Abstract
The cost-effective and qualified weld is a primary requirement in fabrication of SS316 structural applications. Thin sheets of this material, characterized by a very thin invisible anti corrosive oxide film of Chromium and Molybdenum on the surface, require low heat input and optimized process parameters to avoid burn through during welding and to achieve the qualified weld. These facts have made it challenging to produce a qualified weld joint of this material by plasma arc welding. In this study process parameters for single pass plasma arc welding of austenitic stainless steel 316 are optimized by using response surface methodology (RSM). A key-hole mode plasma arc welding (PAW) is used to weld the square butt 2 mm thick plates of SS 316 without filler wire to reduce the cost. A regular two-level trail experiments designed by Design-Expert® software were conducted to establish lower and upper limit values of the input variables and their output responses. The welding current of 100 Amp, voltage of 24 V, speed of 300 mm/min and back shielding gas flow rate of 20 L/min are determined to be optimized values of process parameters, which achieved the adequate values of responses; front bead height, front bead width, penetration height and back penetration width ensuring the qualified weld. Moreover, an empirical mathematical model for predicting responses is constructed and the coefficients are determined using regression analysis. The adequacy of developed model is verified by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and is validated against experimental results.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Syed Sahab Khusnood from Wah Engineering College, Punjab, Pakistan for his guidance and support.
- 
Research ethics: Not applicable.
 - 
Informed consent: Not applicable.
 - 
Author contributions: The authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Ijaz Hussain Malik. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ijaz Hussain Malik and Hafiz Muhammad Abdullah. The draft was reviewed and edited by Hafiz Muhammad Abdullah and Hafiz Muhammad Ubaidullah. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
 - 
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
 - 
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
 - 
Research funding: None declared.
 - 
Data availability: Not applicable.
 
References
1. Karwande, AS, Chavan, RV, Scholar, P. Experimental investigation of SS 316 by using TIG-MAG welding. IJESC 2016;4. https://doi.org/10.4010/2016.1551.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Rajesh, KVD, Buddi, T, Kanth, PR, Satyanarayana, K. Microstructural and corrosion resistance study on plasma arc welded joints of AISI 304 and AISI 316. Adv Mater Process Technol 2020;6:189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.1732158.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Anoop, CR, Singh, RK, Kumar, RR, Jayalakshmi, M, Antony Prabhu, T, Thomas Tharian, K, et al.. A review on steels for cryogenic applications. Mater Perform Charact 2021;10:20200193. https://doi.org/10.1520/MPC20200193.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Kotecki, D, Armao, F. Stainless steels properties–how to weld them where to use them. The Lincoln electric company; 2003;1–36 pp. Industrial Technical Report. Available from: https://static.gasandsupply.com/docs/LIN_c64000.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
5. McGuire, MF. Austenitic stainless steels. In: Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology. Pennsylvania, USA: Fox Chapel; 2011:406–10 pp.10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/00081-4Suche in Google Scholar
6. McGuire, MF. Stainless steels for design engineers. Materials Park, Ohio, USA: ASM International; 2008.10.31399/asm.tb.ssde.9781627082860Suche in Google Scholar
7. Lippold, J, Kotecki, D. Welding metallurgy and weldability of stainless steels. New Jersey, USA: Wiley VCH; 2005.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Ye, C, Lu, G, Peng, X, Hou, S, Zhou, J, Ni, L. Microstructure and mechanical properties of the 316 stainless steel nuclear grade experimental component made by wire and arc additive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 2020;234:4258–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406220920692.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Habib, KA, Damra, MS, Saura, JJ, , Cervera, I, Bellés, J (2011) Breakdown and evolution of the protective oxide scales of AISI 304 and AISI 316 stainless steels under high-temperature oxidation. Int J Corros 2011:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/824676.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Gage, RM. Arc torch and process. United States Patent US2806124A, 1957. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US2806124A/en.