Home Investigating the energy, environmental, and economic challenges and opportunities associated with steam sterilisation autoclaves
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Investigating the energy, environmental, and economic challenges and opportunities associated with steam sterilisation autoclaves

  • Jordan O’Callaghan , John Fitzpatrick ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Fergal Lalor and Edmond Byrne
Published/Copyright: May 17, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Despite steam sterilisation in autoclaves being a common industrial method of sterilisation, very little research has been conducted into quantifying the resources these processes demand and their associated environmental impacts. This paper aims to investigate industrial steam sterilisation in autoclaves with particular application to the biopharmaceutical industry. A mathematical model of a steam autoclave was developed to examine relationships between load size, load material properties and autoclave capacity with energy consumption, environmental impact and cost of sterilisation. The two main energy requirements are thermal energy to produce the clean steam for sterilising, and electrical energy for the vacuum pump. The study showed that thermal energy is dominant, particularly as load increases. The percentage of the maximum load at which the autoclave is operated has a major impact on the specific energy requirement or the energy required to sterilise per unit mass of load. For a given autoclave, the energy requirement increases with increased load but the specific energy requirement decreases. This in turn impacts on the emissions and the energy cost. It is thus shown that it is much more energy efficient to operate at higher loads, making the autoclave much more energy and cost effective, and with less environmental impact. There is potential for applying the analysis presented in this work for conducting optimisation studies for determining the sizes of autoclaves that could minimise the energy requirement, environmental impact and economic cost (3E) of investments for specified load versus time profiles.


Corresponding author: John Fitzpatrick, Process & Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Masson-Delmotte, V. Global warming of 1.5 °C. Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); 2018.Search in Google Scholar

2. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Sources of greenhouse gas emissions [Online]; 2017. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

3. Lalor, F, Fitzpatrick, J, Sage, C, Byrne, E. Sustainability in the biopharmaceutical industry: seeking a holistic perspective. Biotechnol Adv 2019;37:698–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.03.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Seiler, D, Donovan, D, O’Donnell, GE. Industrial steam systems: strategic framework with proxy measurements to evaluate the total cost of steam. J Clean Prod 2019;231:1307–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.285.Search in Google Scholar

5. Koten, H. Phase change materials (PCM) and their applications. In: Recent researches in engineering sciences. Lyon, France: Livre de Lyon; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

6. Yang, M, Dixon, RK. Investigating in efficient industrial boiler systems in China and Vietnam. Energy Pol 2012;40:432–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.030.Search in Google Scholar

7. Hasanbeigi, A, Harrell, G, Schreck, B, Monga, P. Moving beyond equipment and to systems optimization: techno-economic analysis of energy efficiency potentials in industrial steam systems in China. J Clean Prod 2016;120:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.023.Search in Google Scholar

8. Mousavi, S, Kara, S, Kornfeld, B. A hierarchical framework for concurrent assessment of energy and water efficiency in manufacturing systems. J Clean Prod 2016;133:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.074.Search in Google Scholar

9. Coppitters, D, Costa, A, Chauvy, R, Dubois, L, De Paepe, W, Thomas, D, et al.. Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis of integrated direct air capture and CO2 methanation under uncertainty. Fuel 2023;344:127969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127969.Search in Google Scholar

10. Khani, N, Manesh, MHK, Onishi, VC. 6E analyses of a new solar energy-driven polygeneration system integrating CO2 capture, organic Rankine cycle, and humidification-dehumidification desalination. J Clean Prod 2022;379:134478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134478.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dai, M, Yang, F, Zhang, Z, Liu, G, Feng, X. Energetic, economic and environmental (3E) multi-objective optimization of the back-end separation of ethylene plant based on adaptive surrogate model. J Clean Prod 2021;310:127426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127426.Search in Google Scholar

12. Guler, OF, Sen, O, Yilmaz, C, Kanoglu, M. Performance evaluation of a geothermal and solar-based multigeneration system and comparison with alternative case studies: energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic aspects. Renew Energy 2022;200:1517–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.064.Search in Google Scholar

13. Chen, Z, Zhou, Q, Zhang, Y, Zhang, X. Energy, exergy and economic (3E) evaluations of a novel power generation system combining supercritical water gasification of coal with chemical heat recovery. Energy Convers Manag 2023;276:116531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116531.Search in Google Scholar

14. Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008. US: Department of Health and Human Services: 2017.Search in Google Scholar

15. Hong, J, Zhan, S, Yu, Z, Hong, J, Qi, C. Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of medical waste treatment. J Clean Prod 2018;174:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.206.Search in Google Scholar

