieved, which has an inverse ratio with the cavitation intensity. In general, with the increase in cavitation intensity, the production of MNBs increases, and their accumulation is minimized.


Corresponding author: Ebrahim Nemati Lay, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kashan, P. O. Box: 873175-1167, Kashan, Iran, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not required.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Temesgen, T, Bui, TT, Han, M, Kim, T, Park, H. Micro and nanobubble technologies as a new horizon for water-treatment techniques: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2017;246:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.06.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Movahed, SMA, Sarmah, AK. Global trends and characteristics of nano-and micro-bubbles research in environmental engineering over the past two decades: a scientometric analysis. Sci Total Environ 2021;785:147362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147362.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Parmar, R, Majumder, SK. Microbubble generation and microbubble-aided transport process intensification–a state-of-the-art report. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensif 2013;64:79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

4. Terasaka, K, Hirabayashi, A, Nishino, T, Fujioka, S, Kobayashi, D. Development of microbubble aerator for waste water treatment using aerobic activated sludge. Chem Eng Sci 2011;66:3172–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.02.043.Search in Google Scholar

5. Agarwal, A, Ng, WJ, Liu, Y. Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere 2011;84:1175–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Rodrigues, RT, Rubio, J. DAF–dissolved air flotation: potential applications in the mining and mineral processing industry. Int J Miner Process 2007;82:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2006.07.019.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ryskie, S, Gonzalez-Merchan, C, Neculita, CM, Genty, T. Efficiency of ozone microbubbles for ammonia removal from mine effluents. Miner Eng 2020;145:106071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106071.Search in Google Scholar

8. Xie, L, Wang, J, Lu, Q, Hu, W, Yang, D, Qiao, C, et al.. Surface interaction mechanisms in mineral flotation: fundamentals, measurements, and perspectives. Adv Colloid Inter Sci 2021;295:102491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102491.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Wang, H, Yang, W, Yan, X, Wang, L, Wang, Y, Zhang, H. Regulation of bubble size in flotation: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 2020;8:104070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104070.Search in Google Scholar

10. Han, G, Chen, S, Su, S, Huang, Y, Liu, B, Sun, H. A review and perspective on micro and nanobubbles: what they are and why they matter. Miner Eng 2022;189:107906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107906.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kukizaki, M. Microbubble formation using asymmetric Shirasu porous glass (SPG) membranes and porous ceramic membranes–a comparative study. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 2009;340:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.02.033.Search in Google Scholar

12. Favvas, EP, Kyzas, GZ, Efthimiadou, EK, Mitropoulos, AC. Bulk nanobubbles, generation methods and potential applications. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2021;54:101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2021.101455.Search in Google Scholar

13. Levitsky, I, Tavor, D, Gitis, V. Micro and nanobubbles in water and wastewater treatment: a state-of-the-art review. J Water Proc Eng 2022;47:102688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102688.Search in Google Scholar

14. Zhou, S, Nazari, S, Hassanzadeh, A, Bu, X, Ni, C, Peng, Y, et al.. The effect of preparation time and aeration rate on the properties of bulk micro-nanobubble water using hydrodynamic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem 2022;84:105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105965.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Gogate, PR, Pandit, AB. A review and assessment of hydrodynamic cavitation as a technology for the future. Ultrason Sonochem 2005;12:21–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.03.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Gogate, PR, Kabadi, AM. A review of applications of cavitation in biochemical engineering/biotechnology. Biochem Eng J 2009;44:60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2008.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

17. Wu, C, Nesset, K, Masliyah, J, Xu, Z. Generation and characterization of submicron size bubbles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2012;179:123–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2012.06.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Sun, Z-Y, Li, G-X, Chen, C, Yu, Y-S, Gao, G-X. Numerical investigation on effects of nozzle’s geometric parameters on the flow and the cavitation characteristics within injector’s nozzle for a high-pressure common-rail DI diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 2015;89:843–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.10.047.Search in Google Scholar

19. Tian, Y, Kinnas, SA. A numerical method for the analysis of unsteady cavitating rotor and stator interaction. In: Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors. Launceston, Tasmania, Australia: Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

