Home Natural pigment indigoidine production: process design, simulation, and techno-economic assessment
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Natural pigment indigoidine production: process design, simulation, and techno-economic assessment

  • Jhared Axel Mora-Jiménez , Vanessa Andreina Alvarez-Rodriguez , Sebastián Cisneros-Hernández , Carolina Ramírez-Martínez and Alberto Ordaz EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 11, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Natural pigment production represents an innovative and sustainable alternative to synthetic pigments. However, its industrial production to meet the global demand for pigments poses technological and economic challenges. In this work, a process design and simulation were conducted using SuperPro Designer to produce a blue natural pigment known as indigoidine, which is in high demand as a natural alternative to synthetic blue dyes in industries. The process design included upstream, bioreaction, and downstream processing to produce 113 tons per year of dry indigoidine. For the conception and design of the bioprocess, experimental data reported in the literature, such as kinetic and stoichiometric parameters, culture media, feeding strategy, and volumetric power input, were taken into account. The economic and profitability indicators of four scenarios were assessed based on a base scenario, which involved changing the typical stirred tank reactor to an airlift reactor, decreasing indigoidine recovery, and reducing biomass production. It was estimated that the use of an airlift reactor significantly improves the profitability of the bioprocess, while a 50 % decrease in biomass concentration (less than 40 g/L) significantly affected the profitability of the process. Finally, an equilibrium production point of around 56 tons per year was determined to balance total revenues with operational costs. This is the first work that offers valuable insights into the scaling-up of natural pigment indigoidine production using bacteria.


Corresponding author: Alberto Ordaz, Departamento de Bioingeniería, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Estado de México, Carretera Lago de Guadalupe Km 3.5, Margarita Maza de Juárez, Atizapán de Zaragoza, Estado de México, México, E-mail:
Jhared Axel Mora-Jiménez and Vanessa Andreina Alvarez-Rodriguez contributed equally to this work.
  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: Jhared Axel Mora-Jiménez and Vanessa Andreina Alvarez-Rodriguez collected the data, performed analysis, constructed the process in SuperPro designer and wrote the paper. Sebastián Cisneros-Hernández, constructed the process in SuperPro designer, performed the analysis and wrote the paper. Carolina Ramírez-Martínez collected the data and wrote the paper. Alberto Ordaz conceived and designed the analysis, performed the analysis and wrote the paper. The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

Nomenclature

AOCF

Annual fixed operating cost (USD)

AOCV

Annual variable operating cost (USD)

DC

Direct Cost (USD)

DFC

Direct Fixed Capital (USD)

Di

Impeller diameter (m)

FDC

Facility-dependent costs (USD)

Fl

Flow number (−)

Fr

Froude number (−)

GP

Gross Profit (USD)

IC

Indirect Cost (USD)

IRR |

Internal Rate of Return

LRT

Labor Rate per Type (−)

MPP

Minimum profitable productivity (g d−1 L−1)

N

Stirring rate (rpm)

N p

Power number (−)

NP

Net Profit (USD)

NPV

Net present value (USD)

OC

Other Costs (USD)

P

Ungassed power input (Watss)

PC

Equipment Purchase Cost (USD)

P g

Gassed power input (Watts)

Re

Reynolds number (−)

ROI

Return on Investment

TI

Total Investment (USD)

TLC

Total Labor Cost (USD)

TLD

Total Labor Demand (USD)

Y P/X

Indigodine production yield (−)

Y X/S

Growth yield (−)

References

1. Di Salvo, E, Lo Vecchio, G, De Pasquale, R, De Maria, L, Tardugno, R, Vadalà, R, et al.. Natural pigments production and their application in food, health and other industries. Nutrients 2023;15:1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15081923.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Mapari, SAS, Thrane, U, Meyer, AS. Fungal polyketide azaphilone pigments as future natural food colorants? Trends Biotechnol 2010;28:300–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.03.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Ghosh, S, Sarkar, T, Das, A, Chakraborty, R. Natural colorants from plant pigments and their encapsulation: an emerging window for the food industry. LWT 2022;153:112527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112527.Search in Google Scholar

4. Li, S, Mu, B, Wang, X, Wang, A. Recent researches on natural pigments stabilized by clay minerals: a review. Dyes Pigments 2021;190:109322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109322.Search in Google Scholar

5. Molina, AK, Corrêa, RCG, Prieto, MA, Pereira, C, Barros, L. Bioactive natural pigments’ extraction, isolation, and stability in food applications. Molecules 2023;28:1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031200.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Harsanto, B, Primiana, I, Sarasi, V, Satyakti, Y. Sustainability innovation in the textile industry: a systematic review. Sustainability 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021549.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kendall, K. Electrical conductivity of ceramic powders and pigments. Powder Technol 1990;62:147–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(90)80078-D.Search in Google Scholar