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Murphy, AB. Influence of metal vapour on arc temperatures in gas–metal arc welding: convection versus radiation. J Phys Appl Phys 2013;46:224004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/46/22/224004.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Correa, EO, Costa, SC, Santos, JN. Weldability of iron-based powder metal materials using pulsed plasma arc welding process. J Mater Process Technol 2008;198:323–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.007.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Cary, HB. Modern welding technology, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1988.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Lin, CM, Huang, CZ, Su, CY, Chen, CS. Effects of tempering temperature on fatigue crack propagation behavior of high-strength low-alloy D6AC steel plasma arc welds. Mater Lett 2017;204:89–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.06.014.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Kearns, WH. Welding processes--arc and gas welding and cutting, brazing and soldering. In: Welding handbook. Miama, Florida: American Welding Society; 1978:592 p.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Li, Y. A keyhole plasma arc welding technology and its physical mechanism. London: Journal of Advanced Chemical Engineering; 2019.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Hsu, YF, Rubinsky, B. Two-dimensional heat transfer study on the keyhole plasma arc welding process. Int J Heat Mass Tran 1988;31:1409–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(88)90250-5.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Irving, B. Why aren’t airplanes welded. Am Weld Soc Miami FL 1997;76.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Irving, B. Plasma arc welding takes on the advanced solid rocket motor. Weld J 1992;71:49–50.Suche in Google Scholar
20. Keanini, R, Rubinsky, B. Plasma-arc welding under normal and zero gravity. Weld J 1990;69:41–50.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Nunes, AC, Bayless, OE, Jones, CS, et al. The variable polarity plasma arc welding process: its application to the space shuttle external tank – first interim report. 52.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Vikas, EP. Plasma arc welding of exhaust pipe system components. Weld J 1991;70:49–52.Suche in Google Scholar
23. Martikainen, JK, Moisio, TJi. Investigation of the effect of welding parameters on weld quality of plasma arc keyhole welding of structural steels. Weld Res Suppl 1993;72:329–40.Suche in Google Scholar
24. Zhang, YM, Zhang, SB. Observation of the keyhole during plasma arc welding. Weld J 1999;78:s53.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Mi, G, Li, C, Gao, Z, Zhao, D, Niu, J. Finite element analysis of welding residual stress of aluminum plates under different butt joint parameters. Eng Rev 2014;34:161–6.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Li, Y, Feng, Y, Li, Y, Zhang, X, Wu, C. Plasma arc and weld pool coupled modeling of transport phenomena in keyhole welding. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2016;92:628–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.09.016.Suche in Google Scholar
27. Mallieswaran, K, Rajasekaran, S, Vinoth Kumar, M, Rajendran, C. Steel shot peening effects on friction stir welded AA2014-T6 aluminum alloys. Mater Test 2022;64:1202–13.10.1515/mt-2021-2173Suche in Google Scholar
28. Okenıyı, JO. Effects of single pass and multipass welding on austenitic stainless steel corrosion in aggressive environments. Gazi Univ J Sci 2017;30:514–29.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Feujofack Kemda, BV, Barka, N, Jahazi, M, Osmani, D. Optimization of resistance spot welding process applied to A36 mild steel and hot dipped galvanized steel based on hardness and nugget geometry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;106:2477–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04707-w.Suche in Google Scholar
30. Siva, K, Murugan, N, Logesh, R. Optimization of weld bead geometry in plasma transferred arc hardfaced austenitic stainless steel plates using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2009;41:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1451-3.Suche in Google Scholar
31. Kondapalli, SP, Chalamalasetti, SR, Damera, NR. Optimization of fusion zone grain size, hardness and ultimate tensile strength of pulsed current micro plasma arc welded inconel 625 sheets using genetic algorithm. J Manuf Sci Prod 2012;12:181–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmsp-2012-0011.Suche in Google Scholar