20. Mancuso, G, Langone, M, Laezza, M, & Andreottola, G. Decolourization of Rhodamine B: a swirling jet-induced cavitation combined with NaOCl. Ultrason Sonochem 2016;32:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.01.040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Mancuso, G. Experimental and numerical investigation on performance of a swirling jet reactor. Ultrason Sonochem 2018;49:241–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.08.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Li, J, Song, Y, Yin, J, Wang, D. Investigation on the effect of geometrical parameters on the performance of a venturi type bubble generator. Nucl Eng Des 2017;325:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

23. Simpson, A, Ranade, VV. Modeling hydrodynamic cavitation in venturi: influence of venturi configuration on inception and extent of cavitation. AIChE Journal 2019;65:421–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16411.Search in Google Scholar

24. Yin, J, Li, J, Li, H, Liu, W, Wang, D. Experimental study on the bubble generation characteristics for an venturi type bubble generator. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2015;91:218–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.05.076.Search in Google Scholar

25. Song, Y, Wang, D, Yin, J, Li, J, Cai, K. Experimental studies on bubble breakup mechanism in a venturi bubble generator. Annal Nucl Energ 2019;130:259–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.02.020.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhao, L, Sun, L, Mo, Z, Du, M, Huang, J, Bao, J, et al.. Effects of the divergent angle on bubble transportation in a rectangular Venturi channel and its performance in producing fine bubbles. Int J Multiphase Flow 2019;114:192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

27. Wang, X, Shuai, Y, Zhou, X, Huang, Z, Yang, Y, Sun, J, et al.. Performance comparison of swirl-venturi bubble generator and conventional venturi bubble generator. Chem Eng Processing-Process Intensif 2020;154:108022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.108022.Search in Google Scholar

28. Wilson, DA, Pun, K, Ganesan, PB, Hamad, F. Geometrical optimization of a venturi-type microbubble generator using CFD simulation and experimental measurements. Designs 2021;5:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs5010004.Search in Google Scholar

29. Zhou, W, Wang, S, Zhu, J, Xie, J, Cai, C. Parameter optimization and experimental study of jet mixing device based on CFD. Processes 2022;10:933. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050933.Search in Google Scholar

30. Bao, Y, Huang, J-Y. Effect of microbubbles on immersion freezing of grape tomato. Food Chem 2024;139813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139813.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Brennen, CE. Cavitation and bubble dynamics. London: Cambridge University Press; 2014.10.1017/CBO9781107338760Search in Google Scholar

32. Mishra, C, Peles, Y. An experimental investigation of hydrodynamic cavitation in micro-Venturis. Phys Fluids 2006;18. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2360996.Search in Google Scholar

33. Saharan, VK, Badve, MP, Pandit, AB. Degradation of reactive red 120 dye using hydrodynamic cavitation. Chem Eng J 2011;178:100–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.018.Search in Google Scholar

34. Li, M, Bussonnière, A, Bronson, M, Xu, Z, Liu, Q. Study of Venturi tube geometry on the hydrodynamic cavitation for the generation of microbubbles. Miner Eng 2019;132:268–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

35. Abbasi, E, Saadat, S, Jashni, AK, Shafaei, MH. A novel method for optimization of slit Venturi dimensions through CFD simulation and RSM design. Ultrason Sonochem 2020;67:105088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105088.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Multiphysics, C. Introduction to COMSOL multiphysics®. Burlington, MA: COMSOL Multiphysics; 1998, 9:32 p.Search in Google Scholar

37. Bezerra, MA, Santelli, RE, Oliveira, EP, Villar, LS, Escaleira, LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 2008;76:965–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Ferreira, SLC, Bruns, RE, Ferreira, HS, Matos, GD, David, JM, Brandão, GC, et al.. Box-Behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta 2007;597:179–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Oudi, AH, Golhosseini, R. Optimization of the homogeneous rhodium-catalyzed methanol carbonylation reactor to reduce CO2 emissions. Iran J Chem Eng (IJChE) 2022;19:50–68. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijche.2023.364482.1459.Search in Google Scholar

40. Mohajeri, L, Aziz, HA, Isa, MH, Zahed, MA. A statistical experiment design approach for optimizing biodegradation of weathered crude oil in coastal sediments. Bioresour Technol 2010;101:893–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Nam, S-N, Cho, H, Han, J, Her, N, Yoon, J. Photocatalytic degradation of acesulfame K: optimization using the Box–Behnken design (BBD). Process Saf Environ Prot 2018;113:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-12-01
Accepted: 2025-01-26
Published Online: 2025-02-24

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2024-0120/pdf
Scroll to top button