8. Hauptman, N, Vesel, A, Ivanovski, V, Gunde, MK. Electrical conductivity of carbon black pigments. Dyes Pigments 2012;95:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.03.012.Search in Google Scholar

9. Choksi, J, Vora, J, Shrivastava, N. Bioactive pigments from isolated bacteria and its antibacterial, antioxidant and sun protective application useful for cosmetic products. Indian J Microbiol 2020;60:379–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-020-00870-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Lyu, X, Lyu, Y, Yu, H, Chen, W, Ye, L, Yang, R. Biotechnological advances for improving natural pigment production: a state-of-the-art review. Bioresour Bioprocess 2022;9:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00497-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Mouro, C, Gomes, AP, Costa, RV, Moghtader, F, Gouveia, IC. The sustainable bioactive dyeing of textiles: a novel strategy using bacterial pigments, natural antibacterial ingredients, and deep eutectic solvents. Gels 2023;9:800. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9100800.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Celedón, RS, Díaz, LB. Natural pigments of bacterial origin and their possible biomedical applications. Microorganisms 2021;9:739. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040739.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Xu, F, Gage, D, Zhan, J. Efficient production of indigoidine in Escherichia coli. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2015;42:1149–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-015-1642-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Brown, AS, Robins, KJ, Ackerley, DF. A sensitive single-enzyme assay system using the non-ribosomal peptide synthetase BpsA for measurement of L-glutamine in biological samples. Sci Rep 2017;7:41745. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41745.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Wehrs, M, Prahl, JP, Moon, J, Li, Y, Tanjore, D, Keasling, JD, et al.. Production efficiency of the bacterial non-ribosomal peptide indigoidine relies on the respiratory metabolic state in S. cerevisiae. Microb Cell Factories 2018;17:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12934-018-1045-1.Search in Google Scholar

16. Wehrs, M, Gladden, JM, Liu, Y, Platz, L, Prahl, JP, Moon, J, et al.. Sustainable bioproduction of the blue pigment indigoidine: expanding the range of heterologous products in: R. toruloides to include non-ribosomal peptides. Green Chem 2019;21:3394–406. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9gc00920e.Search in Google Scholar

17. Linke, JA, Rayat, A, Ward, JM. Production of indigo by recombinant bacteria. Bioresour Bioprocess 2023;10:1–39. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40643-023-00626-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Yadav, S, Tiwari, KS, Gupta, C, Tiwari, MK, Khan, A, Sonkar, SP. A brief review on natural dyes, pigments: recent advances and future perspectives. Results Chem 2023;5:100733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100733.Search in Google Scholar

19. Sen, T, Barrow, CJ, Deshmukh, SK. Microbial pigments in the food industry – challenges and the way forward. Front Nutr 2019;6:418288. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNUT.2019.00007/BIBTEX.Search in Google Scholar

20. Barreto, JVDO, Casanova, LM, Junior, AN, Reis-Mansur, MCPP, Vermelho, AB. Microbial pigments: major groups and industrial applications. Microorganisms 2023;11:2920. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS11122920.Search in Google Scholar

21. Cude, WN, Mooney, J, Tavanaei, AA, Hadden, MK, Frank, AM, Gulvik, CA, et al.. Production of the antimicrobial secondary metabolite indigoidine contributes to competitive surface colonization by the marine roseobacter Phaeobacter sp. strain Y4I. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:4771–80. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00297-12.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Venkatachalam, M, Mares, G, Dufossé, L, Fouillaud, M. Scale-up of pigment production by the marine-derived filamentous fungus, Talaromyces albobiverticillius 30548, from shake flask to stirred bioreactor. Fermentation 2023;9:77. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9010077.Search in Google Scholar

23. Eng, T, Banerjee, D, Menasalvas, J, Chen, Y, Gin, J, Choudhary, H, et al.. Maximizing microbial bioproduction from sustainable carbon sources using iterative systems engineering. Cell Rep 2023;42:113087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113087.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Araque, J, Nino, L, Gelves, G. Industrial scale bioprocess simulation for Ganoderma Lucidum production using SuperPro Designer. J Phys Conf Ser 2020;1655. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012077.Search in Google Scholar

25. Vučurović, D, Bajić, B, Vučurović, V, Jevtić-Mučibabić, R, Dodić, S. Bioethanol production from spent sugar beet pulp – process modeling and cost analysis. Fermentation 2022;8. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8030114.Search in Google Scholar

26. Villegas-Méndez, MÁ, Montañez, J, Contreras-Esquivel, JC, Salmerón, I, Koutinas, A, Morales-Oyervides, L. Coproduction of microbial oil and carotenoids within the circular bioeconomy concept: a sequential solid-state and submerged fermentation approach. Fermentation 2022;8. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8060258.Search in Google Scholar

27. Czinkóczky, R, Németh, Á. Techno-economic assessment of Bacillus fermentation to produce surfactin and lichenysin. Biochem Eng J 2020;163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2020.107719.Search in Google Scholar

28. Nieto, L, Rivera, C, Gelves, G. Economic assessment of itaconic acid production from Aspergillus Terreus using SuperPro Designer. J Phys Conf Ser 2020;1655. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012100.Search in Google Scholar

29. Ghiffary, MR, Prabowo, CPS, Sharma, K, Yan, Y, Lee, SY, Kim, HU. High-level production of the natural blue pigment indigoidine from metabolically engineered corynebacterium glutamicum for sustainable fabric dyes. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2021;9:6613–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09341.Search in Google Scholar

30. Bailey, JE. Biochemical reaction engineering and biochemical reactors. Chem Eng Sci 1980;35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(80)80134-5.Search in Google Scholar

31. Devi, TT, Kumar, B. Mass transfer and power characteristics of stirred tank with Rushton and curved blade impeller. Eng Sci Technol Int J 2017;20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

32. Chen, X, Zheng, X, Pei, Y, Chen, W, Lin, Q, Huang, J, et al.. Process design and techno-economic analysis of fuel ethanol production from food waste by enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour Technol 2022;363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127882.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Benalcázar, EA, Deynoot, BG, Noorman, H, Osseweijer, P, Posada, JA. Production of bulk chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass via thermochemical conversion and syngas fermentation: a comparative techno-economic and environmental assessment of different site-specific supply chain configurations. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 2017;11. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1790.Search in Google Scholar

34. Timmerhaus, KD, Peters, MS, West, RE. Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, 5th ed. New York, USA: Mc Graw Hill; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

35. Zhao, M, Zhang, XS, Xiong, LB, Liu, K, Li, XF, Liu, Y, et al.. Establishment of an efficient expression and regulation system in streptomyces for economical and high-level production of the natural blue pigment indigoidine. J Agric Food Chem 2024;72:483–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JAFC.3C05696/SUPPL_FILE/JF3C05696_SI_002.XLS.Search in Google Scholar

36. Ghiffary, MR, Prabowo, CPS, Sharma, K, Yan, Y, Lee, SY, Kim, HU. High-level production of the natural blue pigment indigoidine from metabolically engineered corynebacterium glutamicum for sustainable fabric dyes. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2021;9:6613–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.0C09341/SUPPL_FILE/SC0C09341_SI_001.PDF.Search in Google Scholar

37. Synonym Biotechnologies. State of global fermentation capacity. Ind. Biotechnol. 2023;19:62–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2023.29304.syn Search in Google Scholar

38. Rodríguez-Sifuentes, L, Marszalek, JE, Hernández-Carbajal, G, Chuck-Hernández, C. Importance of downstream processing of natural astaxanthin for pharmaceutical application. Front Chem Eng 2020;2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2020.601483.Search in Google Scholar

39. Mussagy, CU, Remonatto, D, Paula, AV, Herculano, RD, Santos-Ebinuma, VC, Coutinho, JAP, et al.. Selective recovery and purification of carotenoids and fatty acids from Rhodotorula glutinis using mixtures of biosolvents. Sep Purif Technol 2021;266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118548.Search in Google Scholar

40. Espada, JJ, Pérez-Antolín, D, Vicente, G, Bautista, LF, Morales, V, Rodríguez, R. Environmental and techno-economic evaluation of β-carotene production from Dunaliella salina. A biorefinery approach. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 2020;14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2012.Search in Google Scholar

41. Yu, LP, Wu, FQ, Chen, GQ. Next-generation industrial biotechnology-transforming the current industrial biotechnology into competitive processes. Biotechnol J 2019;14. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201800437.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Islam, MS, Aryasomayajula, A, Selvaganapathy, PR. A review on macroscale and microscale cell lysis methods. Micromachines (Basel) 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8030083.Search in Google Scholar

43. Markets and Markets. Global synthetic dyes market size forecast; n.d. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/synthetic-dyes-market-184747754.html?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw88yxBhBWEiwA7cm6pb3NwRrTxAMXLBRwudQIdTW2cNIJzBUA8bF3EXwHDGNc0WfDfQPSCBoCJloQAvD_BwE [Accessed 1 May 2024].Search in Google Scholar

44. Shintani, T. Food industrial production of monosaccharides using microbial, enzymatic, and chemical methods. Fermentation 2019;5. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation5020047.Search in Google Scholar

45. Valdés, G, Mendonça, RT, Aggelis, G. Lignocellulosic biomass as a substrate for oleaginous microorganisms: a review. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217698.Search in Google Scholar

46. Osorio-González, CS, Gómez-Falcon, N, Brar, SK, Ramírez, AA. Cheese whey as a potential feedstock for producing renewable biofuels: a review. Energies (Basel) 2022;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186828.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-12-21
Accepted: 2024-05-19
Published Online: 2024-06-11

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2023-0098/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button