32. van der Aa, E. Finite element modelling of temperature profiles, distortions and residual stresses due to tig welding [Doctoral dissertation, Thesis]. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology; 2002. Available from: https://repository.tudelft.nl/file/File_1dbe1c94-72e1-4d1c-8019-459fd32b4fa0?preview=1.Suche in Google Scholar
33. Padmapriya, N, Venkateswaran, N, Vijayalakshmi, K, Mallieswaran, GK, Padmanabhan, R. Characterisation of friction stir welds by logistic regression using fractal and wavelet features. Adv Mater Process Technol 2019;5:582–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2019.1641002.Suche in Google Scholar
34. Mallieswaran, K, Padmanabhan, R. Effect of sheet thickness on the FSW parameters for dissimilar aluminium grades tailor welded blanks. Adv Mater Process Technol 2020;7:150–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.1754744.Suche in Google Scholar
35. Mallieswaran, K, Padmanabhan, R, Balasubramanian, V. Friction stir welding parameters optimization for tailored welded blank sheets of AA1100 with AA6061 dissimilar alloy using response surface methodology. Adv Mater Process Technol 2018;4:142–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2017.1410690.Suche in Google Scholar
36. ASME. ASME boiler and pressure vessel code: an international code. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2021:89 p. Available from: https://dl.gasplus.ir/standard-ha/Standard-ASME/ASME%20BPVC%202021%20Section%20IX(1).pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
37. Haelsig, A, Kusch, M, Mayer, P. New findings on the efficiency of gas shielded Arc Welding. Weld World 2012;56:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03321400.Suche in Google Scholar
38. Evans, DM, Huang, D, Mcclure, J, Nunes, A. Arc efficiency of plasma arc welding. Weld J 1998;77. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:137611520.Suche in Google Scholar
39. Montgomery, DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 8th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
40. Huang, CC. Partially melted zone in aluminum welds. doctoral dissertation; 2002.Suche in Google Scholar
41. Deb, A. Chapter 11 - crashworthiness design issues for lightweight vehicles materials, design and manufacturing for lightweight vehicles, 2nd ed. Woodhead Publishing; 2021:433–70 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-818712-8.00011-2Suche in Google Scholar
42. Rajesh, A, Karthick, S, et al.. Tensile strength analysis of electron beam welded AA2024 aluminum alloy joints 2024-01-5220. https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-5220.Suche in Google Scholar
43. ASTM. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM; 2001.Suche in Google Scholar
44. Su, L, Fei, Z, Davis, B, Bornstein, H. Digital image correlation study on tensile properties of high strength quenched and tempered steel weld joints prepared by K-TIG and GMAW. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.142033.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
 - Research Articles
 - Numerical investigation of superheating secondary flow on performance of steam ejector by considering non-equilibrium condensation in renewable refrigeration cycle
 - Analysis of pressure drop, energy requirements, and entropy generation in natural gas pipelines at dense and pseudo-dense phases: a CFD study
 - Random Forest model for precise cooling load estimation in optimized and non-optimized form
 - Energy recovery from mechanical energy of high-pressure natural gas pipeline: a case study simulation
 - A numerical simulation of nucleate boiling of water on inclined and rough surfaces
 - Optimization and modelling of process parameters for single pass plasma arc welded steel using response surface methodology
 - Forecasting gasification process results via radial basis function optimization schemes
 - Machine learning approaches for predicting syngas production in biomass gasification
 
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
 - Research Articles
 - Numerical investigation of superheating secondary flow on performance of steam ejector by considering non-equilibrium condensation in renewable refrigeration cycle
 - Analysis of pressure drop, energy requirements, and entropy generation in natural gas pipelines at dense and pseudo-dense phases: a CFD study
 - Random Forest model for precise cooling load estimation in optimized and non-optimized form
 - Energy recovery from mechanical energy of high-pressure natural gas pipeline: a case study simulation
 - A numerical simulation of nucleate boiling of water on inclined and rough surfaces
 - Optimization and modelling of process parameters for single pass plasma arc welded steel using response surface methodology
 - Forecasting gasification process results via radial basis function optimization schemes
 - Machine learning approaches for predicting syngas production in biomass gasification