16. Dion, M, Parker, W. Steam sterilisation principles. Pharmaceut Eng 2013;33:6.Search in Google Scholar

17. Cappia, JM. Principles of steam-in-place. Pharmaceut Technol 2004;28:40–6.Search in Google Scholar

18. Schieving, A. Understanding USP <1231> water for pharmaceutical use [Online]; 2017. Available from: http://www.pharmtech.com/understanding-usp-water-pharmaceutical-use [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

19. U.S. Pharmacopeia. <1231> Water for pharmaceutical purposes [Online]; 2019. Available from: http://www.uspbpep.com/usp29/v29240/usp29nf24s0_c1231.html [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

20. McGain, F, Moore, G, Black, J. Steam sterilisation’s energy and water footprint. Aust Health Rev 2017;41:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah15142.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. International Standards Organisation. European standard ISO 17665-1: sterilization of health care products – moist heat – part 1: requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices. Geneva: ISO; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

22. Davies, FL, Underwood, HM, Perkin, AG, Burton, H. Thermal death kinetics of Bacillus stearothermophilus spores at ultra high temperatures. Int J Food Sci Technol 1977;12:115–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1977.tb00093.x.Search in Google Scholar

23. Princeton University Environmental Health & Safety. Autoclaving procedure [Online]. Princeton University; 2019. Available from: https://ehs.princeton.edu/laboratory-research/biological-safety/autoclave-use/procedure [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

24. Flowserve SIHI Pumps brochure. SIHI LEMD compact liquid ring vacuum pumps [Online]; 2019. Available from: https://www.sterlingsihi.com/cms/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&g=0&t=1665234713&hash=219c9ad670b4b3ea55a00f7b32a759625bf55193&file=fileadmin/Dokumente_WEB/Produkt_Kataloge/Vakuumpumpen/Fluessigkeitsring/Blockbauweise/englisch/TC_FLS_SIHI_LEMD_EN.pdf [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

25. Vandoni, G. The basis of vacuum [Online]. CERN; 2012. Available from: https://indico.cern.ch/event/264020/attachments/467855/648232/CERN-Basic-Vacuum-2012-lecture.pdf [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

26. Idris, A, Chu, GK, Othman, MR. Incorporating potential environmental impact from water for injection in environmental assessment of monoclonal antibody production. Chem Eng Res Des 2016;109:430–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.02.014.Search in Google Scholar

27. The Engineering ToolBox. Metals and alloys – densities [Online]; 2019. Available from: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/metal-alloys-densities-d_50.html [Accessed 09 Aug 2019].Search in Google Scholar

28. The Engineering ToolBox. Specific heat of common substances [Online]; 2019. Available from: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-capacity-d_391.html [Accessed 29 Jul 2019].Search in Google Scholar

29. Eirgrid Group. System information – fuel mix [Online]; 2022. Available from: http://www.eirgridgroup.com/how-the-grid-works/system-information/ [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

30. The Engineering ToolBox. Combustion of fuels – carbon dioxide emission [Online]; 2019. Available from: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/co2-emission-fuels-d_1085.html [Accessed 06 Aug 2019].Search in Google Scholar

31. The Engineering ToolBox. Combustion of fuels and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emission [Online]; 2019. Available from: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/nox-emission-combustion-fuels-d_1086.html [Accessed 06 Aug 2019].Search in Google Scholar

32. Environmental Protection Agency. Natural gas combustion [Online]; n.d. Available from: https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

33. Rechenberger, D. Natural gas is the most climate-friendly fossil fuel in electricity production [Online]. Available from: https://www.wingas.com/fileadmin/Wingas/WINGAS-Studien/Energieversorgung_und_Energiewende_en.pdf [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

34. Environmental Protection Agency. Anthracite coal combustion [Online]; n.d. Available from: https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s02.pdf [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

35. Chou, CL. Sulfur in coals: a review of geochemistry and origins. Int J Coal Geol 2012;100:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.05.009.Search in Google Scholar

36. Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland. Conversion factors [Online]. Energy Statistics in Ireland; 2019. Available from: https://www.seai.ie/data-and-insights/seai-statistics/conversion-factors/ [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].Search in Google Scholar

37. Electric Ireland. Electricity and gas price plans for new customers [Online]; 2019. Available from: https://www.electricireland.ie/switch/new-customer/price-plans/electricity-and-gas?priceType=D [Accessed 05 Feb 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-20
Accepted: 2023-03-22
Published Online: 2023-05-17

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2022-0053/html
Scroll to top button