Startseite Naturwissenschaften Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analysis of natural gas sweetening process using lean vapor compression: a comparison study
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analysis of natural gas sweetening process using lean vapor compression: a comparison study

  • Xiujun Sun EMAIL logo und Lizhi Yuan
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. November 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Gas sweetening with an aqueous solution of diethanolamine is a crucial and common process in natural gas processing. However, the process, particularly in the solvent regeneration section, consumes a substantial amount of energy, significantly escalating the cost of gas. This paper presents a simulation and optimization of an existing natural gas refinery plant using a lean vapor compression method. The simulation results indicate that the current process requires 2.73 GJ/tacid gas for solvent regeneration, with exergy destruction of 14,120.59 kW in the solvent regeneration section. The total annualized cost for the current process is 11.68 M$. A modified scheme is proposed to address the issue of high energy consumption and the associated costs. The proposed scheme demonstrates significant improvements in the aforementioned parameters. Specifically, energy for solvent regeneration, exergy destruction in the solvent regeneration section, total annualized cost, and cost of gas are reduced by 16.12 %, 25.04 %, 20.97 %, and 20 % compared to the current process, respectively. These improvements enhance the thermoeconomic indexes, making the proposed scheme a viable and cost-effective alternative to the current process.


Corresponding author: Xiujun Sun, School of New Materials and Chemical Engineering, Tangshan University, Tangshan 063000, China, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Faramawy, S, Zaki, T, Sakr, A-E. Natural gas origin, composition, and processing: a review. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2016;34:34–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.030.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Al-Lagtah, NMA, Al-Habsi, S, Onaizi, SA. Optimization and performance improvement of Lekhwair natural gas sweetening plant using aspen HYSYS. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2015;26:367–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.06.030.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Aromada, SA, Øi, LE. Energy and economic analysis of improved absorption configurations for CO2 capture. Energy Proc 2017;114:1342–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1900.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Banat, F, Younas, O, Didarul, I. Energy and exergical dissection of a natural gas sweetening plant using methyldiethanol amine (MDEA) solution. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2014;16:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2013.10.005.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Nejat, T, Movasati, A, Wood, DA, Ghanbarabadi, H. Simulated exergy and energy performance comparison of physical–chemical and chemical solvents in a sour gas treatment plant. Chem Eng Res Des 2018;133:40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.02.040.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Ghanbarabadi, H, Khoshandam, B. Simulation and comparison of Sulfinol solvent performance with amine solvents in removing sulfur compounds and acid gases from natural sour gas. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2015;22:415–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.12.024.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Niu, MW, Rangaiah, GP. Retrofitting amine absorption process for natural gas sweetening via hybridization with membrane separation. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2014;29:221–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.019.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Jamekhorshid, A, Davani, ZK, Salehi, A, Khosravi, A. Gas sweetening simulation and its optimization by two typical amine solutions: an industrial case study in Persian Gulf region. Nat Gas Ind B 2021;8:309–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2021.04.006.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Moharir, M, Pourkargar, DB, Almansoori, A, Daoutidis, P. Distributed model predictive control of an amine gas sweetening plant. Ind Eng Chem Res 2018;57:13103–15. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01291.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Radzuan, MRA, Syarina, NA, Rosdi, WMW, Hussin, AH, Adnan, MF. Sustainable optimization of natural gas sweetening using A process simulation approach and sustainability evaluator. Mater Today Proc 2019;19:1628–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.191.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Darani, NS, Behbahani, RM, Shahebrahimi, Y, Asadi, A, Mohammadi, AH. Simulation and optimization of the acid gas absorption process by an aqueous diethanolamine solution in a natural gas sweetening unit. ACS Omega 2021;6:12072–80. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00744.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Kazemi, A, Malayeri, M, Shariati, A. Feasibility study, simulation and economical evaluation of natural gas sweetening processes–Part 1: a case study on a low capacity plant in Iran. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2014;20:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.06.001.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Tikadar, D, Gujarathi, AM, Guria, C. Multi-objective optimization of industrial gas-sweetening operations using economic and environmental criteria. Process Saf Environ Protect 2020;140:283–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.006.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Fouladitajar, A, Sadat, S. Application of MDEA in natural gas sweetening on laboratory scale–case study: bidboland gas refinery. Ann Roman Soc Cell Biol 2021;25:3592–600.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Etoumi, A, Alhanash, M, Almabrouk, M, Emtir, M. Performance improvement of gas sweetening units by using a blend of MDEA/PZ. Chem Eng Tran 2021;86:1057–62. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2186177.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Abd, AA, Naji, SZ. Comparison study of activators performance for MDEA solution of acid gases capturing from natural gas: simulation-based on a real plant. Environ Technol Innovat 2020;17:100562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019.100562.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Jaffary, B, Jaafari, L, Idem, R. CO2 capture performance comparisons of polyamines at practical concentrations for use as activators for methyldiethanolamine for natural gas sweetening. Energy Fuels 2021;35:8081–94. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00164.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Xu, Y, Deng, S, Zhao, L, Yuan, X, Fu, J, Li, S, et al.. Application of the thermodynamic cycle to assess the energy efficiency of amine-based absorption of carbon capture. Energies 2019;12:2504. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132504.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, M, Hajizadeh, A, Zahedizadeh, P, Azin, R, Zendehboudi, S. Evaluation of hybridized performance of amine scrubbing plant based on exergy, energy, environmental, and economic prospects: a gas sweetening plant case study. Energy 2021;214:118715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118715.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Ibrahim, AY, Ashour, FH, Gadalla, MA. Exergy study of amine regeneration unit using diethanolamine in a refinery plant: a real start-up plant. Heliyon 2021;7:e06241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06241.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Ibrahim, AY, Ashour, FH, Gadalla, MA, Farouq, R. Exergy study of amine regeneration unit for diethanolamine used in refining gas sweetening: a real start-up plant. Alex Eng J 2022;61:101–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.085.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Esmaeili, A, Yoon, T, Atsbha, TA, Lee, C-J.. Rate-based modeling and energy optimization of acid gas removal from natural gas stream using various amine solutions. Process Saf Environ Protect 2023;177:643–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.030.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Lian, L, Liu, W, Liu, S, Wang, H, Cheng, L, Jiang, Y. Retrofit of the acid gas sweetening process for the refinery based on exergy analysis method. Sep Purif Technol 2023;315:123629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123629.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Economides, MJ, Wood, DA. The state of natural gas. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2009;1:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2009.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar

25. N.I.O.C. South Pars gas field development, phase 19th, onshore facilities, unit 101 acid gas removal unit; n.d.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Moullec, YL, Neveux, T, Azki, AA, Chikukwa, A, Hoff, KA. Process modifications for solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2014;31:96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.09.024.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Ham, LVVD, Romano, MC, Kvamsdal, HM, Bonalumi, D, Os, PV, Goetheer, ELV. Concentrated aqueous piperazine as CO2 capture solvent: detailed evaluation of the integration with a power plant. Energy Proc 2014;63:1218–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.131.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Leal-Navarro, J, Mestre-Escudero, R, Puerta-Arana, A, León-Pulido, J, González-Delgado, AD. Evaluating the exergetic performance of the amine treatment unit in a Latin-American refinery. ACS Omega 2019;4:21993–97. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03051.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Dubois, L, Thomas, D. Simulations of various configurations of the post-combustion CO2 capture process applied to a cement plant flue gas: parametric study with different solvents. Energy Proc 2017;114:1409–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1265.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Yang, Y, Liu, J, Shen, W, Li, J, Chien, I-L. High-efficiency utilization of CO2 in the methanol production by a novel parallel-series system combining steam and dry methane reforming. Energy 2018;158:820–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.061.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Nguyen, TBH, Zondervan, E. Methanol production from captured CO2 using hydrogenation and reforming technologies – environmental and economic evaluation. J CO2 Util 2019;34:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.033.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Mores, PL, Godoy, E, Mussati, SF, Scenna, NJ. A NGCC power plant with a CO2 post-combustion capture option. Optimal economics for different generation/capture goals. Chem Eng Res Des 2014;92:1329–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.11.013.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2023-0040).


Received: 2023-04-26
Accepted: 2023-11-01
Published Online: 2023-11-23

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 31.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2023-0040/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen